Election Interference: Here are the Four Colorado Justices Who Voted to Exclude Donald Trump from the 2024 Ballot

[Delldude]

You imagining you understand their strategy doesn't really mean shit.

Nice try......they argued their point, like I said.

 

[Curried Goats]

Wait a minute......you told me the feds' had no jurisdiction in state elections.

In this instance they don't. Neil Gorsuch ruled that States can determine who meets or doesn't meet the Constitutional requirements.

I proved you wrong, now you attempt to change the subject......

I'm not. I'm happy to keep talking about it.

 

[Slade3200]

Acquitted of all charges.

Acquitted of impeachment with statements that the insurrection charges should go to court once he is out of office. Absorb that fact.

 

[Slade3200]

There it is......Trump's guilty, Mr Potato Head said so.

That's as patently stupid as these Colorado judges you are supporting who want to disenfranchise well over a third or more of the voting block.

You asked for declarations… we are showing you declarations. Your excuses are weak and getting shot down. Do better

 

[Delldude]

In this instance they don't. Neil Gorsuch ruled that States can determine who meets or doesn't meet the Constitutional requirements.

States determine the rules for all elections held in the jurisdictions. That's why States have different rules for mail in ballots and drop boxes and poll times.

Not so......is why it's headed to SCOTUS.

 

[Faun]

Yes, we all saw the capitol riot on TV. That wasn’t an armed insurrection with the intent of overthrowing government.

Retard, a riot against the Congress to "stop the steal" IS an insurrection. Now even you're admitting it, though unwittingly.

 

[Curried Goats]

Not so......is why it's headed to SCOTUS.

Where one of the Republican justices already ruled that States can determine eligibility.

 

[Faun]

Can you post a definition of insurrection where it says it needs to be armed and intended to overthrow the government? It sounds like you’re trying to juice up your argument with things that are not in the constitution or definition of the word.

That's because that dullard doesn't know the difference between an insurrection and a rebellion.

 

[Faun]

There it is......Trump's guilty, Mr Potato Head said so.

That's as patently stupid as these Colorado judges you are supporting who want to disenfranchise well over a third or more of the voting block.

LOL

You asked for a declaration... I gave you one... but you're still crying.

 

[Care4all]

Acquitted of all charges.

58 republicans and democrats voted to convict him in the Senate ....another +/- 20 spoke of his guilt but felt he was no longer in office so they had no need to vote guilty to remove him from office.

 

[Faun]

Acquitted of all charges.

So?

 

[Nostra]

We all saw it on TV so y’all that try and deny it are just sounding like fools but let’s keep this debate a legal one… Where in the constitution does it say that a legal authority needs to declare an insurrection took place? show the text.

And then consider that a legal authority (court judge) did in fact determine that it was an insurrection and Trump had responsibility during the Colorado case.

Insurrection is a federal crime, stupid.

 

[Delldude]

Acquitted of impeachment with statements that the insurrection charges should go to court once he is out of office. Absorb that fact.

They never have.....why hasn't He been charged for criminal insurrection committed while in office?

The Senate has also concluded (by majority vote) on various occasions that an official impeached while in office remains subject to trial, conviction, and imposition of the penalty of disqualification even after he or she leaves office.

As per the impeachment clause, none of you or your cronies arguments are valid.

You asked for declarations… we are showing you declarations. Your excuses are weak and getting shot down. Do better

Looks like you and your cronies have over shot your expectations.

 

[Delldude]

Retard, a riot against the Congress to "stop the steal" IS an insurrection. Now even you're admitting it, though unwittingly.

Ha ha ha.....FBI didn't see it that way.

 

[tahuyaman]

Retard, a riot against the Congress to "stop the steal" IS an insurrection. Now even you're admitting it, though unwittingly.

No. Please educate yourself.

 

[tahuyaman]

The Judiciary arbitrates them you idiot. What happened in this case is that someone used Colorado's laws (written by Colorado's legislative body) to challenge Trumps eligibility. The Attorny General heard that challenge, held hearings and looked at evidence and determined Trump to be unqualified, that ruling was appealed and the appellate court and then Supreme Court made their determinations. That's the process.

Idiots should not call otters an idiot. Imbeciles line you should refrain from proving their ignorance.

 

[Nostra]

Because the 14th Amendment doesn't require such a conviction. Which is some have been banned under the 14th without being convicted of insurrection.

Just like OJ was found responsible for the death of Ron Goldman in civil court even though he was never convicted in criminal court for his death.

The 5th spells out due process, Simp. The 14th doesn’t negate the 5th.

 

[Nostra]

He was acquitted of the impeachment but not the insurrection claims. If you remember, even the GOP members that acquitted him of impeachment used the reasoning that they couldn’t indict a sitting president and the case should be settled in courts after the election. That’s exactly what’s happening

He wasn’t charged with insurrection, stupid.

 

[Delldude]

Where one of the Republican justices already ruled that States can determine eligibility.

Get around the part where it says:

See Foster v. Love, 522 U.S. 67, 69 (1997) ( t is well settled that the Elections Clause grants Congress 'the power to override state regulations' by establishing uniform rules for federal elections binding on the States.

Can you post a definition of insurrection where it says it needs to be armed and intended to overthrow the government?

Can you post why Merrick Garland and Jack Smith haven't pursued this insurrection option?

 

[tahuyaman]

Can you post a definition of insurrection where it says it needs to be armed and intended to overthrow the government? It sounds like you’re trying to juice up your argument with things that are not in the constitution or definition of the word.

Why have none of the hundreds of people convicted or charged faced any charges of engaging in an insurrection? No one has been able to address that.