beautress
Always Faithful
- Sep 28, 2018
- 30,227
- 21,869
Don't be naïve, dear. Heads of state confer with one another endlessly, and so does the Democrat leadership, or I ain't standing here. However, this pure shit behavior of either winning or being sure to beat the opposition winner up to a pulp after an election has gone far enough. If anybody ever started her political career with a goddamn gun in her hand, Hillary Clinton did, and she started that garbage on an American college campus, threatening authorities of her own university with an AK-47 with an ear-to-ear grin, and they let her get away with it to show largesse of academia that hates conservatism anyway.They know how to profit from lying. People put up with it until it's about them. Then they see the light about liars. And lying is just how the DNC rolls when it loses, which is a lot and may be more as more people catch on to it. The DNC does pretty well in colleges, where they have nothing but naiveté to work with, and some professors who never had to eke out a living by serving the public rather enjoy not having to battle with the reality of people who live where the rubber hits the road.Socialist/Democrats and their media co-conspirators began a campaign to make Trump’s election seem illegitimate from day one. BTW...when is anyone going to investigate Clinton campaign misdeeds with regards to conspiring with DNC to undercut Sanders campaign?
How Hillary and the Democrats Played the Russia Card | RealClearPolitics
I think to balance education, schools should not receive federal funding without half or more of their faculty having a minimum of 10 years experience in the military, with half of that being on the front lines. That's the only way you can attain a balance in world leadership, and military experience is a teacher of ethics like no other. You can't intimidate military people with blatant lies and ignorance of how the world works. That way, when the shoe drops on someone, it hits the correct target.
Also, this delegitimizing of Trump would evaporate with more realistic minds managing the university atmosphere with reality, not experimentalistic theory.
The Russia Investigation would have happened whether Clinton won or lost. Russia's intereference in the 2016 Election was an all out assault on US government, and as such, the investigation would be ongoing regardless of who sits in the White House. But had Clinton won, Comey would not have been fired to end the Russian Investigation, and there would be no need for a Special Counsel.
There would not be an ongoing Obstruction of Justice investigation, because Clinton would not be offering pardons to those who refuse to co-operate, or tweeting insults at her attorney general for recusing himself (as he was legally required to do). Or firing people who don't do violate the Constitution where she tells them to.
The Russian Investigation has NOTHING to do with Hillary Clinton and EVERYTHING to do with the criminal activity of the Trump Family in getting Dumb Donald elected, and everything they've done since they've been elected, including taking bribes from the Saudi's, the Chinese, and others. There is now a massive "pay for play" investigation going on over all of these hundreds of hotel rooms the Saudi's have been booking in the US since the election.
So, be careful of pointing out someone else's' cowpies in their pasture lest ye step in yer own. On the other hand, scratch that. It's kinda fun to watch someone criticize others when their own worshipped leadership is far worse.