Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 124,962
- 86,445
- 2,635
LOLOLLOLOLOLOLNow what does any of that have to do with you being an abject imbecile who actually said Obama doubled the debt but Bush didn't; when the reality is that the debt increased 83% under Obama but 86% under Budh?No budget deal with the Freedom Caucus, i.e. Jesus could be potus and we'd still be focked.Thanks for the rightarded view.![]()
To give you an idea of just how rightarded you are... doubling the debt would be a 100% increase. You claim that Obama doubled the debt; meaning he would have had to have increased the debt by 100% or thereabouts. The debt under Obama, so far, is up 83%. It will likely end up a few points highr than that by the time he leaves office. At the sane time, you deny that bush doubled the debt. But the debt went up 86%. And that's not even considering the reality that bush inherited a 17 billion dollar deficit where is Obama inherited a trillion dollar deficit.
On top of that tidbit of rightardism you offer, you compound it with your idiocy the the Great Recession was nothing but a market correction. Quite absurd if you understood we suffered a record number of foreclosures in the housing markets and a stock market which lost more than 50% of its valuation as a result of that and credit markets locking up. Only a brain-dead sycophantic rightwing nut job could possibly deny we were in a recession in 2008.
But fortunately for you -- you fit that Bill perfectly.![]()
the debt was around 10.6 T when Obama took office, it will be over 20 T when he leaves. 21.2 would be doubled, so technically you are correct. What is also correct is that Obama will have added almost as much as all previous presidents combined.
"the great recession" LOL, what a crock of shit.
well, your hero Obama seemed to be able to spend whatever he wanted without a budget. The house passed budget bills every year. How many did Obama sign? How many times did he try to work with congress to find a compromise budget?
And believe me, I fully appreciate the value of your answer given you idiotically think there was no recession in 2008.
Lets look at the absolute dollars added to the debt shall we? Bush added around 5T, Obama added around 10T. So please tell me, who added the most to the national debt?
As to the so-called 2008 recession. The market took a dive. Smart people bought when it was low and made a bundle, I am one of those. The housing and mortgage markets also crashed--------why? Because of a stupid liberal policy that forced banks to give mortgages to people who could never make the payments. The result was a wave of foreclosures and abandoned properties. Another liberal failure, but no where near a recession.
It's funny how you get caught making such a dumbfucking remark, so now you want to change the subject.
![lmao :lmao: :lmao:](/styles/smilies/lmao.gif)
![lmao :lmao: :lmao:](/styles/smilies/lmao.gif)
![lmao :lmao: :lmao:](/styles/smilies/lmao.gif)
Aside from claiming there was no recession in 2008, which in itself establishes you as 50 cards short of a full deck (NBER proves you're insane); you said Obama "doubled" the debt but Bush didn't. Now since you're batshit conservative crazy, you probably don't understand what that means; so I'll explain it to ya... "Doubling" it is a percentage, not an amount. "Doubling" it is increasing it by 100%.
And here's my favorite part... as a percentage, which is how YOU referred to the debt, Bush increased it (86%) more than Obama (83%).
Which means you have to be fucking insane (i.e., conservative) to say Obama doubled it but Bush didn't.
So naturally, rather than face the sad reality that you're simply a nut case who's rambling incoherently, which you've already demonstrated -- you try to change the subject to be about the actual dollar amount rather than the percentage you made a moron of yourself with earlier.
![dance :dance: :dance:](/styles/smilies/dance.gif)
Last edited: