Do you realize that Trump will be the ONLY world leader who denies Climate Change?

[keepitreal]

Trey Gowdy? The asshat that redacted FBI documents before giving them to his committee to try to frame Clinton? That POS?

1) Hillary never said she only used one device. Gowdy lied in his question.

2) Comey later said there were no properly marked e-mails found.

3) No evidence her server was hacked.

All you whiners do is draq out this video. It does not present any Clinton lie.

As Comey testified, it was likely her emails were hacked, but it can't be proven because it's almost impossible to prove. Secondly, she transferred and stored classified information to an unsecured server which was her own. As Comey testified to, she did not return government property (those emails) to the state department; many of them.

Comey testified that YES, she did have classified information on that server. If Comey thought for one second they were not marked classified, he would have answered the question with "No, she did not have classified information on her server."

Yes, Hillary Clinton broke the law | New York Post

Liar. In his report, Comey never said her server was likely hacked. He said there was no evidence in was hacked. They said it was possible. But then again, it is possible to hack government systems too.

Comey also said there were no properly marked classified e-mails on her server. Information can be classsified whether being marked or not. Your statement claiming otherwise is really really stupid.

The end result s that there was no lie, no criminal activity, just a bunch of asshat Republicans swiftboating the other party's candidate & duping the feeble minded to thinking Hillary was a horrible candidate so they could end up with an amateur orange idiot who will likely take our country into the global toilet. And you helped.

You liberals are really something. I just put testimony right in front of you of what Comey said, and you still deny it. Maybe if I spell it out for you, that might be better.

Gowdy: Mrs. Clinton said that she never sent or received any classified information on her server, is that true?

Comey: Our investigation found THAT THERE WAS CLASSIFIED INFORMATION....

Gowdy interrupting: So it was not true?

Comey: Right, that's what I said.

Gowdy: Secretary Clinton said there was NOTHING MARKED CLASSIFIED sent or received on her server, is that true?

Comey: That's not true. There were a small number of portion markings on I think three of the documents.

I don't know what more you want. You have to say either Hillary lied to Congress or Comey did, but they both can't be telling the truth.

Gowdy: Secretary Clinton said there was NOTHING MARKED CLASSIFIED sent or received on her server, is that true?

Comey: That's not true. There were a small number of portion markings on I think three of the documents.

And, the only reason why there was only a few was because,
Hillary, the crook, had Huma strip the classified headers

You people are just plain stupid.

You people are just plain stupid.

Well, isn't this special...
Your the one whose either stupid or in denial...
either way, add them together and you get RealDumb

Hurry up, the train for La La Land is leaving!

 

[LaDexter]

We can reduce the rise in temperatures by regulating greenhouse gas emissions.

There is NO RISE in ATMOSPHERIC TEMPERATURES according to the highly correlated raw data from the two and only two measures we have of ATMOSPHERIC TEMPS....

and hence the BS "greenhouse gas" CO2 does not cause warming, since it went up as a % and didn't warm anything...


Key Argument for Global Warming Critics Evaporates

"For years, skeptics of global warming have used satellite and weather balloon data to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening.

Now, according to three new studies published in the journal Science, it turns out those conclusions based on satellite and weather balloon data were based on "faulty" analyses (ie, any data that shows NO WARMING is "faulty" and needs to be FUDGED).

The atmosphere is indeed warming, not cooling as the (highly correlated raw) data previously showed"



This is really basic science. The data from the satellites and balloons was highly correlated, and showed NO WARMING. There was no scientific basis to challenge that data since two very different measures of the same thing said the same thing.

The desire to "correct" that data was corrupt from the beginning. Both "corrections" are laughable. The satellites were "corrected" for ORBIT WOBBLE. The tippy toppiest "top climate scientists" then claimed the balloon thermometers were, well, just WRONG (anything that shows no warming is "wrong"). Problem - the "corrections" are NOT CORRELATED to two sets of correlated data.

This isn't science, it is fudging, fraud, and then we get left wing science invalid parrots like Dave who parrot and want more harm done to the US over this issue.

 

[P@triot]

Even Putin believes in climate change. Even North Korea signed the Paris accords.

Trump, the ONLY world leader who believes climate change is a hoax. And we know America has more science deniers than any other country when it comes to climate change. I find that hilarious.

What I find hilarious is that you're too stupid to realize what each of them have in common: a deep desire for power and control. Kim Jong Un and Vladimir Putin are dictators. And that's the same reason anyone embraces the scam known as "Global Warming" - an excuse to exert power over others.

 

[P@triot]

The next time a progressive screams about "science" show them this article and remind them that arrogant progressive scientists are wrong more often than they are right. They don't even know what it is that they don't know.

This rocket engine breaks a law of physics. But a NASA test says it works anyway.

 

[RealDave]

Trey Gowdy? The asshat that redacted FBI documents before giving them to his committee to try to frame Clinton? That POS?

1) Hillary never said she only used one device. Gowdy lied in his question.

2) Comey later said there were no properly marked e-mails found.

3) No evidence her server was hacked.

All you whiners do is draq out this video. It does not present any Clinton lie.

As Comey testified, it was likely her emails were hacked, but it can't be proven because it's almost impossible to prove. Secondly, she transferred and stored classified information to an unsecured server which was her own. As Comey testified to, she did not return government property (those emails) to the state department; many of them.

Comey testified that YES, she did have classified information on that server. If Comey thought for one second they were not marked classified, he would have answered the question with "No, she did not have classified information on her server."

Yes, Hillary Clinton broke the law | New York Post

Liar. In his report, Comey never said her server was likely hacked. He said there was no evidence in was hacked. They said it was possible. But then again, it is possible to hack government systems too.

Comey also said there were no properly marked classified e-mails on her server. Information can be classsified whether being marked or not. Your statement claiming otherwise is really really stupid.

The end result s that there was no lie, no criminal activity, just a bunch of asshat Republicans swiftboating the other party's candidate & duping the feeble minded to thinking Hillary was a horrible candidate so they could end up with an amateur orange idiot who will likely take our country into the global toilet. And you helped.

her email server was illegal, she illegally deleted emails after receiving a subpoena, the obumer DOJ sat on her hands. Trump's will not. watching the next year will be truly amazing. The elitist going down.

The server was not illegal. You are one stupid uninformed jackass. No, Hillary did not delete those mails after the Subpoena, she ordered them deleted well before any subpoena.

Trump: Clinton deleted 33,000 emails after getting subpoena

"Clinton and her campaign don’t dispute that she deleted these 33,000 emails. They argue that these were personal in nature, rather than work-related, and therefore were not necessary to turn over.

However, they have denied that they deleted the emails after receiving a congressional subpoena from the House Select Committee on Benghazi on March 4, 2015. But an August 2016 FBI report on its investigation shows that Trump’s claim has some merit."

You people are just incapable of learning anything unless it comes from Rush, Breitbart or Fox. Hillary ordered those mails deleted long before the subpoena. She thought they were long gone so why would she order them deleted again after the subpoena? You should hang the IT guy who admitted he neglected to delete those mails as ordered before the subpoena. Arrest him & crucify him. Quit lying about Hillary Clinton.

 

[RealDave]

The next time a progressive screams about "science" show them this article and remind them that arrogant progressive scientists are wrong more often than they are right. They don't even know what it is that they don't know.

This rocket engine breaks a law of physics. But a NASA test says it works anyway.

So you skipped the part where NASA has had no positive results.
Your argument is childish & shows you never read the article.

 

[P@triot]

The next time a progressive screams about "science" show them this article and remind them that arrogant progressive scientists are wrong more often than they are right. They don't even know what it is that they don't know.

This rocket engine breaks a law of physics. But a NASA test says it works anyway.

So you skipped the part where NASA has had no positive results.
Your argument is childish & shows you never read the article.

Apparently you didn't read the article. Typical of progressives. Most can't read...

The paper, written by astrophysicists at NASA's Eagleworks Laboratories, tested a electromagnetic propulsion system, or “EM drive,” that generates a small amount of thrust simply by bouncing microwaves around a cone-shaped copper chamber. No propellant goes in, no exhaust comes out, and yet, somehow, the engine can make things move.

It was tested and it worked, nitwit.

According to the new paper, yes. The Eagleworks scientists report that their machine generated 1.2 millinewtons of thrust per kilowatt of electricity pumped in.

It was tested and it worked, nitwit.

 

[bendog]

Ah thot Donald sayd he needed to figger on this tem-per-tur thayg sum mewr?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

As Comey testified, it was likely her emails were hacked, but it can't be proven because it's almost impossible to prove. Secondly, she transferred and stored classified information to an unsecured server which was her own. As Comey testified to, she did not return government property (those emails) to the state department; many of them.

Comey testified that YES, she did have classified information on that server. If Comey thought for one second they were not marked classified, he would have answered the question with "No, she did not have classified information on her server."

Yes, Hillary Clinton broke the law | New York Post

Liar. In his report, Comey never said her server was likely hacked. He said there was no evidence in was hacked. They said it was possible. But then again, it is possible to hack government systems too.

Comey also said there were no properly marked classified e-mails on her server. Information can be classsified whether being marked or not. Your statement claiming otherwise is really really stupid.

The end result s that there was no lie, no criminal activity, just a bunch of asshat Republicans swiftboating the other party's candidate & duping the feeble minded to thinking Hillary was a horrible candidate so they could end up with an amateur orange idiot who will likely take our country into the global toilet. And you helped.

her email server was illegal, she illegally deleted emails after receiving a subpoena, the obumer DOJ sat on her hands. Trump's will not. watching the next year will be truly amazing. The elitist going down.

The server was not illegal. You are one stupid uninformed jackass. No, Hillary did not delete those mails after the Subpoena, she ordered them deleted well before any subpoena.

well that isn't what the date on the subpoena says.

Again, for the mentally challenged. Clinton had ordered her personal e-mails deleted long before any subpoena. Whewn the subpoena was issued, she did not have anything deleleted because she thought they had already been deleleted. The IT guy was the one who realized he had not deleted the mails & did so.

Point was, it ain't getting warmer

The planet as a whole is not getting warmer. Certain areas are. The Arctic Ocean is growing, and as it grows, the sea ice will coalesce around Greenland. North America is moving SW. Most continents are moving away from the nearest pole. But, for certain, the climate won't change much until Antarctica moves off the South Pole.

The average global temperatures are rising. Pointing to an area where it isn't &screaming MMGW is a hoax is plain stupid.

So Einsteins Theory of Relativity is not science

Theory VALIDATED by DATA and EVIDENCE is science.

Theory REFUTED by DATA, and then the "scientists" FUDGE that data to fit the "theory," that is "Global Warming"

Global Warming has not been "disproven".

LOL!!!

And your evidence is??

Yeah, you are LEFT WING and have a BEAK and a BIRDBRAIN....

You want to do nothing until we have severe droughts,

And this is what is called THE IDIOCY of THE FRAUD. The only thing that can cause a drought is CO2 according to "Dave." Droughts never happened prior to the Industrial Revolution....


Nice, Polly...

When you have the courage to answer my questions instead of insulting and parroting BS while chickening out from answering, let us know....

I never said the only thing you moron. But Global Warming can increase the number & length of droughts. You really stupid questions were answered.

it can? where is your evidence that global warming caused a longer drought?

hint, you saying so doesn't count.

More Droughts | A Student's Guide to Global Climate Change | US EPA

The average global temperatures are rising.

What's an "average global temperature"?

How many data points do you need?

 

[RealDave]

Even Putin believes in climate change.

Even North Korea signed the Paris accords.

Trump, the ONLY world leader who believes climate change is a hoax. And we know America has more science deniers than any other country when it comes to climate change.

I find that hilarious.

The left doing battle with their strawman again. And losing."
"Obama's talking about all of this with the global warming and … a lot of it's a hoax. It's a hoax. I mean, it's a money-making industry, okay? It's a hoax, a lot of it."

Even Putin believes in climate change.

Even North Korea signed the Paris accords.

Trump, the ONLY world leader who believes climate change is a hoax. And we know America has more science deniers than any other country when it comes to climate change.

I find that hilarious.

The left doing battle with their strawman again. And losing.
Nobody denies the climate changes, dufus.

We can reduce the rise in temperatures by regulating greenhouse gas emissions.

There is NO RISE in ATMOSPHERIC TEMPERATURES according to the highly correlated raw data from the two and only two measures we have of ATMOSPHERIC TEMPS....

and hence the BS "greenhouse gas" CO2 does not cause warming, since it went up as a % and didn't warm anything...


Key Argument for Global Warming Critics Evaporates

"For years, skeptics of global warming have used satellite and weather balloon data to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening.

Now, according to three new studies published in the journal Science, it turns out those conclusions based on satellite and weather balloon data were based on "faulty" analyses (ie, any data that shows NO WARMING is "faulty" and needs to be FUDGED).

The atmosphere is indeed warming, not cooling as the (highly correlated raw) data previously showed"



This is really basic science. The data from the satellites and balloons was highly correlated, and showed NO WARMING. There was no scientific basis to challenge that data since two very different measures of the same thing said the same thing.

The desire to "correct" that data was corrupt from the beginning. Both "corrections" are laughable. The satellites were "corrected" for ORBIT WOBBLE. The tippy toppiest "top climate scientists" then claimed the balloon thermometers were, well, just WRONG (anything that shows no warming is "wrong"). Problem - the "corrections" are NOT CORRELATED to two sets of correlated data.

This isn't science, it is fudging, fraud, and then we get left wing science invalid parrots like Dave who parrot and want more harm done to the US over this issue.

Your satelitte data crap has een debunked a gazx

Liar. In his report, Comey never said her server was likely hacked. He said there was no evidence in was hacked. They said it was possible. But then again, it is possible to hack government systems too.

Comey also said there were no properly marked classified e-mails on her server. Information can be classsified whether being marked or not. Your statement claiming otherwise is really really stupid.

The end result s that there was no lie, no criminal activity, just a bunch of asshat Republicans swiftboating the other party's candidate & duping the feeble minded to thinking Hillary was a horrible candidate so they could end up with an amateur orange idiot who will likely take our country into the global toilet. And you helped.

her email server was illegal, she illegally deleted emails after receiving a subpoena, the obumer DOJ sat on her hands. Trump's will not. watching the next year will be truly amazing. The elitist going down.

The server was not illegal. You are one stupid uninformed jackass. No, Hillary did not delete those mails after the Subpoena, she ordered them deleted well before any subpoena.

well that isn't what the date on the subpoena says.

Again, for the mentally challenged. Clinton had ordered her personal e-mails deleted long before any subpoena. Whewn the subpoena was issued, she did not have anything deleleted because she thought they had already been deleleted. The IT guy was the one who realized he had not deleted the mails & did so.

Point was, it ain't getting warmer

The planet as a whole is not getting warmer. Certain areas are. The Arctic Ocean is growing, and as it grows, the sea ice will coalesce around Greenland. North America is moving SW. Most continents are moving away from the nearest pole. But, for certain, the climate won't change much until Antarctica moves off the South Pole.

The average global temperatures are rising. Pointing to an area where it isn't &screaming MMGW is a hoax is plain stupid.

So Einsteins Theory of Relativity is not science

Theory VALIDATED by DATA and EVIDENCE is science.

Theory REFUTED by DATA, and then the "scientists" FUDGE that data to fit the "theory," that is "Global Warming"

Global Warming has not been "disproven".

LOL!!!

And your evidence is??

Yeah, you are LEFT WING and have a BEAK and a BIRDBRAIN....

You want to do nothing until we have severe droughts,

And this is what is called THE IDIOCY of THE FRAUD. The only thing that can cause a drought is CO2 according to "Dave." Droughts never happened prior to the Industrial Revolution....


Nice, Polly...

When you have the courage to answer my questions instead of insulting and parroting BS while chickening out from answering, let us know....

I never said the only thing you moron. But Global Warming can increase the number & length of droughts. You really stupid questions were answered.

it can? where is your evidence that global warming caused a longer drought?

hint, you saying so doesn't count.

More Droughts | A Student's Guide to Global Climate Change | US EPA

The average global temperatures are rising.

What's an "average global temperature"?

How many data points do you need?

Enough to give a basic idea. It is the change in temperatures that is important not that it is 100% accurate.

 

[RealDave]

The next time a progressive screams about "science" show them this article and remind them that arrogant progressive scientists are wrong more often than they are right. They don't even know what it is that they don't know.

This rocket engine breaks a law of physics. But a NASA test says it works anyway.

So you skipped the part where NASA has had no positive results.
Your argument is childish & shows you never read the article.

Apparently you didn't read the article. Typical of progressives. Most can't read...

The paper, written by astrophysicists at NASA's Eagleworks Laboratories, tested a electromagnetic propulsion system, or “EM drive,” that generates a small amount of thrust simply by bouncing microwaves around a cone-shaped copper chamber. No propellant goes in, no exhaust comes out, and yet, somehow, the engine can make things move.

It was tested and it worked, nitwit.

According to the new paper, yes. The Eagleworks scientists report that their machine generated 1.2 millinewtons of thrust per kilowatt of electricity pumped in.

It was tested and it worked, nitwit.

"This doesn't mean that the Eagleworks EM drive definitely functions. Peer review is designed to make sure that studies are well designed and executed, and that the conclusions are reasonable — it's not an endorsement."

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Even Putin believes in climate change.

Even North Korea signed the Paris accords.

Trump, the ONLY world leader who believes climate change is a hoax. And we know America has more science deniers than any other country when it comes to climate change.

I find that hilarious.

The left doing battle with their strawman again. And losing."
"Obama's talking about all of this with the global warming and … a lot of it's a hoax. It's a hoax. I mean, it's a money-making industry, okay? It's a hoax, a lot of it."

Even Putin believes in climate change.

Even North Korea signed the Paris accords.

Trump, the ONLY world leader who believes climate change is a hoax. And we know America has more science deniers than any other country when it comes to climate change.

I find that hilarious.

The left doing battle with their strawman again. And losing.
Nobody denies the climate changes, dufus.

We can reduce the rise in temperatures by regulating greenhouse gas emissions.

There is NO RISE in ATMOSPHERIC TEMPERATURES according to the highly correlated raw data from the two and only two measures we have of ATMOSPHERIC TEMPS....

and hence the BS "greenhouse gas" CO2 does not cause warming, since it went up as a % and didn't warm anything...


Key Argument for Global Warming Critics Evaporates

"For years, skeptics of global warming have used satellite and weather balloon data to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening.

Now, according to three new studies published in the journal Science, it turns out those conclusions based on satellite and weather balloon data were based on "faulty" analyses (ie, any data that shows NO WARMING is "faulty" and needs to be FUDGED).

The atmosphere is indeed warming, not cooling as the (highly correlated raw) data previously showed"



This is really basic science. The data from the satellites and balloons was highly correlated, and showed NO WARMING. There was no scientific basis to challenge that data since two very different measures of the same thing said the same thing.

The desire to "correct" that data was corrupt from the beginning. Both "corrections" are laughable. The satellites were "corrected" for ORBIT WOBBLE. The tippy toppiest "top climate scientists" then claimed the balloon thermometers were, well, just WRONG (anything that shows no warming is "wrong"). Problem - the "corrections" are NOT CORRELATED to two sets of correlated data.

This isn't science, it is fudging, fraud, and then we get left wing science invalid parrots like Dave who parrot and want more harm done to the US over this issue.

Your satelitte data crap has een debunked a gazx

her email server was illegal, she illegally deleted emails after receiving a subpoena, the obumer DOJ sat on her hands. Trump's will not. watching the next year will be truly amazing. The elitist going down.

The server was not illegal. You are one stupid uninformed jackass. No, Hillary did not delete those mails after the Subpoena, she ordered them deleted well before any subpoena.

well that isn't what the date on the subpoena says.

Again, for the mentally challenged. Clinton had ordered her personal e-mails deleted long before any subpoena. Whewn the subpoena was issued, she did not have anything deleleted because she thought they had already been deleleted. The IT guy was the one who realized he had not deleted the mails & did so.

Point was, it ain't getting warmer

The planet as a whole is not getting warmer. Certain areas are. The Arctic Ocean is growing, and as it grows, the sea ice will coalesce around Greenland. North America is moving SW. Most continents are moving away from the nearest pole. But, for certain, the climate won't change much until Antarctica moves off the South Pole.

The average global temperatures are rising. Pointing to an area where it isn't &screaming MMGW is a hoax is plain stupid.

Theory VALIDATED by DATA and EVIDENCE is science.

Theory REFUTED by DATA, and then the "scientists" FUDGE that data to fit the "theory," that is "Global Warming"



LOL!!!

And your evidence is??

Yeah, you are LEFT WING and have a BEAK and a BIRDBRAIN....




And this is what is called THE IDIOCY of THE FRAUD. The only thing that can cause a drought is CO2 according to "Dave." Droughts never happened prior to the Industrial Revolution....


Nice, Polly...

When you have the courage to answer my questions instead of insulting and parroting BS while chickening out from answering, let us know....

I never said the only thing you moron. But Global Warming can increase the number & length of droughts. You really stupid questions were answered.

it can? where is your evidence that global warming caused a longer drought?

hint, you saying so doesn't count.

More Droughts | A Student's Guide to Global Climate Change | US EPA

The average global temperatures are rising.

What's an "average global temperature"?

How many data points do you need?

Enough to give a basic idea. It is the change in temperatures that is important not that it is 100% accurate.

Enough to give a basic idea.

Wow! We should spend trillions on windmills, because we have a "basic idea"?

That's funny.

 

[P@triot]

Enough to give a basic idea. It is the change in temperatures that is important not that it is 100% accurate.

Man if that isn't vintage progressive "logic". Who cares about a silly thing like being a 100% accurate. It's so much better to have an emotional knee-jerk reaction to perception than ensure something is 100% accurate.

 

[P@triot]

The next time a progressive screams about "science" show them this article and remind them that arrogant progressive scientists are wrong more often than they are right. They don't even know what it is that they don't know.

This rocket engine breaks a law of physics. But a NASA test says it works anyway.

So you skipped the part where NASA has had no positive results.
Your argument is childish & shows you never read the article.

Apparently you didn't read the article. Typical of progressives. Most can't read...

The paper, written by astrophysicists at NASA's Eagleworks Laboratories, tested a electromagnetic propulsion system, or “EM drive,” that generates a small amount of thrust simply by bouncing microwaves around a cone-shaped copper chamber. No propellant goes in, no exhaust comes out, and yet, somehow, the engine can make things move.

It was tested and it worked, nitwit.

According to the new paper, yes. The Eagleworks scientists report that their machine generated 1.2 millinewtons of thrust per kilowatt of electricity pumped in.

It was tested and it worked, nitwit.

"This doesn't mean that the Eagleworks EM drive definitely functions. Peer review is designed to make sure that studies are well designed and executed, and that the conclusions are reasonable — it's not an endorsement."

"It also addressed one of the major knocks against past EM drive tests — that the engines heat up when activated, suggesting that hot air around the machines, rather than the photons inside them, might be what generates thrust. The Eagleworks scientists made sure this wasn't the case by conducting their test in a vacuum."

It was tested. It works. It proves that scientists don't know shit because they don't even know what it is that they don't know yet. The next hundred years will uncover discoveries which contradict everything we thought we knew. Just like the current hundred years did to the previous.

At one time, doctors bled George Washington to death because they were "certain" that was how to "cure" people. They didn't even know what it was that they didn't know. That's how it works. People who aren't smug progressives and who actually have a smidge of humility realize that.

 

[Weatherman2020]

The next time a progressive screams about "science" show them this article and remind them that arrogant progressive scientists are wrong more often than they are right. They don't even know what it is that they don't know.

This rocket engine breaks a law of physics. But a NASA test says it works anyway.

So you skipped the part where NASA has had no positive results.
Your argument is childish & shows you never read the article.

Apparently you didn't read the article. Typical of progressives. Most can't read...

The paper, written by astrophysicists at NASA's Eagleworks Laboratories, tested a electromagnetic propulsion system, or “EM drive,” that generates a small amount of thrust simply by bouncing microwaves around a cone-shaped copper chamber. No propellant goes in, no exhaust comes out, and yet, somehow, the engine can make things move.

It was tested and it worked, nitwit.

According to the new paper, yes. The Eagleworks scientists report that their machine generated 1.2 millinewtons of thrust per kilowatt of electricity pumped in.

It was tested and it worked, nitwit.

"This doesn't mean that the Eagleworks EM drive definitely functions. Peer review is designed to make sure that studies are well designed and executed, and that the conclusions are reasonable — it's not an endorsement."

"It also addressed one of the major knocks against past EM drive tests — that the engines heat up when activated, suggesting that hot air around the machines, rather than the photons inside them, might be what generates thrust. The Eagleworks scientists made sure this wasn't the case by conducting their test in a vacuum."

It was tested. It works. It proves that scientists don't know shit because they don't even know what it is that they don't know yet. The next hundred years will uncover discoveries which contradict everything we thought we knew. Just like the current hundred years did to the previous.

At one time, doctors bled George Washington to death because they were "certain" that was how to "cure" people. They didn't even know what it was that they didn't know. That's how it works. People who aren't smug progressives and who actually have a smidge of humility realize that.

You hit the nail on the head. The left believe they are omnipotent.

 

[NightFox]

Enough to give a basic idea.

Wow! We should spend trillions on windmills, because we have a "basic idea"?

That's funny.

Either that or simply do what the gub'mint worshipers do best, pass new umpteen thousand page legislation regulating the energy output of the Sun, perhaps threaten it with higher taxes and fines if it doesn't comply, it'll accomplish the objective, namely allow them to prattle on about how they "care" and how wonderful they are without actually doing a single thing to solve "the problem".

 

[Jarhead]

I still laugh at this whole thing.

The earth has been warming since the "little ice age" that took place for about 500 years from 1300's to 1800's (look it up).

Exactly what did "mankind" do in the 1800's to create that warming?

 

[LaDexter]

It is the change in temperatures that is important not that it is 100% accurate.

So if the satellites and weather balloons produce highly correlated data showing no warming in the atmosphere, it doesn't matter if the warmers then fudge that data to show "warming," because there is no importance in that data being 100% accurate?

LOL!!!

 

[RealDave]

Enough to give a basic idea. It is the change in temperatures that is important not that it is 100% accurate.

Man if that isn't vintage progressive "logic". Who cares about a silly thing like being a 100% accurate. It's so much better to have an emotional knee-jerk reaction to perception than ensure something is 100% accurate.

I knew you fumducks would not understand it. To show change, it just needs to be consistantly measured.

Like the unemployment rate. We know that the unemployment rate is not accurate but as long as it is calculated the same, it doesn't matter as it is just an indicator used to determine change.

The average global temperature to be 100% exact would requite a data at every point and that is not possible,.

 

[RealDave]

It is the change in temperatures that is important not that it is 100% accurate.

So if the satellites and weather balloons produce highly correlated data showing no warming in the atmosphere, it doesn't matter if the warmers then fudge that data to show "warming," because there is no importance in that data being 100% accurate?

LOL!!!

So, how do you get a global average temperature that is 100% accurate?

Climate Myth...
Satellites show no warming in the troposphere
"Satellite measurements indicate an absence of significant global warming since 1979, the very period that human carbon dioxide emissions have been increasing rapidly. The satellite data signal not only the absence of substantial human-induced warming but also provide an empirical test of the greenhouse hypothesis - a test that the hypothesis fails." (Bob Carter)


Myth? Do you know what that is? It means you have once again been duped.

Then: "Several groups of scientists began looking closely at this discrepancy. With so many other pieces of evidence indicating warming, it seemed unlikely that the troposphere would not be warming. Errors were discovered in the methods the UAH group used to adjust the data."

What???? your heroes adjusted their data??????? OMG OMG OMG

Satellite measurements of warming in the troposphere