Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
People with children are moving away...a silent evacuation isn't publicized, stupid.You never did say how that "evacuation" is going, genius. Why so shy?
Weekly Asahi: 70% of children tested in Kanto (a region that includes Tokyo) have radioactive cesium in their urine -Journalist #Fukushima Weekly Asahi: 70% of children tested in Kanto (a region that includes Tokyo) have radioactive cesium in their urine -Journalist #Fukushima
may remember when I came back from Tokyo back in February, I had 5 samples of dirt that I had taken just randomly around the city. They were all over 7,000 disintegrations per second in a two pound bag (Bq/kg). What that told me was that the releases from the accident were really severe even as far away as Tokyo. And I said then that if this were contaminated ground at a nuclear power plant it would have to be considered as nuclear waste. Well, we took a lot flack for that on the Fairewinds site, but we were right on the mark.
What happened just last week was that in a suburb of Tokyo another sample was taken by citizens and they brought it to the attention of the government that then sampled it. But basically they had a hot spot that was in excess of 10,000 disintegrations per second per kilogram of their sample. So here we are 9 months after I took my samples and citizens are still finding hot spots all over the Tokyo area. I think it speaks to one, the magnitude of the initial release. This was a serious release, not just for Fukushima Prefecture but for Tokyo and its suburbs as well. [...]
So if Tokyo could be highly contaminated to the point where its soil should be shipped to a nuclear waste dump [...] if Tokyo can have soil so hot that it should be shipped to a radioactive dump Gundersen: Tokyo soil so hot it should be sent to nuclear waste dump ? Really severe releases hit city (VIDEO)
Japanese Legal Expert: Even residents of Tokyo are evacuating More and more people fleeing Fukushima (VIDEO) Japanese Legal Expert: ?Even residents of Tokyo are evacuating? ? More and more people fleeing Fukushima (VIDEO)
Hi doctor! Do excuse me for asking but I thought it best to do so especially in light of the following two articles that say just the direct opposite. How will we explain your theory to them?It doesn't "become airborne".
https://www.sciencenews.org/article/ebola-may-go-airborne
Could Ebola now be airborne? New research shows lethal virus can be spread from pigs to monkeys without contact | Mail Online
Both of those articles are about the same study, and there are a number of problems with it. It's far from conclusive, and has never been duplicated.
There's a big difference between a virus being "airborne" and a virus carried in exhaled saliva droplets.
People with children are moving away...You never did say how that "evacuation" is going, genius. Why so shy?
Now you're just teasing me...Believe me. This thing could get out of control very quickly.
As long as they are American I'm okay with it. I would want to be brought back to my country for care.
Mary Mallon (September 23, 1869 November 11, 1938), better known as Typhoid Mary, was the first person in the United States identified as an asymptomatic carrier of the pathogen associated with typhoid fever. She was presumed to have infected 51 people, three of whom died, over the course of her career as a cook.[1] She was twice forcibly isolated by public health authorities and died after a total of nearly three decades in isolation Typhoid Mary - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Even if you knew there was great potential risks to American lives in the process?Hi. You and I don't usually agree on things but in this regard I do agree with you. Physicians do take their Hippocratic Oath and are well intentioned to help aid those who are in medical need. They put their life in danger daily with some of their patients. The only thing I have grave concerns about is their bringing those infected with Ebola into this country. I think rather than just leave that matter to the CDC to decide, the President along with Congress should set certain guidelines into law to be followed explicitly under such circumstances when people are infected in another country with a deadly disease and they are being proposed to be brought back into this country. That needs much more thought and careful planning such as to avoid a potential disaster that could happen. I don't believe there would be too many who would disagree with my train of thought on that.
I do, unfortunately. I want intensive US study of the strains, not reports from afar.
Here's further evidence that Ebola is very dangerous to human and animal lives once it becomes airborne.
http://www.usmessageboard.com/curre...n-the-big-cover-up-about-the-ebola-virus.html
Even if you knew there was great potential risks to American lives in the process?I do, unfortunately. I want intensive US study of the strains, not reports from afar.
Here's further evidence that Ebola is very dangerous to human and animal lives once it becomes airborne.
http://www.usmessageboard.com/curre...n-the-big-cover-up-about-the-ebola-virus.html
The risks for ebola in the US are virtually nonexistent from this guy being brought home. First, Ebola isn't particularly good at finding new hosts. Its only transmitted through body fluids, its only contagious for about 10 days, and its not even airborne. The world goes years without a single infection.
The doctor that was brought home in under biohazard quarantine, meaning that there isn't even flesh to flesh contact with the man. Making the likelihood of transmission virtually nil.
So the potential you are describing is ridiculously unlikely. And even if occured, the doctors and those treating him are under observation. So if they exhibited so much as the flu, they're under quarantine. And there are no reports of such symptoms from anyone treating the doctor.
Making your 'potential' even more ludicriously unlikely. While the individual patient is much more likely to survive. And the CDC being able to investigate an infection first hand will increase their knowledge of the virus and how to combat it.
So huge rewards for the individual and future patients.....and virtually none for anyone else. That's a no-brainer.
Even if you knew there was great potential risks to American lives in the process?
Here's further evidence that Ebola is very dangerous to human and animal lives once it becomes airborne.
http://www.usmessageboard.com/curre...n-the-big-cover-up-about-the-ebola-virus.html
The risks for ebola in the US are virtually nonexistent from this guy being brought home. First, Ebola isn't particularly good at finding new hosts. Its only transmitted through body fluids, its only contagious for about 10 days, and its not even airborne. The world goes years without a single infection.
The doctor that was brought home in under biohazard quarantine, meaning that there isn't even flesh to flesh contact with the man. Making the likelihood of transmission virtually nil.
So the potential you are describing is ridiculously unlikely. And even if occured, the doctors and those treating him are under observation. So if they exhibited so much as the flu, they're under quarantine. And there are no reports of such symptoms from anyone treating the doctor.
Making your 'potential' even more ludicriously unlikely. While the individual patient is much more likely to survive. And the CDC being able to investigate an infection first hand will increase their knowledge of the virus and how to combat it.
So huge rewards for the individual and future patients.....and virtually none for anyone else. That's a no-brainer.
It is the CDC's business to notice the word 'virtually' and '90% fatality rate' and put the two together in one sentence.
Ya gotta love it.... the pro-science crowd is ready and willing to live in the stone age over Al Gore and his hoax, but Ebola... nah.... bring 'em on.
More evidence that the modern day liberal is completely, absolutely, batshit fucking crazy.
Drudge is fanning the flames of FEAR!!! EBOLA!!!
C'mon....fear is a conservative's primary motivator. Remember the 'influence operation' by Huma Abdeen? The 'victory mosque' in NY? The 'death panels' under Obamacare? The 'FEMA concentration camps'? And when you look into each hysteric accusation, what do you find?
Jack shit.
But to this day, there are conservatives that will repeat each debunked talking point with mechanical precision. Just like they were taught to. Given how ludicrously programmable some conservatives are it any shock that now many are being whipping into a frothing lather over another empty issue?
I mean, AIDS kills 1.3 million people a year. The worst ebola outbreak in history has killed 900. But conservatives are shitting their panties over ebola. A disease that isn't airborne, that is contagious for about 10 days, and requires contact with body fluid to be transmitted.
Sigh......you can't fix stupid.
The risks for ebola in the US are virtually nonexistent from this guy being brought home. First, Ebola isn't particularly good at finding new hosts. Its only transmitted through body fluids, its only contagious for about 10 days, and its not even airborne. The world goes years without a single infection.
The doctor that was brought home in under biohazard quarantine, meaning that there isn't even flesh to flesh contact with the man. Making the likelihood of transmission virtually nil.
So the potential you are describing is ridiculously unlikely. And even if occured, the doctors and those treating him are under observation. So if they exhibited so much as the flu, they're under quarantine. And there are no reports of such symptoms from anyone treating the doctor.
Making your 'potential' even more ludicriously unlikely. While the individual patient is much more likely to survive. And the CDC being able to investigate an infection first hand will increase their knowledge of the virus and how to combat it.
So huge rewards for the individual and future patients.....and virtually none for anyone else. That's a no-brainer.
It is the CDC's business to notice the word 'virtually' and '90% fatality rate' and put the two together in one sentence.
If you're using probabilities as your guide, your argument is already lost. As the odds of the type of hysteric 'plague' being imagined is ridiculously, almost laughably low.
Which the CDC seems fully aware of. I'm glad the CDC is making decisions based on rational assessment rather than mindless emotion.
I demand we go to CODE ORANGE! Ebola is on our shores! This missionary doctor should have been tossed out of the plane over the Atlantic.
Where is that bastard Obama? IS HE GOLFING AGAIN!!!!?
Ebola is creeping across the Mexican border, dammit! Inside someone's cantaloupe calf.
HEY! DID YOU JUST SNEEZE? LOCK THAT FUCKER UP. NOW!
