And the life that is being ended.Whenever a woman terminates her own pregnancy as safely as possible there are two fully developed persons involved: herself and her doctor.
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And the life that is being ended.Whenever a woman terminates her own pregnancy as safely as possible there are two fully developed persons involved: herself and her doctor.
And then after the unique living human organism inside her body is dead
And life that is being ended.
No, you don't You pay lip service to it. It's just property to you.I acknowledge that. Like I said, you have no idea what to say to my argument.
And then after the unique living human organism inside her body is dead
And life that is being ended.
You pay lip service to it.
No, you didn't. To you life in the womb is nothing more than property. No right to life whatsoever. Might as well make lampshades out of it.I acknowledge that in nfbw 240403 Veapyz00420.
There is a key point to my argument in my POST Veapyz00420 where I said “after abortion the unique living human organism inside her body is dead” is that a fact Saint Ding that is part of a bugger point I am making?
To you life in the womb is nothing more than property.
A fetus has a right to life through the right to life of it’s mother.
If there is nothing inherently wrong with abortion then they could harvest fetuses for commercial purposes. They're just property. Think of it like a salmon farm, except for aborted human lives.NotfooledbyW said:
I acknowledge that in nfbw 240403 Veapyz00420.
There is a key point to my argument in my POST Veapyz00420 where I said “after abortion the unique living human organism inside her body is dead” is that a fact Saint Ding that is part of a bugger point I am making?
Your
You are a liar Saint Ding. I do not regard a fetus as property. See my POST nfbw 240402 Veap00385
You are a liar Saint Ding. I do not regard a fetus as property. See my POST nfbw 240402 Veap00385No, you didn't. To you life in the womb is nothing more than property. No right to life whatsoever. Might as well make lampshades out of it.
If there is nothing inherently wrong with abortion then they could harvest fetuses for commercial purposes. Think of it like a salmon farm.
That is IMO besides the point, since it isn't about "person-hood" but simply LIFE as such.One can talk about life beginning at any stage for that matter. For instance one can talk about life beginning in the fetal stage.
Both are somewhat irrelevant to a discussion of personhood.
Which one would have thought entailed citizenship and stuff like that.
When Does a Human Life Begin? 17 Timepoints - DNA Science
I rerun this most-read post about when human life begins every time that the discussion resurges, which is usually in the shadow…dnascience.plos.org
If there is nothing inherently wrong with abortion then they could harvest fetuses for commercial purposes. Think of it like a salmon farm.
The possibilities are endless.
Maybe Jesus will come soon and take you away from this horrible life.doomed
Unlike you, (bringing in your Jesus) I am an atheist.Maybe Jesus will come soon and take you away from this horrible life.
As an atheist on what authority do you want my government to protect unborn life from the person who must assume the risk of delivering an unplanned fetus to the world of born human beings,The government has the responsibility to protect LIFE - as such any "forceful" ending of a life (which includes an unborn LIFE) is considered by law to be - Murder.
The authority granted by the people onto their ELECTED government, that is sworn to protect them and LIFE.As an atheist on what authority do you want my government to protect unborn life from the person who must assume the risk of delivering an unplanned fetus to the world of born human beings,
I am not a Christian. I am a rational theist who sees absolutely no doom to western civilization caused by a million women a year in my country ending pregnancies when it was not their inten to become pregnant.Unlike you, (bringing in your Jesus) I am an atheist.
I didn’t say it is a tumor. Next strawman?
It should be covered the same as any other reproductive medical procedure.
Authority was not granted by the good people of Ohio to allow the state government to force full term gestation on women against their will.The authority granted by the people onto their ELECTED government, that is sworn to protect them and LIFE.
Issue 1 is a ballot measure that, if approved, would change the Ohio Constitution to include protections for abortion access. According to ballot language, the measure would establish in the state constitution "an individual right to one's own reproductive medical treatment," including to make decisions on abortion, contraception, fertility treatment, continuing one's own pregnancy and miscarriage care.
If approved, the amendment, titled "The Right to Reproductive Freedom with Protections for Health and Safety," would protect any person or entity that helps a patient receive reproductive medical treatment and prohibit Ohio from "directly or indirectly burdening, penalizing or prohibiting abortion" before viability, generally considered to be between 22 and 24 weeks of pregnancy.
How can the will of the majority protect the unborn when the majority votes to protect the freedom of women first as Ohioans did in Ohio.The authority granted by the people onto their ELECTED government, that is sworn to protect them and LIFE.