E. Jean Carroll asks judge to amend lawsuit to seek further damages for what Trump said at CNN town hall

E. Jean Carroll has asked a judge to amend her initial defamation case against former President Donald Trump to seek additional punitive damages after he repeated his statements at a CNN town hall.

The request was made in a letter to the judge seeking clarity on the initial lawsuit following the jury verdict earlier this month finding Trump sexually abused Carroll and awarding her $5 million.

Carroll’s attorneys said Trump’s defamatory statements repeated during the town hall earlier this month go directly to the issue of punitive damages, which are intended to punish the person found liable.

Carroll’s initial lawsuit was held up on appeal and relates to statements Trump made in 2019 while he was president. The trial involved a statement Trump made in 2022.

Trump and his Big Mouth are his own worst enemy... always has been.
 
Well, I ain't a lawyer either, but.....but I trust E.Jean Carroll has one or more at hand.
Lawyers advising her on the most effective action to take in order to protect her interests.
So, if Carroll (via her attorneys) files some request with the court to get an adjustment
to the previous amount awarded...well, I'll trust her lawyers more than internet chatterati.
IMHO
 
Any legal judgment that says no there was no rape but you said bad things about this gold digging lying whore deserves to be paid off for defamation is bullshit.
 
E. Jean Carroll has asked a judge to amend her initial defamation case against former President Donald Trump to seek additional punitive damages after he repeated his statements at a CNN town hall.

The request was made in a letter to the judge seeking clarity on the initial lawsuit following the jury verdict earlier this month finding Trump sexually abused Carroll and awarding her $5 million.

Carroll’s attorneys said Trump’s defamatory statements repeated during the town hall earlier this month go directly to the issue of punitive damages, which are intended to punish the person found liable.

Carroll’s initial lawsuit was held up on appeal and relates to statements Trump made in 2019 while he was president. The trial involved a statement Trump made in 2022.

A legal analyst said that there might not even be a jury in this new case, because Trump did exactly the same thing that a jury found him liable for. So the judge might just say... you lose Trump, without the need ofa jury.
Lol 🤣🤣🤣 now Trump is suing the Washington Post for a billion.
I remember how this lawsuit filed by Trump ended:
 
A legal analyst said that there might not even be a jury in this new case, because Trump did exactly the same thing that a jury found him liable for. So the judge might just say... you lose Trump, without the need ofa jury.

I remember how this lawsuit filed by Trump ended:
Did any of your legal analysts explain how some charged with rape but not convicted has to pay this bitch 5 million for calling the lying whore a lying whore?
 

Forum List

Back
Top