Don't make a Mistake...

[OKTexas]

Yeah, one dude sold some identities and had no clue who he was selling to. LMAO

.

No, that wasn't all. There were people who sold server and ad space to people who said they lived in the U.S., but paid in rubles.

How many of those folks were indicted?

.

Did I say they were?

With currency conversion over payment platforms they my not have known what currency the bill was paid in. But that doesn't negate the FACT that no one in Trumps orbit was found to have conspired with the Russians. No matter how you commies try to spin it.

.

Let's do this one more time. Mueller could not find definitive evidence to show someone within Trump's campaign, conspired with the Russian government.

Erik Prince is a very good example of this, and it will be interesting to see if he is one of the redacted investigations still to drop.

Democrats ask Bill Barr for PERJURY probe into Erik Prince over meeting with Putin's banker | Daily Mail Online

LMAO commies are asking for a probe of Barr for "perjury". You folks just have no freaking clue when to call it quits, there just might some straw you have yet to grasp.

.

 

[Lewdog]

You can play all the word games you want, the FACT is NO CRIME was committed. No one colluded and no one obstructed. For one thing there has to be an underlying CRIME for obstruction to occur.

It's not "word games." When it comes to laws, and the enforcement of laws, EVERY single word matters and can make a HUGE difference.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

You can play all the word games you want, the FACT is NO CRIME was committed. No one colluded and no one obstructed. For one thing there has to be an underlying CRIME for obstruction to occur.

It's not "word games." When it comes to laws, and the enforcement of laws, EVERY single word matters and can make a HUGE difference.

NO charges is the final word. NONE NADA ZIP. No collusion found and no laws broken means NO obstruction since in order to obstruct you must have a crime to obstruct.

 

[OKTexas]

You can play all the word games you want, the FACT is NO CRIME was committed. No one colluded and no one obstructed. For one thing there has to be an underlying CRIME for obstruction to occur.

It's not "word games." When it comes to laws, and the enforcement of laws, EVERY single word matters and can make a HUGE difference.

No charges, no convictions means every single person is presumed innocent. You can try to play word games all night and it won't change the facts.

.

 

[Lewdog]

No, that wasn't all. There were people who sold server and ad space to people who said they lived in the U.S., but paid in rubles.

How many of those folks were indicted?

.

Did I say they were?

With currency conversion over payment platforms they my not have known what currency the bill was paid in. But that doesn't negate the FACT that no one in Trumps orbit was found to have conspired with the Russians. No matter how you commies try to spin it.

.

Let's do this one more time. Mueller could not find definitive evidence to show someone within Trump's campaign, conspired with the Russian government.

Erik Prince is a very good example of this, and it will be interesting to see if he is one of the redacted investigations still to drop.

Democrats ask Bill Barr for PERJURY probe into Erik Prince over meeting with Putin's banker | Daily Mail Online

LMAO commies are asking for a probe of Barr for "perjury". You folks just have no freaking clue when to call it quits, there just might some straw you have yet to grasp.

.

He got caught lying. He flat out told a lie. Bill Clinton got impeached for lying under oath. Barr was asked if Mueller or his team were unhappy with Barr's 4 page summary and voiced their concerns to him. Barr said no. Then a couple weeks later it became known that not only did Mueller and his team send Barr a letter before his testimony, they sent him TWO letters and Barr even talked to Mueller on the phone about it.

Barr is either one of the dumbest fucking people in Washington to think he would not get caught in his lie, or he just doesn't care about his reputation.

You know it's bad when even Lindsey Graham wrote a letter to Mueller asking if he wanted to testify about his communications with Barr, after Graham had previously said the Senate would not host Mueller for testimony.

 

[Lewdog]

No, that wasn't all. There were people who sold server and ad space to people who said they lived in the U.S., but paid in rubles.

How many of those folks were indicted?

.

Did I say they were?

With currency conversion over payment platforms they my not have known what currency the bill was paid in. But that doesn't negate the FACT that no one in Trumps orbit was found to have conspired with the Russians. No matter how you commies try to spin it.

.

Let's do this one more time. Mueller could not find definitive evidence to show someone within Trump's campaign, conspired with the Russian government.

Erik Prince is a very good example of this, and it will be interesting to see if he is one of the redacted investigations still to drop.

Democrats ask Bill Barr for PERJURY probe into Erik Prince over meeting with Putin's banker | Daily Mail Online

Mueller had 2 YEARS and COMPLETE AUTHORITY to investigate, no one prevent him in any way from that, He found no evidence of collusion which means there was NONE you moron.

And Mueller presented several points of Trump obstruction.

But hey, I mean after 2 years you are still so brain dead that no many how many times you have to be told...

MUELLER SAID HE WOULD FOLLOW DOJ GUIDELINES THAT A SITTING PRESIDENT CANNOT BE INDICTED

MUELLER SAID HE WOULD FOLLOW DOJ GUIDELINES THAT A SITTING PRESIDENT CANNOT BE INDICTED

MUELLER SAID HE WOULD FOLLOW DOJ GUIDELINES THAT A SITTING PRESIDENT CANNOT BE INDICTED

MUELLER SAID HE WOULD FOLLOW DOJ GUIDELINES THAT A SITTING PRESIDENT CANNOT BE INDICTED

MUELLER SAID HE WOULD FOLLOW DOJ GUIDELINES THAT A SITTING PRESIDENT CANNOT BE INDICTED

MUELLER SAID HE WOULD FOLLOW DOJ GUIDELINES THAT A SITTING PRESIDENT CANNOT BE INDICTED

 

[Lewdog]

You can play all the word games you want, the FACT is NO CRIME was committed. No one colluded and no one obstructed. For one thing there has to be an underlying CRIME for obstruction to occur.

It's not "word games." When it comes to laws, and the enforcement of laws, EVERY single word matters and can make a HUGE difference.

No charges, no convictions means every single person is presumed innocent. You can try to play word games all night and it won't change the facts.

.

There has been quite a few people indicted, found guilty, and more investigations still ongoing.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

He found NO Obstruction, or perhaps you can explain in detail what EXACTLY Trump did to obstruct Mueller?

 

[Coyote]

You can play all the word games you want, the FACT is NO CRIME was committed. No one colluded and no one obstructed. For one thing there has to be an underlying CRIME for obstruction to occur.

It's not "word games." When it comes to laws, and the enforcement of laws, EVERY single word matters and can make a HUGE difference.

No charges, no convictions means every single person is presumed innocent. You can try to play word games all night and it won't change the facts.

.

So that would apply to Clinton then, since all those investigations produced nothing?

 

[Coyote]

He found NO Obstruction, or perhaps you can explain in detail what EXACTLY Trump did to obstruct Mueller?

Mueller specifically said he could not exonerate Trump of obstruction. How does that translate into “no obstruction”

 

[OKTexas]

How many of those folks were indicted?

.

Did I say they were?

With currency conversion over payment platforms they my not have known what currency the bill was paid in. But that doesn't negate the FACT that no one in Trumps orbit was found to have conspired with the Russians. No matter how you commies try to spin it.

.

Let's do this one more time. Mueller could not find definitive evidence to show someone within Trump's campaign, conspired with the Russian government.

Erik Prince is a very good example of this, and it will be interesting to see if he is one of the redacted investigations still to drop.

Democrats ask Bill Barr for PERJURY probe into Erik Prince over meeting with Putin's banker | Daily Mail Online

LMAO commies are asking for a probe of Barr for "perjury". You folks just have no freaking clue when to call it quits, there just might some straw you have yet to grasp.

.

He got caught lying. He flat out told a lie. Bill Clinton got impeached for lying under oath. Barr was asked if Mueller or his team were unhappy with Barr's 4 page summary and voiced their concerns to him. Barr said no. Then a couple weeks later it became known that not only did Mueller and his team send Barr a letter before his testimony, they sent him TWO letters and Barr even talked to Mueller on the phone about it.

Barr is either one of the dumbest fucking people in Washington to think he would not get caught in his lie, or he just doesn't care about his reputation.

You know it's bad when even Lindsey Graham wrote a letter to Mueller asking if he wanted to testify about his communications with Barr, after Graham had previously said the Senate would not host Mueller for testimony.

Except Mueller complained about perception and press coverage, not Barr's content or conclusions. In fact Mueller told Barr he misrepresented nothing in his report. So he didn't lie, no matter how much you commies pretend he did.

.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

You can play all the word games you want, the FACT is NO CRIME was committed. No one colluded and no one obstructed. For one thing there has to be an underlying CRIME for obstruction to occur.

It's not "word games." When it comes to laws, and the enforcement of laws, EVERY single word matters and can make a HUGE difference.

No charges, no convictions means every single person is presumed innocent. You can try to play word games all night and it won't change the facts.

.

So that would apply to Clinton then, since all those investigations produced nothing?

Clinton LIED under OATH to a SITTING JUDGE. That is a MOST definite CRIME. Further Clinton tried to tamper with a witness and was caught and charged with that as well.

 

[Lewdog]

He found NO Obstruction, or perhaps you can explain in detail what EXACTLY Trump did to obstruct Mueller?

You'd already know that if you had read the report.

But then again, even if you did read it, you wouldn't be able to understand it... I mean here it is 2 years in and you still think Trump is innocent since Mueller didn't indict him.

 

[Lewdog]

You can play all the word games you want, the FACT is NO CRIME was committed. No one colluded and no one obstructed. For one thing there has to be an underlying CRIME for obstruction to occur.

It's not "word games." When it comes to laws, and the enforcement of laws, EVERY single word matters and can make a HUGE difference.

No charges, no convictions means every single person is presumed innocent. You can try to play word games all night and it won't change the facts.

.

So that would apply to Clinton then, since all those investigations produced nothing?

Clinton LIED under OATH to a SITTING JUDGE. That is a MOST definite CRIME. Further Clinton tried to tamper with a witness and was caught and charged with that as well.

Lying under oath to a judge is just as bad as lying to Congress.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

You can play all the word games you want, the FACT is NO CRIME was committed. No one colluded and no one obstructed. For one thing there has to be an underlying CRIME for obstruction to occur.

It's not "word games." When it comes to laws, and the enforcement of laws, EVERY single word matters and can make a HUGE difference.

No charges, no convictions means every single person is presumed innocent. You can try to play word games all night and it won't change the facts.

.

So that would apply to Clinton then, since all those investigations produced nothing?

Clinton LIED under OATH to a SITTING JUDGE. That is a MOST definite CRIME. Further Clinton tried to tamper with a witness and was caught and charged with that as well.

Lying under oath to a judge is just as bad as lying to Congress.

Remind me again what the democrats did to Clinton for his perjury and his tampering with a witness?

 

[Lewdog]

Did I say they were?

With currency conversion over payment platforms they my not have known what currency the bill was paid in. But that doesn't negate the FACT that no one in Trumps orbit was found to have conspired with the Russians. No matter how you commies try to spin it.

.

Let's do this one more time. Mueller could not find definitive evidence to show someone within Trump's campaign, conspired with the Russian government.

Erik Prince is a very good example of this, and it will be interesting to see if he is one of the redacted investigations still to drop.

Democrats ask Bill Barr for PERJURY probe into Erik Prince over meeting with Putin's banker | Daily Mail Online

LMAO commies are asking for a probe of Barr for "perjury". You folks just have no freaking clue when to call it quits, there just might some straw you have yet to grasp.

.

He got caught lying. He flat out told a lie. Bill Clinton got impeached for lying under oath. Barr was asked if Mueller or his team were unhappy with Barr's 4 page summary and voiced their concerns to him. Barr said no. Then a couple weeks later it became known that not only did Mueller and his team send Barr a letter before his testimony, they sent him TWO letters and Barr even talked to Mueller on the phone about it.

Barr is either one of the dumbest fucking people in Washington to think he would not get caught in his lie, or he just doesn't care about his reputation.

You know it's bad when even Lindsey Graham wrote a letter to Mueller asking if he wanted to testify about his communications with Barr, after Graham had previously said the Senate would not host Mueller for testimony.

Except Mueller complained about perception and press coverage, not Barr's content or conclusions. In fact Mueller told Barr he misrepresented nothing in his report. So he didn't lie, no matter how much you commies pretend he did.

.

Boy you bit on that hard. Please show in Mueller's letter where he complained about how the media was interpreting the report incorrectly. Oh yeah... he didn't, Barr said that... and lied.

 

[OKTexas]

He found NO Obstruction, or perhaps you can explain in detail what EXACTLY Trump did to obstruct Mueller?

Mueller specifically said he could not exonerate Trump of obstruction. How does that translate into “no obstruction”

It wasn't his job to exonerate anyone and having no sealed indictment against Trump the presumption of innocence is assumed. No one is charged by our legal system with proving their innocence.

.

 

[Coyote]

He found NO Obstruction, or perhaps you can explain in detail what EXACTLY Trump did to obstruct Mueller?

Mueller specifically said he could not exonerate Trump of obstruction. How does that translate into “no obstruction”

It wasn't his job to exonerate anyone and having no sealed indictment against Trump the presumption of innocence is assumed. No one is charged by our legal system with proving their innocence.

.

Again, Mueller NEVER said no obstruction.

 

[Coyote]

You can play all the word games you want, the FACT is NO CRIME was committed. No one colluded and no one obstructed. For one thing there has to be an underlying CRIME for obstruction to occur.

It's not "word games." When it comes to laws, and the enforcement of laws, EVERY single word matters and can make a HUGE difference.

No charges, no convictions means every single person is presumed innocent. You can try to play word games all night and it won't change the facts.

.

So that would apply to Clinton then, since all those investigations produced nothing?

Clinton LIED under OATH to a SITTING JUDGE. That is a MOST definite CRIME. Further Clinton tried to tamper with a witness and was caught and charged with that as well.

I meant Hilary.

 

[Lewdog]

It's not "word games." When it comes to laws, and the enforcement of laws, EVERY single word matters and can make a HUGE difference.

No charges, no convictions means every single person is presumed innocent. You can try to play word games all night and it won't change the facts.

.

So that would apply to Clinton then, since all those investigations produced nothing?

Clinton LIED under OATH to a SITTING JUDGE. That is a MOST definite CRIME. Further Clinton tried to tamper with a witness and was caught and charged with that as well.

Lying under oath to a judge is just as bad as lying to Congress.

Remind me again what the democrats did to Clinton for his perjury and his tampering with a witness?

Well he was impeached, which he deserved. In fact, I think he should have also been removed from office.

There have only been 2 Presidents in the history of the U.S. impeached.