Don Trump, Judge Chutkan, and Jack Smith (redux)

Chillicothe

Platinum Member
Feb 14, 2021
10,604
6,797
938
The online news collator, right-leaning 'The Hill' is out this morning with an informative reportage on the state of play with DonTrump's role in the attempt to negate the results of the 2020 election.

As we all know, the Supreme Court ruled Presidents have immunity for any official act they perform......even if it breaks existing law. Any other act ...not deemed 'official'.... can go before the lower courts for determination if a crime was committed and can the president be held accountable for it.

And so, here we are again before Judge Chutkan. Her court will determine....at this step.....if what Trump did in the illegal electors, and with the incitement of the J6 insurrection against the Congress .... well, if his actions and directions were illegal and is he accountable.

Here's a taster from that reportage:
"But in some respects, Chutkan has suggested she cannot consider the election in weighing how to proceed in Trump’s case, noting she must treat him like any other citizen.

“She’s made clear already that Trump is not going to be treated any differently, nor should he be treated any differently, than any other defendant in her courtroom. Other defendants have jobs, but they have to come to court,” Eisen said.

“We don’t have two systems of law in the United States, one for presidential candidates, one for everybody else.”





Here's is a link to that article:
 
The online news collator, right-leaning 'The Hill' is out this morning with an informative reportage on the state of play with DonTrump's role in the attempt to negate the results of the 2020 election.

As we all know, the Supreme Court ruled Presidents have immunity for any official act they perform......even if it breaks existing law. Any other act ...not deemed 'official'.... can go before the lower courts for determination if a crime was committed and can the president be held accountable for it.

And so, here we are again before Judge Chutkan. Her court will determine....at this step.....if what Trump did in the illegal electors, and with the incitement of the J6 insurrection against the Congress .... well, if his actions and directions were illegal and is he accountable.

Here's a taster from that reportage:
"But in some respects, Chutkan has suggested she cannot consider the election in weighing how to proceed in Trump’s case, noting she must treat him like any other citizen.

“She’s made clear already that Trump is not going to be treated any differently, nor should he be treated any differently, than any other defendant in her courtroom. Other defendants have jobs, but they have to come to court,” Eisen said.

“We don’t have two systems of law in the United States, one for presidential candidates, one for everybody else.”





Here's is a link to that article:
https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/4816762-chutkan-judge-trump-jan-6-case/
So here we are coming up on the eighth anniversary of the day Trump took over your life and relieved you of all your other worldly thoughts, hopes and dreams giving the impression of yourself as the always miserable communist sitting in a dank windowless basement perched beneath a bare bulb rigged to hang from the ceiling by extension cord while rifling off post after post to, and on behalf of, the other would be world government "clintonista's" that saw trump destroy their utopian illusion of feminism like the bully kid who drags his feet across the anthill built of sand and dirt awaiting the great savior chutkan, smith, Fani, Bragg, mueller, schiff. pelosi, schumer, j6 panel etc. etc. explaining how it is going to be different this time...8 years chi-co, 8 years...no matter how ya slice and dice it, it is serious TDS chi-co.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top