Election Interference: Here are the Four Colorado Justices Who Voted to Exclude Donald Trump from the 2024 Ballot

[WEATHER53]

Not Trump.....it just was a gut feeling, I guess.

It’s a wish that when repeated daily becomes a reality per their feelings.

 

[Flash]

The Democrat Dirty Tricks Department is very active in Colorado, isn't it?

Just another mission of the 2020 stolen election.

Democrats are the scum of the earth and are turning this country into a Banana Republic shithole and the stupid Moon Bats are too damn stupid to understand what is going on. Either too damn stupid or simple screwed up in the mind and don't care. Probably both.

If anybody needs to be disqualified for office because of ties to an insurrection it would be those filthy Democrats that supported the 2020 Negro/Communist insurrection that was six months of murdering, rioting, burning and looting in 200 American cities.

 

[Meister]

No one.

Why?

Why did you call him an insurrectionist then?

Kinda like calling someone a murderer, just because, right?

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Does not apply to the office of President, as that office is clearly not included. And that's just one reason why it doesn't apply.

addressed in the ruling. read it: https://www.courts.state.co.us/user...ation/Supreme_Court/Opinions/2023/23SA300.pdf

Keep ignoring the train leaving the station, and It will run you over.

remember Gay Marriage? The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court - The United States Supreme Court

Now we are here - Trump on Ballot - The Colorado Supreme Court -

 

[Marener]

Why did you call him an insurrectionist then?

Kinda like calling someone a murderer, just because, right?

Because the Supreme Court of Colorado determined his actions constituted insurrection.

 

[JustAGuy1]

And? Not one person was charged with "insurrection" in 1865 either.

The topic is Jan 6th and Rump. Stupid people use deflection.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Why did you call him an insurrectionist then?

Kinda like calling someone a murderer, just because, right?

Was Charles Manson a murderer? Did Mr. Trump call people murderers before they were convicted?

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Because the Supreme Court of Colorado determined his actions constituted insurrection.

read it: https://www.courts.state.co.us/user...ation/Supreme_Court/Opinions/2023/23SA300.pdf

 

[BlindBoo]

Who was convicted of, or even charged with, insurrection?

Conviction is not required.

No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability."

The Neo-GOP could try to get 2/3rds from each House to remove this condition. Notice it say nothing about running for office. So even if Benedict Donnie is elected he would still be constitutionally barred from taking office. The Neo-Fascist party better choose a non Jan 6th participant as VP or the Speaker of the House might be sworn in as 47.

 

[Meister]

Because the Supreme Court of Colorado determined his actions constituted insurrection.

And that is the exact reason why the Supreme Court will reverse their decision.

The constitution was created to protect the people from their government.
This is exactly what the FF's had in mind.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

There is no election interference. The election will be held. Republicans will be on the ballot.

Don't count on an election being held. Republicans are threatening to scrap the primary election and go to caucus. No election, no one kept off the ballot.

 

[Meister]

Was Charles Manson a murderer? Did Mr. Trump call people murderers before they were convicted?

Did Manson have his day in court? Well?
Was Manson convicted of murder? Well?

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Conviction is not required.

No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability."

The Neo-GOP could try to get 2/3rds from each House to remove this condition. Notice it say nothing about running for office. So even if Benedict Donnie is elected he would still be constitutionally barred from taking office. The Neo-Fascist party better choose a non Jan 6th participant as VP or the Speaker of the House might be sworn in as 47.

Actually no. If removed from the Colorado primary ballot Trump could still be elected. If Trump wins the primary election on the basis of the other 49 states, he would still be on the general election ballot, even in Colorado.

 

[Richard-H]

Does not apply to the office of President, as that office is clearly not included. And that's just one reason why it doesn't apply.

Section 3. No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may, by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

 

[ColonelAngus]

How is he legally off the ballot if he was not convicted of sedition?

 

[EvilCat Breath]

You do realize this is for a primary election. It will have no effect on the general election.

 

[badbob85037]

No, they shouldn’t. The proper place to petition your government, state, or federal, for the redress of grievances, is AT the government, not at their homes. In other words, picket the courthouse…but their homes should be off limits.

Besides, their neighbors shouldn’t have to suffer a mob shouting for hours on end because of something a judge did.

No, I think it should go through the appeals process and work through the system legally. Protesting outside of someone’s home isn’t killed going to have any affect other than to galvanize them.

I understand playing the lefts game the same as they do, but not at someone’s house…

If they follow the constitution, this should be overturned easily ..

Come on! you drag, pull, or yank these ass clowns from office and try them for breaking their oath and never having any honor to begin with. The only bench those pukes will be setting on is a park bench, loitering.

 

[BlindBoo]

Actually no. If removed from the Colorado primary ballot Trump could still be elected. If Trump wins the primary election on the basis of the other 49 states, he would still be on the general election ballot, even in Colorado.

The Constitution doesn't bar him from appearing on a ballot or for his sycophants from voting for him. It bars him from holding office for his roll in the Jan 6th Rebellion against the Constitution. Swearing him in as President would still be unconstitutional.

 

[Marener]

And that is the exact reason why the Supreme Court will reverse their decision.

The constitution was created to protect the people from their government.
This is exactly what the FF's had in mind.

The 14th amendment does protect the people from the government by forbidding insurrectionist from holding government authority.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

The Constitution doesn't bar him from appearing on a ballot or for his sycophants from voting for him. It bars him from holding office for his roll in the Jan 6th Rebellion against the Constitution. Swearing him in as President would still be unconstitutional.

None of which is affected by this ruling. This ruling only concerns the primary ballot in Colorado. It has no effect at all on federal elections.