cbirch2
Active Member
- Jul 9, 2011
- 1,394
- 49
- 36
That is what i said before you said it.
I told you i was way ahead of you what are you doing reading it as we go ?
But you're gonna ignore the math ,i thought you liked math.
What math? i dont think you get what i said. I might have had a typo as well. There is no difference in information between the human and chimpanzee genome. Theres minor differences, but in terms of total information they are almost exactly the same. Your 5% figure is pulled from your ass, they both have 2.9 billion base pairs in their DNA. Just because two of those segments of base pairs joined together doesnt mean there is actually less information, it means the same amount of information is contained within a smaller number of chromosomes.
At least allie knows what hes talking about now. Your still confused.
WHICH IS IT? There is NO difference, or there is SOME difference???
You see, when you can't make a coherent statement even at this level, you've got a problem.
Dude you really cant get it. YWC said humans had 5% more information than chimps did. I said thats wrong. Of course we have some more/different information, but in terms of raw base pairs the amount of information they contain is nearly identical to ours.
Dont you get this?