Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So, who has confidence in Dominion providing systems for another Election? If there are affidavits or otherwise concerns, they should be jumping at the opportunity to allay those concerns. They are a software and hardware company. I've witnessed software product companies address similar concerns about validity and integrity. They should be thinking about their market. For example, upcoming midterms and state and local elections. If I am the CEO, I want to capture as much of the Total Market as possible for my shareholders and company.
So, who has confidence in Dominion providing systems for another Election? If there are affidavits or otherwise concerns, they should be jumping at the opportunity to allay those concerns. They are a software and hardware company. I've witnessed software product companies address similar concerns about validity and integrity. They should be thinking about their market. For example, upcoming midterms and state and local elections. If I am the CEO, I want to capture as much of the Total Market as possible for my shareholders and company.
I agree and the fact that they backed out of the meeting in PA speaks volumes.
If it were me and my company I'd be in there fighting tooth and nail about the validity of my company.
Since they aren't I'd guess they have plenty to hide. How bout you??
So, who has confidence in Dominion providing systems for another Election? If there are affidavits or otherwise concerns, they should be jumping at the opportunity to allay those concerns. They are a software and hardware company. I've witnessed software product companies address similar concerns about validity and integrity. They should be thinking about their market. For example, upcoming midterms and state and local elections. If I am the CEO, I want to capture as much of the Total Market as possible for my shareholders and company.
I agree and the fact that they backed out of the meeting in PA speaks volumes.
If it were me and my company I'd be in there fighting tooth and nail about the validity of my company.
Since they aren't I'd guess they have plenty to hide. How bout you??
Does refusing to meet with investigators indicate that one is hiding criminality?
Why do you rape children??If they want to clear the air they had the opportunity....they are guilty of something...their employees are wiping their social media that shows them to be workers or contractors for Dominion.....now we have moved even farther from being confident in this election....they should have showed up.....if they were totally innocent the would have.....They have no obligation to. So why would they? It's up to Trumps's D-Team of lawyers and the crack investigative squad that the PA Republican legislature employs to back those assertions up.
So far, all that's been presented is speculation and conspiracy theories. Nothing to convince a judge to look at it.
If they want to clear the air they had the opportunity....they are guilty of something...their employees are wiping their social media that shows them to be workers or contractors for Dominion.....now we have moved even farther from being confident in this election....they should have showed up.....if they were totally innocent the would have.....They have no obligation to. So why would they? It's up to Trumps's D-Team of lawyers and the crack investigative squad that the PA Republican legislature employs to back those assertions up.
So far, all that's been presented is speculation and conspiracy theories. Nothing to convince a judge to look at it.
In investigating Biden's Cancer charity scam I found out that Gregory Simon, the charity’s president lobbied for energy company Enron.Yeah, they are acting eerily similar to Enron Execs. I lived in Houston when that shit went down. I new 2 different guys who abruptly left the company with no explanation. This looks EXACTLY like that.So, who has confidence in Dominion providing systems for another Election? If there are affidavits or otherwise concerns, they should be jumping at the opportunity to allay those concerns. They are a software and hardware company. I've witnessed software product companies address similar concerns about validity and integrity. They should be thinking about their market. For example, upcoming midterms and state and local elections. If I am the CEO, I want to capture as much of the Total Market as possible for my shareholders and company.
But, who knows. Maybe Dominion is not scurrying like cockroaches with the light coming on because of anything Trump's team found. Maybe they are also involved in a pension scandal like Enron.
So, who has confidence in Dominion providing systems for another Election? If there are affidavits or otherwise concerns, they should be jumping at the opportunity to allay those concerns. They are a software and hardware company. I've witnessed software product companies address similar concerns about validity and integrity. They should be thinking about their market. For example, upcoming midterms and state and local elections. If I am the CEO, I want to capture as much of the Total Market as possible for my shareholders and company.
I agree and the fact that they backed out of the meeting in PA speaks volumes.
If it were me and my company I'd be in there fighting tooth and nail about the validity of my company.
Since they aren't I'd guess they have plenty to hide. How bout you??
Does refusing to meet with investigators indicate that one is hiding criminality?
Refusing to meet with investigators shows guilt. If your innocent you meet. If you aren't. Any excuse not to meet works for you.
So, who has confidence in Dominion providing systems for another Election? If there are affidavits or otherwise concerns, they should be jumping at the opportunity to allay those concerns. They are a software and hardware company. I've witnessed software product companies address similar concerns about validity and integrity. They should be thinking about their market. For example, upcoming midterms and state and local elections. If I am the CEO, I want to capture as much of the Total Market as possible for my shareholders and company.
I agree and the fact that they backed out of the meeting in PA speaks volumes.
If it were me and my company I'd be in there fighting tooth and nail about the validity of my company.
Since they aren't I'd guess they have plenty to hide. How bout you??
Does refusing to meet with investigators indicate that one is hiding criminality?
Does it?So, who has confidence in Dominion providing systems for another Election? If there are affidavits or otherwise concerns, they should be jumping at the opportunity to allay those concerns. They are a software and hardware company. I've witnessed software product companies address similar concerns about validity and integrity. They should be thinking about their market. For example, upcoming midterms and state and local elections. If I am the CEO, I want to capture as much of the Total Market as possible for my shareholders and company.
I agree and the fact that they backed out of the meeting in PA speaks volumes.
If it were me and my company I'd be in there fighting tooth and nail about the validity of my company.
Since they aren't I'd guess they have plenty to hide. How bout you??
Does refusing to meet with investigators indicate that one is hiding criminality?
Refusing to meet with investigators shows guilt. If your innocent you meet. If you aren't. Any excuse not to meet works for you.
www.bbc.com
So, who has confidence in Dominion providing systems for another Election? If there are affidavits or otherwise concerns, they should be jumping at the opportunity to allay those concerns. They are a software and hardware company. I've witnessed software product companies address similar concerns about validity and integrity. They should be thinking about their market. For example, upcoming midterms and state and local elections. If I am the CEO, I want to capture as much of the Total Market as possible for my shareholders and company.
I agree and the fact that they backed out of the meeting in PA speaks volumes.
If it were me and my company I'd be in there fighting tooth and nail about the validity of my company.
Since they aren't I'd guess they have plenty to hide. How bout you??
Does refusing to meet with investigators indicate that one is hiding criminality?
Refusing to meet with investigators shows guilt. If your innocent you meet. If you aren't. Any excuse not to meet works for you.
Hmmm. Does that apply when the person doing the refusing is Trump or a member of Trump’s administration?
Even Chris Christie has seen enough of this national embarrassment.
Chris Christie calls the conduct of Trump’s legal team a ‘national embarrassment’ - The Washington Post
Michigan? Did you just mention Michigan---hun Whitmer, the corrupt sec of state and others will be lucky if they don't have a rebellion come in and take them out of office and put them on trial for their crimes----Michigan is moving to rebel against their corrupt dems stealing elections and stealing their constitutional rights.That is how it works.Here's one for you..They have no obligation to. So why would they? It's up to Trumps's D-Team of lawyers and the crack investigative squad that the PA Republican legislature employs to back those assertions up.
So far, all that's been presented is speculation and conspiracy theories. Nothing to convince a judge to look at it.
Supreme court we have evidence of FRAUD using Dominion
SC...what says Dominion--
D-Team, that they plead the 5 th and now are on the run.
SC---will have no choice but to rule the election invalid
You know, that's not how it works, right?
You must work for Trump's clown show legal team.
This is going to the SC... We all know this
Trump is going to claim corruption and fraud largely based on Dominion and failure of states to follow their own state laws which includes certifying election systems (dominion) and failing to do so knowing that dominion has a long history of failing certifications in other states and countries AND miscounting votes.
The question the supreme court will be forced to rule on is Dominion a safe reliable way to count votes-------which under theory would be based on witnesses including DOMINION who now in hiding and claiming the 5th in essence.
So Rudy and team-----will claim Dominion is unreliable based on their evidence and experts----while the dems will have no experts in the system as the system experts the company are in hiding.
The election will be ruled invalid due to not following state laws, not certifying the election system, the system having a variety of known issues, and likely even known voter fraud giving what we are hearing about flipping votes and Germany right now--------
Only variable is can the dems get to the 5 SC judges--------(not including sell out Roberts or the dems) and if Trump is going to give the orders that Dominion exes will be picked up by our military from whereever they are hiding in the world. It's not like the US really has anything to fear from Canada by sending the seals in to pick up dominion "experts" hiding.
Claim away. That alone won't make it in court. Rudy and the D-Team will have to walk into court and present their "evidence" to a judge who will then hear the evidence and rule on it. Depending on the ruling, it can then be appealed. Based on the result of that appeal(s), it may be taken to the Supreme Court and they decide to hear the case or not.
Do ANY of you Trump worshipers understand the basics of how a case gets in front of the highest court in the land? Hint..it doesn't happen because you wish it. Go back and look at the process for Bush v Gore if you need education.
So far, all lawsuits regarding fraud have been thrown out...so....nothing to take to the SC, let alone appeal.
I am sorry..........I'm not the one all giddy any time a dem partisan judge tries to stop Trump showing the fraud--we all know that cases can and will be appealed to the supreme court. we all know this is where this is going. I chose not to dabble with the lower courts because well their opinions don't really matter do they................the SC will be the final decision.
Don't know why you felt wasting everyone's time mentioning the lower courts except to try to blow smoke-------I think you failed in your endeavor.
Just educating you. You seem to be laboring under the delusion that this will go to the SC. Hint..courts don't decide elections. The people do. And they've spoken. No court in the world will invalidate this election. The only shot he has is to try and convince electors to vote for him. You can strike Michigan off that list.
Michigan lawmakers who met with Trump say they see nothing to change election outcome
Members of the Michigan state Legislature's Republican leadership who met with President Donald Trump at the White House Friday afternoon said they haven't seen any evidence that would change the fact that President-elect Joe Biden won their state.www.cnn.com
"But the left claimed Kavanaugh was guilty of rape, due to the ridiculous sworn testimony of one woman."No, they are not evidence.The testimony during his confirmation was given under oath. Democrats believed Blasey-Ford's ridiculous charge of rape was evidence.They were for the Kavanaugh hearings. Y'all need to make up your minds.link to those accusation being proven falseLike so many little Pepe frogs, you morons hop from one bullshit lily pad to the next. Accusation proven false? No worries!
There will be another equally baseless one for you to get worked up about tomorrow.
Absolute fake patriots.....every last one of you.
Court cases nationwide. No evidence. Accusations are not evidence. You’re a fucking moron cult member.
Kavanaugh was never put on trial for that which he was accused of doing. Why are you a moron?
You can shut up now.
No. They didn’t. There was never a trial.
Rudy said that sworn affidavits ARE EVIDENCE. You seem to agree. Is that the case?
But the left claimed Kavanaugh was guilty of rape, due to the ridiculous sworn testimony of one woman.
Do you deny that?
Many democrats stated that, in there OPINION, the asshole was a creep and forced himself upon a female student when he was young. They based that on the sworn testimony of a woman.
He was never charged with a crime. He faced no legal action whatsoever.
"unless she's Tara Reade accusing Joe Biden""we must believe the woman"No, they are not evidence.The testimony during his confirmation was given under oath. Democrats believed Blasey-Ford's ridiculous charge of rape was evidence.They were for the Kavanaugh hearings. Y'all need to make up your minds.link to those accusation being proven falseLike so many little Pepe frogs, you morons hop from one bullshit lily pad to the next. Accusation proven false? No worries!
There will be another equally baseless one for you to get worked up about tomorrow.
Absolute fake patriots.....every last one of you.
Court cases nationwide. No evidence. Accusations are not evidence. You’re a fucking moron cult member.
Kavanaugh was never put on trial for that which he was accused of doing. Why are you a moron?
You can shut up now.
No. They didn’t. There was never a trial.
Rudy said that sworn affidavits ARE EVIDENCE. You seem to agree. Is that the case?
But the left claimed Kavanaugh was guilty of rape, due to the ridiculous sworn testimony of one woman.
Do you deny that?
There were no credible accusations. You believed them simply because you hate the man.he was never charged because he was not guiltyNo, they are not evidence.The testimony during his confirmation was given under oath. Democrats believed Blasey-Ford's ridiculous charge of rape was evidence.They were for the Kavanaugh hearings. Y'all need to make up your minds.link to those accusation being proven falseLike so many little Pepe frogs, you morons hop from one bullshit lily pad to the next. Accusation proven false? No worries!
There will be another equally baseless one for you to get worked up about tomorrow.
Absolute fake patriots.....every last one of you.
Court cases nationwide. No evidence. Accusations are not evidence. You’re a fucking moron cult member.
Kavanaugh was never put on trial for that which he was accused of doing. Why are you a moron?
You can shut up now.
No. They didn’t. There was never a trial.
Rudy said that sworn affidavits ARE EVIDENCE. You seem to agree. Is that the case?
But the left claimed Kavanaugh was guilty of rape, due to the ridiculous sworn testimony of one woman.
Do you deny that?
Many democrats stated that, in there OPINION, the asshole was a creep and forced himself upon a female student when he was young. They based that on the sworn testimony of a woman.
He was never charged with a crime. He faced no legal action whatsoever.
Yeah? Does not being charged mean that one is not guilty? Or...only when you say so?
Give some thought to what you just said there, Jack! Why WOULD a company who provides voting systems want to provide assurances that their systems protected people's votes?They have no obligation to. So why would they? It's up to Trumps's D-Team of lawyers and the crack investigative squad that the PA Republican legislature employs to back those assertions up.
So far, all that's been presented is speculation and conspiracy theories. Nothing to convince a judge to look at it.
Give some thought to what you just said there, Jack! Why WOULD a company who provides voting systems want to provide assurances that their systems protected people's votes?They have no obligation to. So why would they? It's up to Trumps's D-Team of lawyers and the crack investigative squad that the PA Republican legislature employs to back those assertions up.
So far, all that's been presented is speculation and conspiracy theories. Nothing to convince a judge to look at it.
A better question would be...HOW COULD THEY NOT DEFEND THEIR SYSTEMS?
Simple question then, Jack! Why isn't Dominion sending out it's people to show that's the case? Why would they go into hiding?Give some thought to what you just said there, Jack! Why WOULD a company who provides voting systems want to provide assurances that their systems protected people's votes?They have no obligation to. So why would they? It's up to Trumps's D-Team of lawyers and the crack investigative squad that the PA Republican legislature employs to back those assertions up.
So far, all that's been presented is speculation and conspiracy theories. Nothing to convince a judge to look at it.
A better question would be...HOW COULD THEY NOT DEFEND THEIR SYSTEMS?
There is no evidence of voter fraud or machine fraud. The foaming at the mouth alt-right media took one user input error (not a machine error) of 6K votes in one county in Michigan and blew it up
to be this country wide conspiracy that moved millions of votes from Trump's column to Biden's. You right wingers are easy. You will believe anything those media whores at OAN and Newsmax will serve you.
Simple question then, Jack! Why isn't Dominion sending out it's people to show that's the case? Why would they go into hiding?Give some thought to what you just said there, Jack! Why WOULD a company who provides voting systems want to provide assurances that their systems protected people's votes?They have no obligation to. So why would they? It's up to Trumps's D-Team of lawyers and the crack investigative squad that the PA Republican legislature employs to back those assertions up.
So far, all that's been presented is speculation and conspiracy theories. Nothing to convince a judge to look at it.
A better question would be...HOW COULD THEY NOT DEFEND THEIR SYSTEMS?
There is no evidence of voter fraud or machine fraud. The foaming at the mouth alt-right media took one user input error (not a machine error) of 6K votes in one county in Michigan and blew it up
to be this country wide conspiracy that moved millions of votes from Trump's column to Biden's. You right wingers are easy. You will believe anything those media whores at OAN and Newsmax will serve you.
