Economics 101

[P@triot]

And no, I personally do NOT interpret the General Welfare Clause as meaning giving Welfare to the poor. Unfortunately, I am NOT on The Supreme Court or a Member of Congress. Of course, if I WERE a Member of Congress I would be stomping on the greedy asses of Globalists who are forcing my Representatives to tax me to keep the poor from hanging your pathetic ass out to dry.

You seem really angry. May I ask why? Why are you so pissed off at society?

 

[P@triot]

YOUR personal interpretation doesn't obviate the FACT that our Federal, State and Municipal Tax Dollars ARE going to subsidize the poor via the General Welfare Clause.

I'm not sure I follow the logic here. I'm well aware that my tax dollars are being used illegally. That's precisely why I'm complaining. What is your point? That its ok simply because it is being done? Well - that would be like someone saying "YOUR personal interpretation about rape laws doesn't obviate the FACT that women are raped every single day in this country". Yeah? Ok? So should we just accept rape and throw out the law then or should we constantly work towards seeing the law strictly enforced until rape is eradicated from society?

 

[Indeependent]

And no, I personally do NOT interpret the General Welfare Clause as meaning giving Welfare to the poor. Unfortunately, I am NOT on The Supreme Court or a Member of Congress. Of course, if I WERE a Member of Congress I would be stomping on the greedy asses of Globalists who are forcing my Representatives to tax me to keep the poor from hanging your pathetic ass out to dry.

You seem really angry. May I ask why? Why are you so pissed off at society?

Why are you NOT angry?
Perhaps our Anti-General Welfare Claus Free Trade behavior has been good for you.

 

[P@triot]

And no, I personally do NOT interpret the General Welfare Clause as meaning giving Welfare to the poor. Unfortunately, I am NOT on The Supreme Court or a Member of Congress. Of course, if I WERE a Member of Congress I would be stomping on the greedy asses of Globalists who are forcing my Representatives to tax me to keep the poor from hanging your pathetic ass out to dry.

You seem really angry. May I ask why? Why are you so pissed off at society?

Why are you NOT angry?
Perhaps our Anti-General Welfare Claus Free Trade behavior has been good for you.

There is nothing "anti-general welfare clause" about free trade. You seem confused right now.

 

[Rshermr]

And no, I personally do NOT interpret the General Welfare Clause as meaning giving Welfare to the poor. Unfortunately, I am NOT on The Supreme Court or a Member of Congress. Of course, if I WERE a Member of Congress I would be stomping on the greedy asses of Globalists who are forcing my Representatives to tax me to keep the poor from hanging your pathetic ass out to dry.

You seem really angry. May I ask why? Why are you so pissed off at society?

Why are you NOT angry?
Perhaps our Anti-General Welfare Claus Free Trade behavior has been good for you.

Actually, the problem is simple. The clown is a con tool. Which, by definition, means that he does not have the ability to reason. He has been told what to believe, and he does as he is told. Spends his time in the bat shit crazy con web sites, of which there are many paid for and financially supported by the far, far, far right.
The con tool is incapable of rational thought, and therefor of rational argument. But, it is simple to know what their beliefs are. Go to conservative talking points, and you will find 90% of his beliefs reduced to statements he can cut and paste (best he can do). The rest is just simple personal attack.

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

April jobless rates down over the year in 269 of 387 metro areas; payroll jobs up in 327
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

Economic News Release USDL-16-1095

Metropolitan Area Employment and Unemployment Summary

For release 10:00 a.m. (EDT) Wednesday, June 1, 2016

Technical information:
Employment: (202) 691-6559 * [email protected] * www.bls.gov/sae
Unemployment: (202) 691-6392 * [email protected] * www.bls.gov/lau

Media contact: (202) 691-5902 * [email protected]


METROPOLITAN AREA EMPLOYMENT AND UNEMPLOYMENT -- APRIL 2016


Unemployment rates were lower in April than a year earlier in 269 of the 387 metropolitan areas, higher in 94 areas, and unchanged in 24 areas, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Twenty-five areas had jobless rates of less than 3.0 percent and seven areas had rates of at least 10.0 percent. Nonfarm payroll employment increased over the year in 327 metropolitan areas, decreased in 54 areas, and was unchanged in 6 areas. The national unemployment rate in April was 4.7 percent, not seasonally adjusted, down from 5.1 percent a year earlier.
....

Metropolitan Division Nonfarm Employment (Not Seasonally Adjusted)

In April, nonfarm payroll employment increased in 36 of the 38 metropolitan divisions over the year and was unchanged in Lynn-Saugus-Marblehead, Mass., and Nashua, N.H.-Mass. The largest over-the-year increase in employment among the metropolitan divisions occurred in New York-Jersey City-White Plains, N.Y.-N.J. (+145,600), followed by Dallas-Plano-Irving, Texas (+111,900), and Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, Calif. (+106,800). (See table 4.)

The largest over-the-year percentage increase in employment among the metropolitan divisions occurred in Dallas-Plano-Irving, Texas (+4.7 percent), followed by Haverhill-Newburyport-Amesbury Town, Mass.-N.H. (+4.4 percent), and San Francisco-Redwood City-South San Francisco, Calif. (+4.1 percent).

_____________
The Regional and State Employment and Unemployment news release for May is scheduled to be released on Friday, June 17, 2016, at 10:00 a.m. (EDT). The Metropolitan Area Employment and Unemployment news release for May is scheduled to be released on Wednesday, June 29, 2016, at 10:00 a.m. (EDT).

Read more: Metropolitan Area Employment and Unemployment Summary

 

[P@triot]

And no, I personally do NOT interpret the General Welfare Clause as meaning giving Welfare to the poor. Unfortunately, I am NOT on The Supreme Court or a Member of Congress. Of course, if I WERE a Member of Congress I would be stomping on the greedy asses of Globalists who are forcing my Representatives to tax me to keep the poor from hanging your pathetic ass out to dry.

You seem really angry. May I ask why? Why are you so pissed off at society?

Why are you NOT angry?
Perhaps our Anti-General Welfare Claus Free Trade behavior has been good for you.

Actually, the problem is simple. The clown is a con tool. Which, by definition, means that he does not have the ability to reason. He has been told what to believe, and he does as he is told. Spends his time in the bat shit crazy con web sites, of which there are many paid for and financially supported by the far, far, far right.
The con tool is incapable of rational thought, and therefor of rational argument. But, it is simple to know what their beliefs are. Go to conservative talking points, and you will find 90% of his beliefs reduced to statements he can cut and paste (best he can do). The rest is just simple personal attack.

Projecting. The cornerstone of the mindless liberal. Everything you just stated flawlessly describes the liberal. Liberalism is the complete and total absence of intellectualism. A liberal feels everything. That's why they support failed policy. Because they don't study the facts, they refuse to look at history, and they don't care what the results are. They just feel that they want socialism, so everything else be damned. And it is why they get so incredibly frustrated debating with conservatives. You can't make a logical case based on irrational emotion. And liberalism is built entirely on irrational emotion.

Meanwhile, the liberal masters are laughing all the way to the bank. While the liberal minions on this site wallow in poverty, people like Barack Obama and Hilldabeast are rolling in tens of millions of dollars. They sure as hell aren't sharing what they have. But they do laugh at how all of you are too stupid to realize that you vote for the 1% while crying about the 1%.

 

[Rshermr]

And no, I personally do NOT interpret the General Welfare Clause as meaning giving Welfare to the poor. Unfortunately, I am NOT on The Supreme Court or a Member of Congress. Of course, if I WERE a Member of Congress I would be stomping on the greedy asses of Globalists who are forcing my Representatives to tax me to keep the poor from hanging your pathetic ass out to dry.

You seem really angry. May I ask why? Why are you so pissed off at society?

Why are you NOT angry?
Perhaps our Anti-General Welfare Claus Free Trade behavior has been good for you.

Actually, the problem is simple. The clown is a con tool. Which, by definition, means that he does not have the ability to reason. He has been told what to believe, and he does as he is told. Spends his time in the bat shit crazy con web sites, of which there are many paid for and financially supported by the far, far, far right.
The con tool is incapable of rational thought, and therefor of rational argument. But, it is simple to know what their beliefs are. Go to conservative talking points, and you will find 90% of his beliefs reduced to statements he can cut and paste (best he can do). The rest is just simple personal attack.

.

Projecting. The cornerstone of the mindless liberal. Everything you just stated flawlessly describes the liberal. Liberalism is the complete and total absence of intellectualism. A liberal feels everything. That's why they support failed policy. Because they don't study the facts, they refuse to look at history, and they don't care what the results are. They just feel that they want socialism, so everything else be damned. And it is why they get so incredibly frustrated debating with conservatives. You can't make a logical case based on irrational emotion. And liberalism is built entirely on irrational emotion.

Meanwhile, the liberal masters are laughing all the way to the bank. While the liberal minions on this site wallow in poverty, people like Barack Obama and Hilldabeast are rolling in tens of millions of dollars. They sure as hell aren't sharing what they have. But they do laugh at how all of you are too stupid to realize that you vote for the 1% while crying about the 1%

Wow. There must be some place where we get all the liberal talking points. Though I have never seen that place, nor that list. Perhaps you can point me to it, dipshit.

Here is yours, me boy:
Conservative Talking Points - A Conservative's Debating Tool and Reference Database of Political Knowledge
Over 1000 conservative talking points, presented as facts for the conservative tool. So the conservative tool will not need to think. Because they do not want to have to think. Cons want to be angry, and they want to be part of a group that thinks like them. Mostly, they want to be told what to believe and what to do.

So, if there were talking points for liberals, I missed the memo. While con tools can go to their site, and see a list of talking points that tells them why they should believe that Obama was not born in Hawaii, which is a REALLY STUPID BELIEF, it is possible to get only one set of people to believe such drivel: CONSERVATIVES.

And speaking of projection, cons have their talking points. Tons of them. And they believe them without question. So they project that to progressives. Assuming that they must be similarly brain dead to themselves. Problem is, progressives are rational (Look it up). And if you try to provide them talking points, they rebel. Because they do not want to be told what to believe. Because, again, they are rations.

 

[Indeependent]

And no, I personally do NOT interpret the General Welfare Clause as meaning giving Welfare to the poor. Unfortunately, I am NOT on The Supreme Court or a Member of Congress. Of course, if I WERE a Member of Congress I would be stomping on the greedy asses of Globalists who are forcing my Representatives to tax me to keep the poor from hanging your pathetic ass out to dry.

You seem really angry. May I ask why? Why are you so pissed off at society?

Why are you NOT angry?
Perhaps our Anti-General Welfare Claus Free Trade behavior has been good for you.

There is nothing "anti-general welfare clause" about free trade. You seem confused right now.

Really, schmuko?
What happens to the "General Welfare" of the US when all our money goes to other nations?
Why do I even ask knowing you're too stupid to connect dots.

 

[P@triot]

And no, I personally do NOT interpret the General Welfare Clause as meaning giving Welfare to the poor. Unfortunately, I am NOT on The Supreme Court or a Member of Congress. Of course, if I WERE a Member of Congress I would be stomping on the greedy asses of Globalists who are forcing my Representatives to tax me to keep the poor from hanging your pathetic ass out to dry.

You seem really angry. May I ask why? Why are you so pissed off at society?

Why are you NOT angry?
Perhaps our Anti-General Welfare Claus Free Trade behavior has been good for you.

There is nothing "anti-general welfare clause" about free trade. You seem confused right now.

Really, schmuko?
What happens to the "General Welfare" of the US when all our money goes to other nations?
Why do I even ask knowing you're too stupid to connect dots.

And why does it go to other nations? Because idiot liberal socialism has made it so costly to do business in the U.S., it has forced all of our jobs overseas. If we had made taxes, regulations, and labor laws lower here than they are in other nations, we would not only have 100% of American jobs here in the U.S. but we'd have probably 50% of the entire world's jobs from other nations here in the U.S. as well. Instead - liberal policy did what liberal policy always does - created unemployment and poverty.

 

[Indeependent]

And no, I personally do NOT interpret the General Welfare Clause as meaning giving Welfare to the poor. Unfortunately, I am NOT on The Supreme Court or a Member of Congress. Of course, if I WERE a Member of Congress I would be stomping on the greedy asses of Globalists who are forcing my Representatives to tax me to keep the poor from hanging your pathetic ass out to dry.

You seem really angry. May I ask why? Why are you so pissed off at society?

Why are you NOT angry?
Perhaps our Anti-General Welfare Claus Free Trade behavior has been good for you.

Actually, the problem is simple. The clown is a con tool. Which, by definition, means that he does not have the ability to reason. He has been told what to believe, and he does as he is told. Spends his time in the bat shit crazy con web sites, of which there are many paid for and financially supported by the far, far, far right.
The con tool is incapable of rational thought, and therefor of rational argument. But, it is simple to know what their beliefs are. Go to conservative talking points, and you will find 90% of his beliefs reduced to statements he can cut and paste (best he can do). The rest is just simple personal attack.

Meanwhile, the liberal masters are laughing all the way to the bank. While the liberal minions on this site wallow in poverty, people like Barack Obama and Hilldabeast are rolling in tens of millions of dollars. They sure as hell aren't sharing what they have. But they do laugh at how all of you are too stupid to realize that you vote for the 1% while crying about the 1%.

You can easily replace "liberal" with "conservative".

 

[Indeependent]

And no, I personally do NOT interpret the General Welfare Clause as meaning giving Welfare to the poor. Unfortunately, I am NOT on The Supreme Court or a Member of Congress. Of course, if I WERE a Member of Congress I would be stomping on the greedy asses of Globalists who are forcing my Representatives to tax me to keep the poor from hanging your pathetic ass out to dry.

You seem really angry. May I ask why? Why are you so pissed off at society?

Why are you NOT angry?
Perhaps our Anti-General Welfare Claus Free Trade behavior has been good for you.

There is nothing "anti-general welfare clause" about free trade. You seem confused right now.

Really, schmuko?
What happens to the "General Welfare" of the US when all our money goes to other nations?
Why do I even ask knowing you're too stupid to connect dots.

And why does it go to other nations? Because idiot liberal socialism has made it so costly to do business in the U.S., it has forced all of our jobs overseas. If we had made taxes, regulations, and labor laws lower here than they are in other nations, we would not only have 100% of American jobs here in the U.S. but we'd have probably 50% of the entire world's jobs from other nations here in the U.S. as well. Instead - liberal policy did what liberal policy always does - created unemployment and poverty.

Like nobody EVER became immensely successful before Reagan.
You're arguments are vacuous.
Please start quoting some GDP statistics as I need a good laugh.

 

[P@triot]

And no, I personally do NOT interpret the General Welfare Clause as meaning giving Welfare to the poor. Unfortunately, I am NOT on The Supreme Court or a Member of Congress. Of course, if I WERE a Member of Congress I would be stomping on the greedy asses of Globalists who are forcing my Representatives to tax me to keep the poor from hanging your pathetic ass out to dry.

You seem really angry. May I ask why? Why are you so pissed off at society?

Why are you NOT angry?
Perhaps our Anti-General Welfare Claus Free Trade behavior has been good for you.

Actually, the problem is simple. The clown is a con tool. Which, by definition, means that he does not have the ability to reason. He has been told what to believe, and he does as he is told. Spends his time in the bat shit crazy con web sites, of which there are many paid for and financially supported by the far, far, far right.
The con tool is incapable of rational thought, and therefor of rational argument. But, it is simple to know what their beliefs are. Go to conservative talking points, and you will find 90% of his beliefs reduced to statements he can cut and paste (best he can do). The rest is just simple personal attack.

Meanwhile, the liberal masters are laughing all the way to the bank. While the liberal minions on this site wallow in poverty, people like Barack Obama and Hilldabeast are rolling in tens of millions of dollars. They sure as hell aren't sharing what they have. But they do laugh at how all of you are too stupid to realize that you vote for the 1% while crying about the 1%.

You can easily replace "liberal" with "conservative".

Conservative politicians aren't the one's out there preaching against the "evil" 1% genius and they don't pretend to want to redistribute wealth. They are very open in their belief of keeping what you earn. Epic fail my friend.

 

[P@triot]

You seem really angry. May I ask why? Why are you so pissed off at society?

Why are you NOT angry?
Perhaps our Anti-General Welfare Claus Free Trade behavior has been good for you.

There is nothing "anti-general welfare clause" about free trade. You seem confused right now.

Really, schmuko?
What happens to the "General Welfare" of the US when all our money goes to other nations?
Why do I even ask knowing you're too stupid to connect dots.

And why does it go to other nations? Because idiot liberal socialism has made it so costly to do business in the U.S., it has forced all of our jobs overseas. If we had made taxes, regulations, and labor laws lower here than they are in other nations, we would not only have 100% of American jobs here in the U.S. but we'd have probably 50% of the entire world's jobs from other nations here in the U.S. as well. Instead - liberal policy did what liberal policy always does - created unemployment and poverty.

Like nobody EVER became immensely successful before Reagan.
You're arguments are vacuous.
Please start quoting some GDP statistics as I need a good laugh.

Of course they did. The further back in U.S. history you go, the less liberal policy we had forcing jobs overseas. In the 1700's and 1800's, there was no EPA creating illegal regulations costing hundreds of billions of dollars.

 

[Indeependent]

You seem really angry. May I ask why? Why are you so pissed off at society?

Why are you NOT angry?
Perhaps our Anti-General Welfare Claus Free Trade behavior has been good for you.

Actually, the problem is simple. The clown is a con tool. Which, by definition, means that he does not have the ability to reason. He has been told what to believe, and he does as he is told. Spends his time in the bat shit crazy con web sites, of which there are many paid for and financially supported by the far, far, far right.
The con tool is incapable of rational thought, and therefor of rational argument. But, it is simple to know what their beliefs are. Go to conservative talking points, and you will find 90% of his beliefs reduced to statements he can cut and paste (best he can do). The rest is just simple personal attack.

Meanwhile, the liberal masters are laughing all the way to the bank. While the liberal minions on this site wallow in poverty, people like Barack Obama and Hilldabeast are rolling in tens of millions of dollars. They sure as hell aren't sharing what they have. But they do laugh at how all of you are too stupid to realize that you vote for the 1% while crying about the 1%.

You can easily replace "liberal" with "conservative".

Conservative politicians aren't the one's out there preaching against the "evil" 1% genius and they don't pretend to want to redistribute wealth. They are very open in their belief of keeping what you earn. Epic fail my friend.

So you're saying there are NO Conservative politicians.
Conservative declare that whoever works for them is not worth the pay they're getting and so they open the borders and order more Business Visas and off-shore to Totalitarian China.
You're very dull.

 

[Indeependent]

Why are you NOT angry?
Perhaps our Anti-General Welfare Claus Free Trade behavior has been good for you.

There is nothing "anti-general welfare clause" about free trade. You seem confused right now.

Really, schmuko?
What happens to the "General Welfare" of the US when all our money goes to other nations?
Why do I even ask knowing you're too stupid to connect dots.

And why does it go to other nations? Because idiot liberal socialism has made it so costly to do business in the U.S., it has forced all of our jobs overseas. If we had made taxes, regulations, and labor laws lower here than they are in other nations, we would not only have 100% of American jobs here in the U.S. but we'd have probably 50% of the entire world's jobs from other nations here in the U.S. as well. Instead - liberal policy did what liberal policy always does - created unemployment and poverty.

Like nobody EVER became immensely successful before Reagan.
You're arguments are vacuous.
Please start quoting some GDP statistics as I need a good laugh.

Of course they did. The further back in U.S. history you go, the less liberal policy we had forcing jobs overseas. In the 1700's and 1800's, there was no EPA creating illegal regulations costing hundreds of billions of dollars.

Fascinating...I the last 5 years I have asked contractors if they hate the EPA and not one said "Yes".

 

[P@triot]

Why are you NOT angry?
Perhaps our Anti-General Welfare Claus Free Trade behavior has been good for you.

Actually, the problem is simple. The clown is a con tool. Which, by definition, means that he does not have the ability to reason. He has been told what to believe, and he does as he is told. Spends his time in the bat shit crazy con web sites, of which there are many paid for and financially supported by the far, far, far right.
The con tool is incapable of rational thought, and therefor of rational argument. But, it is simple to know what their beliefs are. Go to conservative talking points, and you will find 90% of his beliefs reduced to statements he can cut and paste (best he can do). The rest is just simple personal attack.

Meanwhile, the liberal masters are laughing all the way to the bank. While the liberal minions on this site wallow in poverty, people like Barack Obama and Hilldabeast are rolling in tens of millions of dollars. They sure as hell aren't sharing what they have. But they do laugh at how all of you are too stupid to realize that you vote for the 1% while crying about the 1%.

You can easily replace "liberal" with "conservative".

Conservative politicians aren't the one's out there preaching against the "evil" 1% genius and they don't pretend to want to redistribute wealth. They are very open in their belief of keeping what you earn. Epic fail my friend.

So you're saying there are NO Conservative politicians.
Conservative declare that whoever works for them is not worth the pay they're getting and so they open the borders and order more Business Visas and off-shore to Totalitarian China.
You're very dull.

That doesn't send jobs overseas genius. That's just competition. Do you fear competition? Sadly, most liberals do. But what sends jobs overseas is government coercion creating an unfair playing field by making the cost of doing business in the U.S. exponentially higher than it is to do business in another country.

 

[P@triot]

There is nothing "anti-general welfare clause" about free trade. You seem confused right now.

Really, schmuko?
What happens to the "General Welfare" of the US when all our money goes to other nations?
Why do I even ask knowing you're too stupid to connect dots.

And why does it go to other nations? Because idiot liberal socialism has made it so costly to do business in the U.S., it has forced all of our jobs overseas. If we had made taxes, regulations, and labor laws lower here than they are in other nations, we would not only have 100% of American jobs here in the U.S. but we'd have probably 50% of the entire world's jobs from other nations here in the U.S. as well. Instead - liberal policy did what liberal policy always does - created unemployment and poverty.

Like nobody EVER became immensely successful before Reagan.
You're arguments are vacuous.
Please start quoting some GDP statistics as I need a good laugh.

Of course they did. The further back in U.S. history you go, the less liberal policy we had forcing jobs overseas. In the 1700's and 1800's, there was no EPA creating illegal regulations costing hundreds of billions of dollars.

Fascinating...I the last 5 years I have asked contractors if they hate the EPA and not one said "Yes".

I'm sure they are all liberal idiots. How many business owners have you asked if they liked the EPA? Exactly...

 

[Indeependent]

Why are you NOT angry?
Perhaps our Anti-General Welfare Claus Free Trade behavior has been good for you.

There is nothing "anti-general welfare clause" about free trade. You seem confused right now.

Really, schmuko?
What happens to the "General Welfare" of the US when all our money goes to other nations?
Why do I even ask knowing you're too stupid to connect dots.

And why does it go to other nations? Because idiot liberal socialism has made it so costly to do business in the U.S., it has forced all of our jobs overseas. If we had made taxes, regulations, and labor laws lower here than they are in other nations, we would not only have 100% of American jobs here in the U.S. but we'd have probably 50% of the entire world's jobs from other nations here in the U.S. as well. Instead - liberal policy did what liberal policy always does - created unemployment and poverty.

Like nobody EVER became immensely successful before Reagan.
You're arguments are vacuous.
Please start quoting some GDP statistics as I need a good laugh.

Of course they did. The further back in U.S. history you go, the less liberal policy we had forcing jobs overseas. In the 1700's and 1800's, there was no EPA creating illegal regulations costing hundreds of billions of dollars.

Off-shoring is due to technology and being able to write off the expense.

 

[Indeependent]

Really, schmuko?
What happens to the "General Welfare" of the US when all our money goes to other nations?
Why do I even ask knowing you're too stupid to connect dots.

And why does it go to other nations? Because idiot liberal socialism has made it so costly to do business in the U.S., it has forced all of our jobs overseas. If we had made taxes, regulations, and labor laws lower here than they are in other nations, we would not only have 100% of American jobs here in the U.S. but we'd have probably 50% of the entire world's jobs from other nations here in the U.S. as well. Instead - liberal policy did what liberal policy always does - created unemployment and poverty.

Like nobody EVER became immensely successful before Reagan.
You're arguments are vacuous.
Please start quoting some GDP statistics as I need a good laugh.

Of course they did. The further back in U.S. history you go, the less liberal policy we had forcing jobs overseas. In the 1700's and 1800's, there was no EPA creating illegal regulations costing hundreds of billions of dollars.

Fascinating...I the last 5 years I have asked contractors if they hate the EPA and not one said "Yes".

I'm sure they are all liberal idiots. How many business owners have you asked if they liked the EPA? Exactly...

Rules are created and enforced due to the occurrence of actual events.
How many Architects & Contractors have you actually ever had a conversation with?