Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The "classified" documents were in the middle of Trumps ridiculous argument he magically declassified them. To avoid getting caught up in that, they simply went after all presidential records that Trump stole, independent of any classification markings or status.I've got news for you...the classified documents weren't what the Biden White House were after! They were looking for something else to use against Trump if he becomes the GOP nominee in '24. That's why you get a warrant that lets you take EVERYTHING! If all they were after were the classified documents...then the warrant would have stated that!
Seems to me President Biden had nothing to do with the investigation(s). Actually, The Donald gave enough dumb comments to put himself into the trouble he's now in, Strike Two.I've got news for you...the classified documents weren't what the Biden White House were after! They were looking for something else to use against Trump if he becomes the GOP nominee in '24. That's why you get a warrant that lets you take EVERYTHING! If all they were after were the classified documents...then the warrant would have stated that!
It looks like Eileen Cannon got handed a smack down by the 11th circuit, showing what a partisan nut job she has been.
Holding back these documents by Cannon was so obviously political. She has violated her oath.
It's so sad that those who supported and defended The Donald have gotten to the time when the former president has lost every court case thus far.
I really can't imagine when an already Supreme Court has lost credibility will not overturn the 11th District Court's decisions.
What do the New Right have to do now? They lost the first time on January 6, 2021; if they tried to overturn our Constitution again, they will be met with the power of the real militia and there is no doubt that they will be ready.
It seems that trump's efforts to pack the federal judiciary with conservative judges didn't work out for him, he wanted loyalty, and got shocked when he got honest judges.
Pressured into putting the most qualified person out of all nine Justices on the bench?
You're a fucking idiot no matter what name you post under.
most qualified person out of all nine Justices on the bench?
you are not making any senseIt's so sad that those who supported and defended The Donald have gotten to the time when the former president has lost every court case thus far.
I really can't imagine when an already Supreme Court has lost credibility will not overturn the 11th District Court's decisions.
What do the New Right have to do now? They lost the first time on January 6, 2021; if they tried to overturn our Constitution again, they will be met with the power of the real militia and there is no doubt that they will be ready.
It seems that trump's efforts to pack the federal judiciary with conservative judges didn't work out for him, he wanted loyalty, and got shocked when he got honest judges.
If the Supreme Court even TAKES this case.
Let's be honest here, Gene. They got a "general" warrant that allowed them to take everything! That's not usually done because it's not Constitutional. The Biden DOJ got a compliant Magistrate to let them raid Mar A Lago and take anything they liked. The warrant SHOULD have been for the classified documents and only for the classified documents!The "classified" documents were in the middle of Trumps ridiculous argument he magically declassified them. To avoid getting caught up in that, they simply went after all presidential records that Trump stole, independent of any classification markings or status.
It made moot any claims Trump made about declassifying anything.
Thanks for your opinion but virtually everything in that post is just wrongLet's be honest here, Gene. They got a "general" warrant that allowed them to take everything! That's not usually done because it's not Constitutional. The Biden DOJ got a compliant Magistrate to let them raid Mar A Lago and take anything they liked. The warrant SHOULD have been for the classified documents and only for the classified documents!
LOL...oh, really? Wrong in what way? Was it NOT a general warrant? Are those not prohibited by our rule of law?Thanks for your opinion but virtually everything in that post is just wrong
So show us the regs that state how exactly specific a warrant MUST be. By what criteria are you claiming this was a "general" warrant?LOL...oh, really? Wrong in what way? Was it NOT a general warrant? Are those not prohibited by our rule of law?
Anyone with even a smidgen of common sense knows that a warrant that allowed the FBI to take any document having anything to do with the entire Trump Presidency plus anything that is "near" those documents is the epitome of a general warrant!So show us the regs that state how exactly specific a warrant MUST be. By what criteria are you claiming this was a "general" warrant?
This warrant was approved by a judge after reviewing the application.
I believe he might know the law better than you.
By the way...who besides you is claiming the warrant was too general? Some dickhead on gatewaypundit? Tuckems?
www.findlaw.com
Your comment is made after 2 am. Were you drinking too much? Or ....you are not making any sense
Awww and Judge Cannon was not biased? BTW, in my 32 years in LE I've never heard of a "general warrant" Please don't post the 4th Amendment, post the code that defines a general warrant.Anyone with even a smidgen of common sense knows that a warrant that allowed the FBI to take any document having anything to do with the entire Trump Presidency plus anything that is "near" those documents is the epitome of a general warrant!
As for the Magistrate that approved that warrant? He's the same judge that disqualified himself from judging a law suit between Hillary Clinton and Trump because he was biased towards Clinton.
Search Warrant Requirements - FindLaw
FindLaw's search and seizure section details the Fourth Amendment's search warrant rules and other topics related to searches and seizures.
That's irrelevant. The only thing that matters is is she upholds the Constitution, or erroneously believed she can interpret the Constitution however she pleases.Like I said, you're a fucking idiot. And a racist.
Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson gets 'well qualified' rating for SCOTUS by unanimous ABA committee
The ABA Journal is read by half of the nation's 1 million lawyers every month. It covers the trends, people and finances of the legal profession from Wall Street to Main Street to Pennsylvania Avenue.www.abajournal.com
She has more trial experience than all the other Justices combined.
No, that's what the Rightwing Justices have done - the most activist court in history, after decades of Republicans railing against activist judges.That's irrelevant. The only thing that matters is is she upholds the Constitution, or erroneously believed she can interpret the Constitution however she pleases.
Awww and Judge Cannon was not biased? BTW, in my 32 years in LE I've never heard of a "general warrant" Please don't post the 4th Amendment, post the code that defines a general warrant.
You were in law enforcement for three decades and don't know what a general warrant is? That's interesting, Rye...Awww and Judge Cannon was not biased? BTW, in my 32 years in LE I've never heard of a "general warrant" Please don't post the 4th Amendment, post the code that defines a general warrant.
