Do You Support The Possible Coming Wars With Iran & Syria?

[paulitician]

It looks like we're headed in that direction. What do you think?

 

[Full-Auto]

It looks we're headed in that direction. What do you think?

Wont happen.

We have taken on a different role with them.

POWER PUSS.

 

[PredFan]

I don't agree that it won't happen. Lybia happened, Pakistan happened, Obama might do it and Romney is even more likely to.

But yeah, I'm against it 100%.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Depends on the reasoning. Ignoring hostile enemies is not the solution. Ignoring problems only makes them worse.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

One could argue the question is moot – given the fact we’ve nearly depleted our military assets wasting our efforts the last ten years fighting two pointless wars.

 

[G.T.]

It's a dumb question without providing the hypothetical reason we'd go to the hypothetical war.

 

[Sallow]

Absolutely not. Anything egged on by the Saudis and conservatives is simply wrong.

 

[geauxtohell]

It looks like we're headed in that direction. What do you think?

That it doesn't look like we are heading in that direction, and I don't support going in that direction.

 

[Katzndogz]

We don't HAVE to go to war. We could always surrender immediately!

We have no projected such a position of weakness that war with Iran is inevitable. What are we going to do about it? That's the only question there is. Iran is not subject to diplomacy or negotiation. They are driven by the ideology of the Twelfth Imam. We either mount a defense or we don't.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

It's a dumb question without providing the hypothetical reason we'd go to the hypothetical war.

I think this thread is in the context of the other thread citing a Federal judge’s finding there is credible evidence Iran played some role in 9/11.

 

[occupied]

Since we are speaking in simplistic generalities my answer is no. My actual answer is that we should react in a responsible and measured manner to aggression against our allies and interests with a constant eye towards minimal loss of life.

 

[rightwinger]

There wont be a war with either Iran or Syria

Unless we elect Republicans

 

[dblack]

There wont be a war with either Iran or Syria

Unless we elect Republicans

I wish I could be certain of that. The republicans certainly talk about it more. But bravado is different than will. Obama's willingness to keep the war machine running seems as solid as Bush. I have to give him some credit for getting us out of Iraq though. Didn't really think that would happen.

 

[rightwinger]

There wont be a war with either Iran or Syria

Unless we elect Republicans

I wish I could be certain of that. The republicans certainly talk about it more. But bravado is different than will. Obama's willingness to keep the war machine running seems as solid as Bush. I have to give him some credit for getting us out of Iraq though. Didn't really think that would happen.

You can see the Republican saber rattling on Iran already. They are already convinced that not only does Iran have nukes (within weeks!) but they are ready to attack us!

Where have we seen this before?

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

There wont be a war with either Iran or Syria

Unless we elect Republicans

I wish I could be certain of that. The republicans certainly talk about it more. But bravado is different than will. Obama's willingness to keep the war machine running seems as solid as Bush. I have to give him some credit for getting us out of Iraq though. Didn't really think that would happen.

You can see the Republican saber rattling on Iran already. They are already convinced that not only does Iran have nukes (within weeks!) but they are ready to attack us!

Where have we seen this before?

When everyone ignored Hitler.

 

[Katzndogz]

By all means we should wait until Iran attacks us in some way.

 

[JoeB131]

It looks like we're headed in that direction. What do you think?

Well, two different countries, two different questions.

Syria first. Bashir Assad is a dead man walking. The Europeans are gettting ready to cut him off at the knees, obviously. Turkey is making moves against him. He might well fall without any provocation from us.

Iran is a different issue. Right now, their nuclear ambitions are being flustered by sabotage. Might be the Russians, the Israelis or even us. Eventually, they are going to get close to a nuke, and Israel will probably attack them at that point.

 

[rightwinger]

I wish I could be certain of that. The republicans certainly talk about it more. But bravado is different than will. Obama's willingness to keep the war machine running seems as solid as Bush. I have to give him some credit for getting us out of Iraq though. Didn't really think that would happen.

You can see the Republican saber rattling on Iran already. They are already convinced that not only does Iran have nukes (within weeks!) but they are ready to attack us!

Where have we seen this before?

When everyone ignored Hitler.

OHhhhhhhhhhh..........Hitler analogy

I'm scared. We better preemptively attack. Just to be sure

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Do You Support The Possible Coming Wars With Iran & Syria?

Also, what’s meant by ‘war’?

A Balkans-type campaign – perhaps.

A ground invasion – no.

Either option would be a mistake, however.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

You can see the Republican saber rattling on Iran already. They are already convinced that not only does Iran have nukes (within weeks!) but they are ready to attack us!

Where have we seen this before?

When everyone ignored Hitler.

OHhhhhhhhhhh..........Hitler analogy

I'm scared. We better preemptively attack. Just to be sure

You asked, I answered. I fail to see the problem. We could use Clinton ignoring multiple attacks on us if you like. It really matters not as with most insane cultures and countries we get drawn in. I would rather send over a couple stealth bombers and level Irans nuclear facilities than to wait for them to hit first. Save American lives and all that jazz.