- Sep 9, 2022
- 15,169
- 6,776
- 938
Triple CO2 amounts.Why what would be worse?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Triple CO2 amounts.Why what would be worse?
No, if you nearly triple the current level of co2, like some food producers in greenhouses do, it's better for plants. If co2 levels reached 1,100ppm to 1,800ppm, you would get high crop yield. We are currently in a co2 drought.Triple CO2 amounts.
Who are "you two"? Never mind. I have dropped my own thread and have stopped responding onallmost others
No, if you nearly triple the current level of co2, like some food producers in greenhouses do, it's better for plants. If co2 levels reached 1,100ppm to 1,800ppm, you would get high crop yield. We are currently in a co2 drought.
Can you remember the saying that plants grow better when you talk to them? It's because you're breathing co2 on them.
The alarmist's doom and gloom on co2 is bizarre, but they've morphed their rhetoric into, "Speed of climate change".You are correct ... human food plants for the most part prosper with more CO2, as long as other nutrients are supplied ... especially water ... the warmer Earth is a wetter Earth and far and away the extra water is more benefit to all living things ... like we evolved in water if you believe in that evolution stuff ...
Now that you clarified, we agree. I thought you said the opposite.No, if you nearly triple the current level of co2, like some food producers in greenhouses do, it's better for plants. If co2 levels reached 1,100ppm to 1,800ppm, you would get high crop yield. We are currently in a co2 drought.
Can you remember the saying that plants grow better when you talk to them? It's because you're breathing co2 on them.
As the co2 debacle raged on, I noticed that some food producers pump co2 into greenhouses to 1,100ppm+ to get better growth and crop yield. I believe it can be detrimental to the likes of cucumbers and tomatoes above 1,800ppm.Now that you clarified, we agree. I thought you said the opposite.
Gold plated remarks.As the co2 debacle raged on, I noticed that some food producers pump co2 into greenhouses to 1,100ppm+ to get better growth and crop yield. I believe it can be detrimental to the likes of cucumbers and tomatoes above 1,800ppm.
Temperature and co2 have never been in unison over the earth's history, but if we had higher temperatures too, we are better off having a much higher co2 level.
Crustaceans over millions of years supped up so much co2, the earth's co2ppm was getting critically low. I believe 150ppm - 180ppm life starts dying out. So ironically, mankind and other factors saved life on earth.
But it's all doom and gloom with the alarmists and they want to drag our lives down to their miserable level.
Not at 442ppm.You know, when you ferment wine it produces a lot of carbon dioxide gas. The little yeast guys eat sugar, piss ethanol and exhale carbon dioxide.
A natural way to enrich your greenhouse with carbon dioxide is to ferment wine in there.
CO2 is the green gas.