Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Feel free to show where reporters are exempt form possession of stolen property laws.
This thread is too stupid to be discussed much......But, for your benefit, OKTX, know that there is a Journalist Shield Law states that federal and state law generally provides journalists with substantial protection....
Quote it.Feel free to show where reporters are exempt form possession of stolen property laws.
This thread is too stupid to be discussed much......But, for your benefit, OKTX, know that there is a Journalist Shield Law states that federal and state law generally provides journalists with substantial protection....
He also said "it's different for the media." Does that mean the media "possesses" the documents? That would be nonsensical. He obviously meant it's illegal for anyone who isn't in the media to look at them. So on top of being an asshole, he's also a moron.He said it's illegal to POSESS the documents, as they are stolen. And that is correct. That's different from simply viewing them on wikileaks.
Stop being so disingenuous with every fucking thread you start.
Trump wants to give minorities jobs, Hillary wants them on welfare..................
So, just as I said, he's an asshole and a moron.He also said "it's different for the media." Does that mean the media "possesses" the documents? That would be nonsensical. He obviously meant it's illegal for anyone who isn't in the media to look at them. So on top of being an asshole, he's also a moron.He said it's illegal to POSESS the documents, as they are stolen. And that is correct. That's different from simply viewing them on wikileaks.
Stop being so disingenuous with every fucking thread you start.
I really think he misphrased that, because CNN doesn't "possess" the emails either. They're just reading them on wikileaks like everyone else.
And CNN is being disingenuousHe said it's illegal to POSESS the documents, as they are stolen. And that is correct. That's different from simply viewing them on wikileaks.
Stop being so disingenuous with every fucking thread you start.
Wow, what an asshole! Let's be clear, it's completely legal to view the emails released by wikileaks and be made aware of the corruption and lies the establishment is swimming in. You can view them at your own pleasure.
As usual, the Clinton News Network is fully in the tank for Hillary, spreading complete fabrications. Maybe in Hillary's America the media will tell you what to think indeed. That certainly is how it works for Hillary drones as is.
Better drink your ovaltine. LOL
Moronic contention which shows a complete lack of comprehension.......What Cuomo is stating is that its ILLEGAL to possess stolen documents......NOT that its "illegal" to hear about them from the media.............
Are you drunk already so early in the evening?
He also said "it's different for the media." Does that mean the media "possesses" the documents? That would be nonsensical. He obviously meant it's illegal for anyone who isn't in the media to look at them. So on top of being an asshole, he's also a moron.He said it's illegal to POSESS the documents, as they are stolen. And that is correct. That's different from simply viewing them on wikileaks.
Stop being so disingenuous with every fucking thread you start.
I really think he misphrased that, because CNN doesn't "possess" the emails either. They're just reading them on wikileaks like everyone else.
Trump wants to give minorities jobs, Hillary wants them on welfare..................
How many minorities can Trump hire at his failed casinos, failed airline, failed university, failed wine distribution, failed steaks on-line, failed vodka company, failed magazine ???? LOL
So they are stolen?He said it's illegal to POSESS the documents, as they are stolen. And that is correct. That's different from simply viewing them on wikileaks.
Stop being so disingenuous with every fucking thread you start.
So they are stolen?He said it's illegal to POSESS the documents, as they are stolen. And that is correct. That's different from simply viewing them on wikileaks.
Stop being so disingenuous with every fucking thread you start.
And what are the trump tapes?
Didn't they steal from him on basis of the 4th?
What about Carter's grandson illegally taping Romney..
No fucker fair game is fair game
.
This is because the leaks can change the election and Clinton is now SCARED
Sure.....you will always have the old, white, uneducated male voters.....Fear not its now about 32% of the eligible voters. LOL
So they are stolen?He said it's illegal to POSESS the documents, as they are stolen. And that is correct. That's different from simply viewing them on wikileaks.
Stop being so disingenuous with every fucking thread you start.
And what are the trump tapes?
Didn't they steal from him on basis of the 4th?
What about Carter's grandson illegally taping Romney..
No fucker fair game is fair game
.
I believe NYT actually committed a crime when they released partial Trump tax return.
This is because the leaks can change the election and Clinton is now SCARED
I kind of think that's the humps trump card..this is a midterm election...
Sure.....you will always have the old, white, uneducated male voters.....Fear not its now about 32% of the eligible voters. LOL
Well since only about 52.5% of eligibles actually voted in 2012, 32% could be enough with the enthusiasm gap. Anti hildabitch voters seem to much more motivated, and the hildabitch ain't no maobama.
This is because the leaks can change the election and Clinton is now SCARED
Sure.....you will always have the old, white, uneducated male voters.....Fear not its now about 32% of the eligible voters. LOL
Well since only about 52.5% of eligibles actually voted in 2012, 32% could be enough with the enthusiasm gap. Anti hildabitch voters seem to much more motivated, and the hildabitch ain't no maobama.
So they are stolen?He said it's illegal to POSESS the documents, as they are stolen. And that is correct. That's different from simply viewing them on wikileaks.
Stop being so disingenuous with every fucking thread you start.
And what are the trump tapes?
Didn't they steal from him on basis of the 4th?
What about Carter's grandson illegally taping Romney..
No fucker fair game is fair game
.
Feel free to show where reporters are exempt form possession of stolen property laws.
This thread is too stupid to be discussed much......But, for your benefit, OKTX, know that there is a Journalist Shield Law states that federal and state law generally provides journalists with substantial protection....
This is because the leaks can change the election and Clinton is now SCARED
Sure.....you will always have the old, white, uneducated male voters.....Fear not its now about 32% of the eligible voters. LOL
Well since only about 52.5% of eligibles actually voted in 2012, 32% could be enough with the enthusiasm gap. Anti hildabitch voters seem to much more motivated, and the hildabitch ain't no maobama.
I'll crawl over broken glass to vote against Hillary.
So they are stolen?He said it's illegal to POSESS the documents, as they are stolen. And that is correct. That's different from simply viewing them on wikileaks.
Stop being so disingenuous with every fucking thread you start.
And what are the trump tapes?
Didn't they steal from him on basis of the 4th?
What about Carter's grandson illegally taping Romney..
No fucker fair game is fair game
.
Again, CNN does not "possess" the emails. Why would they incriminate themselves by doing something illegal? They'll leave that to wikileaks.
