Does this mean house democrats are still racists...?

[NYcarbineer]

And liberals were not opposing him because he's ultra-conservative?

lol, then what racism was at work when liberals opposed Robert Bork for the court?

eh, genius?

Take the same rationale and apply it to Republicans v Obama.

But NOOO! That's racism!

Okay so you admit that liberals could oppose Clarence Thomas without being racist and that all your rightwing pals are idiots for ever having claimed otherwise,

including Clarence Thomas himself.

Case closed.

 

[Meathead]

And liberals were not opposing him because he's ultra-conservative?

lol, then what racism was at work when liberals opposed Robert Bork for the court?

eh, genius?

Take the same rationale and apply it to Republicans v Obama.

But NOOO! That's racism!

Okay so you admit that liberals could oppose Clarence Thomas without being racist and that all your rightwing pals are idiots for ever having claimed otherwise,

including Clarence Thomas himself.

Case closed.

Of course, but conservatives oppose Obama because he is black?