Nostra
Diamond Member
- Oct 7, 2019
- 66,678
- 57,366
- 3,615
Nope. You are still lying, Simp.I did. It took three posts to include all the information from the court ruling and you failed to address any of them like the fail white that you are.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nope. You are still lying, Simp.I did. It took three posts to include all the information from the court ruling and you failed to address any of them like the fail white that you are.
Funny, I feel pretty confident.You're wasting your time and fighting a useless battle.
It's not a lie that I posted excerpts from Colorado's ruling, fail white. We all have eyes.Nope. You are still lying, Simp.
You are in support of letting the courts decide who people should vote for?Funny, I feel pretty confident.
Nope, that wasn’t your lie. You posted a lot of stuff, but ZERO orders by Trump telling people to do anything……much less “attack the Capitol”, Vermin.It's not a lie that I posted excerpts from Colorado's ruling, fail white. We all have eyes.
How can someone be disqualified for committing a crime which they were never charged with let alone convicted of. A person can’t be disqualified based on a political opinion of their fitness for office. That’s up to the voters.
How can someone be found guilty of a crime when they have never been charged with such a crime?
If court's shouldn't play a role in determining who's on the ballot then what, everyone who wants to be on the ballot gets to be on?You are in support of letting the courts decide who people should vote for?
And you people call Trump Hitler...
Right. So how can he be disqualified for being guilty of a crime?He wasn't found guilty of a crime.
Yet plenty of quotes from Trump telling people to fight because the election was rigged and stolen from them.Nope, that wasn’t your lie. You posted a lot of stuff, but ZERO orders by Trump telling people to do anything……much less “attack the Capitol”, Vermin.
You are flailing, liar.
Idiot.You still haven’t posted a definition or intelligent argument as to why it wasn’t an insurrection. You recognize that there were hundreds of arrests. So laws were being broken. We saw the destruction and violence on tv that day. The target was our capital and the purpose was to stop the certification of votes for President. I don’t think you could show otherwise. So in that case it fits the sedition of insurrection to the letter. You have no argument. Learn English
in·sur·rec·tion
/ˌinsəˈrekSH(ə)n/
noun
a violent uprising against an authority or government.
He wasn't found guilty of a crime you dumb Bingo. He was determined to have engaged in insurrection and is thus disqualified from being on the ballot. Criminal convictions require criminal trials, to determine eligibility Trump got a hearing. His arguments during that hearing (to determine his eligibility) failed.
All were unanimous in their assessment that Trump engaged in insurrection. Where they disagreed was that relief.
The judge who presided over the initial eligibility hearing and then the seven Colorado Supreme Court Justices who heard the appeal.
Why are you so ignorant of the rule of law?
If court's shouldn't play a role in determining who's on the ballot then what, everyone who wants to be on the ballot gets to be on?
Why not If they meet the constitutional requirements? Voters decide who makes it to the presidential ballot.
So what?Yet plenty of quotes from Trump telling people to fight because the election was rigged and stolen from them.
Why do you argue like such a little bitch?
Was there ever a declaration by the federal gov't that an insurrection had occurred?There was another court in between. Three separate courts found he engaged in insurrection.
DO it the old fashioned way and let the people decide.If court's shouldn't play a role in determining who's on the ballot then what, everyone who wants to be on the ballot gets to be on?
lolHe doesn’t need to be charged in criminal court to be accused or found guilty in civil court. Brian up on your understanding of the law. If you disagree with what I just said show the statute to back up your argument
Cool story. Still ZERO DEMANDS of people to “attack the Capital “. Get back to me when you find something that actually backs up Richard-H lie, Simp.Yet plenty of quotes from Trump telling people to fight because the election was rigged and stolen from them.
Why do you argue like such a little bitch?
Ok genius, guess what system we have in place to determine if candidates meet those requirements. Being an insurrectionist is as constitutionally disqualifying as being to young or being a foreign national.tahuyaman said:Why not If they meet the constitutional requirements? Voters decide who makes it to the presidential ballot.
No stupid, someone’s age or being a foreign national isn’t an opinion.Ok genius, guess what system we have in place to determine if candidates meet those requirements. Being an insurrectionist is as constitutionally disqualifying as being to young or being a foreign national.