Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
No, dumb ass. Giving them unaccountable handouts keeps them poor. How stupid are you? Boggles the mind
So churches means test everyone who walks into a soup kitchen or a food bank or clothing distribution?
Are you sure about that? Can you produce some paperwork on that?
Why do you exaggerate 5,000 times every second?
You're the one that said private charity holds the poor accountable. Does it?
How?
"So churches means test everyone who walks into a soup kitchen or a food bank or clothing distribution?"
Where do you come up with those ridiculous exaggerations, and beyond that what is your point?
What is an unaccountable handout? You used the term. Define it. Or babble some more and then run off.
So churches means test everyone who walks into a soup kitchen or a food bank or clothing distribution?
Are you sure about that? Can you produce some paperwork on that?
Why do you exaggerate 5,000 times every second?
You're the one that said private charity holds the poor accountable. Does it?
How?
"So churches means test everyone who walks into a soup kitchen or a food bank or clothing distribution?"
Where do you come up with those ridiculous exaggerations, and beyond that what is your point?
What is an unaccountable handout? You used the term. Define it. Or babble some more and then run off.
If that was your question why did you put all that other stupid crap in there?
Charities are accountable to their donors. The donors do not contribute if they do not get the results they are looking for. That is accountable charity. Politicians take money by force. You don't pay, they send guns to take the money. Then they give it according to their terms, not yours. You don't get the results you want, you pay anyway. That is unaccountable
The Tea Party is nothing more than a rebranded John Birch Society
I doubt if any responsible politician would belong
Why do you exaggerate 5,000 times every second?
You're the one that said private charity holds the poor accountable. Does it?
How?
"So churches means test everyone who walks into a soup kitchen or a food bank or clothing distribution?"
Where do you come up with those ridiculous exaggerations, and beyond that what is your point?
What is an unaccountable handout? You used the term. Define it. Or babble some more and then run off.
If that was your question why did you put all that other stupid crap in there?
Charities are accountable to their donors. The donors do not contribute if they do not get the results they are looking for. That is accountable charity. Politicians take money by force. You don't pay, they send guns to take the money. Then they give it according to their terms, not yours. You don't get the results you want, you pay anyway. That is unaccountable
Charities have to spend a large part of their donations on fund raising
Government does not
"So churches means test everyone who walks into a soup kitchen or a food bank or clothing distribution?"
Where do you come up with those ridiculous exaggerations, and beyond that what is your point?
You're the one that said private charity holds the poor accountable. Does it?
How?
"So churches means test everyone who walks into a soup kitchen or a food bank or clothing distribution?"
Where do you come up with those ridiculous exaggerations, and beyond that what is your point?
What is an unaccountable handout? You used the term. Define it. Or babble some more and then run off.
If that was your question why did you put all that other stupid crap in there?
Charities are accountable to their donors. The donors do not contribute if they do not get the results they are looking for. That is accountable charity. Politicians take money by force. You don't pay, they send guns to take the money. Then they give it according to their terms, not yours. You don't get the results you want, you pay anyway. That is unaccountable
Charities have to spend a large part of their donations on fund raising
Government does not
So seriously, you're comparing private charity overhead to government?
And you're arguing that in a pro government way?
Um...I'm not going to make any sudden movements, I will just back out of the room slowly. You are one whacked out lunatic, that's for sure
Yes, since government went to being run by monks, it's been fab"So churches means test everyone who walks into a soup kitchen or a food bank or clothing distribution?"
Where do you come up with those ridiculous exaggerations, and beyond that what is your point?
What is an unaccountable handout? You used the term. Define it. Or babble some more and then run off.
If that was your question why did you put all that other stupid crap in there?
Charities are accountable to their donors. The donors do not contribute if they do not get the results they are looking for. That is accountable charity. Politicians take money by force. You don't pay, they send guns to take the money. Then they give it according to their terms, not yours. You don't get the results you want, you pay anyway. That is unaccountable
Charities have to spend a large part of their donations on fund raising
Government does not
So seriously, you're comparing private charity overhead to government?
And you're arguing that in a pro government way?
Um...I'm not going to make any sudden movements, I will just back out of the room slowly. You are one whacked out lunatic, that's for sure
Absolutely
The Government is more efficient in collecting money than private charities are
Yes, since government went to being run by monks, it's been fabWhat is an unaccountable handout? You used the term. Define it. Or babble some more and then run off.
If that was your question why did you put all that other stupid crap in there?
Charities are accountable to their donors. The donors do not contribute if they do not get the results they are looking for. That is accountable charity. Politicians take money by force. You don't pay, they send guns to take the money. Then they give it according to their terms, not yours. You don't get the results you want, you pay anyway. That is unaccountable
Charities have to spend a large part of their donations on fund raising
Government does not
So seriously, you're comparing private charity overhead to government?
And you're arguing that in a pro government way?
Um...I'm not going to make any sudden movements, I will just back out of the room slowly. You are one whacked out lunatic, that's for sure
Absolutely
The Government is more efficient in collecting money than private charities are
How's the kool-aid today? It's it a bit chilly to go swimming in it?
Yes, since government went to being run by monks, it's been fabIf that was your question why did you put all that other stupid crap in there?
Charities are accountable to their donors. The donors do not contribute if they do not get the results they are looking for. That is accountable charity. Politicians take money by force. You don't pay, they send guns to take the money. Then they give it according to their terms, not yours. You don't get the results you want, you pay anyway. That is unaccountable
Charities have to spend a large part of their donations on fund raising
Government does not
So seriously, you're comparing private charity overhead to government?
And you're arguing that in a pro government way?
Um...I'm not going to make any sudden movements, I will just back out of the room slowly. You are one whacked out lunatic, that's for sure
Absolutely
The Government is more efficient in collecting money than private charities are
How's the kool-aid today? It's it a bit chilly to go swimming in it?
A good charity will have overhead of around 33%. Their CEOs make more than the President
Who is more efficient?
Yes, since government went to being run by monks, it's been fabIf that was your question why did you put all that other stupid crap in there?
Charities are accountable to their donors. The donors do not contribute if they do not get the results they are looking for. That is accountable charity. Politicians take money by force. You don't pay, they send guns to take the money. Then they give it according to their terms, not yours. You don't get the results you want, you pay anyway. That is unaccountable
Charities have to spend a large part of their donations on fund raising
Government does not
So seriously, you're comparing private charity overhead to government?
And you're arguing that in a pro government way?
Um...I'm not going to make any sudden movements, I will just back out of the room slowly. You are one whacked out lunatic, that's for sure
Absolutely
The Government is more efficient in collecting money than private charities are
How's the kool-aid today? It's it a bit chilly to go swimming in it?
A good charity will have overhead of around 33%. Their CEOs make more than the President
Who is more efficient?
And you know that about charity CEOs how?
The 33% is minimum, not average
Also, you actually think efficiency is measured only by the salary of CEO compared to the President? Seriously?
The President has to go before We the People to get hired and keep hi jobYes, since government went to being run by monks, it's been fabCharities have to spend a large part of their donations on fund raising
Government does not
So seriously, you're comparing private charity overhead to government?
And you're arguing that in a pro government way?
Um...I'm not going to make any sudden movements, I will just back out of the room slowly. You are one whacked out lunatic, that's for sure
Absolutely
The Government is more efficient in collecting money than private charities are
How's the kool-aid today? It's it a bit chilly to go swimming in it?
A good charity will have overhead of around 33%. Their CEOs make more than the President
Who is more efficient?
The CEO. If they do a crappy job running the company they get fired. If Obama does a crappy job running the country. We have nitwits like you to prop him up and tell us the sky is green.
The President has to go before We the People to get hired and keep hi jobYes, since government went to being run by monks, it's been fabSo seriously, you're comparing private charity overhead to government?
And you're arguing that in a pro government way?
Um...I'm not going to make any sudden movements, I will just back out of the room slowly. You are one whacked out lunatic, that's for sure
Absolutely
The Government is more efficient in collecting money than private charities are
How's the kool-aid today? It's it a bit chilly to go swimming in it?
A good charity will have overhead of around 33%. Their CEOs make more than the President
Who is more efficient?
The CEO. If they do a crappy job running the company they get fired. If Obama does a crappy job running the country. We have nitwits like you to prop him up and tell us the sky is green.
Charity CEO just has to buy people off
The President has to go before We the People to get hired and keep hi jobYes, since government went to being run by monks, it's been fabAbsolutely
The Government is more efficient in collecting money than private charities are
How's the kool-aid today? It's it a bit chilly to go swimming in it?
A good charity will have overhead of around 33%. Their CEOs make more than the President
Who is more efficient?
The CEO. If they do a crappy job running the company they get fired. If Obama does a crappy job running the country. We have nitwits like you to prop him up and tell us the sky is green.
Charity CEO just has to buy people off
Right, no one in private enterprise is accountable, government employees are. LOL. You actually believe it too, don't you?
The President has to go before We the People to get hired and keep hi jobYes, since government went to being run by monks, it's been fab
How's the kool-aid today? It's it a bit chilly to go swimming in it?
A good charity will have overhead of around 33%. Their CEOs make more than the President
Who is more efficient?
The CEO. If they do a crappy job running the company they get fired. If Obama does a crappy job running the country. We have nitwits like you to prop him up and tell us the sky is green.
Charity CEO just has to buy people off
Right, no one in private enterprise is accountable, government employees are. LOL. You actually believe it too, don't you?
More people in so called "charities" go to jail than government employees
At their best, charities have to spend a significant portion of their money on advertising and fund raising
Government doesn't have to do that
It's so easy to imagine MLK standing in place of this tea partier:
Who teaches you and people like you such bull shit,you only got one talking point right,Jesus didn't talk about gays,the rest it total bull shit.MLK a republican today... You have lost it...
I would say Jesus would have definitely been more Democrat than Republican?
Reasons, Jesus never mentioned Homosextuality, Abortion,... These are GOP wedge issues
Jesus said murder was wrong: GOP is pro Death Penalty
Jesus advocated for the poor: GOP worship the rich
Jesus spoke against false gods: GOP are devotees of the Market and the almighty dollar
Jesus said turn the other cheek: GOP said Bomb Bomb Bomb. Never saw a war they said no to.
Jesus said love thy neighbour: Now that's just straight out socialism.
In his LAST speech ever and just a day before his death by the hands of a democrat Dr, King gave a short four and a half minute speech. He did not talk about what the democrats had done to the Negro. No he talked about what democratic government had done to ALL people.
After that he invoked the name of God and Gods word. Democrats killed that man because forty plus years ago he saw what democrats could and would do to a people and a nation.And every word out of his mouth are the VERY issues we are facing today from democrats.
????? I personally know John Lewis who marched with Dr King as I have spoke to him and others most recently at the 50th anniversary march in Selma with other that knew him and marched with Dr King, He was murdered fighting for workers rights in Memphis , I first saw Dr King in 67 at the Mobilization to end the war in NYC. To suggest he would have been a tea bagger is insane , Rep Lewis would be laughing at you and shaking his head at your insanity , Dr King fought against the right wing all his life
Martin Luther King Jr.'s advocacy for workers' rights, housing, jobs after 1963 overlooked
Martin Luther King Jr. s advocacy for workers rights housing jobs after 1963 overlooked - newsnet5.com Cleveland
The MLK Speech That Linked Vietnam and Civil Rights - Video - TIME.com
Dr. King WAS a REPUBLICAN shit breath and a CHRISTIAN. Something YOU hate. No go back to your rat hole and shut the hell up.
Nelson Rockefeller, a MLK contemporary, was a Republican. Go read his resume lol
