Election Interference: Here are the Four Colorado Justices Who Voted to Exclude Donald Trump from the 2024 Ballot

[Curried Goats]

Yes, they will since they did zippo to back up the lie, Tardo.

They did enough to convince two seperate courts little bit.

 

[Delldude]

You are an idiot. The people suing to keep Trump off the ballot cited in their arguments a ruling by Neil Gorsush determining that States have a right to decide who is on their ballots before he was appointed to the Supreme Court. This is in part a States Rights issue.

For state elections, not Federal elections.

 

[Slade3200]

Of the hundreds of people charged and convicted and the hundreds pending trial, not a single one is facing a charge of participating in an insurrection. Why is that?

Ohh there a few that got seditious conspiracy but that’s besides the point… as I explained the civil suit and constitution don’t require criminal charges… just engaging and aiding

 

[ColonelAngus]

18 U.S. Code § 1503 - Influencing or injuring officer or juror generally

www.law.cornell.edu

"
(a)
Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication, endeavors to influence, intimidate, or impede any grand or petit juror, or officer in or of any court of the United States, or officer who may be serving at any examination or other proceeding before any United States magistrate judge or other committing magistrate, in the discharge of his duty, or injures any such grand or petit juror in his person or property on account of any verdict or indictment assented to by him, or on account of his being or having been such juror, or injures any such officer, magistrate judge, or other committing magistrate in his person or property on account of the performance of his official duties, or corruptly or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication, influences, obstructs, or impedes, or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede, the due administration of justice, shall be punished as provided in subsection (b). If the offense under this section occurs in connection with a trial of a criminal case, and the act in violation of this section involves the threat of physical force or physical force, the maximum term of imprisonment which may be imposed for the offense shall be the higher of that otherwise provided by law or the maximum term that could have been imposed for any offense charged in such case."

Merrick Garland does not believe in enforcing this law.

NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW!!! RIGHT?

 

[Curried Goats]

How is it in this case?

Didn't three of those democrat Colorado justices argued the others were wrong in their opinion?

Partisan opinions are law now?

No. They all determined that Jan 6 was an insurrection and that Trump "engaged in" that insurrection. Where they disagreed was the relief and by that I mean two of three dissenters thought Congress had to be the one to disqualify him and the third thought you still needed a conviction.

 

[Curried Goats]

For state elections, not Federal elections.

States determine the rules for all elections held in the jurisdictions. That's why States have different rules for mail in ballots and drop boxes and poll times.

 

[Slade3200]

Which was written under a declared insurrection by Congress and President Lincoln.
No such declaration has been made.

Oh really? Can you show some literature where the constitution requires a declaration of insurrection from the president and Congress?

Trump was impeached for his part in the insurrection and he sure as hell isn’t going to declare it on himself so if a declaration is all you need then it’s there

 

[tahuyaman]

Ohh there a few that got seditious conspiracy but that’s besides the point… as I explained the civil suit and constitution don’t require criminal charges… just engaging and aiding

Engaging and aiding in something which has happened though. No legal authority has said an insurrection took place. How can one engage in and aid something which didn’t happen?

 

[Slade3200]

Idiot.

You heard me the first time, troll.

Go away.

Goddamn leftards are FUCKING ANNOYING.

Ok to be clear I’m posting a definition and you are not. I’ll take the easy victory then, thanks

 

[Delldude]

Where they disagreed was the relief and by that I mean two of three dissenters thought Congress had to be the one to disqualify him and the third thought you still needed a conviction.

Thank you for proving my point.

 

[tahuyaman]

States determine the rules for all elections held in the jurisdictions. That's why States have different rules for mail in ballots and drop boxes and poll times.

State legislatures, not judiciaries.

 

[Slade3200]

lol

Scruffy pWns Slade3200.

You don’t win when you can’t back up your arguments

 

[Nostra]

They did enough to convince two seperate courts little bit.

A few Dimtard judges. Gonna be fun watching your sloped head explode when a real court reverses those hacks.

 

[Delldude]

Can you show some literature where the constitution requires a declaration of insurrection from the president and Congress?

Why was the 14th, Sec 3 written then?

Trump was impeached for his part in the insurrection and he sure as hell isn’t going to declare it on himself so if a declaration is all you need then it’s there

You forgot to mention 'He was acquitted'.

 

[Slade3200]

Engaging and aiding in something which has happened though. No legal authority has said an insurrection took place. How can one engage in and aid something which didn’t happen?

We all saw it on TV so y’all that try and deny it are just sounding like fools but let’s keep this debate a legal one… Where in the constitution does it say that a legal authority needs to declare an insurrection took place? show the text.

And then consider that a legal authority (court judge) did in fact determine that it was an insurrection and Trump had responsibility during the Colorado case.

 

[Curried Goats]

Thank you for proving my point.

What point?

 

[Delldude]

States determine the rules for all elections held in the jurisdictions. That's why States have different rules for mail in ballots and drop boxes and poll times.

Federal elections, federal control.

 

[Curried Goats]

State legislatures, not judiciaries.

State write their election laws the Attorney General enforces them.

 

[Curried Goats]

Federal elections, federal control.

Nope.

 

[Delldude]

Nope.

Who has the power to regulate presidential elections under the Constitution?

1. See Foster v. Love, 522 U.S. 67, 69 (1997) ( t is well settled that the Elections Clause grants Congress 'the power to override state regulations' by establishing uniform rules for federal elections binding on the States.

https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artI-S4-C1-2/ALDE_00013577/