Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Trump has not been found guilty of any of those things. It’s not up to a state court to determine he has without a trial giving him his rights to due process.You start with the Trumper premise that all judges are partisan, political, and corrupt, if they do not rule in your favor. You've been trained by Trump Speak to do so.
The 4 to 3 ruling included 1 REPUBLICAN appointed justice as well... A bipartisan decision, if you believe all judges are partisan. AND the suit was brought by 4 Republicans and two independents, ZERO democrats.
It does need to be a 9 to 0 decision or close by the U.S. supreme court, to appease the masses.... I will accept their decision....Will you, if not in your favor?
The Colorado justices did not take this decision lightly, they reviewed his speech, and all the actions, tweets, and evidence of what happened on 1/6 and before, including the republican Congress critters plan, and the fake elector plan, gathered by the congressional investigators...
The disqualification in section 3 of the 14th A, is not just insurrection, but also rebellion, and also aiding and abetting the enemy....which Trump did on 1/6.
The 14th does not require a charge or conviction of insurrection or rebellion, and those removed from their positions at the time, or prevented from running for office, had no due process or conviction needed, it was self evident.
If and when Biden incited and instigated a violent insurrection or rebellion against the constitution that is self evident, then yes, he too could be removed from the ballot....
And I understand the concern for this being simply opinion with no evidence, states could abuse it and just remove opponents....but this was not done by the Colorado Secretary of State, she stepped back, to let the courts decide on the evidence....
But, there is still a chance in other states that an abuse could occur, since each state controls their own election according to the constitution....
I look forward to seeing how the U.S. supreme court works around this decision they have to make, and as said above, will accept their decision.
LOL
Keep crying, Dumbfuck. I showed your bullshit position was a bullshit position you couldn't defend. Took me just 1 post to do it too.
Sorry. And with that cleared up, I agree with you. The only reason Biden won was due to the ignorance of his voters. (Well, that and the halt in six swing states to truck in harvested ballots.)Uh, I was talking about Marener
You love Trump.
What did you do with your life prior to 2015?
Great. So join me in my call for a single national popular vote for president.
As it stands now, electing a president is 50 individual elections in 50 states with 50 different set of rules. So your criticism is a necessary part of the electoral college you are all so desperate to protect.
As is obvious, you’re desperately hoping to sidestep any accountability for a pointless argument you hope to make.Trump had all three.
As noted above, there is no stipulation regarding due process in the Constitution and Courts routinely make rulings as far as elections.Trump has not been found guilty of any of those things. It’s not up to a state court to determine he has without a trial giving him his rights to due process.
There’s no way the SCOTUS will allow a presidential nominee to be stripped of his Constitutional rights and kicked off the ballot. At worst, it will be 6-3.
I didn't say it was.
And what that poster doesn’t realize is that cartoon WILL represent Trump once the SCOTUS disallows the CO Democrats for deciding Trump can’t be on the Republican primary ballot because….
…..it is their OPINION he is guilty of something never proven, or even charged, in a trial.
If they don’t , will you accept that?
LOL. According to who?And they're wrong. Trump had due process.
So you won’t accept that ruling were it to occur?If they don't, it is officially the end of any fair elections in our country.
That was written by the CO chief justice of a decision that will be reversed by the USSC 9-0.That was written by a Justice on the wrong side of a 4-3 decision
People who have been convicted. Accusations are not tantamount to conviction.Others have been banned from holding public just as Trump has been. There's precedence to this court's ruling.
So basically land area gets to vote rather than people get to voteYou will find out soon enough just how wrong you are when the SC knocks this ruling down.
The electoral college is absolutely necessary to keep large cities from running the show as they see fit. God only knows that I don't want to live like people in those areas.
So you won’t accept that ruling were it to occur?
True. However the CO Chief Justice said that "due process" was not adequate. We'll soon see if the USSC agrees.Talking out my ass?
There was a trial. That’s simply a fact.
That could be. For now he was on the wrong side of a 4-3 decisionThat was written by the CO chief justice of a decision that will be reversed by the USSC 9-0.
As is obvious, you’re desperately hoping to sidestep any accountability for a pointless argument you hope to make.
Identify the date of a trial for insurrection™ for Donald Trump or anyone else.
With regard to the Colorado Judges, identify the standards met for due process. You keep hoping to sidestep.
“Making room for these innovations, the Court has determined that due process requires, at a minimum: (1) notice; (2) an opportunity to be heard; and (3) an impartial tribunal.”
Let’s give you an opportunity to support the specious claims you’re making.
1). Notice. When was Trump or his legal team served with notice to appear? It’s, you know, kinda’ in good form to serve the accused with notice so they know when to appear for trial. When did the trial take place? Did someone forget to report the trial date?
