jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 139,498
- 29,247
- 2,180
he has you and me on ignore. we beat his fugley ass. therefore, he didn't read your article, nor will he respond.you mean like the link I gave you from Dr Risch proving you wrong on all accounts of the topic at hand???Except my link shows that it works in practice. Links don’t work if you don’t read them.What’s your experience that says masks are just for optics?So now you don't believe me? Excellent. I had firsthand experience. You're discussing theory.God I wish people would just stop pretending they know what they’re talking about.Masks are just there for optics. Disease is real. I had it.BTW, I don't believe any numbers coming out today. all bullshit. nothing of value or logic. if masks worked then the masks failed if the count went up. there isn't any other way to look at it. the compliance is by 90% of people. fk, the stay at home participation was worse. But yet, the numbers are rising with masks. How can that even be logically? start naming places people frequent where there have been reported outbreaks. none. zip, and the governors are still talking about stricter restrictions. fk them and their administrations. Fake numbers all of them. I say prove it. BTW, if masks work why is it my glasses fog up when I wear one? why do they stick a nine inch swab into one's head rather than a swab from the mouth? anyone else curious? just asking.It didn't but we have the disease under control. If people were healthier we would have COVID under control too. We are too fat.
If I were fat and or had diabetes, I'd be dead.
Go ahead.
My doctor. Unless you have surgical masks...they are just for show.
Sounds like he may not have been basing that statement on best evidence.
For example:
![]()
Cloth Masks Are Useless Against COVID-19
Lisa Brosseau, ScD: "What we’re seeing is a lot of magical thinking. A lot of wishful thinking. Cloth masks are wishful thinking."www.infectioncontroltoday.com
We can play link games all day.