Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The only argument I have about that is that no vote has ever been unanimous.Too many.However many many have died thoughout history precisely for that reason.I've got family up there. Plus, I don't like to see people's lives destroyed just because they believe ideas that I think are shitty.
A lot of people have died from starvation, too. I don't like to see that, either.
Well, it is their shitty ideas that destroyed their lives.
I hope all is well with your family.
The only argument I have about that is that no vote has ever been unanimous.Too many.However many many have died thoughout history precisely for that reason.I've got family up there. Plus, I don't like to see people's lives destroyed just because they believe ideas that I think are shitty.
A lot of people have died from starvation, too. I don't like to see that, either.
Well, it is their shitty ideas that destroyed their lives.
I hope all is well with your family.
I live in Portland. My ideas have never been in charge of this city, and if it burns down, I don't believe that any significant portion of the responsibility will be mine, though I'm certain that I and my family would suffer during such an event.
Mass destruction inevitably hurts a lot of people who don't deserve it by any sane metric.
That about sums up my feelings as well.All this back-and-forth about Seattle and federal marshalls.
Seattle sits in the state of Washington.
It is subject to both state and federal laws.
But in the end, I really don't care if the residents want to burn the place to the ground. In fact, it would be a welcome event.
The only think I care about are the federal buildings. I helped pay for those and I'd prefer that the residents of Seattle leave them alone.
As for the rest of the "worlds largest homeless shelter and toilet", I could care less.
You can’t save people from their own shitty ideas. The point is the people in Seattle voted in high enough numbers to make the rest of the state subject to their shitty ideas. So if they penance comes then so be it.I've got family up there. Plus, I don't like to see people's lives destroyed just because they believe ideas that I think are shitty.
You sound like a real stand up guyAll this back-and-forth about Seattle and federal marshalls.
Seattle sits in the state of Washington.
It is subject to both state and federal laws.
But in the end, I really don't care if the residents want to burn the place to the ground. In fact, it would be a welcome event.
The only think I care about are the federal buildings. I helped pay for those and I'd prefer that the residents of Seattle leave them alone.
As for the rest of the "worlds largest homeless shelter and toilet", I could care less.
That didn’t seem to be the case when Arizona tried to get illegals under control.Seattle sits in the state of Washington.
It is subject to both state and federal laws.
Wrong. Seattle sits in the state of Washington, but it's not DC.
Might wanna brush up on your civics class.
Please show me where I said D.C.
I said it sits in the state of Washington.
Seattle in Washington D.C. ? You drinking ?
Nope, not drinking (much anyway), but you said that it has to comply with state and federal laws. States don't have to do that, only the District of Columbia (Washington DC to be specific). States have the right to tell the federal government to fuck off. Washington DC doesn't have that right.
Like I said.............................learn civics.
You are saying that no federal laws apply to either the state of Washington or Seattle ?
So, Washington or Seattle can print it's own currency ?
Sea-Tac Airport does not have to comply with FAA regulations ?
You are being obviously obtuse. No, they can't print their own currency, as they are part of the USA. However, states rights are over federal rights when it comes to certain things. Sorry, but the federal government has no right to censor a state.
Seattle isn't going to burn to the ground.
Seattle isn't going to burn to the ground.
The question was:
IF it did
Would you care.
Why don't you find someplace else to demonstrate your lack of comprehension.
Seattle isn't going to burn to the ground.
The question was:
IF it did
Would you care.
Why don't you find someplace else to demonstrate your lack of comprehension.
I know what the question was. I just don't see the use in it.
First, it's a hypothetical situation that won't actually happen. That's neat. Some hypothetical questions are useful because they get to something, but I don't see what the point of this is. Conservatives on a conservative-leaning message board don't care if a blue city burns to the ground. Is that it? Is that what you're trying to prove? Real cutting-edge stuff there. I could have told you that.
If there's more to this hypothetical question, please enlighten me.
Seattle isn't going to burn to the ground.
The question was:
IF it did
Would you care.
Why don't you find someplace else to demonstrate your lack of comprehension.
I know what the question was. I just don't see the use in it.
First, it's a hypothetical situation that won't actually happen. That's neat. Some hypothetical questions are useful because they get to something, but I don't see what the point of this is. Conservatives on a conservative-leaning message board don't care if a blue city burns to the ground. Is that it? Is that what you're trying to prove? Real cutting-edge stuff there. I could have told you that.
If there's more to this hypothetical question, please enlighten me.
Some might care.
Just curious.
This is so typical of you. If you don't get it....you have something to say that is meaningless.
Seattle isn't going to burn to the ground.
The question was:
IF it did
Would you care.
Why don't you find someplace else to demonstrate your lack of comprehension.
I know what the question was. I just don't see the use in it.
First, it's a hypothetical situation that won't actually happen. That's neat. Some hypothetical questions are useful because they get to something, but I don't see what the point of this is. Conservatives on a conservative-leaning message board don't care if a blue city burns to the ground. Is that it? Is that what you're trying to prove? Real cutting-edge stuff there. I could have told you that.
If there's more to this hypothetical question, please enlighten me.
Some might care.
Just curious.
This is so typical of you. If you don't get it....you have something to say that is meaningless.
You're curious? You couldn't have predicted this? Meh, well good for you being curious I guess. I'll put in my vote just for you.
Here's a question for you: Would you care if the state of Wyoming burned to the ground?
The point you are missing is do any of us feel compelled to come help rescue a left wing city from their own self induced problems. Clearly that answer is no. Your entire city may not burn down. Don’t bother asking for help to rebuild it. You already know better than to ask for our help in stopping the results of your politics.Seattle isn't going to burn to the ground.
The question was:
IF it did
Would you care.
Why don't you find someplace else to demonstrate your lack of comprehension.
I know what the question was. I just don't see the use in it.
First, it's a hypothetical situation that won't actually happen. That's neat. Some hypothetical questions are useful because they get to something, but I don't see what the point of this is. Conservatives on a conservative-leaning message board don't care if a blue city burns to the ground. Is that it? Is that what you're trying to prove? Real cutting-edge stuff there. I could have told you that.
If there's more to this hypothetical question, please enlighten me.
All this back-and-forth about Seattle and federal marshalls.
Seattle sits in the state of Washington.
It is subject to both state and federal laws.
But in the end, I really don't care if the residents want to burn the place to the ground. In fact, it would be a welcome event.
The only think I care about are the federal buildings. I helped pay for those and I'd prefer that the residents of Seattle leave them alone.
As for the rest of the "worlds largest homeless shelter and toilet", I could care less.
Good question.
If the state was suffering from a lot of lawless riots and they did nothing about it, probably not.
Good question.
If the state was suffering from a lot of lawless riots and they did nothing about it, probably not.
Ok. So you probably don't care.
So let's say that there is lawless riots there and the state officials are doing nothing about it.
You have a close aunt who lives there. Do you care now?
The point you are missing is do any of us feel compelled to come help rescue a left wing city from their own self induced problems. Clearly that answer is no. Your entire city may not burn down. Don’t bother asking for help to rebuild it. You already know better than to ask for our help in stopping the results of your politics.Seattle isn't going to burn to the ground.
The question was:
IF it did
Would you care.
Why don't you find someplace else to demonstrate your lack of comprehension.
I know what the question was. I just don't see the use in it.
First, it's a hypothetical situation that won't actually happen. That's neat. Some hypothetical questions are useful because they get to something, but I don't see what the point of this is. Conservatives on a conservative-leaning message board don't care if a blue city burns to the ground. Is that it? Is that what you're trying to prove? Real cutting-edge stuff there. I could have told you that.
If there's more to this hypothetical question, please enlighten me.
Good question.
If the state was suffering from a lot of lawless riots and they did nothing about it, probably not.
Ok. So you probably don't care.
So let's say that there is lawless riots there and the state officials are doing nothing about it.
You have a close aunt who lives there. Do you care now?
No.
She'll be out of there.
I've already stated the same about bearing responsibility based on voting in leaders that would allow the city to burn, in that scenario, but the question wasn't whether or not it would be a just ending for those people who had a hand in it. I'm just saying that I wouldn't like to see it. I hope those crazy morons pump the brakes before things get much worse.You can’t save people from their own shitty ideas. The point is the people in Seattle voted in high enough numbers to make the rest of the state subject to their shitty ideas. So if they penance comes then so be it.I've got family up there. Plus, I don't like to see people's lives destroyed just because they believe ideas that I think are shitty.
Good question.
If the state was suffering from a lot of lawless riots and they did nothing about it, probably not.
Ok. So you probably don't care.
So let's say that there is lawless riots there and the state officials are doing nothing about it.
You have a close aunt who lives there. Do you care now?
No.
She'll be out of there.
She chooses to stay there. It's her home.
Do you care?
