Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Simple question: yes or no?
Yes. For spectacular incompetence and criminal negligence.
Really?
See, because neither of those are the charges contained in the articles of impeachment.
I'll just mark you down as another low-information lib with little to add...
Trump is NOT going to testify. He's a coward.
He cannot be compelled to testify. That's how our system of justice is set up.
You're on record as stating that he will be convicted on two charges on which he's not even being tried.
You're an idiot...
Trump can lie and talk trash all day long but he's too chicken shit to testify. Are you impressed?
Simple question: yes or no?
Yes. For spectacular incompetence and criminal negligence.
Really?
See, because neither of those are the charges contained in the articles of impeachment.
I'll just mark you down as another low-information lib with little to add...
Trump is NOT going to testify. He's a coward.
Simple question: yes or no?
Yes. For spectacular incompetence and criminal negligence.
Really?
See, because neither of those are the charges contained in the articles of impeachment.
I'll just mark you down as another low-information lib with little to add...
Trump is NOT going to testify. He's a coward.
No it is a sigh of desperation that the dumdass, I mean Democrats asked him to testify, it is clear sign they know their case is dead in the water.
No. 45 senators have already said the trial is unconstitutional. The Dumbocrats need 62 votes to convict.Simple question: yes or no?
No. 45 senators have already said the trial is unconstitutional. The Dumbocrats need 62 votes to convict.Simple question: yes or no?
Your posting content suggests you are trying to emulate Trump.Simple question: yes or no?
Yes. For spectacular incompetence and criminal negligence.
Really?
See, because neither of those are the charges contained in the articles of impeachment.
I'll just mark you down as another low-information lib with little to add...
Trump is NOT going to testify. He's a coward.
He cannot be compelled to testify. That's how our system of justice is set up.
You're on record as stating that he will be convicted on two charges on which he's not even being tried.
You're an idiot...
Trump can lie and talk trash all day long but he's too chicken shit to testify. Are you impressed?
No. 45 senators have already said the trial is unconstitutional. The Dumbocrats need 62 votes to convict.Simple question: yes or no?
No it is not a simple question and anyone who thinks that it's simple, or thinks that they know the answer, is well....SIMPLE McConnel wants him out of the way and out of the party. He is destoying and fragmenting the party amd McConnel and others know it. McConnel, who has a lot of influence in his party, may well be lobbying Senators to drum up the voytes to convictSimple question: yes or no?
No it is not a simple question and anyone who thinks that it's simple, or thinks that they know the answer, is well....SIMPLE McConnel wants him out of the way and out of the party. He is destoying and fragmenting the party amd McConnel and others know it. McConnel, who has a lot of influence in his party, may well be lobbying Senators to drum up the voytes to convictSimple question: yes or no?
And now, The Deocrats has asked Trump to testify! Very clever indeed! He is in a no win situation. He could be a no show, or take the 5th which would confirm his guilt and make him look even more stupid that he alredy does. Or, he could testify and get himself into even deeper shit with his pathological and compulsive lying . I am looking forward to the shit show.
Nope. They already showed us he wont be convicted. They have already acquitted him without any trial.Simple question: yes or no?
No they couldn't. Are you joking?I they had a strong case, they could get a conviction without his testimony...
Doubtful. The ones who voted with Trump would make a point of going public with their votes, leaving the ones who didn't exposed by process of elimination.No.
They would if the vote was private.
Of course you can.You can't convict an X President.
Simple question: yes or no?
Yes. For spectacular incompetence and criminal negligence.
Really?
See, because neither of those are the charges contained in the articles of impeachment.
I'll just mark you down as another low-information lib with little to add...
Trump is NOT going to testify. He's a coward.
Which, lest we forget, would be a pathological liar lying his ass off under oath.Why give the Democrats what they want?
Impeachment is to remove a sitting fucking president. Read the Constitution. I know you never read it yet.Of course you can.You can't convict an X President.
False. While it is a remedy for that, it is not its only purpose. Nor is it required that a sitting president be removed from office, if convicted of the charges in the impeachment trial.Impeachment is to remove a sitting fucking president.
NOSimple question: yes or no?
