BS Filter
Diamond Member
- Jan 12, 2018
- 43,803
- 26,966
- 2,615
It's not going to suddenly get better for you. Dementia doesn't work like that.And the election is next week?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's not going to suddenly get better for you. Dementia doesn't work like that.And the election is next week?
Its a basic tenant of American law that someone hasn't committed a crime until it has been proven in an open court and the person has been convicted by a jury of his peers. That hasn't happened, Trump, nor anyone else, has even been indicted for insurrection, let alone convicted so no one is guilty of insurrection.Of course you did, Dumbfuck. I asked you to point to where the 14th Amendment stated a politician needed to be "convicted" of insurrection and you couldn't do. That's a tacit confession that a conviction isn't necessary.
The impeachment, dupe.Huh?
Trump didn’t invite those illegal in, Dumbass.
You lose again, Simp.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Could be.And that ruling will go down in flames when it gets to a real court.
That dumb Bingo hasn't present one yet.You definitely are not superior. Lisa is an outstanding debater and in her case she actually relies on facts, as I personally do too.
Umm…Because they weren’t charged with insurrection?Explain how you have an insurrection and nobody is charged with insurrection, vermin.
Who is a liberal democrat. And most people and most lawyers say the minority WASN'T on the wrong side of the decision.That was written by a Justice on the wrong side of a 4-3 decision
And yet, no insurrection charges for the abandoned insurrection, Vermin.
Nah, mostly peaceful protest.
There is no question. Not in the real world anyway.There was no insurrection, and it was - and still is - questionable that the current occupier of the WH was duly elected.
Thus, Trump is not an insurrectionist, and the SCOTUS will righty put a stop to this nonsense.
It’s already done.And your boys can’t prove insurrection. A handful of Democrats saying so isn’t sufficient.
That’s the determining authority in our system of govt.Exactly! These Dimmers say “there was a ruling” as if that makes it true. The SCOTUS will shoot it down.
lmaoThere is no question. Not in the real world anyway.
You mean everything in that statement is evidence that it was a coordinated effort led by the then president.Trump wanted an investigation. Everything in that January 5th statement is Legal and Constitutional.
I hope that is how it is working. I posted a video of a dumb woman Democrat and when she was asked (in terms that applied to Trump but she did not notice that - the person asking the questions phrased his questions as if it was happening to Biden) she was very defensive when she believed it was happening to Biden. When she was told it was happening to Trump and not Biden, suddenly she went into a nosedive and changed everything she said. She is clearly a bigot as many Democrat posters here are. We need to remind them all they are bigots.That Curried Goats, and other Dems, resort to insults and gutter language when they realize they are losing the argument.
And do you see the one who keeps calling me Grandma?
The Dems are desperate. And with every additional ridiculous punch they throw, they are losing independents.
That’s the determining authority in our system of govt.
We are a nation of laws, not of men.
They protested on his property, asshole. Having violent progs on your property is a threat.
Yes, all legal and Constitutional. Your problem is you're stupid and ignorant of the Constitution.You mean everything in that statement is evidence that it was a coordinated effort led by the then president.![]()