Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The prosecution PROVED their caseYou don't even know how trials are conducted. It's the PROSECUTION who presented THEIR case, dumbbell. And they presented ZERO proof.The judge rightfully allowed him to present a defense.....no matter how ridiculous it wasThe judge accepted that he "reasonably" believed it. That's why it proceeded as a SD case. I'll go with the judge on that.Wrong again my friend
The mere act of exiting a car does not represent a threat. Neither does posessing a weapon
You don't know the law. (in Florida)
You posted it
Look at the word "reasonably"
A person is justified in using or threatening to use deadly force if he or she reasonably believes that using or threatening to use such force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another
The jury took it for what it was .......a pathetic plea from a guilty man
it's worse than that. the defense failed so thoroughly there wasn't even a reasonable doubt about the case the prosecution presented.The prosecution PROVED their caseYou don't even know how trials are conducted. It's the PROSECUTION who presented THEIR case, dumbbell. And they presented ZERO proof.The judge rightfully allowed him to present a defense.....no matter how ridiculous it wasThe judge accepted that he "reasonably" believed it. That's why it proceeded as a SD case. I'll go with the judge on that.You don't know the law. (in Florida)
You posted it
Look at the word "reasonably"
A person is justified in using or threatening to use deadly force if he or she reasonably believes that using or threatening to use such force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another
The jury took it for what it was .......a pathetic plea from a guilty man
The defense FAILED to PROVE self defense