Care4all
Warrior Princess
- Mar 24, 2007
- 73,855
- 28,784
he already waved executive privilege by testifying before Mueller...and not claiming executive privilege then... is the argument.exactly how could democrats FORCE him to lie?Sworn testimony shouldn't include lies. Why would McGhan need to lie? You aren't making any sense.You aren't arguing a point though. Yeah, McGhan has to show up. Big deal. So why is it such a whipping for Trump?
Sure, they can make McGahn show up, but they can't make him lie about his President.
So the libs will fight this as part of a pyrrhic battle that will give them nothing.
The liberals want to press McGahn to lie about President Trump, because their goal is to get rid of Trump.
His already given grand jury testimony under oath, would PREVENT him from lying.... losing his LAW LICENSE is not really an option for him....
And what would he say? All he will do is point them to reports and claim presidential privilege and another "impeachment news loop" starts and all the zombies watch.