Durham report released

[yidnar]

Again, why didn't Durham levy charges? He had the authority.

He's telling you what he thought of his own claims when he both refused to levy any additional charges AND didn't recommend any in his report.

he will be testifying before congress next week ...even CNN admitted that the findings proved the dossier was fake .

 

[1srelluc]

Like they give a damn. The end justifies ANY MEANS where Trump is concerned. IT'S TIME TO BECOME UNGOVERNABLE...

I'm already there in a "cute law you got there but no Mr. Federal Man, I don't think I'll be doing that today" kinda way.

 

[Skylar]

he will be testifying before congress next week ...even CNN admitted that the findings proved the dossier was fake .

So if the crimes are as numerous and egregious as you seem to be insinuating....

....why no additional charges?

....why no recommendation of additional charges?

These aren't hard questions.

 

[Calypso Jones]

 

[Lakhota]

 

[Skylar]

Isn't it Trump that insists that the lack of charges are a full exoneration?

 

[Calypso Jones]

 

[Calypso Jones]

 

[Dragonlady]

Ex-CIA chief admitted that the 'Dirty 51' letter 'WAS political'

Former CIA director John Brennan has admitted that an infamous letter signed by 51 former intelligence officials that sought to discredit reporting on Hunter Biden's laptop 'was political'.

www.dailymail.co.uk

Well, of course it was political but that doesn’t mean it was untrue. And of course you’re quoting the daily Mail UK, which we’ve already posted links proving that that’s a questionable source anyway.

So the DOJ and FBI broke the law. Now what?

Neither the DOJ, nor the FBI broke the law. People used poor judgment, and made mistakes, but nobody broke the law.

I guess he’s forgotten about all of the people that were charged and convicted, and sent to jail in the wake of the Mueller Report.

And never forget the three of Durhams top prosecutors, who had been with him for years and signed onto this investigation with him, resigned in protest political pressure from the DOJ and the White House, to file charges, and Durham’s filing charges on no real evidence, which were tossed by the juries in less time that it takes to order in coffee.

 

[Rambunctious]

It also means that once again, a big nothingburger for the GOP. There was an obvious conspiracy by the government to nail a president to the cross with fabricated lies they knew were false created by his political opponents, but no harm no foul, business as usual. Three minor people indicted, two found innocent, one given a slap on the wrist and some community service, but no laws broken because they are above the law, and all the same players go on, the agencies go on unscathed to do it all over again the next time another "Trump" comes along.

Recommendation by Durham: a few minor corrective actions on paper for show and pretty much this will all just be buried under the carpet. They tried to destroy a president to effect a political coup and walk free. But if you made the slightest callous threat against Biden, they would break down your door and drag you off to federal prison and be served the maximum possible punishment just like the J6-ers.

I know.... its a white wash....

 

[Skylar]

Well, of course it was political but that doesn’t mean it was untrue. And of course you’re quoting the daily Mail UK, which we’ve already posted links proving that that’s a questionable source anyway.

Neither the DOJ, nor the FBI broke the law. People used poor judgment, and made mistakes, but nobody broke the law.

I guess he’s forgotten about all of the people that were charged and convicted, and sent to jail in the wake of the Mueller Report.

And never forget the three of Durhams top prosecutors, who had been with him for years and signed onto this investigation with him, resigned in protest political pressure from the DOJ and the White House, to file charges, and Durham’s filing charges on no real evidence, which were tossed by the juries in less time that it takes to order in coffee.

What did Trump call it when he wasn't charged with any crime in the Mueller report?

 

[Rambunctious]

It also means that once again, a big nothingburger for the GOP. There was an obvious conspiracy by the government to nail a president to the cross with fabricated lies they knew were false created by his political opponents, but no harm no foul, business as usual. Three minor people indicted, two found innocent, one given a slap on the wrist and some community service, but no laws broken because they are above the law, and all the same players go on, the agencies go on unscathed to do it all over again the next time another "Trump" comes along.

Recommendation by Durham: a few minor corrective actions on paper for show and pretty much this will all just be buried under the carpet. They tried to destroy a president to effect a political coup and walk free. But if you made the slightest callous threat against Biden, they would break down your door and drag you off to federal prison and be served the maximum possible punishment just like the J6-ers.

 

[Skylar]

What did Trump call it when he wasn't charged with any crime in the Mueller report?

 

[Lakhota]

Prosecutor Ends Probe Of FBI's Trump-Russia Investigation With Harsh Criticism, But No New Charges​

Harsh criticism is all moron Durham had - because NO new charges says it all. Durham lost both cases he brought in court.

 

[Leo123]

Well, of course it was political but that doesn’t mean it was untrue. And of course you’re quoting the daily Mail UK, which we’ve already posted links proving that that’s a questionable source anyway.

Neither the DOJ, nor the FBI broke the law. People used poor judgment, and made mistakes, but nobody broke the law.

I guess he’s forgotten about all of the people that were charged and convicted, and sent to jail in the wake of the Mueller Report.

And never forget the three of Durhams top prosecutors, who had been with him for years and signed onto this investigation with him, resigned in protest political pressure from the DOJ and the White House, to file charges, and Durham’s filing charges on no real evidence, which were tossed by the juries in less time that it takes to order in coffee.

You’re correct….why they’re above the law.

 

[MarathonMike]

Wrong thread, retard.

It's all about your worst nightmare Trump, Libtard.

 

[Skylar]

You’re correct….why they’re above the law.

Durham had the authority to charge new folks. He didn't.

Durham had the authority to recommend new charges. He didn't.

Which tells you everything you need to know about what Durham thought of his own claims.

 

[Lakhota]

What about what Barr and Durham were told about Trump by Italian authorities? Did they pursue that?

One particularly telling section of the Times' story involves a trip that Barr made to Italy in order to push officials in that country for evidence that the Russia investigation was part of an elaborate setup designed to damage former President Donald Trump politically.

The Italian officials responded by offering evidence of wrongdoing of a very different sort.

"Italian officials... unexpectedly offered a potentially explosive tip linking Mr. Trump to certain suspected financial crimes," the Times reports. "Mr. Barr and [former special counsel John] Durham decided that the tip was too serious and credible to ignore. But rather than assign it to another prosecutor, Mr. Barr had Mr. Durham investigate the matter himself."

Barr and Durham tried to discredit Russia probe​

 

[easyt65]

.

LIARS! CRIMINALS! TRAITORS!

Conspiracy to Smear Trump, Boost Hillary to White House​

Durham Report Reveals Obama, Biden Briefed in 2016 on Clinton’s Plan to Link Trump to Russia​

*But Still Pushed Collusion Hoax*​

Durham: Obama, Biden Briefed on Clinton Plan to Link Trump to Russia

Then-President Obama and then-Vice President Biden were briefed by Brennen in 2016 that Clinton was planning to falsely link Trump to Russia.

www.breitbart.com

 

[Rambunctious]