norwegen
Diamond Member
This is the shortest day of the year.Schiff is honest as the day is long.
Finally, you said something sort of right.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This is the shortest day of the year.Schiff is honest as the day is long.
I don't know they have never been under oath, but all 3 should be.
Schiff is honest as the day is long.
(None so blind as those who do not wish to see )
Since the Mueller report came out last year, Trump and his minions have insisted it found no evidence of collusion. In fact, Mueller explicitly wrote that he was not investigating collusion at all. (āWe did not address ācollusion,ā which is not a legal term. Rather, we focused on whether the evidence was sufficient to charge any member of the campaign with taking part in a criminal conspiracy.ā)
Unlike Muellerās tightly circumscribed criminal probe, the Senate Intelligence Committee report did investigate collusion. The most important evidence of collusion has either already been exposed (Trump officials taking a meeting with a Russian agent offering Vladimir Putinās help with the campaign) or happened right in front of our eyes (Trump going on television to ask Russia to steal and publish Hillary Clintonās emails). The real question is how extensively or tightly Trumpās campaign managed to coordinate its activity with Russia. And while it lacked the broad-ranging investigative powers Mueller could have used if he wanted, the Senate Intelligence Committee turned up damning evidence.
The primary focus of Russian interference was Russian hacking of Democratic emails and then leaking them in order to benefit Trumpās campaign. Two Trump advisers seem likely to have been involved in this scheme: campaign manager Paul Manafort and outside adviser Roger Stone.
------
Stone also spoke at length with Manafort, and the next day spoke with Trump, and then drafted tweets for Trump to send, expressing a desire for friendlier relations with Russia (i.e., āI want a new dĆ©tente with Russia under Putinā). Trump never sent those tweets, but the sequence of events strongly indicates Stoneās belief that Trumpās foreign policy toward Russia was linked with Russiaās campaign assistance.
The committee did not establish a quid pro quo. But Stone, like Manafort, did not cooperate. Instead, he lied to investigators. Trump also lied (in written answers to Mueller) about his conversations with Stone. You can say this is a lack of proof, but it is certainly not a lack of evidence of collusion. The evidence is extensive.
In a court of law, any defendant is entitled to a presumption of innocence. In the court of public opinion, the rules work differently. All the evidence points to the conclusion that Trump colluded with Russia and persuaded his top lieutenants to cover up their guilt. The traditional investigative technique of exposing a corrupt organization by flipping the mid-level staff against the boss doesnāt work when the boss has the power to pardon them and is shameless enough to use it. But the bipartisan Senate report has laid bare enough of the reality that was clear all along: They acted guilty because they were guilty.
(full article online)
Bipartisan Senate Report Shows How Trump Colluded With Russia in 2016
Trump and his advisers acted guilty because they were.nymag.com
Thats the cult talkingSchiff is honest as the day is long.
John Durham was appointed by Trump to discredit the Bipartisan finding. Bipartisan as in Republicans and Democrats, not Democrats only.Fresh proof the Russiagate āscandalā was created by the Hillary Clinton campaign
A federal grand jury handed up an indictment requested by special counsel John Durham ā and itās fresh proof that the entire Russiagate āscandalā was manufactured by Hillary Clintonās campaign.ā¦nypost.com
And then the Progs wonder why no one believes them.
Prog slaves are such stupid people.
View attachment 578521
I don't know they have never been under oath, but all 3 should be.
Schiff is honest as the day is long.
Schiff is honest as the day is long.
Why is it that some many of the Trump supporters do nothing but curse and swear at those who do not support Fox Faux news and their endless attempt to make people look there and not here?Fresh proof the Russiagate āscandalā was created by the Hillary Clinton campaign
A federal grand jury handed up an indictment requested by special counsel John Durham ā and itās fresh proof that the entire Russiagate āscandalā was manufactured by Hillary Clintonās campaign.ā¦nypost.com
And then the Progs wonder why no one believes them.
Prog slaves are such stupid people.
View attachment 578521
No John Durham was not appointed by President Trump, but the AG at the time. If John Durham is lying he could be replaced with another investigator by the current AG. But since Hitlery isnt worth anything anymore, the radical Dems dont care if she sinks like the Titanic.John Durham was appointed by Trump to discredit the Bipartisan finding. Bipartisan as in Republicans and Democrats, not Democrats only.
Don Jr. and others meeting with Russians before the 2016 election is not something to wonder about? Why Russians? What did they want from the Trump family or campaign?
The result is there. Believe in it or not.
Demeaning Biden's IQ, or his experience in helping the country for all Americans as he has done for decadesWhy is it that some many of the Trump supporters do nothing but curse and swear at those who do not support Fox Faux news and their endless attempt to make people look there and not here?
Demeaning Biden's IQ, or his experience in helping the country for all Americans as he has done for decades leads to what level of intelligence on the Trump side?
Trump takes the vaccine before he leaves, not wanting others to do so. Just had a booster and wants others to do so as well. And NOW, they will not follow him, believe in him.
It is a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World, just like the movie.
Clinton has not sunk as the Titanic did. Yes, Barr appointed him.No John Durham was not appointed by President Trump, but the AG at the time. If John Durham is lying he could be replaced with another investigator by the current AG. But since Hitlery isnt worth anything anymore, the radical Dems dont care if she sinks like the Titanic.
You are a typical lying libtard!Why is it that some many of the Trump supporters do nothing but curse and swear at those who do not support Fox Faux news and their endless attempt to make people look there and not here?
Demeaning Biden's IQ, or his experience in helping the country for all Americans as he has done for decades leads to what level of intelligence on the Trump side?
Trump takes the vaccine before he leaves, not wanting others to do so. Just had a booster and wants others to do so as well. And NOW, they will not follow him, believe in him.
It is a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World, just like the movie.
The RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA ship has sailed. Let it goJohn Durham was appointed by Trump to discredit the Bipartisan finding. Bipartisan as in Republicans and Democrats, not Democrats only.
Don Jr. and others meeting with Russians before the 2016 election is not something to wonder about? Why Russians? What did they want from the Trump family or campaign?
The result is there. Believe in it or not.
Opinion | What Are the Consequences for Adam Schiffās Lies?
Fox News Host Sean Hannity: āAdam Schiff Is A Proven Liarā
Gingrich: Adam Schiff is a āclear, proven liar,ā Trump should ācut ties with himā
Rep. Adam Schiff and media acolytes are proven liars
Disinformation from Schiff, media damaged America
Adam Schiff lied about the Trump investigation ā and the media let him
Schiff claimed numerous times that he had evidence Trump colluded with the Russians but he never presented it.
Still believing what Fox Whatever says.Demeaning Biden's IQ, or his experience in helping the country for all Americans as he has done for decades
Like calling black children "roaches", or black men as "predators" while he and his children have been racketeering millions of dollars from countries like Ukraine and China? I am not demeaning Joe Biteme's intelligence, because i have known him as long as he has been in office(and always the wrong side of history) , but i am demeaning the Joe Biteme voter because they are as stupid as the chart shows.
A Joe Biden voter deserves all the misery and poverty that Democrats force upon them, because they are that stupid to vote against their best interests.
View attachment 578530
Shows what a pathological liar you are.I don't know they have never been under oath, but all 3 should be.
Schiff is honest as the day is long.
I don't know they have never been under oath, but all 3 should be.
Schiff is honest as the day is long.
You mean the campaign they spied on by committing Felonies when they filed False Affidavits in The FISA court? The Campaign they could not find had committed any crimes despites wasting what was it $50 Million investigating over a false accusation they knew was false?(None so blind as those who do not wish to see )
Since the Mueller report came out last year, Trump and his minions have insisted it found no evidence of collusion. In fact, Mueller explicitly wrote that he was not investigating collusion at all. (āWe did not address ācollusion,ā which is not a legal term. Rather, we focused on whether the evidence was sufficient to charge any member of the campaign with taking part in a criminal conspiracy.ā)
Unlike Muellerās tightly circumscribed criminal probe, the Senate Intelligence Committee report did investigate collusion. The most important evidence of collusion has either already been exposed (Trump officials taking a meeting with a Russian agent offering Vladimir Putinās help with the campaign) or happened right in front of our eyes (Trump going on television to ask Russia to steal and publish Hillary Clintonās emails). The real question is how extensively or tightly Trumpās campaign managed to coordinate its activity with Russia. And while it lacked the broad-ranging investigative powers Mueller could have used if he wanted, the Senate Intelligence Committee turned up damning evidence.
The primary focus of Russian interference was Russian hacking of Democratic emails and then leaking them in order to benefit Trumpās campaign. Two Trump advisers seem likely to have been involved in this scheme: campaign manager Paul Manafort and outside adviser Roger Stone.
------
Stone also spoke at length with Manafort, and the next day spoke with Trump, and then drafted tweets for Trump to send, expressing a desire for friendlier relations with Russia (i.e., āI want a new dĆ©tente with Russia under Putinā). Trump never sent those tweets, but the sequence of events strongly indicates Stoneās belief that Trumpās foreign policy toward Russia was linked with Russiaās campaign assistance.
The committee did not establish a quid pro quo. But Stone, like Manafort, did not cooperate. Instead, he lied to investigators. Trump also lied (in written answers to Mueller) about his conversations with Stone. You can say this is a lack of proof, but it is certainly not a lack of evidence of collusion. The evidence is extensive.
In a court of law, any defendant is entitled to a presumption of innocence. In the court of public opinion, the rules work differently. All the evidence points to the conclusion that Trump colluded with Russia and persuaded his top lieutenants to cover up their guilt. The traditional investigative technique of exposing a corrupt organization by flipping the mid-level staff against the boss doesnāt work when the boss has the power to pardon them and is shameless enough to use it. But the bipartisan Senate report has laid bare enough of the reality that was clear all along: They acted guilty because they were guilty.
(full article online)
Bipartisan Senate Report Shows How Trump Colluded With Russia in 2016
Trump and his advisers acted guilty because they were.nymag.com