Docs show John Brennan suppressed intel showing Russia actually wanted Hillary to win

[Rambunctious]

I'm getting tired of watching republicans downplay this crime....why are some of them so afraid?.....this is worse than watergate by 10 times and if they don't put people in prison and retroactively impeach Obama they will get away with what they did....

Forget Obama - he is untouchable.
Some low level people will probably go to jail, but not any big names.
Congress will tell the FISA courts to shape up
Congress will tell The FBI to shape up

Too much establishment of each party for the status quo to achieve meaningful change.

Flynn should get his day in court....and he should be made whole again by Obama.....

 

[badbob85037]

Ed Henry pointed out that Fred Fleitz — a 25-year veteran of the CIA and the State Department — first spotlighted this damning information in a recent column.

“Fred Fleitz should get credit for this,” Henry said. “He was a former Chief of Staff at the National Security Council under President Trump. Fleitz [wrote] that Brennan suppressed some of the intel that suggested that Russia wanted Clinton to win. I separately have an intelligence source tonight who confirmed that that information is one of the four or five other batches of intel that Rick Grenell is declassifying.”

(Source: Tucker Carlson Tonight)

BJ
As all the documents trickle out what is most confirmed to people who will actually read them is the fact that The Obama Administration orchestrated a coup attempt against an incoming President. ( as a lot of us have said)
I am amazed at the loons who think that it is okay simply because they hated Trump.

democrats are dirty. Who would have ever though?

 

[Billiejeens]

Ed Henry pointed out that Fred Fleitz — a 25-year veteran of the CIA and the State Department — first spotlighted this damning information in a recent column.

“Fred Fleitz should get credit for this,” Henry said. “He was a former Chief of Staff at the National Security Council under President Trump. Fleitz [wrote] that Brennan suppressed some of the intel that suggested that Russia wanted Clinton to win. I separately have an intelligence source tonight who confirmed that that information is one of the four or five other batches of intel that Rick Grenell is declassifying.”

(Source: Tucker Carlson Tonight)

BJ
As all the documents trickle out what is most confirmed to people who will actually read them is the fact that The Obama Administration orchestrated a coup attempt against an incoming President. ( as a lot of us have said)
I am amazed at the loons who think that it is okay simply because they hated Trump.

democrats are dirty. Who would have ever though?

Is it everyone?

 

[Rambunctious]

See? All the Trump heads went kerblooey They've go no reply to why their "PRESIDENTS ARE ALLOWED TO DO ANY CRIMES THEY WANT!" standard, one they trumpeted so loudly and proudly during impeachment, doesn't apply to Democratic presidents.

And now they just want me to go away. I'm causing them serious mental pain by laughing at their obvious hypocrisy.

kerblooey?......

 

[PoliticalChic]

Why the heck wouldn't they.......they already had a history of being able to bribe the Clinton Crime Family.

"Ex-NSC chief: House Intelligence Committee staff found John Brennan 'suppressed' Russia evidence
House Intelligence Committee staff said former CIA Director John Brennan "suppressed" intelligence indicating that Russia wanted Hillary Clinton to win the 2016 election, according to John Bolton’s former chief of staff.
The Senate Intelligence Committee released a report on Tuesday that defended the 2017 intelligence community assessment on Russian election interference and determined with "moderate" to "high" confidence that Russian President Vladimir Putin and the Kremlin sought to boost President Trump's 2016 election chances.

One day later, Fred Fleitz, a former CIA officer and National Security Council chief of staff, wrote in a Fox News opinion piece that House Intelligence Committee members "found the opposite" motivations for Russia to interfere in the presidential contest.

...Brennan suppressed facts or analysis that showed why it was not in Russia’s interests to support Trump and why Putin stood to benefit from Hillary Clinton’s election. They also told me that Brennan suppressed that intelligence over the objections of CIA analysts," Fleitz wrote.


...Putin actually wanted the more predictable and malleable Clinton to win the 2016 election," he added.


Fleitz concluded his op-ed by touting U.S. Attorney John Durham's review of the Russia investigation, which is reportedly looking into highly sensitive issues, including whether Brennan took politicized actions to pressure the rest of the intelligence community to match his conclusions about Putin’s motivations during the 2016 presidential election.

"One anticipates that a tough lawman like Durham, with confidence from both sides of the political aisle, will finally answer whether the 2017 intelligence community assessment was rigged to hurt Trump politically," he wrote."

Ex-NSC chief: House Intelligence Committee staff found John Brennan ‘suppressed’ Russia evidence - Washington Examiner

House Intelligence Committee staff said former CIA Director John Brennan "suppressed" intelligence indicating that Russia wanted Hillary Clinton to win the 2016 election, according to John Bolton’s former chief of staff.The Senate Intelligence Committee released a report on Tuesday that defended...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

 

[Dragonlady]

Ed Henry pointed out that Fred Fleitz — a 25-year veteran of the CIA and the State Department — first spotlighted this damning information in a recent column.

“Fred Fleitz should get credit for this,” Henry said. “He was a former Chief of Staff at the National Security Council under President Trump. Fleitz [wrote] that Brennan suppressed some of the intel that suggested that Russia wanted Clinton to win. I separately have an intelligence source tonight who confirmed that that information is one of the four or five other batches of intel that Rick Grenell is declassifying.”

(Source: Tucker Carlson Tonight)

BJ
As all the documents trickle out what is most confirmed to people who will actually read them is the fact that The Obama Administration orchestrated a coup attempt against an incoming President. ( as a lot of us have said)
I am amazed at the loons who think that it is okay simply because they hated Trump.

One of Trump’s appointed liars suddenly unearths evidence. So where is it? You fools keep talking about evidence of crimes, and yet you can’t evennname a crime that was committed or produce evidence of what you say.

Nothing was suddenly "unearthed"
The documents were just declassified.

Bullshit. These people in Justice and the White House all have top level security clearances. These clowns are manufacturing lies to prove their conspiracy theories. The Trump Administration has an abyssmal track record of promoting Russian based lies and conspiracy theories, and promising us evidence and that never ever materializes.

Where's the proof that Obama wire tapped Trump Tower? Trump had this investigated six ways to Sunday? Where is the evidence of ANY of the allegations that Trump has made against President Obama. Dumb Donald can't even tell us what it is that Obama did that is illegal.

Why hasn't HIllary Clinton been prosecuted for her "crimes"? Mike Pompeo investigated for two years. Prosecutor Huber investigated for two years. The Senate investigated for two years. The IG investigated for two years. Where's the evidence, the witnesses the charges? How much money was spent on these invesetigations?

Where's all this evidence that Rudy was finding on the Bidens? What about Crowdstrike.

THREE YEARS AND NOT A SINGLE CHARGE AGAINST THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION. 8 CONVICTIONS AGAINST THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION.

 

[Meister]

No doubt, Hillary would have pushed the reset button with them

 

[Augustine_]

Why the heck wouldn't they.......they already had a history of being able to bribe the Clinton Crime Family.

"Ex-NSC chief: House Intelligence Committee staff found John Brennan 'suppressed' Russia evidence
House Intelligence Committee staff said former CIA Director John Brennan "suppressed" intelligence indicating that Russia wanted Hillary Clinton to win the 2016 election, according to John Bolton’s former chief of staff.
The Senate Intelligence Committee released a report on Tuesday that defended the 2017 intelligence community assessment on Russian election interference and determined with "moderate" to "high" confidence that Russian President Vladimir Putin and the Kremlin sought to boost President Trump's 2016 election chances.

One day later, Fred Fleitz, a former CIA officer and National Security Council chief of staff, wrote in a Fox News opinion piece that House Intelligence Committee members "found the opposite" motivations for Russia to interfere in the presidential contest.

...Brennan suppressed facts or analysis that showed why it was not in Russia’s interests to support Trump and why Putin stood to benefit from Hillary Clinton’s election. They also told me that Brennan suppressed that intelligence over the objections of CIA analysts," Fleitz wrote.


...Putin actually wanted the more predictable and malleable Clinton to win the 2016 election," he added.


Fleitz concluded his op-ed by touting U.S. Attorney John Durham's review of the Russia investigation, which is reportedly looking into highly sensitive issues, including whether Brennan took politicized actions to pressure the rest of the intelligence community to match his conclusions about Putin’s motivations during the 2016 presidential election.

"One anticipates that a tough lawman like Durham, with confidence from both sides of the political aisle, will finally answer whether the 2017 intelligence community assessment was rigged to hurt Trump politically," he wrote."

Ex-NSC chief: House Intelligence Committee staff found John Brennan ‘suppressed’ Russia evidence - Washington Examiner

House Intelligence Committee staff said former CIA Director John Brennan "suppressed" intelligence indicating that Russia wanted Hillary Clinton to win the 2016 election, according to John Bolton’s former chief of staff.The Senate Intelligence Committee released a report on Tuesday that defended...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

^

 

[PoliticalChic]

No doubt, Hillary would have pushed the reset button with them

Remember Hussein offering Putin a quid pro quo?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Why the heck wouldn't they.......they already had a history of being able to bribe the Clinton Crime Family.

"Ex-NSC chief: House Intelligence Committee staff found John Brennan 'suppressed' Russia evidence
House Intelligence Committee staff said former CIA Director John Brennan "suppressed" intelligence indicating that Russia wanted Hillary Clinton to win the 2016 election, according to John Bolton’s former chief of staff.
The Senate Intelligence Committee released a report on Tuesday that defended the 2017 intelligence community assessment on Russian election interference and determined with "moderate" to "high" confidence that Russian President Vladimir Putin and the Kremlin sought to boost President Trump's 2016 election chances.

One day later, Fred Fleitz, a former CIA officer and National Security Council chief of staff, wrote in a Fox News opinion piece that House Intelligence Committee members "found the opposite" motivations for Russia to interfere in the presidential contest.

...Brennan suppressed facts or analysis that showed why it was not in Russia’s interests to support Trump and why Putin stood to benefit from Hillary Clinton’s election. They also told me that Brennan suppressed that intelligence over the objections of CIA analysts," Fleitz wrote.


...Putin actually wanted the more predictable and malleable Clinton to win the 2016 election," he added.


Fleitz concluded his op-ed by touting U.S. Attorney John Durham's review of the Russia investigation, which is reportedly looking into highly sensitive issues, including whether Brennan took politicized actions to pressure the rest of the intelligence community to match his conclusions about Putin’s motivations during the 2016 presidential election.

"One anticipates that a tough lawman like Durham, with confidence from both sides of the political aisle, will finally answer whether the 2017 intelligence community assessment was rigged to hurt Trump politically," he wrote."

Ex-NSC chief: House Intelligence Committee staff found John Brennan ‘suppressed’ Russia evidence - Washington Examiner

House Intelligence Committee staff said former CIA Director John Brennan "suppressed" intelligence indicating that Russia wanted Hillary Clinton to win the 2016 election, according to John Bolton’s former chief of staff.The Senate Intelligence Committee released a report on Tuesday that defended...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

^

Difficult for you to admit how truly stupid you've been for four years.


Probably much longer.....how old are you again???

 

[colfax_m]

So why hasn’t anyone seen this information?

 

[Billiejeens]

Ed Henry pointed out that Fred Fleitz — a 25-year veteran of the CIA and the State Department — first spotlighted this damning information in a recent column.

“Fred Fleitz should get credit for this,” Henry said. “He was a former Chief of Staff at the National Security Council under President Trump. Fleitz [wrote] that Brennan suppressed some of the intel that suggested that Russia wanted Clinton to win. I separately have an intelligence source tonight who confirmed that that information is one of the four or five other batches of intel that Rick Grenell is declassifying.”

(Source: Tucker Carlson Tonight)

BJ
As all the documents trickle out what is most confirmed to people who will actually read them is the fact that The Obama Administration orchestrated a coup attempt against an incoming President. ( as a lot of us have said)
I am amazed at the loons who think that it is okay simply because they hated Trump.

One of Trump’s appointed liars suddenly unearths evidence. So where is it? You fools keep talking about evidence of crimes, and yet you can’t evennname a crime that was committed or produce evidence of what you say.

Nothing was suddenly "unearthed"
The documents were just declassified.

Bullshit. These people in Justice and the White House all have top level security clearances. These clowns are manufacturing lies to prove their conspiracy theories. The Trump Administration has an abyssmal track record of promoting Russian based lies and conspiracy theories, and promising us evidence and that never ever materializes.

Where's the proof that Obama wire tapped Trump Tower? Trump had this investigated six ways to Sunday? Where is the evidence of ANY of the allegations that Trump has made against President Obama. Dumb Donald can't even tell us what it is that Obama did that is illegal.

Why hasn't HIllary Clinton been prosecuted for her "crimes"? Mike Pompeo investigated for two years. Prosecutor Huber investigated for two years. The Senate investigated for two years. The IG investigated for two years. Where's the evidence, the witnesses the charges? How much money was spent on these invesetigations?

Where's all this evidence that Rudy was finding on the Bidens? What about Crowdstrike.

THREE YEARS AND NOT A SINGLE CHARGE AGAINST THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION. 8 CONVICTIONS AGAINST THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION.

So uninformed.

 

[Augustine_]

 

[Augustine_]

So why hasn’t anyone seen this information?

Can't see something that never existed

 

[WTH_Progs?]

You mean all this time I've tried to explain to PROGS that all countries "ATTACK a SNOWFLAKE'S DEMOCRACY" with foreign and at home election "INTERFERENCE" including Russian interests for Clinton is actually true? Weird

And and it's like way more common now because of globalization, technology and web? Double Weird

Poor poor PROGS, their democracy fell under attack - need a blanket, sucker and pin wheel, and someone to bask with in victim roles

 

[rightwinger]

The Kremlin wanted Hillary to win
That is why they hacked the RNC servers and leaked what they found.

Oh wait.......that was the DNC servers

 

[airplanemechanic]

So why hasn’t anyone seen this information?

Can't see something that never existed

Never stopped libtards with Trump Russia collusion. They've been "seeing" something that has not been there for years.

 

[airplanemechanic]

The Kremlin wanted Hillary to win
That is why they hacked the RNC servers and leaked what they found.

Oh wait.......that was the DNC servers

Yep and the RNC reported unsuccessful attacks on their servers. Can't help it if the DNC doesn't know how to protect their shit.

 

[PoliticalChic]

So why hasn’t anyone seen this information?

Take the blinders off.


I might have posted this a much as three years ago:

Russia is a dictatorship.
Nothing emanates from Moscow without Putin's imprimatur....
The 'information' in the infamous 'dossier' came from Russia.

Now.....if Putin wanted Trump to win.......would there have ever.......ever.....been a dossier?????


QED......the candidate of Vladimir Putin was Hillary Clinton and the Democrats.

So why hasn’t anyone seen this information?

Can't see something that never existed

"The deniers first deceive themselves that they are sincere in their adherence to falsehoods. Thus they cannot be faulted for acting on genuinely held views. But in truth, they have cultivated an ignorance of the facts, what Thomas Aquinas called ignorantia affectata. An ignorance so useful that one protects it at all costs, in order to continue using it in one’s own self interest. This ignorance is not exculpatory, but inculpatory. Forgive them not, for they know full well what they do.' RICHARD BADALAMENTE

 

[Augustine_]

So why hasn’t anyone seen this information?

Can't see something that never existed

Never stopped libtards with Trump Russia collusion. They've been "seeing" something that has not been there for years.

Trump's self-declared, dictatorial style immunity is now in front of the Supreme Court. He'll be joining all the others that went to jail for crimes committed in the name of helping Trump and Russia.