Do you have a problem with children and parents being detained in separate facilities?

[Care4all]

YES....when it is simply for a MISDEMEANOR charge, if they do not qualify for REFUGEE status after it has been reviewed.

They should not be treated like they are being charged with a felony. like the people trying to cross the border illegally a second time, AFTER their first time and their refugee status was DENIED and they were shipped back home once before.

91% of these separations f parents from their children are for people who may be charged with a MISDEMEANOR,only 9% with a felony...

for goodness sake! We don't take children from their parents for an alleged misdemeanor charge....that's is NOT JUSTICE.

And that is not how the laws were written, Congress gave mercy for first time crossers seeking refugee status by making the illegal crossing for them a misdemeanor, and then came down hard with a felony for second time crossers who had already been given leniency/mercy and a chance to see if they did qualify for Refugee Asylum....

What Sessions is doing, is making the first time crosser and misdemeanor charge, EQUAL TO the felony charge, when Congress clearly separated the two circumstances.... sessions is DEFYING the law and the spirit of the law.

The parents shouldnt be engaging in illegal activities. Perhaps, the parents should consider how they put their children at risk before they endeavor in this illegal activity.

Hello?

they are seeking refugee status. If they do qualify, it is NOT a crime at all.

And if it is a crime, it is a misdemeanor....a misdemeanor!!! For goodness sake....NOT A FELONY.... and it used to be simply a "civil offense" like a parking ticket....

And NO, people coming here from Honduras or ElSalvador seeking refugee asylum status should NOT be separated from their kids... they are not even charged with the misdemeanor, until they have been denied the Refugee status, if they do qualify for refugee status, there is no charge at all. The kids should not be taken from their parents under those circumstances...PERIOD.

No, they shouldn't be trying to come in illegally, refugee, illegal, whatever you want to call them.

sorry, you don't know the law....

If they are seeking refugee status, it is not against the law.....not until they have been DENIED their refugee status because they did not qualify.

The refugees are turning themselves in, seeking asylum.

AND THESE are the people you are traumatizing....

by law, they have every right to come here and seek asylum...only if they do such, and do not qualify, is it a misdemeanor for their crossing.

 

[Norman]

YES....when it is simply for a MISDEMEANOR charge, if they do not qualify for REFUGEE status after it has been reviewed.

They should not be treated like they are being charged with a felony. like the people trying to cross the border illegally a second time, AFTER their first time and their refugee status was DENIED and they were shipped back home once before.

91% of these separations f parents from their children are for people who may be charged with a MISDEMEANOR,only 9% with a felony...

for goodness sake! We don't take children from their parents for an alleged misdemeanor charge....that's is NOT JUSTICE.

And that is not how the laws were written, Congress gave mercy for first time crossers seeking refugee status by making the illegal crossing for them a misdemeanor, and then came down hard with a felony for second time crossers who had already been given leniency/mercy and a chance to see if they did qualify for Refugee Asylum....

What Sessions is doing, is making the first time crosser and misdemeanor charge, EQUAL TO the felony charge, when Congress clearly separated the two circumstances.... sessions is DEFYING the law and the spirit of the law.

The parents shouldnt be engaging in illegal activities. Perhaps, the parents should consider how they put their children at risk before they endeavor in this illegal activity.

Hello?

they are seeking refugee status. If they do qualify, it is NOT a crime at all.

And if it is a crime, it is a misdemeanor....a misdemeanor!!! For goodness sake....NOT A FELONY.... and it used to be simply a "civil offense" like a parking ticket....

And NO, people coming here from Honduras or ElSalvador seeking refugee asylum status should NOT be separated from their kids... they are not even charged with the misdemeanor, until they have been denied the Refugee status, if they do qualify for refugee status, there is no charge at all. The kids should not be taken from their parents under those circumstances...PERIOD.

Yes... yes... the famous rapefugees card.

How many of those people are actually refugees? I bet the overwhelming minority. Having a shitty country does unfortunately not qualify one for the refugee status. They should just live with what they have created, and not try to spread the crap elsewhere.

Again the Europeans for three hundred years dumped their problems on North, South and Central America.

Well that explains, why the countries are so shitty.

And it especially explains why we shouldn't let these guys in.

 

[kaz]

YES....when it is simply for a MISDEMEANOR charge, if they do not qualify for REFUGEE status after it has been reviewed.

They should not be treated like they are being charged with a felony. like the people trying to cross the border illegally a second time, AFTER their first time and their refugee status was DENIED and they were shipped back home once before.

91% of these separations f parents from their children are for people who may be charged with a MISDEMEANOR,only 9% with a felony...

for goodness sake! We don't take children from their parents for an alleged misdemeanor charge....that's is NOT JUSTICE.

And that is not how the laws were written, Congress gave mercy for first time crossers seeking refugee status by making the illegal crossing for them a misdemeanor, and then came down hard with a felony for second time crossers who had already been given leniency/mercy and a chance to see if they did qualify for Refugee Asylum....

What Sessions is doing, is making the first time crosser and misdemeanor charge, EQUAL TO the felony charge, when Congress clearly separated the two circumstances.... sessions is DEFYING the law and the spirit of the law.

If you planned to commit a crime, would you take your children with you? Would you take your children with you while you walked across the desert?

Why not?

 

[Care4all]

YES....when it is simply for a MISDEMEANOR charge, if they do not qualify for REFUGEE status after it has been reviewed.

They should not be treated like they are being charged with a felony. like the people trying to cross the border illegally a second time, AFTER their first time and their refugee status was DENIED and they were shipped back home once before.

91% of these separations f parents from their children are for people who may be charged with a MISDEMEANOR,only 9% with a felony...

for goodness sake! We don't take children from their parents for an alleged misdemeanor charge....that's is NOT JUSTICE.

And that is not how the laws were written, Congress gave mercy for first time crossers seeking refugee status by making the illegal crossing for them a misdemeanor, and then came down hard with a felony for second time crossers who had already been given leniency/mercy and a chance to see if they did qualify for Refugee Asylum....

What Sessions is doing, is making the first time crosser and misdemeanor charge, EQUAL TO the felony charge, when Congress clearly separated the two circumstances.... sessions is DEFYING the law and the spirit of the law.

The parents shouldnt be engaging in illegal activities. Perhaps, the parents should consider how they put their children at risk before they endeavor in this illegal activity.

Hello?

they are seeking refugee status. If they do qualify, it is NOT a crime at all.

And if it is a crime, it is a misdemeanor....a misdemeanor!!! For goodness sake....NOT A FELONY.... and it used to be simply a "civil offense" like a parking ticket....

And NO, people coming here from Honduras or ElSalvador seeking refugee asylum status should NOT be separated from their kids... they are not even charged with the misdemeanor, until they have been denied the Refugee status, if they do qualify for refugee status, there is no charge at all. The kids should not be taken from their parents under those circumstances...PERIOD.

Yes... yes... the famous rapefugees card.

How many of those people are actually refugees? I bet the overwhelming minority. Having a shitty country does unfortunately not qualify one for the refugee status. They should just live with what they have created, and not try to spread the crap elsewhere.

Again the Europeans for three hundred years dumped their problems on North, South and Central America and they killed to take that which was not theirs and you bitch about the poor people who come here now..

then have your congress critters and president change the law.... but the law now, states they can seek refugee status.

 

[Thinker101]

YES....when it is simply for a MISDEMEANOR charge, if they do not qualify for REFUGEE status after it has been reviewed.

They should not be treated like they are being charged with a felony. like the people trying to cross the border illegally a second time, AFTER their first time and their refugee status was DENIED and they were shipped back home once before.

91% of these separations f parents from their children are for people who may be charged with a MISDEMEANOR,only 9% with a felony...

for goodness sake! We don't take children from their parents for an alleged misdemeanor charge....that's is NOT JUSTICE.

And that is not how the laws were written, Congress gave mercy for first time crossers seeking refugee status by making the illegal crossing for them a misdemeanor, and then came down hard with a felony for second time crossers who had already been given leniency/mercy and a chance to see if they did qualify for Refugee Asylum....

What Sessions is doing, is making the first time crosser and misdemeanor charge, EQUAL TO the felony charge, when Congress clearly separated the two circumstances.... sessions is DEFYING the law and the spirit of the law.

The parents shouldnt be engaging in illegal activities. Perhaps, the parents should consider how they put their children at risk before they endeavor in this illegal activity.

Hello?

they are seeking refugee status. If they do qualify, it is NOT a crime at all.

And if it is a crime, it is a misdemeanor....a misdemeanor!!! For goodness sake....NOT A FELONY.... and it used to be simply a "civil offense" like a parking ticket....

And NO, people coming here from Honduras or ElSalvador seeking refugee asylum status should NOT be separated from their kids... they are not even charged with the misdemeanor, until they have been denied the Refugee status, if they do qualify for refugee status, there is no charge at all. The kids should not be taken from their parents under those circumstances...PERIOD.

And many in the last group were given refugee status in Mexico. When seeking refugee status you don't get to pick and choose.

 

[kaz]

When an American citizen is arrested for a crime. He is separated from his family and put in jail.

So why should illegals who have committed a criminal act by sneaking across our border be treated any different? ....

Many are here trying to get refugee status.

And for most of them it's a crock of shit

 

[Norman]

YES....when it is simply for a MISDEMEANOR charge, if they do not qualify for REFUGEE status after it has been reviewed.

They should not be treated like they are being charged with a felony. like the people trying to cross the border illegally a second time, AFTER their first time and their refugee status was DENIED and they were shipped back home once before.

91% of these separations f parents from their children are for people who may be charged with a MISDEMEANOR,only 9% with a felony...

for goodness sake! We don't take children from their parents for an alleged misdemeanor charge....that's is NOT JUSTICE.

And that is not how the laws were written, Congress gave mercy for first time crossers seeking refugee status by making the illegal crossing for them a misdemeanor, and then came down hard with a felony for second time crossers who had already been given leniency/mercy and a chance to see if they did qualify for Refugee Asylum....

What Sessions is doing, is making the first time crosser and misdemeanor charge, EQUAL TO the felony charge, when Congress clearly separated the two circumstances.... sessions is DEFYING the law and the spirit of the law.

The parents shouldnt be engaging in illegal activities. Perhaps, the parents should consider how they put their children at risk before they endeavor in this illegal activity.

Hello?

they are seeking refugee status. If they do qualify, it is NOT a crime at all.

And if it is a crime, it is a misdemeanor....a misdemeanor!!! For goodness sake....NOT A FELONY.... and it used to be simply a "civil offense" like a parking ticket....

And NO, people coming here from Honduras or ElSalvador seeking refugee asylum status should NOT be separated from their kids... they are not even charged with the misdemeanor, until they have been denied the Refugee status, if they do qualify for refugee status, there is no charge at all. The kids should not be taken from their parents under those circumstances...PERIOD.

No, they shouldn't be trying to come in illegally, refugee, illegal, whatever you want to call them.

sorry, you don't know the law....

If they are seeking refugee status, it is not against the law.....not until they have been DENIED their refugee status because they did not qualify.

The refugees are turning themselves in, seeking asylum.

AND THESE are the people you are traumatizing....

by law, they have every right to come here and seek asylum...only if they do such, and do not qualify, is it a misdemeanor for their crossing.

I heard the democrats have now recruited lawyers in order to to coach these "refugees" so that they can enter the voter rolls.

Just build that wall already, so tired of this bullshit.

 

[Moonglow]

YES....when it is simply for a MISDEMEANOR charge, if they do not qualify for REFUGEE status after it has been reviewed.

They should not be treated like they are being charged with a felony. like the people trying to cross the border illegally a second time, AFTER their first time and their refugee status was DENIED and they were shipped back home once before.

91% of these separations f parents from their children are for people who may be charged with a MISDEMEANOR,only 9% with a felony...

for goodness sake! We don't take children from their parents for an alleged misdemeanor charge....that's is NOT JUSTICE.

And that is not how the laws were written, Congress gave mercy for first time crossers seeking refugee status by making the illegal crossing for them a misdemeanor, and then came down hard with a felony for second time crossers who had already been given leniency/mercy and a chance to see if they did qualify for Refugee Asylum....

What Sessions is doing, is making the first time crosser and misdemeanor charge, EQUAL TO the felony charge, when Congress clearly separated the two circumstances.... sessions is DEFYING the law and the spirit of the law.

The parents shouldnt be engaging in illegal activities. Perhaps, the parents should consider how they put their children at risk before they endeavor in this illegal activity.

Hello?

they are seeking refugee status. If they do qualify, it is NOT a crime at all.

And if it is a crime, it is a misdemeanor....a misdemeanor!!! For goodness sake....NOT A FELONY.... and it used to be simply a "civil offense" like a parking ticket....

And NO, people coming here from Honduras or ElSalvador seeking refugee asylum status should NOT be separated from their kids... they are not even charged with the misdemeanor, until they have been denied the Refugee status, if they do qualify for refugee status, there is no charge at all. The kids should not be taken from their parents under those circumstances...PERIOD.

Yes... yes... the famous rapefugees card.

How many of those people are actually refugees? I bet the overwhelming minority. Having a shitty country does unfortunately not qualify one for the refugee status. They should just live with what they have created, and not try to spread the crap elsewhere.

Again the Europeans for three hundred years dumped their problems on North, South and Central America and they killed to take that which was not theirs and you bitch about the poor people who come here now..

then have your congress critters and president change the law.... but the law now, states they can seek refugee status.

I know and it was both the Dems and Republicans that passed the laws to allow it, but now we have the people with hard hearts act like it was only one side that feels compassion.

 

[kaz]

It's inhumane treatment and notice employers of illegals still aren't being punished.

It's inhumane to leave kids with abusive parents who took their children with them on their criminal endeavors and endangered their lives going across the desert. Cut the spin

But not via political sanction.....

Iraq Sanctions Kill Children, U.N. Reports
~S~

Gotcha. I guess you think it's funny

 

[Care4all]

YES....when it is simply for a MISDEMEANOR charge, if they do not qualify for REFUGEE status after it has been reviewed.

They should not be treated like they are being charged with a felony. like the people trying to cross the border illegally a second time, AFTER their first time and their refugee status was DENIED and they were shipped back home once before.

91% of these separations f parents from their children are for people who may be charged with a MISDEMEANOR,only 9% with a felony...

for goodness sake! We don't take children from their parents for an alleged misdemeanor charge....that's is NOT JUSTICE.

And that is not how the laws were written, Congress gave mercy for first time crossers seeking refugee status by making the illegal crossing for them a misdemeanor, and then came down hard with a felony for second time crossers who had already been given leniency/mercy and a chance to see if they did qualify for Refugee Asylum....

What Sessions is doing, is making the first time crosser and misdemeanor charge, EQUAL TO the felony charge, when Congress clearly separated the two circumstances.... sessions is DEFYING the law and the spirit of the law.

If you planned to commit a crime, would you take your children with you? Would you take your children with you while you walked across the desert?

Why not?

requesting Asylum is not a crime

 

[kaz]

The parents shouldnt be engaging in illegal activities. Perhaps, the parents should consider how they put their children at risk before they endeavor in this illegal activity.

Hello?

they are seeking refugee status. If they do qualify, it is NOT a crime at all.

And if it is a crime, it is a misdemeanor....a misdemeanor!!! For goodness sake....NOT A FELONY.... and it used to be simply a "civil offense" like a parking ticket....

And NO, people coming here from Honduras or ElSalvador seeking refugee asylum status should NOT be separated from their kids... they are not even charged with the misdemeanor, until they have been denied the Refugee status, if they do qualify for refugee status, there is no charge at all. The kids should not be taken from their parents under those circumstances...PERIOD.

Yes... yes... the famous rapefugees card.

How many of those people are actually refugees? I bet the overwhelming minority. Having a shitty country does unfortunately not qualify one for the refugee status. They should just live with what they have created, and not try to spread the crap elsewhere.

Again the Europeans for three hundred years dumped their problems on North, South and Central America and they killed to take that which was not theirs and you bitch about the poor people who come here now..

then have your congress critters and president change the law.... but the law now, states they can seek refugee status.

I know and it was both the Dems and Republicans that passed the laws to allow it, but now we have the people with hard hearts act like it was only one side that feels compassion.

You're so full of shit. We want legal immigration, not illegal immigration, ass wipe. You're seriously as stupid as you write, aren't you?

 

[Moonglow]

YES....when it is simply for a MISDEMEANOR charge, if they do not qualify for REFUGEE status after it has been reviewed.

They should not be treated like they are being charged with a felony. like the people trying to cross the border illegally a second time, AFTER their first time and their refugee status was DENIED and they were shipped back home once before.

91% of these separations f parents from their children are for people who may be charged with a MISDEMEANOR,only 9% with a felony...

for goodness sake! We don't take children from their parents for an alleged misdemeanor charge....that's is NOT JUSTICE.

And that is not how the laws were written, Congress gave mercy for first time crossers seeking refugee status by making the illegal crossing for them a misdemeanor, and then came down hard with a felony for second time crossers who had already been given leniency/mercy and a chance to see if they did qualify for Refugee Asylum....

What Sessions is doing, is making the first time crosser and misdemeanor charge, EQUAL TO the felony charge, when Congress clearly separated the two circumstances.... sessions is DEFYING the law and the spirit of the law.

The parents shouldnt be engaging in illegal activities. Perhaps, the parents should consider how they put their children at risk before they endeavor in this illegal activity.

Hello?

they are seeking refugee status. If they do qualify, it is NOT a crime at all.

And if it is a crime, it is a misdemeanor....a misdemeanor!!! For goodness sake....NOT A FELONY.... and it used to be simply a "civil offense" like a parking ticket....

And NO, people coming here from Honduras or ElSalvador seeking refugee asylum status should NOT be separated from their kids... they are not even charged with the misdemeanor, until they have been denied the Refugee status, if they do qualify for refugee status, there is no charge at all. The kids should not be taken from their parents under those circumstances...PERIOD.

No, they shouldn't be trying to come in illegally, refugee, illegal, whatever you want to call them.

sorry, you don't know the law....

If they are seeking refugee status, it is not against the law.....not until they have been DENIED their refugee status because they did not qualify.

The refugees are turning themselves in, seeking asylum.

AND THESE are the people you are traumatizing....

by law, they have every right to come here and seek asylum...only if they do such, and do not qualify, is it a misdemeanor for their crossing.

I heard the democrats have now recruited lawyers in order to to coach these "refugees" so that they can enter the voter rolls.

Just build that wall already, so tired of this bullshit.

A wall will not stop people from coming to the US to seek asylum status as a refugee.

 

[Moonglow]

Hello?

they are seeking refugee status. If they do qualify, it is NOT a crime at all.

And if it is a crime, it is a misdemeanor....a misdemeanor!!! For goodness sake....NOT A FELONY.... and it used to be simply a "civil offense" like a parking ticket....

And NO, people coming here from Honduras or ElSalvador seeking refugee asylum status should NOT be separated from their kids... they are not even charged with the misdemeanor, until they have been denied the Refugee status, if they do qualify for refugee status, there is no charge at all. The kids should not be taken from their parents under those circumstances...PERIOD.

Yes... yes... the famous rapefugees card.

How many of those people are actually refugees? I bet the overwhelming minority. Having a shitty country does unfortunately not qualify one for the refugee status. They should just live with what they have created, and not try to spread the crap elsewhere.

Again the Europeans for three hundred years dumped their problems on North, South and Central America and they killed to take that which was not theirs and you bitch about the poor people who come here now..

then have your congress critters and president change the law.... but the law now, states they can seek refugee status.

I know and it was both the Dems and Republicans that passed the laws to allow it, but now we have the people with hard hearts act like it was only one side that feels compassion.

You're so full of shit. We want legal immigration, not illegal immigration, ass wipe. You're seriously as stupid as you write, aren't you?

Gfy.

 

[Norman]

YES....when it is simply for a MISDEMEANOR charge, if they do not qualify for REFUGEE status after it has been reviewed.

They should not be treated like they are being charged with a felony. like the people trying to cross the border illegally a second time, AFTER their first time and their refugee status was DENIED and they were shipped back home once before.

91% of these separations f parents from their children are for people who may be charged with a MISDEMEANOR,only 9% with a felony...

for goodness sake! We don't take children from their parents for an alleged misdemeanor charge....that's is NOT JUSTICE.

And that is not how the laws were written, Congress gave mercy for first time crossers seeking refugee status by making the illegal crossing for them a misdemeanor, and then came down hard with a felony for second time crossers who had already been given leniency/mercy and a chance to see if they did qualify for Refugee Asylum....

What Sessions is doing, is making the first time crosser and misdemeanor charge, EQUAL TO the felony charge, when Congress clearly separated the two circumstances.... sessions is DEFYING the law and the spirit of the law.

If you planned to commit a crime, would you take your children with you? Would you take your children with you while you walked across the desert?

Why not?

requesting Asylum is not a crime

And just asserting something doesn't make it so.

So far you have repeated this statement that all these people are refugees. But where is the evidence?

 

[Care4all]

Hello?

they are seeking refugee status. If they do qualify, it is NOT a crime at all.

And if it is a crime, it is a misdemeanor....a misdemeanor!!! For goodness sake....NOT A FELONY.... and it used to be simply a "civil offense" like a parking ticket....

And NO, people coming here from Honduras or ElSalvador seeking refugee asylum status should NOT be separated from their kids... they are not even charged with the misdemeanor, until they have been denied the Refugee status, if they do qualify for refugee status, there is no charge at all. The kids should not be taken from their parents under those circumstances...PERIOD.

Yes... yes... the famous rapefugees card.

How many of those people are actually refugees? I bet the overwhelming minority. Having a shitty country does unfortunately not qualify one for the refugee status. They should just live with what they have created, and not try to spread the crap elsewhere.

Again the Europeans for three hundred years dumped their problems on North, South and Central America and they killed to take that which was not theirs and you bitch about the poor people who come here now..

then have your congress critters and president change the law.... but the law now, states they can seek refugee status.

I know and it was both the Dems and Republicans that passed the laws to allow it, but now we have the people with hard hearts act like it was only one side that feels compassion.

You're so full of shit. We want legal immigration, not illegal immigration, ass wipe. You're seriously as stupid as you write, aren't you?

you don't want illegal OR LEGAL immigration from Mexico....you are all for cutting quotas for legal immigration...

 

[kaz]

YES....when it is simply for a MISDEMEANOR charge, if they do not qualify for REFUGEE status after it has been reviewed.

They should not be treated like they are being charged with a felony. like the people trying to cross the border illegally a second time, AFTER their first time and their refugee status was DENIED and they were shipped back home once before.

91% of these separations f parents from their children are for people who may be charged with a MISDEMEANOR,only 9% with a felony...

for goodness sake! We don't take children from their parents for an alleged misdemeanor charge....that's is NOT JUSTICE.

And that is not how the laws were written, Congress gave mercy for first time crossers seeking refugee status by making the illegal crossing for them a misdemeanor, and then came down hard with a felony for second time crossers who had already been given leniency/mercy and a chance to see if they did qualify for Refugee Asylum....

What Sessions is doing, is making the first time crosser and misdemeanor charge, EQUAL TO the felony charge, when Congress clearly separated the two circumstances.... sessions is DEFYING the law and the spirit of the law.

If you planned to commit a crime, would you take your children with you? Would you take your children with you while you walked across the desert?

Why not?

requesting Asylum is not a crime

So you're only addressing the tiny percentage who request asylum at the border? So let's agree then, we tell them no and they all go away, right? We only arrest and take the children of the ones who don't listen to that.

Asylum is another crock of shit game that you idiots came up with. They're only doing that because you (leftists) told them to do that

 

[Moonglow]

When an American citizen is arrested for a crime. He is separated from his family and put in jail.

So why should illegals who have committed a criminal act by sneaking across our border be treated any different? ....

Many are here trying to get refugee status.

And for most of them it's a crock of shit

Is that an Irish crock o’ shit?

 

[kaz]

Yes... yes... the famous rapefugees card.

How many of those people are actually refugees? I bet the overwhelming minority. Having a shitty country does unfortunately not qualify one for the refugee status. They should just live with what they have created, and not try to spread the crap elsewhere.

Again the Europeans for three hundred years dumped their problems on North, South and Central America and they killed to take that which was not theirs and you bitch about the poor people who come here now..

then have your congress critters and president change the law.... but the law now, states they can seek refugee status.

I know and it was both the Dems and Republicans that passed the laws to allow it, but now we have the people with hard hearts act like it was only one side that feels compassion.

You're so full of shit. We want legal immigration, not illegal immigration, ass wipe. You're seriously as stupid as you write, aren't you?

Gfy.

You're a liar, we don't oppose immigration. The difference between us is that you want rapists, murderers and drug dealers to come with them as well as millions who take the jobs from our own poor and millions more who can't support themselves and go on welfare. Then you call yourself a humanitarian. So take your own idea and really ream it

 

[Moonglow]

YES....when it is simply for a MISDEMEANOR charge, if they do not qualify for REFUGEE status after it has been reviewed.

They should not be treated like they are being charged with a felony. like the people trying to cross the border illegally a second time, AFTER their first time and their refugee status was DENIED and they were shipped back home once before.

91% of these separations f parents from their children are for people who may be charged with a MISDEMEANOR,only 9% with a felony...

for goodness sake! We don't take children from their parents for an alleged misdemeanor charge....that's is NOT JUSTICE.

And that is not how the laws were written, Congress gave mercy for first time crossers seeking refugee status by making the illegal crossing for them a misdemeanor, and then came down hard with a felony for second time crossers who had already been given leniency/mercy and a chance to see if they did qualify for Refugee Asylum....

What Sessions is doing, is making the first time crosser and misdemeanor charge, EQUAL TO the felony charge, when Congress clearly separated the two circumstances.... sessions is DEFYING the law and the spirit of the law.

If you planned to commit a crime, would you take your children with you? Would you take your children with you while you walked across the desert?

Why not?

requesting Asylum is not a crime

So you're only addressing the tiny percentage who request asylum at the border? So let's agree then, we tell them no and they all go away, right? We only arrest and take the children of the ones who don't listen to that.

Asylum is another crock of shit game that you idiots came up with. They're only doing that because you (leftists) told them to do that

Refugee status immigration was passed during Boosh sr, as was chain migration, right after a Republican president gave amnesty to illegals.

 

[Norman]

Again the Europeans for three hundred years dumped their problems on North, South and Central America and they killed to take that which was not theirs and you bitch about the poor people who come here now..

then have your congress critters and president change the law.... but the law now, states they can seek refugee status.

I know and it was both the Dems and Republicans that passed the laws to allow it, but now we have the people with hard hearts act like it was only one side that feels compassion.

You're so full of shit. We want legal immigration, not illegal immigration, ass wipe. You're seriously as stupid as you write, aren't you?

Gfy.

You're a liar, we don't oppose immigration. The difference between us is that you want rapists, murderers and drug dealers to come with them as well as millions who take the jobs from our own poor and millions more who can't support themselves and go on welfare. Then you call yourself a humanitarian. So take your own idea and really ream it

Successful decent white Europeans are welcome.

Rapefugees... pass on that.