Election Interference: Here are the Four Colorado Justices Who Voted to Exclude Donald Trump from the 2024 Ballot

[BS Filter]

I agree they should not have been there but what violence did they commit?

If speech can be violent then so is Trespassing.

 

[ColonelAngus]

NBC: Joe Biden Emailed Hunter's Business 'Associate' 54 Times As VP

The plot thickens. Joe Biden and the White House have long claimed that he had no connection to Hunter Biden’s businesses, even though the only apparent business product Hunter had was Joe. As t...

hotair.com

JOE NEVER DISCUSSED BUSINESS WITH HUNTER!

Only fucking retards believe this.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Yes, all legal and Constitutional. Your problem is you're stupid and ignorant of the Constitution.

Sure, dupe. That’s why he’s under federal indictment for doing so.

 

[Lisa558]

I claim to be a superior debater you ignorant fuckwit. Not a kind one. Also Lisa558 is one of the biggest morons in this place. That's not a ringing endorsement.

Aren’t you the ghetto trashed who just said something about my “playing pussy” earlier - whatever the hell that means? I wouldn’t go around criticizing others’ posting styles if I were you.

 

[Lisa558]

I claim to be a superior debater you ignorant fuckwit. Not a kind one. Also Lisa558 is one of the biggest morons in this place. That's not a ringing endorsement.

P.S. You claim I am a moron the same way those CO Democrats claim Trump is an insurrectionist. Wrong on both counts.

 

[Faun]

First he had the duty as president to ensure a fair election. And in his judgement it was not fair. I agree with Trump.

The president is not allowed to break the law just because he disagrees with every authority telling him he lost the election.

 

[Faun]

You want to understand why Juries are that way? You seem befuddled as to why the law created the jury system that requires 100 percent approval to allege a party is guilty.
It is to prevent mistakes. It would be a horrible mistake were Trump to be convicted.

Even though the Senate has far more relaxed rules to convict, there they could not convict Trump. This is a witch hunt and to the Democrats Donald is the witch.

I'm not talking about mistakes. I'm talking about blind sycophancy.

 

[Faun]

Since when have we voted for Biden? Put up or shut up.

When was Biden ever found responsible for sexual abuse??

 

[BS Filter]

Sure, dupe. That’s why he’s under federal indictment for doing so.

Democrat party is full of ignorant people writing indictments. Have fun. Let us know when those turn into convictions. Idiot

 

[Curried Goats]

P.S. You claim I am a moron the same way those CO Democrats claim Trump is an insurrectionist. Wrong on both counts.

You argue that like you argue everything. Sans evidence or even a basic rationale. "Not uh" is not an argument. It's petulance.

 

[Faun]

And your boys can’t prove insurrection. A handful of Democrats saying so isn’t sufficient.

LOL

The Colorado Supreme would laugh at you too if they read your post.

 

[Faun]

And there wasn’t an insurrection. There was a demand that unprecedented anomalies be investigated further before certifying the election, and 0000000.1% of Trump voters took it too far.

it was a short-lived riot, causing a fraction of the damage to life and property as did the BLM riots that went on all summer long, at dozens of cities.

You realize doing that is a crime punishable up to 20 years, right?

 

[Faun]

You keep incorrectly saying install. That happened on January 20 and not earlier.

What else do you call trying to make the losing candidate the president?

 

[Faun]

The 4 Colorado Justices accused Trump of insurrection. They fucked up. He's never been charged with insurrection.

Doesn't have to be.

 

[konradv]

If speech can be violent then so is Trespassing.

Can you cite the ruling on that issue?

 

[konradv]

The 4 Colorado Justices accused Trump of insurrection. They fucked up. He's never been charged with insurrection.

This is a Constitutional issue. Trump encouraging the riot is taken as fact.

 

[Faun]

Trump wanted an investigation. Everything in that January 5th statement is Legal and Constitutional.

Retard, read his OWN words.

He wanted Pence to throw out ALL of the votes. NOT for an investigation. But so that on January 6th, the House of Representatives would elect him president of the election he fucking lost. That's Hitlerian type politics. That wasn't calling for an investigation.

Seriously, wtf is mentally wrong with you Qult freaks?

 

[Faun]

You democrats are liars. You can shout "insurrection" all you want, but the people of America aren't buying it.

Colorado bought it. And they're just the first.

 

[Faun]

It's not going to suddenly get better for you. Dementia doesn't work like that.

Retard, how on Earth do you not understand that polls this far out from an election are utterly meaningless?

 

[Faun]

Its a basic tenant of American law that someone hasn't committed a crime until it has been proven in an open court and the person has been convicted by a jury of his peers. That hasn't happened, Trump, nor anyone else, has even been indicted for insurrection, let alone convicted so no one is guilty of insurrection.

There's precedence...

• Kenneth H. Worthy: Worthy v. Barrett, 63 N.C. 199 (1869), appeal dismissed, 76 U.S. 611 (1869)
• William L. Tate: In re Tate, 63 N.C. 308, 309 (1869)
• J.D. Watkins: Louisiana ex rel. Sandlin v. Watkins, 21 La. Ann. 631 (La. 1869)
• Zebulon B. Vance: The Election Case of Joseph C. Abbott v. Zebulon B. Vance and Matt W. Ransom of North Carolina (1872)
• A.F. Gregory: A Case Under the 14th Amendment, Daily Dispatch
• Victor L. Berger: Cannon’s Precedents, Ch. 157, § 56
• Couy Griffin: New Mexico ex rel White v. Griffin, 2022 WL 4295619 (N.M. Dist. Sept. 6, 2022), appeal dismissed and reconsideration denied, No. S-1-SC-39571 (N.M. Feb. 16, 2023)
• John H. Christy: Hinds’ Precedents, Ch. 14, § 459 ; Col. John H. Christy Obituary, Calhoun Times (Mar. 3, 1877)