Dominion voting machine privacy flaws found.

I hear the allegation, still waiting for the PROOF. I have about 150 recorded cases where it WAS.

Oh wait . . . now is when you'll say you've claimed nothing and don't need to prove a thing. :auiqs.jpg:
Again, for the umpteenth time, YOU are making the allegation..and so far, you've FAILED to prove ANYTHING.
150 cases of.....nothing. 150 farts in the wind. :auiqs.jpg:

Sit down and take your meds. :)
 
This....Doesn't....Happen.

And the democrats are STILL cheating! Now they have invented the new weighting system where in some states, instead of just voting for your guy you pick your top three choices and a lower candidate ends up winning because he was ranked more often than anyone else but as a lower choice.

Fucking pathological cheaters.
 
Don't need to tell anything to any judge....The algorithims exist in the machines, as do modems, as a matter of established fact.
So what? You need proof that something happened. Merely stating facts isn’t evidence of anything, no matter how many times you repeat it.
 
So what? You need proof that something happened. Merely stating facts isn’t evidence of anything, no matter how many times you repeat it.
The proof has been put right under your nose hundreds of times and you just deny it exists.

So fuck off.
 
Right asshole, I alleged YOUR contention that fractional weighting does not exist at our polls despite countless reports by experts that it does! :auiqs.jpg:

Just 20 days to go.
Fractional weighting has to exist, because it's how they tabulate the votes in the ranked choice voting scam.
 
And the democrats are STILL cheating! Now they have invented the new weighting system where in some states, instead of just voting for your guy you pick your top three choices and a lower candidate ends up winning because he was ranked more often than anyone else but as a lower choice.

Fucking pathological cheaters.
How is it cheating, if everyone knows the rules ahead of time? It’s just an issue because Palin cried about it…, after she lost! If it was so terrible, why did Republican-controlled Alaska go with the plan?
 
So what? You need proof that something happened.
Where is your proof that Biden was elected honestly and fairly and that all of the evidence to the contrary has all been disproven? That is what you say happened.

Merely stating facts isn’t evidence of anything

:laugh2: Think about what you just said:
  • Merely stating facts isn’t evidence of anything
  • Merely stating facts isn’t evidence of anything
  • Merely stating facts isn’t evidence of anything
You really want to RUN with that, corncob??? :71:
 
How is it cheating, if everyone knows the rules ahead of time?

That type of inside-out "logic" is akin to a dictator ruling a country where you either vote for HIM on election day or get your head lopped off, then defending it as not cheating by saying: "Well, everyone knew the rules ahead of time!" :cuckoo:
 
No. They can't flip votes. Says so right in the article.
We know where this is headed.
Honestly, the desperation is starting to get tiresome. :)
Correction, the article reads: "This vulnerability is a privacy flaw and cannot directly modify results or change votes." You are being dishonest.
 
Where is your proof that Biden was elected honestly and fairly and that all of the evidence to the contrary has all been disproven? That is what you say happened.



:laugh2: Think about what you just said:
  • Merely stating facts isn’t evidence of anything
  • Merely stating facts isn’t evidence of anything
  • Merely stating facts isn’t evidence of anything
You really want to RUN with that, corncob??? :71:
Don’t need proof. The courts take care of those questions. Ask yourself why even the Trump-appointed judge’s aren’t backing you up.
 
That type of inside-out "logic" is akin to a dictator ruling a country where you either vote for HIM on election day or get your head lopped off, then defending it as not cheating by saying: "Well, everyone knew the rules ahead of time!" :cuckoo:
Nobody’s getting their heads chopped off in the US. This is simply an election formula that everyone knew beforehand and, in the case of Alaska, that would mean the Republicans are the “dictator” you mentioned!
 
Ask yourself why even the Trump-appointed judge’s aren’t backing you up.

I don't need to. The Trump appointed judges are not so partisan like the Left that they rule based on who appoints them.
 
Nobody’s getting their heads chopped off in the US.
Idiot, I never said anything like that. But thanks. You just proved yourself another imbecile leftie really too dumb to be running your own life, probably why you all want the government doing it for you.

This is simply an election formula that everyone knew beforehand
Which does not mean they agreed with it or wanted to use it, pinhead.
 
I don't need to. The Trump appointed judges are not so partisan like the Left that they rule based on who appoints them.
Beside that, Trump himself didn't appoint those judges.....That job fell to Mitch McTurtle, who hates Trump and would do anything to monkeywrench anything he wanted to do.
 
I don't need to. The Trump appointed judges are not so partisan like the Left that they rule based on who appoints them.
Good for them! But the fact is they did rule against Trump, ergo the election was not overturned.
 

Forum List

Back
Top