🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Donald's Claims About Voter Fraud Are Based On A Lie

If it wasn't for voter fraud by the democrats Obamacare would never have passed.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

In 2008 Minnesota Senate race incumbent republican Norm Coleman narrowly defeated democrat Al Franken. Close enough that a recount was mandated. In the recount, Al Franken was declared the winner by a 312 vote edge. Rampant voter fraud charges followed. And yet, nothing came of it for reasons I cannot recall? But it was Franken’s election that gave Obama the vote he needed to pass Obamacare.

One case of voter fraud alone found in many links shows how Franken could have tipped the election. The whole system is absolutely bogus and corrupt. Is everyone blackmailed to shut up?

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

Widespread Voter Fraud Documented in New Minnesota Supreme Court Case - American Experiment

But for voter fraud in Minnesota, we would not have Obamacare. That is the scenario of a case being heard by the Supreme Court of Minnesota, over likely voter fraud that made the difference in the 2008 election of Senator Al Franken, whose vote was absolutely necessary for the passage of Obamacare.

After a grueling recount, the Minnesota Voters Alliance (MVA) found 941 ineligible felons who were allowed to vote in 2008 alone, exceeding the 312 vote margin separating DFL candidate Al Franken and GOP Sen. Norm Coleman after a grueling recount.

This is stunning. It was Franken’s razor-thin “victory” over incumbent Senator Norm Coleman that allowed the Democrats to ram Obamacare down the throats of the American people. If we assume that 80% of the 941 ineligible felons voted for Al Franken–a conservative assumption, as nearly all convicted felons are Democrats–then Franken’s victory is attributable to voter fraud.

The lawyers representing plaintiffs in the case have done a great deal of digging, and have come up with names, dates and places–illegal votes that likely swung Minnesota elections toward Democratic candidates. The illegal votes that plaintiffs have been able to document are only a small fraction of the actual total:

Court papers demonstrate how the incomplete list of ineligible voters provided to local election officials routinely allows felons, wards of the state, immigrants [who are not citizens] and other ineligible persons to register and vote.

“The 1,366 identified felons who have been permitted to vote is believed to be only a fraction of the true total,” the 110 page court petition filed by MVA and former Rep. Kirk Stensrud states. “Cooperation from the Secretary of State would have allowed for a more complete accounting of the number of ineligible persons who have been permitted to vote.”

The Minnesota Voters Alliance group behind the challenge alleges the actual number of illegal ballots submitted by ineligible voters far surpasses the 1,670 votes documented through a painstaking search of voting records hampered by a lack of cooperation by Minnesota Secretary of State Steve Simon.images

Altogether, more than 100,000 Minnesota felons had their right to vote restricted and reported to the Minnesota Secretary of State between 2003 and 2015. But the Minnesota Secretary of State only notifies local election officials of the ineligible status of felons and others if they’re already registered to vote in the Statewide Voter Registration System.

Secretary of State Simon has refused to release the data that would enable MVA to verify the actual number of ineligible people that have illegally cast a vote. In holding back the critical government data, Simon has ignored a Minnesota Department of Administration opinion stating that the voting records in question should be made public. “The Secretary of State plays a significant role with other election officials in permitting known ineligible felons to register or to vote,” court documents state.
 
Last edited:
Not that Donald's adherants care, but there were 35 credible allegations of voter fraud out of 835,065,926 votes cast between 2000 and 2014.

but now he wants to send his thugs out to intimidate minority voters. (yes, we know what "in Philadelphia" means)


Trump’s claims about voter fraud are based on a lie





The voting system that trump used to win the nomination he now says is rigged.

If it's rigged then at least during the nomination process, the voting system was rigged.

Doesn't he realize he's saying he rigged his own nomination?

I don't understand how people can fall for this man's lies.
 
14705763_10208616270616865_2634758647207336256_n.jpg
Trump would rather see his country go up in flames than admit America has rejected him like a rotting orange.
 
The democrook party is a lie.

Everything liberalism is founded on is a giant dried up lump of bullshit.

Jillian, you're really one of the biggest fucking morons I've ever suffered. It's a goddamned crime that you weren't sucked out of the womb by Kermit Gosnell.

Fertilizer is the only thing you will ever contribute to the world.


tissue, hack?

http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/?ex_cid=rrpromo

so you can't prove that the o/p isn't accurate.

now run along and go buy yourself another trump hat... if you can afford it.
 
If it wasn't for voter fraud by the democrats Obamacare would never have passed.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

In 2008 Minnesota Senate race incumbent republican Norm Coleman narrowly defeated democrat Al Franken. Close enough that a recount was mandated. In the recount, Al Franken was declared the winner by a 312 vote edge. Rampant voter fraud charges followed. And yet, nothing came of it for reasons I cannot recall? But it was Franken’s election that gave Obama the vote he needed to pass Obamacare.

One case of voter fraud alone found in many links shows how Franken could have tipped the election. The whole system is absolutely bogus and corrupt. Is everyone blackmailed to shut up?

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

Widespread Voter Fraud Documented in New Minnesota Supreme Court Case - American Experiment

But for voter fraud in Minnesota, we would not have Obamacare. That is the scenario of a case being heard by the Supreme Court of Minnesota, over likely voter fraud that made the difference in the 2008 election of Senator Al Franken, whose vote was absolutely necessary for the passage of Obamacare.

After a grueling recount, the Minnesota Voters Alliance (MVA) found 941 ineligible felons who were allowed to vote in 2008 alone, exceeding the 312 vote margin separating DFL candidate Al Franken and GOP Sen. Norm Coleman after a grueling recount.

This is stunning. It was Franken’s razor-thin “victory” over incumbent Senator Norm Coleman that allowed the Democrats to ram Obamacare down the throats of the American people. If we assume that 80% of the 941 ineligible felons voted for Al Franken–a conservative assumption, as nearly all convicted felons are Democrats–then Franken’s victory is attributable to voter fraud.

The lawyers representing plaintiffs in the case have done a great deal of digging, and have come up with names, dates and places–illegal votes that likely swung Minnesota elections toward Democratic candidates. The illegal votes that plaintiffs have been able to document are only a small fraction of the actual total:

Court papers demonstrate how the incomplete list of ineligible voters provided to local election officials routinely allows felons, wards of the state, immigrants [who are not citizens] and other ineligible persons to register and vote.

“The 1,366 identified felons who have been permitted to vote is believed to be only a fraction of the true total,” the 110 page court petition filed by MVA and former Rep. Kirk Stensrud states. “Cooperation from the Secretary of State would have allowed for a more complete accounting of the number of ineligible persons who have been permitted to vote.”

The Minnesota Voters Alliance group behind the challenge alleges the actual number of illegal ballots submitted by ineligible voters far surpasses the 1,670 votes documented through a painstaking search of voting records hampered by a lack of cooperation by Minnesota Secretary of State Steve Simon.images

Altogether, more than 100,000 Minnesota felons had their right to vote restricted and reported to the Minnesota Secretary of State between 2003 and 2015. But the Minnesota Secretary of State only notifies local election officials of the ineligible status of felons and others if they’re already registered to vote in the Statewide Voter Registration System.

Court papers demonstrate how the incomplete list of ineligible voters provided to local election officials routinely allows felons, wards of the state, immigrants and other ineligible persons to register and vote.

“The 1,366 identified felons who have been permitted to vote is believed to be only a fraction of the true total,” the 110 page court petition filed by MVA and former Rep. Kirk Stensrud states. “Cooperation from the Secretary of State would have allowed for a more complete accounting of the number of ineligible persons who have been permitted to vote.”

Secretary of State Simon has refused to release the data that would enable MVA to verify the actual number of ineligible people that have illegally cast a vote. In holding back the critical government data, Simon has ignored a Minnesota Department of Administration opinion stating that the voting records in question should be made public. “The Secretary of State plays a significant role with other election officials in permitting known ineligible felons to register or to vote,” court documents state.

You don't recall what came of the fraud charges? There were 8 months of court hearings, and eventually the Minnesota supreme court unanimously ruled that Franken won. You are just whining because you lost....again. There was no fraud.
 
So, two things we now know thanks to the libtards.
Al Gore was an asshole when he said Bush stole the election from him .

The BP were out of line to be at the polls with batons intimidating voters.


Thanks Jillian.
 
So, two things we now know thanks to the libtards.
Al Gore was an asshole when he said Bush stole the election from him .

The BP were out of line to be at the polls with batons intimidating voters.


Thanks Jillian.

al gore didn't lose because of in person voter fraud, willow ijit. but if the vote count were stopped in florida by a democrat you and your fellow ignorant twits would be trolling this board til the end of time

again, nice deflect from uneducated trumpsters.

now try disputing the o/p/.

otherwise, go back to your hole.
 
Not that Donald's adherants care, but there were 35 credible allegations of voter fraud out of 835,065,926 votes cast between 2000 and 2014.

but now he wants to send his thugs out to intimidate minority voters. (yes, we know what "in Philadelphia" means)


Trump’s claims about voter fraud are based on a lie





The voting system that trump used to win the nomination he now says is rigged.

If it's rigged then at least during the nomination process, the voting system was rigged.

Doesn't he realize he's saying he rigged his own nomination?

I don't understand how people can fall for this man's lies.
Bernie we know got the shaft.
 
Trump lashes out at Republicans for not buying election rigging line
Source: Politico

Donald Trump on Monday morning lashed out at Republican leaders, including House Speaker Paul Ryan, who have pushed back against the Republican nominee’s message that the election is being rigged against him.

Donald J. Trump ‏@realDonaldTrump 1 hour ago
Of course there is large scale voter fraud happening on and before election day. Why do Republican leaders deny what is going on? So naive!


He followed up with a unity message for the deeply fractured Republican Party, saying, “We have all got to come together and win this election. We can't have four more years of Obama (or worse!).”

Trump’s campaign has been thrown into a tailspin by the release of a 2005 “Access Hollywood” tape in which the billionaire cavalierly talks cavalierly about being able to get away with sexual assault and the subsequent march of females who have accused him of groping them.

Read more: Trump lashes out at Republicans for not buying election rigging line
 
Not that Donald's adherants care, but there were 35 credible allegations of voter fraud out of 835,065,926 votes cast between 2000 and 2014.

but now he wants to send his thugs out to intimidate minority voters. (yes, we know what "in Philadelphia" means)


Trump’s claims about voter fraud are based on a lie
Yo jillderp...they are based on a lie...the lefts lie that there is no voter fraud...
 
So, two things we now know thanks to the libtards.
Al Gore was an asshole when he said Bush stole the election from him .

The BP were out of line to be at the polls with batons intimidating voters.


Thanks Jillian.

al gore didn't lose because of in person voter fraud, willow ijit. but if the vote count were stopped in florida by a democrat you and your fellow ignorant twits would be trolling this board til the end of time

again, nice deflect from uneducated trumpsters.

now try disputing the o/p/.

otherwise, go back to your hole.
Poor ewe, arguing with the Supreme Court? Ha! Ewe lose!
 
31 cases of voter impersonation since 2000.

32,000 deaths from guns each year.

Guess which problem Trump wants you to worry about.
 
If it wasn't for voter fraud by the democrats Obamacare would never have passed.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

In 2008 Minnesota Senate race incumbent republican Norm Coleman narrowly defeated democrat Al Franken. Close enough that a recount was mandated. In the recount, Al Franken was declared the winner by a 312 vote edge. Rampant voter fraud charges followed. And yet, nothing came of it for reasons I cannot recall? But it was Franken’s election that gave Obama the vote he needed to pass Obamacare.

One case of voter fraud alone found in many links shows how Franken could have tipped the election. The whole system is absolutely bogus and corrupt. Is everyone blackmailed to shut up?

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

Widespread Voter Fraud Documented in New Minnesota Supreme Court Case - American Experiment

But for voter fraud in Minnesota, we would not have Obamacare. That is the scenario of a case being heard by the Supreme Court of Minnesota, over likely voter fraud that made the difference in the 2008 election of Senator Al Franken, whose vote was absolutely necessary for the passage of Obamacare.

After a grueling recount, the Minnesota Voters Alliance (MVA) found 941 ineligible felons who were allowed to vote in 2008 alone, exceeding the 312 vote margin separating DFL candidate Al Franken and GOP Sen. Norm Coleman after a grueling recount.

This is stunning. It was Franken’s razor-thin “victory” over incumbent Senator Norm Coleman that allowed the Democrats to ram Obamacare down the throats of the American people. If we assume that 80% of the 941 ineligible felons voted for Al Franken–a conservative assumption, as nearly all convicted felons are Democrats–then Franken’s victory is attributable to voter fraud.

The lawyers representing plaintiffs in the case have done a great deal of digging, and have come up with names, dates and places–illegal votes that likely swung Minnesota elections toward Democratic candidates. The illegal votes that plaintiffs have been able to document are only a small fraction of the actual total:

Court papers demonstrate how the incomplete list of ineligible voters provided to local election officials routinely allows felons, wards of the state, immigrants [who are not citizens] and other ineligible persons to register and vote.

“The 1,366 identified felons who have been permitted to vote is believed to be only a fraction of the true total,” the 110 page court petition filed by MVA and former Rep. Kirk Stensrud states. “Cooperation from the Secretary of State would have allowed for a more complete accounting of the number of ineligible persons who have been permitted to vote.”

The Minnesota Voters Alliance group behind the challenge alleges the actual number of illegal ballots submitted by ineligible voters far surpasses the 1,670 votes documented through a painstaking search of voting records hampered by a lack of cooperation by Minnesota Secretary of State Steve Simon.images

Altogether, more than 100,000 Minnesota felons had their right to vote restricted and reported to the Minnesota Secretary of State between 2003 and 2015. But the Minnesota Secretary of State only notifies local election officials of the ineligible status of felons and others if they’re already registered to vote in the Statewide Voter Registration System.

Court papers demonstrate how the incomplete list of ineligible voters provided to local election officials routinely allows felons, wards of the state, immigrants and other ineligible persons to register and vote.

“The 1,366 identified felons who have been permitted to vote is believed to be only a fraction of the true total,” the 110 page court petition filed by MVA and former Rep. Kirk Stensrud states. “Cooperation from the Secretary of State would have allowed for a more complete accounting of the number of ineligible persons who have been permitted to vote.”

Secretary of State Simon has refused to release the data that would enable MVA to verify the actual number of ineligible people that have illegally cast a vote. In holding back the critical government data, Simon has ignored a Minnesota Department of Administration opinion stating that the voting records in question should be made public. “The Secretary of State plays a significant role with other election officials in permitting known ineligible felons to register or to vote,” court documents state.

You don't recall what came of the fraud charges? There were 8 months of court hearings, and eventually the Minnesota supreme court unanimously ruled that Franken won. You are just whining because you lost....again. There was no fraud.

No fraud? The evidence proves there was fraud. It is illegal for felons to vote.

The ruling or lack of ruling proves that courts are beholden to their benefactors or those who are coercing them. Such as James Comey of the FBI, such as the total dereliction of duty on the IRS scandal. Such as Hillary destroys evidence after a congressional subpoena and no one is charged.
 
Here's Part 1 of the rigging


Poor John Miller is getting schlonged LOL
Trump’s Shameful Closing Argument
October 17, 2016

Rick Klein: “And so it will end for Donald Trump with words that could be far more damaging than the insults or innuendo or labels or lies. Trump is closing with allegations of massive conspiracy, suggesting a corporate/media/international cabal to boost the Clintons that would be unprecedented in scope. Even if there’s no evidence for any of it, Trump is now using words (and Tweets) that directly undermine faith in American democracy. (Notably, after Newt Gingrich gave him a partial out on ‘This Week,’ saying he meant media conspiracy and not precinct-level irregularities that would leave Americans skeptical of the results, Trump Tweeted to clarify that he means both. Mike Pence and Paul Ryan are among those who are signaling they disagree.)”


“By saying the election itself is ‘rigged,’ Trump is playing a dangerous game during a tense time. With each passing day, the possibility of a gracious loser, in keeping with American traditions of power transfer, diminishes with fresh allegations.”
 
Again, it will forever be an article of religious faith among Republicans that they lose elections as a consequence of the myth of "voter fraud," when in fact nothing could be further from the truth.
 

Forum List

Back
Top