Docs show John Brennan suppressed intel showing Russia actually wanted Hillary to win

Why the heck wouldn't they.......they already had a history of being able to bribe the Clinton Crime Family.

"Ex-NSC chief: House Intelligence Committee staff found John Brennan 'suppressed' Russia evidence
House Intelligence Committee staff said former CIA Director John Brennan "suppressed" intelligence indicating that Russia wanted Hillary Clinton to win the 2016 election, according to John Boltonā€™s former chief of staff.
The Senate Intelligence Committee released a report on Tuesday that defended the 2017 intelligence community assessment on Russian election interference and determined with "moderate" to "high" confidence that Russian President Vladimir Putin and the Kremlin sought to boost President Trump's 2016 election chances.

One day later, Fred Fleitz, a former CIA officer and National Security Council chief of staff, wrote in a Fox News opinion piece that House Intelligence Committee members "found the opposite" motivations for Russia to interfere in the presidential contest.

...Brennan suppressed facts or analysis that showed why it was not in Russiaā€™s interests to support Trump and why Putin stood to benefit from Hillary Clintonā€™s election. They also told me that Brennan suppressed that intelligence over the objections of CIA analysts," Fleitz wrote.


...Putin actually wanted the more predictable and malleable Clinton to win the 2016 election," he added.


Fleitz concluded his op-ed by touting U.S. Attorney John Durham's review of the Russia investigation, which is reportedly looking into highly sensitive issues, including whether Brennan took politicized actions to pressure the rest of the intelligence community to match his conclusions about Putinā€™s motivations during the 2016 presidential election.

"One anticipates that a tough lawman like Durham, with confidence from both sides of the political aisle, will finally answer whether the 2017 intelligence community assessment was rigged to hurt Trump politically," he wrote."


An interesting take I suppose, I would have thought the opposite. Certainly control is a major motivation for some, and they probably knew a great deal more regarding how Clinton would act in a situation, while trump is always a Wild Card.



They had a history of bribing the Clintons.

The Clintons sold out America before:

"Two decades ago, the media werenā€™t obsessed with Chinese interference in a presidential election.

.... involving Communist China ā€” that developed during Bill Clintonā€™s 1996 reelection campaign. The Washington Post reported in 1998 that ā€œevidence gathered in federal surveillance intercepts has indicated that the Chinese government planned to increase Chinaā€™s influence in the U.S. political process in 1996.ā€

Read more at: Not All Foreign-Influence Scandals Are Created Equal | National Review.

The most suspect funds were brought in by Johnny Chung, a bagman for the Asian billionaire Riady family. Chung confessed that at least $35,000 of his donations to the Clinton campaign and the DNC had come from a Chinese aerospace executive ā€” a lieutenant colonel in the Chinese military. Chung said the executive had helped him meet three times with General Ji Shengde, the head of Chinese military intelligence. According to Chungā€™s testimony, General Shengde had told him: ā€œWe really like your president. We hope he will be reelected. I will give you $300,000 U.S. dollars. You can give it to . . . your president and the Democratic party.ā€



The sprawling fundraising scandal ultimately led to 22 guilty pleas on various violations of election laws. Among the Clinton fundraisers and friends who pleaded guilty were John Huang, Charlie Trie, James Riady, and Michael Brown, son of the late Clinton Commerce secretary Ron Brown. "



Read more at: Not All Foreign-Influence Scandals Are Created Equal | National Review




Now.....what did Bill Clinton give the Chinese to engender the 'donations'???

Flashback: Bill Clinton gave China missile technology
As president, Bill Clinton essentially wiped out any strategic advantage the U.S. had by selling advanced U.S. missile technology to our enemy, the Peopleā€™s Republic of China.

That ā€œadministrationā€™s voluntary release of all the secrets of Americaā€™s nuclear tests, combined with the systematic theft of the secrets that were left as a result of its lax security controls, effectively wiped out Americaā€™s technological edge,ā€ David Horowitz writes in the recently published, The Black Book of the American Left Volume 7: The Left in Power: Clinton to Obama.

ā€œOne of the key technological breaks China received, without having to spy to get it, was the deliverance of supercomputers once banned from export for security reasons,ā€ writes Horowitz.

ā€œSupercomputers underpin the technology of nuclear and missile warfare, and not only for firing and controlling the missiles. A supercomputer can simulate a nuclear test and is thus crucial to the development of nuclear warheads. But, according to a Washington Post editorial: ā€˜In the first three quarters of 1998 nine times as many [supercomputers] were exported [to China] as during the previous seven years.ā€™ā€

.... helped a company called Loral Space get seats on official trade missions. He reportedly convinced the Clinton administration to overrule national security officials in order win approval for a Loral deal that gave Red China critical missile technology. Loralā€™s chief executive officer became the Democratic National Committeeā€™s largest donor ...."



Chinagate:
Attempts were made by Communist China to funnel money to the Clinton campaign and influence elections in 1996. Charlie Trie, one of Bills trusted DNC fundraisers, attempted to funnel this money. When faced with indictment he fled to China for refuge. Another money funneler for the communists and Clinton campaign, Johnny Chung, is now in jail. The funds came from divisions of the Chinese army, one of which had been caught only months earlier while attempting to smuggle AK-47's to LA street gangs. This is the government of RED CHINA - definitely a serious matter. If any scandals do catch up with him, which probably will happen, this is by far the worst. Amidst the sex scandals another DNC fundraiser scandal, Johnny Chung, openly admitted to knowingly taking funds from the Chinese government. Chung also testified that the DNC knew the source of this money was communist China. They accepted it anyway. The money is said to have been funneled through Chinese government official Liu Chao-ying then Chung and then to the DNC. Even more revealing was that Liu Chao-ying, daughter of Liu Hauqing (recent head of the Chinese military and top official of the Chinese communist party) and a Peoples Liberation Army and Chinese space agency official, attended a DNC fundraiser. Here she was photographed with Clinton. Chung also visited the White House over 45 times. Chung took several thousand dollars from commies and contributed them to a partisan candidate for President of the United States and leader of the free world. Chung was only a powerful campaign contributer/supporter with ties to the DNC and White House. Johnny Chung testified under oath to Congress on his admitted relations with the Chinese Commies and the ties to the President. Ironically Chung is one of a very small number of people who had greater White House access than Monica Lewinsky! Chung is said to have made over 50 visits compared to Monica's 39! Even better, only a week later Charlie Trie entered a guilty plea for his fundraising crimes and agreed to talk with investigators! Who next? Well it happened to be John Huang! Huang, another Clinton cronie, pled guilty to funneling Chinese funds less than a week after Trie! Well, at least we know the commies endorse Bill Clinton for president.
The Clintongate Administration



1. Hughes Electronics and Loral Space & Communications Ltd. are both under investigation by the Justice Department and two Congressional committees for their role in transferring sensitive U.S. space technology to the Chinese after Hughes and Loral satellites were destroyed in two Chinese rocket explosions.
A House-Senate conference has agreed to transfer export licensing authority, reversing a 1996 decision by President Clinton that came under fire this year amid allegations of unauthorized technology transfers to China and favoritism to a big campaign contributor.
Washingtonpost.com: Key Stories on Chinese Missile Allegations

2. China Resources Holding Company of Hong Kong is said to be the commercial arm of China's Ministry of Foreign Trade, and according to western intelligence sources, this international bank serves as a front for Chinese intelligence. China Resources owns half interest in Hong Kong Chinese Bank. The other half is owned by the Lippo Group, an Indonesian banking and real estate conglomerate which had close ties to President Clinton before all hell broke loose over illegal campaign contributions.

The so called campaign contribution scandal, as labeled by the national media, is actually a classical foreign intelligence operation which exploited corruptible politicians and lax security for strategic financial gain. China's intelligence interest and investments in Clinton is now bearing fruit in a windfall of one sided trade deals with the United States
Red Chinese Threat

3.Chung gave $10,000 to Kerry's campaign -- most of it illegally -- hosted a fund-raising party in Beverly Hills, and threw in an extra $10,000 to honor Kerry at a Democratic Senate Campaign Committee event. Kerry eventually returned all the Chung money.
More than anything else, the saga of John Kerry, Johnny Chung and Liu Chao Ying, as laid out in a series of interviews, court records, campaign finance disclosure forms and bank documents obtained by NBC News, is a story of what can happen when the pursuit of campaign cash gets out of hand. Kerry's Chinese campaign connections - Nightly News - msnbc.com

4. NEW DETAILS HAVE EMERGED ABOUT AN ALLEGED CONTRIBUTION OF
ABOUT 100-THOUSAND DOLLARS FROM A CHINESE MILITARY AEROSPACE
OFFICER TO THE 1986 CLINTON-GORE REELECTION TREASURY. NEW ALLEGATIONS ABOUT A CLINTON "CHINA CONNECTION"
 
How about behind-doors sworn testimony?
If such testimony existed, it wouldnā€™t have been covered up by Devin Nunes.


Just declassified and released by Grenell.

Nunes has not had difficulty declassifying information in the past.

Oh, and nothing of the sort has been released.


That's a lie.


After four years of lying to the American people, newly released documents find that every Obama official admitted that here was neverā€¦.NEVERā€¦even a hint of collusion.



ā€œOther newly declassified transcripts released Thursday by the House Intelligence Committee revealed that top Obama administration officials had no concrete evidence that the Trump campaigned colluded with Russia in the 2016 Election.

The transcripts come from 57 witnesses who were interviewed by the committee during the Trump Russia probe. Obama's National Security Advisor Susan Rice and Former Attorney General Loretta Lynch were among those who gave their testimony.

In her interview with the House Intelligence Committee, conducted on September 8, 2017, Rice admitted there 'wasn't anything smoking' that showed the Trump campaign had helped with Russia's election meddling.

'I don't recall intelligence that I would consider evidence to that effect... prior to my departure,' she stated.

ā€¦former AG Loretta Lynch similarly stated that she 'could not say' whether evidence of collusion, coordination or conspiracy existed when she gave her interview on October 20, 2017.

Other officials who worked in the Obama Administration were also asked about whether or not there was any concrete evidence they had seen.

Former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper stated: 'I never saw any direct empirical evidence that the Trump campaign or someone in it was plotting/conspiring with the Russians to meddle with the election.

'That's not to say that there weren't concerns about the evidence we were seeing, anecdotal evidence. ... But I do not recall any instance where I had direct evidence.'

Samantha Power, who was appointed by Obama to be the US Ambassador to the United Nations, was also among the 57 interviewees probed by the House Intelligence Committee.

'I am not in possession of anythingā€”I am not in possession and didn't read or absorb information that came from out of the intelligence community,' Power stated, according to the newly released transcripts.ā€ Obama surprised DoJ officials with knowledge of Michael Flynn's calls
 
How about behind-doors sworn testimony?
If such testimony existed, it wouldnā€™t have been covered up by Devin Nunes.


Just declassified and released by Grenell.

Nunes has not had difficulty declassifying information in the past.

Oh, and nothing of the sort has been released.


That's a lie.


After four years of lying to the American people, newly released documents find that every Obama official admitted that here was neverā€¦.NEVERā€¦even a hint of collusion.



ā€œOther newly declassified transcripts released Thursday by the House Intelligence Committee revealed that top Obama administration officials had no concrete evidence that the Trump campaigned colluded with Russia in the 2016 Election.

The transcripts come from 57 witnesses who were interviewed by the committee during the Trump Russia probe. Obama's National Security Advisor Susan Rice and Former Attorney General Loretta Lynch were among those who gave their testimony.

In her interview with the House Intelligence Committee, conducted on September 8, 2017, Rice admitted there 'wasn't anything smoking' that showed the Trump campaign had helped with Russia's election meddling.

'I don't recall intelligence that I would consider evidence to that effect... prior to my departure,' she stated.

ā€¦former AG Loretta Lynch similarly stated that she 'could not say' whether evidence of collusion, coordination or conspiracy existed when she gave her interview on October 20, 2017.

Other officials who worked in the Obama Administration were also asked about whether or not there was any concrete evidence they had seen.

Former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper stated: 'I never saw any direct empirical evidence that the Trump campaign or someone in it was plotting/conspiring with the Russians to meddle with the election.

'That's not to say that there weren't concerns about the evidence we were seeing, anecdotal evidence. ... But I do not recall any instance where I had direct evidence.'

Samantha Power, who was appointed by Obama to be the US Ambassador to the United Nations, was also among the 57 interviewees probed by the House Intelligence Committee.

'I am not in possession of anythingā€”I am not in possession and didn't read or absorb information that came from out of the intelligence community,' Power stated, according to the newly released transcripts.ā€ Obama surprised DoJ officials with knowledge of Michael Flynn's calls


YOU'RE A LIE
 
It is quite clear they wanted Trump to win, this is supported by multiple intelligence agencies in more than one country. Trump is an easily placated dupe who admires dictators and bows to flattery. He was trying to remove sanctions from day one. Hilary is a tough bitch who already had several fights with Russia when she was Sec of State. In addition they could count on Trump to further divide, polarize and destabilize our institutions.

Trumpists and their conspiracy theories. This is just another one that ignores the realities on the ground.



I have your new avi here:


1589389515525.png
 
Why the heck wouldn't they.......they already had a history of being able to bribe the Clinton Crime Family.

"Ex-NSC chief: House Intelligence Committee staff found John Brennan 'suppressed' Russia evidence
House Intelligence Committee staff said former CIA Director John Brennan "suppressed" intelligence indicating that Russia wanted Hillary Clinton to win the 2016 election, according to John Boltonā€™s former chief of staff.
The Senate Intelligence Committee released a report on Tuesday that defended the 2017 intelligence community assessment on Russian election interference and determined with "moderate" to "high" confidence that Russian President Vladimir Putin and the Kremlin sought to boost President Trump's 2016 election chances.

One day later, Fred Fleitz, a former CIA officer and National Security Council chief of staff, wrote in a Fox News opinion piece that House Intelligence Committee members "found the opposite" motivations for Russia to interfere in the presidential contest.

...Brennan suppressed facts or analysis that showed why it was not in Russiaā€™s interests to support Trump and why Putin stood to benefit from Hillary Clintonā€™s election. They also told me that Brennan suppressed that intelligence over the objections of CIA analysts," Fleitz wrote.


...Putin actually wanted the more predictable and malleable Clinton to win the 2016 election," he added.


Fleitz concluded his op-ed by touting U.S. Attorney John Durham's review of the Russia investigation, which is reportedly looking into highly sensitive issues, including whether Brennan took politicized actions to pressure the rest of the intelligence community to match his conclusions about Putinā€™s motivations during the 2016 presidential election.

"One anticipates that a tough lawman like Durham, with confidence from both sides of the political aisle, will finally answer whether the 2017 intelligence community assessment was rigged to hurt Trump politically," he wrote."


I suppose that is why Russia hacked the DNC servers and John Podesta's e-mails. Why a faked memo using the letterhead of a Democrat Senator saying the fix was in. Why Paul Manafort gave internal polling data and other campaign information to a business associate with ties to Russian Intelligence. Why Russia launched pro-Trump ads on social media.

The House Intelligence Committee's investigation was a fraud. Republicans knew what it would say when they started. The Senate Intelligence Committee displayed no such bias.
 
Why the heck wouldn't they.......they already had a history of being able to bribe the Clinton Crime Family.

"Ex-NSC chief: House Intelligence Committee staff found John Brennan 'suppressed' Russia evidence
House Intelligence Committee staff said former CIA Director John Brennan "suppressed" intelligence indicating that Russia wanted Hillary Clinton to win the 2016 election, according to John Boltonā€™s former chief of staff.
The Senate Intelligence Committee released a report on Tuesday that defended the 2017 intelligence community assessment on Russian election interference and determined with "moderate" to "high" confidence that Russian President Vladimir Putin and the Kremlin sought to boost President Trump's 2016 election chances.

One day later, Fred Fleitz, a former CIA officer and National Security Council chief of staff, wrote in a Fox News opinion piece that House Intelligence Committee members "found the opposite" motivations for Russia to interfere in the presidential contest.

...Brennan suppressed facts or analysis that showed why it was not in Russiaā€™s interests to support Trump and why Putin stood to benefit from Hillary Clintonā€™s election. They also told me that Brennan suppressed that intelligence over the objections of CIA analysts," Fleitz wrote.


...Putin actually wanted the more predictable and malleable Clinton to win the 2016 election," he added.


Fleitz concluded his op-ed by touting U.S. Attorney John Durham's review of the Russia investigation, which is reportedly looking into highly sensitive issues, including whether Brennan took politicized actions to pressure the rest of the intelligence community to match his conclusions about Putinā€™s motivations during the 2016 presidential election.

"One anticipates that a tough lawman like Durham, with confidence from both sides of the political aisle, will finally answer whether the 2017 intelligence community assessment was rigged to hurt Trump politically," he wrote."


An interesting take I suppose, I would have thought the opposite. Certainly control is a major motivation for some, and they probably knew a great deal more regarding how Clinton would act in a situation, while trump is always a Wild Card.



They had a history of bribing the Clintons.

The Clintons sold out America before:

"Two decades ago, the media werenā€™t obsessed with Chinese interference in a presidential election.

.... involving Communist China ā€” that developed during Bill Clintonā€™s 1996 reelection campaign. The Washington Post reported in 1998 that ā€œevidence gathered in federal surveillance intercepts has indicated that the Chinese government planned to increase Chinaā€™s influence in the U.S. political process in 1996.ā€

Read more at: Not All Foreign-Influence Scandals Are Created Equal | National Review.

The most suspect funds were brought in by Johnny Chung, a bagman for the Asian billionaire Riady family. Chung confessed that at least $35,000 of his donations to the Clinton campaign and the DNC had come from a Chinese aerospace executive ā€” a lieutenant colonel in the Chinese military. Chung said the executive had helped him meet three times with General Ji Shengde, the head of Chinese military intelligence. According to Chungā€™s testimony, General Shengde had told him: ā€œWe really like your president. We hope he will be reelected. I will give you $300,000 U.S. dollars. You can give it to . . . your president and the Democratic party.ā€



The sprawling fundraising scandal ultimately led to 22 guilty pleas on various violations of election laws. Among the Clinton fundraisers and friends who pleaded guilty were John Huang, Charlie Trie, James Riady, and Michael Brown, son of the late Clinton Commerce secretary Ron Brown. "



Read more at: Not All Foreign-Influence Scandals Are Created Equal | National Review




Now.....what did Bill Clinton give the Chinese to engender the 'donations'???

Flashback: Bill Clinton gave China missile technology
As president, Bill Clinton essentially wiped out any strategic advantage the U.S. had by selling advanced U.S. missile technology to our enemy, the Peopleā€™s Republic of China.

That ā€œadministrationā€™s voluntary release of all the secrets of Americaā€™s nuclear tests, combined with the systematic theft of the secrets that were left as a result of its lax security controls, effectively wiped out Americaā€™s technological edge,ā€ David Horowitz writes in the recently published, The Black Book of the American Left Volume 7: The Left in Power: Clinton to Obama.

ā€œOne of the key technological breaks China received, without having to spy to get it, was the deliverance of supercomputers once banned from export for security reasons,ā€ writes Horowitz.

ā€œSupercomputers underpin the technology of nuclear and missile warfare, and not only for firing and controlling the missiles. A supercomputer can simulate a nuclear test and is thus crucial to the development of nuclear warheads. But, according to a Washington Post editorial: ā€˜In the first three quarters of 1998 nine times as many [supercomputers] were exported [to China] as during the previous seven years.ā€™ā€

.... helped a company called Loral Space get seats on official trade missions. He reportedly convinced the Clinton administration to overrule national security officials in order win approval for a Loral deal that gave Red China critical missile technology. Loralā€™s chief executive officer became the Democratic National Committeeā€™s largest donor ...."



Chinagate:
Attempts were made by Communist China to funnel money to the Clinton campaign and influence elections in 1996. Charlie Trie, one of Bills trusted DNC fundraisers, attempted to funnel this money. When faced with indictment he fled to China for refuge. Another money funneler for the communists and Clinton campaign, Johnny Chung, is now in jail. The funds came from divisions of the Chinese army, one of which had been caught only months earlier while attempting to smuggle AK-47's to LA street gangs. This is the government of RED CHINA - definitely a serious matter. If any scandals do catch up with him, which probably will happen, this is by far the worst. Amidst the sex scandals another DNC fundraiser scandal, Johnny Chung, openly admitted to knowingly taking funds from the Chinese government. Chung also testified that the DNC knew the source of this money was communist China. They accepted it anyway. The money is said to have been funneled through Chinese government official Liu Chao-ying then Chung and then to the DNC. Even more revealing was that Liu Chao-ying, daughter of Liu Hauqing (recent head of the Chinese military and top official of the Chinese communist party) and a Peoples Liberation Army and Chinese space agency official, attended a DNC fundraiser. Here she was photographed with Clinton. Chung also visited the White House over 45 times. Chung took several thousand dollars from commies and contributed them to a partisan candidate for President of the United States and leader of the free world. Chung was only a powerful campaign contributer/supporter with ties to the DNC and White House. Johnny Chung testified under oath to Congress on his admitted relations with the Chinese Commies and the ties to the President. Ironically Chung is one of a very small number of people who had greater White House access than Monica Lewinsky! Chung is said to have made over 50 visits compared to Monica's 39! Even better, only a week later Charlie Trie entered a guilty plea for his fundraising crimes and agreed to talk with investigators! Who next? Well it happened to be John Huang! Huang, another Clinton cronie, pled guilty to funneling Chinese funds less than a week after Trie! Well, at least we know the commies endorse Bill Clinton for president.
The Clintongate Administration



1. Hughes Electronics and Loral Space & Communications Ltd. are both under investigation by the Justice Department and two Congressional committees for their role in transferring sensitive U.S. space technology to the Chinese after Hughes and Loral satellites were destroyed in two Chinese rocket explosions.
A House-Senate conference has agreed to transfer export licensing authority, reversing a 1996 decision by President Clinton that came under fire this year amid allegations of unauthorized technology transfers to China and favoritism to a big campaign contributor.
Washingtonpost.com: Key Stories on Chinese Missile Allegations

2. China Resources Holding Company of Hong Kong is said to be the commercial arm of China's Ministry of Foreign Trade, and according to western intelligence sources, this international bank serves as a front for Chinese intelligence. China Resources owns half interest in Hong Kong Chinese Bank. The other half is owned by the Lippo Group, an Indonesian banking and real estate conglomerate which had close ties to President Clinton before all hell broke loose over illegal campaign contributions.

The so called campaign contribution scandal, as labeled by the national media, is actually a classical foreign intelligence operation which exploited corruptible politicians and lax security for strategic financial gain. China's intelligence interest and investments in Clinton is now bearing fruit in a windfall of one sided trade deals with the United States
Red Chinese Threat

3.Chung gave $10,000 to Kerry's campaign -- most of it illegally -- hosted a fund-raising party in Beverly Hills, and threw in an extra $10,000 to honor Kerry at a Democratic Senate Campaign Committee event. Kerry eventually returned all the Chung money.
More than anything else, the saga of John Kerry, Johnny Chung and Liu Chao Ying, as laid out in a series of interviews, court records, campaign finance disclosure forms and bank documents obtained by NBC News, is a story of what can happen when the pursuit of campaign cash gets out of hand. Kerry's Chinese campaign connections - Nightly News - msnbc.com

4. NEW DETAILS HAVE EMERGED ABOUT AN ALLEGED CONTRIBUTION OF
ABOUT 100-THOUSAND DOLLARS FROM A CHINESE MILITARY AEROSPACE
OFFICER TO THE 1986 CLINTON-GORE REELECTION TREASURY. NEW ALLEGATIONS ABOUT A CLINTON "CHINA CONNECTION"


Thank You.
 
How about behind-doors sworn testimony?
If such testimony existed, it wouldnā€™t have been covered up by Devin Nunes.


Just declassified and released by Grenell.

Nunes has not had difficulty declassifying information in the past.

Oh, and nothing of the sort has been released.


That's a lie.


After four years of lying to the American people, newly released documents find that every Obama official admitted that here was neverā€¦.NEVERā€¦even a hint of collusion.



ā€œOther newly declassified transcripts released Thursday by the House Intelligence Committee revealed that top Obama administration officials had no concrete evidence that the Trump campaigned colluded with Russia in the 2016 Election.

The transcripts come from 57 witnesses who were interviewed by the committee during the Trump Russia probe. Obama's National Security Advisor Susan Rice and Former Attorney General Loretta Lynch were among those who gave their testimony.

In her interview with the House Intelligence Committee, conducted on September 8, 2017, Rice admitted there 'wasn't anything smoking' that showed the Trump campaign had helped with Russia's election meddling.

'I don't recall intelligence that I would consider evidence to that effect... prior to my departure,' she stated.

ā€¦former AG Loretta Lynch similarly stated that she 'could not say' whether evidence of collusion, coordination or conspiracy existed when she gave her interview on October 20, 2017.

Other officials who worked in the Obama Administration were also asked about whether or not there was any concrete evidence they had seen.

Former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper stated: 'I never saw any direct empirical evidence that the Trump campaign or someone in it was plotting/conspiring with the Russians to meddle with the election.

'That's not to say that there weren't concerns about the evidence we were seeing, anecdotal evidence. ... But I do not recall any instance where I had direct evidence.'

Samantha Power, who was appointed by Obama to be the US Ambassador to the United Nations, was also among the 57 interviewees probed by the House Intelligence Committee.

'I am not in possession of anythingā€”I am not in possession and didn't read or absorb information that came from out of the intelligence community,' Power stated, according to the newly released transcripts.ā€ Obama surprised DoJ officials with knowledge of Michael Flynn's calls



Needs repeated.

After four years of lying to the American people, newly released documents find that every Obama official admitted that here was neverā€¦.NEVERā€¦even a hint of collusion.
 
Barry KNEW!
Biden KNEW!
Rice KNEW!
Powers KNEW!
Rosenstein KNEW!
Brennan KNEW!
Clapper KNEW!
Comey KNEW!
McCabe KNEW!
Strzok KNEW!
Page KNEW!
Baker KNEW!
Clinesmith KNEW!
Schiff KNEW!
.
.
.
.
 
Now.....if Putin wanted Trump to win.......would there have ever.......ever.....been a dossier?????
Why didnā€™t the Clinton campaign go with the dossier? Why wasnā€™t it actually published before the election?

Because no one took it seriously. If Putin wanted to harm Trump, the dossier wouldnā€™t have contained stories of Trump getting golden showers.


It was.

Buzzfeed.

It was published by Buzzfeed on Jan 10 2017.

When was the election?



Used throughout the hoax by the Deep State.


ā€œWASHINGTON ā€“ Acting Director of National Intelligence Richard Grenell has sought to declassify a list of former Obama administration officials who were allegedly involved in the so-called ā€œunmaskingā€ of former national security adviser Michael Flynn in his conversations with the former Russian ambassador during the presidential transition, a senior U.S. official tells ABC News.ā€



Any Obama officials involved in Flynn 'unmasking' declassified: Source


Acting DNI Grenell has sought to declassify a list of former Obama administration officials who were allegedly involved in the so-called 'unmasking' of Michael Flynn.

abcnews.go.com




The FBI could not hide the illegality of the plot without pro forma FISA warrants, to ā€˜legallyā€™ allow them to spy on opponents. The apologists have denied that the bogus Steele/Putin dossier was used to get the warrants. In those declassified interviews, McCabe says otherwise:

Gowdy asks: ā€œā€¦did the Bureau rely on what has come to be known as a dossier in any form, and if so, how? MR. MCCABE: So very generally, sir, we did not rely on the Steele reporting for the opening of the investigation into possible Russian influence on the 2016 election, but we did rely on that reporting in the FISA applicationā€ https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/am33.pdf




"FBI Director James Comey has been caught going around to secret Congressional briefings in ā€œrecent weeksā€ touting the lurid fake ā€œTrump dossier.ā€ He has been claiming that it is a major foundation of the FBIā€™s investigation of purported Russian collusion with Trump to interfere in the electionā€”months after the FBI had already assessed the ā€œdossierā€ as non-credible."
The Final Truth about the ā€œTrump Dossierā€



"...a major foundation of the FBIā€™s investigation of purported Russian collusion with Trump...."
Even when he already knew it was "non-credible

Non-credible....


"The Department of Justice used the unverified dossier to obtain a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrant against Carter Page, an alleged "foreign policy adviser" to Donald Trump and the last frayed thread of the Russian collusion story. The FISA court was not told who had paid Steele to create the "salacious and unverified" dossier -- in the words of the showboating former FBI Director James Comey -- much less about Steele's personal hatred of Trump. Carter Page: Agent 000

When an investigation is begun without a predicate, without a crimeā€¦.you rely on Putinā€™s fake dossier.

It is not illegal to unmask someone as long as you have the proper security clearances. A fact you conveniently ignore.

The dossier was not bogus. It was right in at least 2 instances. It was not the only part of the FISA document. Even Devin Nunes had to admit that.

Lying Chick.
 
How about behind-doors sworn testimony?
If such testimony existed, it wouldnā€™t have been covered up by Devin Nunes.


Just declassified and released by Grenell.

Nunes has not had difficulty declassifying information in the past.

Oh, and nothing of the sort has been released.


That's a lie.


After four years of lying to the American people, newly released documents find that every Obama official admitted that here was neverā€¦.NEVERā€¦even a hint of collusion.



ā€œOther newly declassified transcripts released Thursday by the House Intelligence Committee revealed that top Obama administration officials had no concrete evidence that the Trump campaigned colluded with Russia in the 2016 Election.

The transcripts come from 57 witnesses who were interviewed by the committee during the Trump Russia probe. Obama's National Security Advisor Susan Rice and Former Attorney General Loretta Lynch were among those who gave their testimony.

In her interview with the House Intelligence Committee, conducted on September 8, 2017, Rice admitted there 'wasn't anything smoking' that showed the Trump campaign had helped with Russia's election meddling.

'I don't recall intelligence that I would consider evidence to that effect... prior to my departure,' she stated.

ā€¦former AG Loretta Lynch similarly stated that she 'could not say' whether evidence of collusion, coordination or conspiracy existed when she gave her interview on October 20, 2017.

Other officials who worked in the Obama Administration were also asked about whether or not there was any concrete evidence they had seen.

Former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper stated: 'I never saw any direct empirical evidence that the Trump campaign or someone in it was plotting/conspiring with the Russians to meddle with the election.

'That's not to say that there weren't concerns about the evidence we were seeing, anecdotal evidence. ... But I do not recall any instance where I had direct evidence.'

Samantha Power, who was appointed by Obama to be the US Ambassador to the United Nations, was also among the 57 interviewees probed by the House Intelligence Committee.

'I am not in possession of anythingā€”I am not in possession and didn't read or absorb information that came from out of the intelligence community,' Power stated, according to the newly released transcripts.ā€ Obama surprised DoJ officials with knowledge of Michael Flynn's calls



Needs repeated.

After four years of lying to the American people, newly released documents find that every Obama official admitted that here was neverā€¦.NEVERā€¦even a hint of collusion.

The O officials were lying and were in fact colluding themselves.
 
Now.....if Putin wanted Trump to win.......would there have ever.......ever.....been a dossier?????
Why didnā€™t the Clinton campaign go with the dossier? Why wasnā€™t it actually published before the election?

Because no one took it seriously. If Putin wanted to harm Trump, the dossier wouldnā€™t have contained stories of Trump getting golden showers.


It was.

Buzzfeed.

It was published by Buzzfeed on Jan 10 2017.

When was the election?



Used throughout the hoax by the Deep State.


ā€œWASHINGTON ā€“ Acting Director of National Intelligence Richard Grenell has sought to declassify a list of former Obama administration officials who were allegedly involved in the so-called ā€œunmaskingā€ of former national security adviser Michael Flynn in his conversations with the former Russian ambassador during the presidential transition, a senior U.S. official tells ABC News.ā€



Any Obama officials involved in Flynn 'unmasking' declassified: Source


Acting DNI Grenell has sought to declassify a list of former Obama administration officials who were allegedly involved in the so-called 'unmasking' of Michael Flynn.

abcnews.go.com




The FBI could not hide the illegality of the plot without pro forma FISA warrants, to ā€˜legallyā€™ allow them to spy on opponents. The apologists have denied that the bogus Steele/Putin dossier was used to get the warrants. In those declassified interviews, McCabe says otherwise:

Gowdy asks: ā€œā€¦did the Bureau rely on what has come to be known as a dossier in any form, and if so, how? MR. MCCABE: So very generally, sir, we did not rely on the Steele reporting for the opening of the investigation into possible Russian influence on the 2016 election, but we did rely on that reporting in the FISA applicationā€ https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/am33.pdf




"FBI Director James Comey has been caught going around to secret Congressional briefings in ā€œrecent weeksā€ touting the lurid fake ā€œTrump dossier.ā€ He has been claiming that it is a major foundation of the FBIā€™s investigation of purported Russian collusion with Trump to interfere in the electionā€”months after the FBI had already assessed the ā€œdossierā€ as non-credible."
The Final Truth about the ā€œTrump Dossierā€



"...a major foundation of the FBIā€™s investigation of purported Russian collusion with Trump...."
Even when he already knew it was "non-credible

Non-credible....


"The Department of Justice used the unverified dossier to obtain a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrant against Carter Page, an alleged "foreign policy adviser" to Donald Trump and the last frayed thread of the Russian collusion story. The FISA court was not told who had paid Steele to create the "salacious and unverified" dossier -- in the words of the showboating former FBI Director James Comey -- much less about Steele's personal hatred of Trump. Carter Page: Agent 000

When an investigation is begun without a predicate, without a crimeā€¦.you rely on Putinā€™s fake dossier.

It is not illegal to unmask someone as long as you have the proper security clearances. A fact you conveniently ignore.

The dossier was not bogus. It was right in at least 2 instances. It was not the only part of the FISA document. Even Devin Nunes had to admit that.

Lying Chick.

Yes, the dossier was bogus was a fake hit job contracted from clintons research team. This has been proven again and again. Quit lying.
 

Forum List

Back
Top