In what country do you have that right? Certainly not in the US.Relax. We`ll always have the right to shoot up a classroom or a spouse.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
In what country do you have that right? Certainly not in the US.Relax. We`ll always have the right to shoot up a classroom or a spouse.
/—-/ Post the link to that admission. Now don’t break the internet looking for it.Why are you defending this MONSTER???? He admits to raping women and still you vote for him.
SHAME ON YOU!!!
This woman is nuts:
You`re correct. We don`t have the right but who is going to stop the shooter? One armed man held off 300 cops while he murdered a classroom full of 4th graders.In what country do you have that right? Certainly not in the US.
/—-/ Post the link to that admission. Now don’t break the internet looking for it.
View attachment 895170
/——/ Couldn’t find a link, eh?
/——/ Couldn’t find a link, eh?
Are you talking about the case where the cops refused to go in after him, even when they knew he was shooting kids? That's on the cops. A parent with a gun would have gone in and stopped it.You`re correct. We don`t have the right but who is going to stop the shooter? One armed man held off 300 cops while he murdered a classroom full of 4th graders.
Only if the parent`s own kid was inside would they go in. Every cop there should have been fired. Unfortunately, the cops would just get another police job somewhere else.Are you talking about the case where the cops refused to go in after him, even when they knew he was shooting kids? That's on the cops. A parent with a gun would have gone in and stopped it.
Which brings us back around to your statement, "We`ll always have the right to shoot up a classroom or a spouse". Now why did you say that?Only if the parent`s own kid was inside would they go in. Every cop there should have been fired. Unfortunately, the cops would just get another police job somewhere else.
You are blind of you think there was no evidence.They did just make a fool out of the DOJ, didn't they. Even if they call it a joke. They got something without proof. What a buncha fools to give creepsisters someone else's wealth who earned it the hard way--day by day hard work, making their businesses a starting point for making other American businesses prosper, as in a Convention area in a hotel for business meetings. Business meetings prosper profits and extend benefits for the American people who get something nice for the money they spend on products offered to them by businesses who make it their business to make life better for the American people. It's how free enterprise works.
There are factions who want communism for this country, which means they can detain someone who prospers others for life in a prison cell, or even a trip for the gallows if they make their communist leaders unpopular in any way, shape or form. Do we have to go through the torture of what a communist country is before we lose every last human right guaranteed to us in the Constitution of the United States of America? I hope not.
The whole thing is going to be overturned. THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE OF A CRIME BEING COMMITTED. Since the plaintiffs presented no evidence to support their claim, the trial judge should have thrown the whole case out with a directed judgement.Yea, appeal is what Trump does
In the meantime, Carrol is tying up Trump assets to secure the appeal.
Trump may eventually cut down the award, but not get it overturned
Trump will still pay Bigly
What was the evidence? The dress she refused to provide for DNA testing. The witnesses she didn't have. The contemporary reports on the sexual assault she didn't file. The friends who she didn't tell about it back then. Over thirty years later she makes a claim about something that she can't even remember the year it happened. That's impossible to defend against. No one keeps records for thirty years.You are blind of you think there was no evidence.
We are passed Trumps denial.The whole thing is going to be overturned. THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE OF A CRIME BEING COMMITTED. Since the plaintiffs presented no evidence to support their claim, the trial judge should have thrown the whole case out with a directed judgement.
This woman is nuts:
You're living in fantasyland. The jury found him liable. One would need some kind of new exculpatory evidence to overturn a jury decision.The whole thing is going to be overturned. THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE OF A CRIME BEING COMMITTED. Since the plaintiffs presented no evidence to support their claim, the trial judge should have thrown the whole case out with a directed judgement.
/——/ I asked for a link where Trump admitted he rapes women, you deflect to a meme about democRATs not believing women who claim they were raped by a democRAT but do believe it about a Republican. Hope that clears things up for you.Didn't need a link. I updated the meme directly.
Simply put each side consistently with an age appropriate picture instead of using the picture of an 80 year old.
It's funny your meme didn't use the below for Tara Reade.
View attachment 895194
WW
You do that because you're sea lioning./——/ I asked for a link where Trump admitted he rapes women, you deflect to a meme about democRATs not believing women who claim they were raped by a democRAT but do believe it about a Republican. Hope that clears things up for you.
Post # 22
Dragonlady said:
Why are you defending this MONSTER???? He admits to raping women and still you vote for him.
The Jury found it more likely than not that Trump sexually assaulted her.You're living in fantasyland. The jury found him liable. One would need some kind of new exculpatory evidence to overturn a jury decision.