Easy To Convince The Uneducated

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

what if they attack turkey, what do we do, Turkey is in the UN. Our obligation lies with them, so we get shot with our own weapons? too fking funny. the circular trap you're in is very obvious.

First, I suspect you meant NATO, not the UN. Second, if they attack Turkey I'd be very surprised, but they are no threat militarily to Turkey so we would not get involved.

well if they won't attack turkey, why are we there? ISIS are captured and Turkey has them in prisons. what is our objective then? Again, Turkey is our ally not Kurds.

Wrong . The Kurds have ISIS in prison in Syria. Turkey wants to get rid of the Syrian refugees.

 

[alang1216]

They were fighting ISIS with/for us. Doesn't that make them our friends?

So you're a government school grad, huh?

Yes I am (and my wife and kids are too) and I'm not ashamed of it. I answered your question, would you kindly answer my question?

You mean you're not ashamed of being ignorant, huh?

No I'm not ashamed of being ignorant, no one knows everything. I'm proud of my honestly however and the fact that I can answer questions when asked. You?

 

[PoliticalChic]

1. Of course, that is the mission of government school, owned and operated by Democrats/Progressives.
The Kurd kerfuffle is a case in point.
Trump promised disengagement from the perpetual wars of the Middle East....who complained then?

Now, saving American soldier's lives isn't important.



2. America made promises....in writing.....to the Ukraine, which Hussein didn't choose to fulfill,
....we'd protect them from a Russian invasion if they turned over nuclear weapons....

...and you had no problem with his refusal.....but now you choose to support Marxists and use this move as a cudgel to beat an American President.

On December 5, 1994 the leaders of Ukraine, Russia, Britain and the United States signed a memorandum to provide Ukraine with security assurances in connection with its accession to the NPT as a non-nuclear weapon state.
Nuclear weapons and Ukraine - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Nuclear_weapons_and_Ukraine




3. Who, exactly are we there to defend???

A quick trip to Wikipedia:

"The Kurdistan Workers' Party or PKK (Kurdish: Partiya Karkerên Kurdistanê‎[a]) is a Kurdish far-left militant and political organization based in Turkey and Iraq. Since 1984 the PKK has been involved in an armed conflict with the Turkish state (with a two-year cease-fire during 2013–2015), with the initial aim of achieving an independent Kurdish state, later changing it to a demand for equal rights and Kurdish autonomy in Turkey.[16][17][18][19]

The PKK was founded in 1978 in the village of Fis (near Lice) by a group of Kurdish students led by Abdullah Öcalan[20] and 1979 it made its existence known to tthehe public.[21]The PKK's ideology was originally a fusion of revolutionary socialism and Kurdish nationalism, seeking the foundation of an independent Communist state in the region,....

Ideology Kurdish nationalism[1]
Communalism
Democratic confederalism[2]
Libertarian socialism[3]
Jineology
Anti-capitalism"
Kurdistan Workers' Party - Wikipedia

Just what the Democrat Party stands for, too.




4. "Christian Fighters Abandon Anti-ISIS Kurd Group Because It's Communist
... many of the most motivated Western fighters are Christian crusaders eager to defeat the armies of Muhammad, but they were shocked to learn they'd joined up with a bunch of Kurdish atheist commies to do it:
Christian Fighters Abandon Anti-ISIS Kurd Group Because It's Communist



QED....if you know nothing, you'll fall for anything.

A Trumpette calling others uneducated is like Danny Devito mocking people for being short.

We save soldiers lives by establishing allies that join us in war.

When Trump abandoned the Kurds in Syria, who will trust us again? How with that save soldier's lives?

Turkey has always wanted to attack the Kurds in Syria. The US blocked it. Trump pulled us out. When the kurds are attacked, Trump will not do shit to Turkey's economy because there is a Trump Tower in Istanbul..

You'd like your turn to be spanked???


Sure thing, RealDumb.....see if you can find anything....ANYTHING.....not 100% true, accurate and correct:


1. Of course, that is the mission of government school, owned and operated by Democrats/Progressives.
The Kurd kerfuffle is a case in point.
Trump promised disengagement from the perpetual wars of the Middle East....who complained then?

Now, saving American soldier's lives isn't important.



2. America made promises....in writing.....to the Ukraine, which Hussein didn't choose to fulfill,
....we'd protect them from a Russian invasion if they turned over nuclear weapons....

...and you had no problem with his refusal.....but now you choose to support Marxists and use this move as a cudgel to beat an American President.

On December 5, 1994 the leaders of Ukraine, Russia, Britain and the United States signed a memorandum to provide Ukraine with security assurances in connection with its accession to the NPT as a non-nuclear weapon state.
Nuclear weapons and Ukraine - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Nuclear_weapons_and_Ukraine




3. Who, exactly are we there to defend???

A quick trip to Wikipedia:

"The Kurdistan Workers' Party or PKK (Kurdish: Partiya Karkerên Kurdistanê‎[a]) is a Kurdish far-left militant and political organization based in Turkey and Iraq. Since 1984 the PKK has been involved in an armed conflict with the Turkish state (with a two-year cease-fire during 2013–2015), with the initial aim of achieving an independent Kurdish state, later changing it to a demand for equal rights and Kurdish autonomy in Turkey.[16][17][18][19]

The PKK was founded in 1978 in the village of Fis (near Lice) by a group of Kurdish students led by Abdullah Öcalan[20] and 1979 it made its existence known to tthehe public.[21]The PKK's ideology was originally a fusion of revolutionary socialism and Kurdish nationalism, seeking the foundation of an independent Communist state in the region,....

Ideology Kurdish nationalism[1]
Communalism
Democratic confederalism[2]
Libertarian socialism[3]
Jineology
Anti-capitalism"
Kurdistan Workers' Party - Wikipedia

Just what the Democrat Party stands for, too.




4. "Christian Fighters Abandon Anti-ISIS Kurd Group Because It's Communist
... many of the most motivated Western fighters are Christian crusaders eager to defeat the armies of Muhammad, but they were shocked to learn they'd joined up with a bunch of Kurdish atheist commies to do it:
Christian Fighters Abandon Anti-ISIS Kurd Group Because It's Communist



QED....if you know nothing, you'll fall for anything.

You voted for Trump so I'd quit accusing people of falling for stuff.

So, when Obama pulled troops from Iraq, you ilk had a fit. even though he had no option at that time.

Trump said he would bring our troops home. But there are ways to do this without screwing over our allies.

"So, when Obama pulled troops from Iraq, you ilk had a fit. even though he had no option at that time."


Wrong again, RealDumb.


He was given the choice....and bowed to ISIS instead.



In his battle to abet the creation of a Muslim Caliphate, Obama clearing the field for the creation of ISIS by refusing to leave any troops as a counterweight in Iraq

"With regards to Iraq, you and I agreed, I believe, that there should be a status of forces agreement,” Romney told Obama as the two convened on the Lynn University campus in Boca Raton, Fla., that October evening.

“That’s not true,” Obama interjected. “Oh, you didn’t want a status of forces agreement?” Romney asked as an argument ensued.“No,” Obama said. “What I would not have done is left 10,000 troops in Iraq that would tie us down. That certainly would not help us in the Middle East.”
Obama Suddenly No Longer Interested in Taking Credit for Ending Iraq War | FrontPage Magazinehttp://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dg...erested-in-taking-credit-for-ending-iraq-war/




"The toll wreaked by his disengagement from the world and retreat from the use of American influence is severe. While ISIS expands its reach with summary executions possibly running into the thousands, Obama is left to offload onto Maliki all responsibility for the chaos that’s happened and all that’s to come.

That's the easy way for Obama to escape admitting that he blew it."
http://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/obama-wrought-article-1.1832083#ixzz35TDXzhJC



And this:
"This month, Colin Kahl, the senior Pentagon official in charge of Iraq policy at the time, explained why the White House insisted on Iraq’s parliament approving the changes to the SOFA.

He wrote in Politico Magazine that in 2011 Iraq’s prime minister, Nouri al-Maliki, “told U.S. negotiators that he was willing to sign an executive memorandum of understanding that included these legal protections.

Yet this time around, Obama is willing to accept an agreement from Iraq’s foreign ministry on U.S. forces in Iraq without a vote of Iraq’s parliament. “We believe we need a separate set of assurances from the Iraqis,” one senior U.S. defense official told The Daily Beast on Sunday. This official said this would likely be an agreement or exchange of diplomatic notes from the Iraq’s foreign ministry. “We basically need a piece of paper from them,” another U.S. official involved in the negotiations told The Daily Beast. The official didn’t explain why the parliamentary vote, so crucial three years ago, was no longer needed.”
Obama Does a U-Turn on Immunity for U.S. Troops in Iraq - The Daily Beast

Obama rejected it.




Now....don't ever let me catch you lying about Obama's culpability again!

Iraq refused to sign an agreement to protect our troops.

Of course, I should have known, you Trumpettes hate our troops. You would put them in danger.

A lie, RealDumb

Watch me obliterate it....and you:


1. Bush made sure that the community organizer had until 2012 to work out an agreement:
"In one of his final acts in office, President Bush in December of 2008 had signed a Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) with the Iraqi government thatset the clock ticking on ending the war he’d launched in March of 2003. The SOFA provided a legal basis for the presence of U.S. forces in Iraq after the United Nations Security Council mandate for the occupation mission expired at the end of 2008. But it required that all U.S. forces be gone from Iraq by January 1, 2012, unless the Iraqi government was willing to negotiate a new agreement that would extend their mandate. "
Iraq 8217 s Government Not Obama Called Time on the U.S. Troop Presence TIME.com



2." BLITZER: -- Agreement that would have left a residual force, 5,000 or 10,000 U.S. troops, but you couldn't get immunity from Nuri al Maliki's government. Take us behind the scenes, clarify, who's right, John McCain or Jay Carney, in this debate.

BARBERO: Well, in the summer of 2010, prepared a briefing, I was responsible for Iraqi security forces, andtook it to all the Iraqi leaders, Maliki, the other Shia leaders, the Sunnis, the Kurds, and said here is going to be the status of your security forces, what they cannot do, what they will be able to do, when we're schedule to leave. And to a man they said, well, general, you must stay.And my response was, you must make it easy for us. So I think Maliki did not make it easy for us and we did not try hard enough. So it's a -- both views. I think it could have been done though."
CNN.com - Transcripts



3. "Obama's 2012 Debate Boast: I Didn't Want to Leave Any Troops in Iraq
Obama then denied that he ever supported a status of forces agreement that would have left troops in Iraq:

MR. ROMNEY: [W]ith regards to Iraq, you and I agreed, I believe, that there should have been a status of forces agreement. Did you —

PRESIDENT OBAMA: That's not true.

MR. ROMNEY: Oh, you didn't — you didn't want a status of forces agreement?

PRESIDENT OBAMA: No, but what I — what I would not have done is left 10,000 troops in Iraq that would tie us down. That certainly would not help us in the Middle East.

"Here's one thing I've learned as commander in chief," Obama said at the end of the exchange. "You've got to be clear, both to our allies and our enemies, about where you stand and what you mean."
Obama s 2012 Debate Boast I Didn t Want to Leave Any Troops in Iraq The Weekly Standard



4. And this:
"This month, Colin Kahl, the senior Pentagon official in charge of Iraq policy at the time, explained why the White House insisted on Iraq’s parliament approving the changes to the SOFA.

He wrote in Politico Magazine that in 2011 Iraq’s prime minister, Nouri al-Maliki, “told U.S. negotiators that he was willing to sign an executive memorandum of understanding that included these legal protections.

Yet this time around, Obama is willing to accept an agreement from Iraq’s foreign ministry on U.S. forces in Iraq without a vote of Iraq’s parliament. “We believe we need a separate set of assurances from the Iraqis,” one senior U.S. defense official told The Daily Beast on Sunday. This official said this would likely be an agreement or exchange of diplomatic notes from the Iraq’s foreign ministry. “We basically need a piece of paper from them,” another U.S. official involved in the negotiations told The Daily Beast. The official didn’t explain why the parliamentary vote, so crucial three years ago, was no longer needed.”
Obama Does a U-Turn on Immunity for U.S. Troops in Iraq - The Daily Beast

Obama rejected it.




Now....don't ever let me catch you lying about Obama's culpability again!


1. Bush left Iraq with an agreement that allowed US troops to remain until 2012.

2. The windbag, Obama took charge in 2009

3. Obama declined to negotiate a Status of Forces agreement that would have left troops, and he actually removed same before he had to.

4. Political landscapes, like nature, abhor a vacuum.

5. Therefore, through Obama's efforts, ISIS had free reign.

QED Isis: In Iraq Because Of Obama

 

[alang1216]

"ISIS has not been defeated, ..."

Hussein Obama will be pleased.....send him a note.

Am I wrong? At least Obama was able to face facts. I miss him.

 

[PoliticalChic]

They were fighting ISIS with/for us. Doesn't that make them our friends?

So you're a government school grad, huh?

Yes I am (and my wife and kids are too) and I'm not ashamed of it. I answered your question, would you kindly answer my question?

You mean you're not ashamed of being ignorant, huh?

No I'm not ashamed of being ignorant, no one knows everything. I'm proud of my honestly however and the fact that I can answer questions when asked. You?

Judging by how miserably you've failed in every attempt to dispute my posts.....it seems I know everything.

Thanks so much for your failed efforts.

Now that you’ve been thoroughly embarrassed, time for your retreat to your warehouse, farmhouse, henhouse, outhouse, doghouse, whatever….

 

[Skylar]

1. Of course, that is the mission of government school, owned and operated by Democrats/Progressives.
The Kurd kerfuffle is a case in point.
Trump promised disengagement from the perpetual wars of the Middle East....who complained then?

Now, saving American soldier's lives isn't important.



2. America made promises....in writing.....to the Ukraine, which Hussein didn't choose to fulfill,
....we'd protect them from a Russian invasion if they turned over nuclear weapons....

...and you had no problem with his refusal.....but now you choose to support Marxists and use this move as a cudgel to beat an American President.

On December 5, 1994 the leaders of Ukraine, Russia, Britain and the United States signed a memorandum to provide Ukraine with security assurances in connection with its accession to the NPT as a non-nuclear weapon state.
Nuclear weapons and Ukraine - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Nuclear_weapons_and_Ukraine

Then why did Trump withhold that aid just before soliciting the Ukraine to open an investigation into his primary political opponent?

 

[PoliticalChic]

"ISIS has not been defeated, ..."

Hussein Obama will be pleased.....send him a note.

Am I wrong? At least Obama was able to face facts. I miss him.

Lots of Russians have the same mentality as you....they miss Stalin.

Can't cure stupid.

 

[Skylar]

what if they attack turkey, what do we do, Turkey is in the UN. Our obligation lies with them, so we get shot with our own weapons? too fking funny. the circular trap you're in is very obvious.

First, I suspect you meant NATO, not the UN. Second, if they attack Turkey I'd be very surprised, but they are no threat militarily to Turkey so we would not get involved.

well if they won't attack turkey, why are we there? ISIS are captured and Turkey has them in prisons. what is our objective then? Again, Turkey is our ally not Kurds.

Wrong . The Kurds have ISIS in prison in Syria. Turkey wants to get rid of the Syrian refugees.

And the Kurds have made it ridiculously clear that they will stop guarding those ISIS prisoners and defend their towns and villages if the Turks attack.

Trump has said that 100% of the ISIS rebels are captured. What then is Turkey invading to do? Who, pray tell, are they fighting?

 

[alang1216]

.....it seems I know everything.

I can see why you admire Trump so much. He too believes he knows best.

 

[bodecea]

“I love the poorly educated.” - Donald Trump

I'm glad I wasn't the only one seeing the Irony in the OP.

 

[alang1216]

Lots of Russians have the same mentality as you....they miss Stalin.

Can't cure stupid.

Judging by Trump's admiration for Putin and Kim Jong-in I'd guess he misses him too.

 

[PoliticalChic]

1. Of course, that is the mission of government school, owned and operated by Democrats/Progressives.
The Kurd kerfuffle is a case in point.
Trump promised disengagement from the perpetual wars of the Middle East....who complained then?

Now, saving American soldier's lives isn't important.



2. America made promises....in writing.....to the Ukraine, which Hussein didn't choose to fulfill,
....we'd protect them from a Russian invasion if they turned over nuclear weapons....

...and you had no problem with his refusal.....but now you choose to support Marxists and use this move as a cudgel to beat an American President.

On December 5, 1994 the leaders of Ukraine, Russia, Britain and the United States signed a memorandum to provide Ukraine with security assurances in connection with its accession to the NPT as a non-nuclear weapon state.
Nuclear weapons and Ukraine - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Nuclear_weapons_and_Ukraine

Then why did Trump withhold that aid just before soliciting the Ukraine to open an investigation into his primary political opponent?

Why did Biden brag about withholding $1 billion if the Ukraine didn't fete his son's business.

And why did China reward his son with $1.5 billion???


And why did Russia give Hillary $145 million for our uranium?

And give Bill $500,000 for a speech no one listened to???


And
"…the Clinton Foundationmade a major announcement this week that went by with almost no notice: For all intents and purposes, it's closing its doors.

In a tax filing, the Clinton Global Initiative said it's firing 22 staffers and closing its offices, a result of the gusher of foreign money that kept the foundation afloat suddenly drying up after Hillary Clinton failed to win the presidency.”
The Clinton Foundation Is Dead — But The Case Against Hillary Isn't | Investor's Business Daily



“Donations to the Clinton Foundation nose-dived last year amid Hillary Clinton’s presidential run, pay-to-play allegations, internal strife and a black mark from a charity watchdog.

Contributions fell by 37 percent to $108 million, down from $172 million in 2014, according to the group’s latest tax filings.

Not only did contributions drop, but so did revenue the Clintons brought in from speeches. That income fell to $357,500 from $3.6 million in 2014.” https://nypost.com/2016/11/20/donations-to-clinton-foundation-fell-by-37-percent/




And...

....why are you so stupid????

Government school grad?

 

[PoliticalChic]

what if they attack turkey, what do we do, Turkey is in the UN. Our obligation lies with them, so we get shot with our own weapons? too fking funny. the circular trap you're in is very obvious.

First, I suspect you meant NATO, not the UN. Second, if they attack Turkey I'd be very surprised, but they are no threat militarily to Turkey so we would not get involved.

well if they won't attack turkey, why are we there? ISIS are captured and Turkey has them in prisons. what is our objective then? Again, Turkey is our ally not Kurds.

Wrong . The Kurds have ISIS in prison in Syria. Turkey wants to get rid of the Syrian refugees.

And the Kurds have made it ridiculously clear that they will stop guarding those ISIS prisoners and defend their towns and villages if the Turks attack.

Trump has said that 100% of the ISIS rebels are captured. What then is Turkey invading to do? Who, pray tell, are they fighting?

Don't fret....your education continues:

"...the YPG is the fighting arm of the Syrian-based Kurdish Democratic Union Party, which supports the Turkish Kurdistan Workers' Party, which is labeled a terrorist group by the U.S. and until recently talked about setting up a Marxist-Leninist state in Kurdistan."
Christian Fighters Abandon Anti-ISIS Kurd Group Because It's Communist

 

[PoliticalChic]

.....it seems I know everything.

I can see why you admire Trump so much. He too believes he knows best.

Here's why:

Here's a dozen reasons:


Most voted against the Democrats,
against the mess Hussein Obama made of the economy,
against the corruption we've witnessed for decades,
against awarding nuclear weapons to the 7th century savages,
against the anti-white bias of the Democrat Party,

against the flood of illegal immigrants who require welfare
against bringing millions of unvetted Muslim refugees from war-indoctrinated nations,
against redistribution of wealth,
against the failed Liberal welfare industry,
against being dictated to by the United Nothings,
against a failed Liberal education industry,

...and for the slim possibility of a rebirth of America.




"When secular leftists express frustration at how practicing Catholics (your humble servants) and evangelicals could ever vote for Donald Trump, the first thing they refuse to concede is the horror of the alternative.

They refuse to admit that Hillary Clinton clearly, forthrightly stood for abortion on demand, at any time, for any reason and even supported it having it funded by pro-life taxpayers. It’s what she and her husband called “safe, legal and rare.” Hillary and her crew even dismissed the videotaped baby-organ-selling grotesqueries of Planned Parenthood as somehow fictional. And they refuse to admit that Hillary Clinton represented the creeping extremism of the LGBT movement, with its emphasis on redesigning all the nation’s bathrooms, not to mention human nature."
Bozell & Graham Column: The Book Against Transgender Extremism




“Job growth surges by 312,000 in December” Job growth surges by 312,000 in December


"Unemployment hits 49-year low as US employers step up hiring"
Unemployment hits 49-year low as US employers step up hiring


"The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Friday shows that 50% of Likely U.S. Voters approve of President Trump’s job performance. "
Daily Presidential Tracking Poll - Rasmussen Reports®


"Hispanic Unemployment Rate Sets New Record Low in April"
Hispanic Unemployment Rate Sets New Record Low in April

"Unemployment Rate for Women Falls to Lowest Since 1953"
Unemployment Rate for Women Falls to Lowest Since 1953 | Breitbart

"Lowest unemployment in 19 years for workers without bachelor's degrees in April"
Lowest unemployment in 19 years for workers without bachelor's degrees in April


“Black unemployment rate falls to 5.9%, ties record low hit earlier this year” Black unemployment rate falls to 5.9%, ties record low hit earlier this year


Where's the gripe?????


You must be quite the dunce not to have caught on yet.

 

[Skylar]

1. Of course, that is the mission of government school, owned and operated by Democrats/Progressives.
The Kurd kerfuffle is a case in point.
Trump promised disengagement from the perpetual wars of the Middle East....who complained then?

Now, saving American soldier's lives isn't important.



2. America made promises....in writing.....to the Ukraine, which Hussein didn't choose to fulfill,
....we'd protect them from a Russian invasion if they turned over nuclear weapons....

...and you had no problem with his refusal.....but now you choose to support Marxists and use this move as a cudgel to beat an American President.

On December 5, 1994 the leaders of Ukraine, Russia, Britain and the United States signed a memorandum to provide Ukraine with security assurances in connection with its accession to the NPT as a non-nuclear weapon state.
Nuclear weapons and Ukraine - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Nuclear_weapons_and_Ukraine

Then why did Trump withhold that aid just before soliciting the Ukraine to open an investigation into his primary political opponent?

Why did Biden brag about withholding $1 billion if the Ukraine didn't fete his son's business.

Biden didn't withhold anything. Biden can't order any aid be withheld to the Ukraine. Its not a power that Vice Presidents have.

Trump on the other hand personally ordered the withholding of aid to the Ukraine just before trying to solicite an investigation into Biden, his chief political rival.

Why? You fled screaming from my question last time.

Try again.

And...

....why are you so stupid????

Government school grad?

Ad Hominems? If your arguments had merit, you wouldn't have to flee to personal attacks.

I must have struck a nerve with my question....as not only did you run screaming from it, refusing to answer, but your argument devolved into shrill name calling.

Try again. This time try actually answering the question.

 

[PoliticalChic]

1. Of course, that is the mission of government school, owned and operated by Democrats/Progressives.
The Kurd kerfuffle is a case in point.
Trump promised disengagement from the perpetual wars of the Middle East....who complained then?

Now, saving American soldier's lives isn't important.



2. America made promises....in writing.....to the Ukraine, which Hussein didn't choose to fulfill,
....we'd protect them from a Russian invasion if they turned over nuclear weapons....

...and you had no problem with his refusal.....but now you choose to support Marxists and use this move as a cudgel to beat an American President.

On December 5, 1994 the leaders of Ukraine, Russia, Britain and the United States signed a memorandum to provide Ukraine with security assurances in connection with its accession to the NPT as a non-nuclear weapon state.
Nuclear weapons and Ukraine - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Nuclear_weapons_and_Ukraine

Then why did Trump withhold that aid just before soliciting the Ukraine to open an investigation into his primary political opponent?

Why did Biden brag about withholding $1 billion if the Ukraine didn't fete his son's business.

Biden didn't withhold anything. Biden can't order any aid be withheld to the Ukraine. Its not a power that Vice Presidents have.

Trump on the other hand personally ordered the withholding of aid to the Ukraine just before trying to solicite an investigation into Biden, his chief political rival.

Why? You fled screaming from my question last time.

Try again.

And...

....why are you so stupid????

Government school grad?

Ad Hominems? If your arguments had merit, you wouldn't have to flee to personal attacks.
Try again. This time try actually answering the question.

"Biden didn't withhold anything."

Here's Biden doing exactly what I said he did.





You're quite the moron, huh?

 

[nat4900]

“I love the poorly educated.” - Donald Trump

 

[jc456]

what if they attack turkey, what do we do, Turkey is in the UN. Our obligation lies with them, so we get shot with our own weapons? too fking funny. the circular trap you're in is very obvious.

First, I suspect you meant NATO, not the UN. Second, if they attack Turkey I'd be very surprised, but they are no threat militarily to Turkey so we would not get involved.

well if they won't attack turkey, why are we there? ISIS are captured and Turkey has them in prisons. what is our objective then? Again, Turkey is our ally not Kurds.

ISIS has not been defeated, they just hold no territory. They are still a terrorist group so we can fight them there, with Kurdish help, or we can fight them elsewhere by ourselves.

if they hold no territory why are we there? it's what I asked you, our NATO alliance is who we defend, not the kurds.

 

[PoliticalChic]

1. Of course, that is the mission of government school, owned and operated by Democrats/Progressives.
The Kurd kerfuffle is a case in point.
Trump promised disengagement from the perpetual wars of the Middle East....who complained then?

Now, saving American soldier's lives isn't important.



2. America made promises....in writing.....to the Ukraine, which Hussein didn't choose to fulfill,
....we'd protect them from a Russian invasion if they turned over nuclear weapons....

...and you had no problem with his refusal.....but now you choose to support Marxists and use this move as a cudgel to beat an American President.

On December 5, 1994 the leaders of Ukraine, Russia, Britain and the United States signed a memorandum to provide Ukraine with security assurances in connection with its accession to the NPT as a non-nuclear weapon state.
Nuclear weapons and Ukraine - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Nuclear_weapons_and_Ukraine

Then why did Trump withhold that aid just before soliciting the Ukraine to open an investigation into his primary political opponent?

Why did Biden brag about withholding $1 billion if the Ukraine didn't fete his son's business.

Biden didn't withhold anything. Biden can't order any aid be withheld to the Ukraine. Its not a power that Vice Presidents have.

Trump on the other hand personally ordered the withholding of aid to the Ukraine just before trying to solicite an investigation into Biden, his chief political rival.

Why? You fled screaming from my question last time.

Try again.

And...

....why are you so stupid????

Government school grad?

Ad Hominems? If your arguments had merit, you wouldn't have to flee to personal attacks.

I must have struck a nerve with my question....as not only did you run screaming from it, refusing to answer, but your argument devolved into shrill name calling.

Try again. This time try actually answering the question.

"Ad Hominems? If your arguments had merit, you wouldn't have to flee to personal attacks."

I don't 'flee' to personal attacks.....it's just that I'm really good at it.





Look at it this way:

Welcome to the karma cafe....there are no menus but you will get what you deserve

 

[jc456]

1. Of course, that is the mission of government school, owned and operated by Democrats/Progressives.
The Kurd kerfuffle is a case in point.
Trump promised disengagement from the perpetual wars of the Middle East....who complained then?

Now, saving American soldier's lives isn't important.



2. America made promises....in writing.....to the Ukraine, which Hussein didn't choose to fulfill,
....we'd protect them from a Russian invasion if they turned over nuclear weapons....

...and you had no problem with his refusal.....but now you choose to support Marxists and use this move as a cudgel to beat an American President.

On December 5, 1994 the leaders of Ukraine, Russia, Britain and the United States signed a memorandum to provide Ukraine with security assurances in connection with its accession to the NPT as a non-nuclear weapon state.
Nuclear weapons and Ukraine - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Nuclear_weapons_and_Ukraine

Then why did Trump withhold that aid just before soliciting the Ukraine to open an investigation into his primary political opponent?

Why did Biden brag about withholding $1 billion if the Ukraine didn't fete his son's business.

Biden didn't withhold anything. Biden can't order any aid be withheld to the Ukraine. Its not a power that Vice Presidents have.

Trump on the other hand personally ordered the withholding of aid to the Ukraine just before trying to solicite an investigation into Biden, his chief political rival.

Why? You fled screaming from my question last time.

Try again.

And...

....why are you so stupid????

Government school grad?

Ad Hominems? If your arguments had merit, you wouldn't have to flee to personal attacks.
Try again. This time try actually answering the question.

"Biden didn't withhold anything."

Here's Biden doing exactly what I said he did.





You're quite the moron, huh?

PC you know that never happened. that is a lying video made by god to deceive everyone that joe did something he didn't. don't you know that?