odanny
Diamond Member
Most addicts don't.Hunter answered the form he was given
No, I am not currently using drugs
No, I do not think I am an addict
Defendant is fined 10 large and cannot ever possess a firearm.
Circus trial concluded.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Most addicts don't.Hunter answered the form he was given
No, I am not currently using drugs
No, I do not think I am an addict
But they could have been. The dipshit threw the gun in the trash where any child could have found it.On the law, they probably have him dead to rights.
On a human level, no one was harmed, it was a technical violation when he was suffering from a disease, and he has no criminal record. Unless you have a jury of 12 totally heartless people; he'll probably be acquitted.
I see the question was too complicated for you. A simple 'Yes' or 'No' will do.Already lining up the excuses
Yes, clearly "not being a dick" is paramount to a person's innocence.Here's a very interesting discussion of how the Hunter case is being handled by his lawyer vs. How Trump handled his case.
The Contrasts Between Hunter Biden’s Trial and the Trump Trial Are Already Striking
So far, at least, it looks like Hunter Biden is avoiding some of Trump's mistakes.slate.com
It boils down to, Hunter isn't being a dick, so he's more likely to be acquitted.
Since i saw right through it and your prescribed answer... far from complicated.I see the question was too complicated for you. A simple 'Yes' or 'No' will do.
That's right. The jury's perception of whether or not a defendant would commit a crime or lie is absolutely affected by the defendant's behavior and demeanor in court. Not every case has definitive evidence that makes it a slam dunk, like the orange slob's document case does.Yes, clearly "not being a dick" is paramount to a person's innocence.
I wouldn't bet against you on that Joe. But don't you think that the case is ironclad against him and other solutions need to be found.Again, I doubt he'll be found guilty.
He sounds like a complete low-life to me. Addiction is a real bitch to deal with (our doctors and nurses see it every night in the ER) but he had more opportunities than most to get help. He refused.Stand up and be counted. I say no way.
Most addicts don't.
Defendant is fined 10 large and cannot ever possess a firearm.
Circus trial concluded.
If you love your guns, be careful of what you wish for.But they could have been. The dipshit threw the gun in the trash where any child could have found it.
The Magas will then have a solid case on the 'abuse of presidential pardons!'He sounds like a complete low-life to me. Addiction is a real bitch to deal with (our doctors and nurses see it every night in the ER) but he had more opportunities than most to get help. He refused.
So if he gets found guilty--which seems pretty cut and dried to me--I won’t be surprised. He sure as hell sounds guilty (much like your idol the blob did) so yeah, I think he will be found guilty.
And I think Joe will pardon him. I’d pardon my son in this case--a “victimless” crime (if there is such a thing) if I had one and had the power to; so would you.
Paying for sex is not a felony. I am not in the least surprised you would think that.Well, that and he did exactly what he is accused of.
Or are you a true believer who thinks he didn't fuck Stormy
"We"? So, you are saying that ALL Stalinists will be laughing?We call that a successful prosecution.
But please, regale us with your cult fantasies of corrupt jurors. So we can laugh.
Go fuck yourself, duck. You speak for no one but your Chinese masters.If you love your guns, be careful of what you wish for.
Not only are you trying to curtail the rights of people to possess guns, you're limiting their right to get rid of them!
Joe can make this into the gunrights court case from hell!
I would be the happiest person on earth if we got rid of the presidential pardon. It’s about 230 years past the time this should have been done. Still have pardons; still have a White House office on pardons. But have a 3 judge panel of the Supreme Court justices decide who gets one. Presidents dangle pardons for favorable actions. That isn’t the intent of it and its become a way for the connected to get around the law--as it would be with Hunter Biden.The Magas will then have a solid case on the 'abuse of presidential pardons!'
Oh, and then there's pardons for all the J6'ers?
Maybe it's just all fkd up and nobody can predict anymore?
Yes, parts of it are part of the evidence presented against the Dementia Patient's spoiled brat son.is the lasptop entered intp evidence? isn't this a 2nd amendment case?
Maybe it would be a good idea if you started a new thread for the purpose of talking about pardons?I would be the happiest person on earth if we got rid of the presidential pardon. It’s about 230 years past the time this should have been done. Still have pardons; still have a White House office on pardons. But have a 3 judge panel of the Supreme Court justices decide who gets one. Presidents dangle pardons for favorable actions. That isn’t the intent of it and its become a way for the connected to get around the law--as it would be with Hunter Biden.
Having said that, few voters in the nation would not pardon their kid in this case if they had the power to do it.
I hope that Biden wouldn’t pardon his son....but if it happened, I totally understand it and wouldn’t hold it against him.
I'd guess it was. Democrats want it to seem like, see, we get prosecuted, too! Excpet Hunter will be found not guilty, IMHO, or will get a slap on the wrist.Does anyone on this board not think this trial was scheduled to start on the week after Trump was found guilty, by design?