Billy_Kinetta
Paladin of the Lost Hour
- Mar 4, 2013
- 52,766
- 22,206
- 2,320
No.
They would if the vote was private.
Baseless fantasy.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No.
They would if the vote was private.
No.
They would if the vote was private.
Simple question: yes or no?
Nothing should be private in a representative Republic.No.
They would if the vote was private.
You can't convict an X President. LOLOLSimple question: yes or no?
Simple question: yes or no?
Yes. For spectacular incompetence and criminal negligence.
Nope not in the Senate.Simple question: yes or no?
All Toro wants is for the dark skinned VP to become President.No.
They would if the vote was private.
Baseless fantasy.
Simple question: yes or no?
Yes. For spectacular incompetence and criminal negligence.
Really?
See, because neither of those are the charges contained in the articles of impeachment.
I'll just mark you down as another low-information lib with little to add...
That was the most fact filled post you're made about Trump thus far!!!Simple question: yes or no?
Yes. For spectacular incompetence and criminal negligence.
Really?
See, because neither of those are the charges contained in the articles of impeachment.
I'll just mark you down as another low-information lib with little to add...
Trump is NOT going to testify. He's a coward.
Simple question: yes or no?
Yes. For spectacular incompetence and criminal negligence.
Really?
See, because neither of those are the charges contained in the articles of impeachment.
I'll just mark you down as another low-information lib with little to add...
Trump is NOT going to testify. He's a coward.
He's already been tried and convicted by the majority of Americans. And shunned by media outlets, and social media, and banks, and corporations.
It took you this long to come to that conclusion?Simple question: yes or no?
Yes. For spectacular incompetence and criminal negligence.
Really?
See, because neither of those are the charges contained in the articles of impeachment.
I'll just mark you down as another low-information lib with little to add...
Trump is NOT going to testify. He's a coward.
He cannot be compelled to testify. That's how our system of justice is set up.
You're on record as stating that he will be convicted on two charges on which he's not even being tried.
You're an idiot...
Simple question: yes or no?
Yes. For spectacular incompetence and criminal negligence.
Really?
See, because neither of those are the charges contained in the articles of impeachment.
I'll just mark you down as another low-information lib with little to add...
Trump is NOT going to testify. He's a coward.
He cannot be compelled to testify. That's how our system of justice is set up.
You're on record as stating that he will be convicted on two charges on which he's not even being tried.
You're an idiot...
It took you this long to come to that conclusion?Simple question: yes or no?
Yes. For spectacular incompetence and criminal negligence.
Really?
See, because neither of those are the charges contained in the articles of impeachment.
I'll just mark you down as another low-information lib with little to add...
Trump is NOT going to testify. He's a coward.
He cannot be compelled to testify. That's how our system of justice is set up.
You're on record as stating that he will be convicted on two charges on which he's not even being tried.
You're an idiot...