Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You claim that Carthaginians, and Phoenicians had conquered Africa?
They hardly touched the bulk of it.
Never said they conquered it. I said they harvested it for its raw materials and enslaved the people. MOST of mankind lives within a few miles of the oceans of the world. It is only with the recent inventions of trains and cars etc. that mankind has moved into the interior of the various continents of the world.
Much of the slavery came from Africans trading their slaves to Arabs, or Europeans.
As for resources I'd like to see a source for widespread non-Sub-Saharan influences before the Scramble for Africa?
Which merely reinforces my point. Thank you. The only reason why white Europeans have higher IQs now is because they have benefited from over a century of good nutrition. That's it. White people are not inherently smarter. They are just fed better.
While I certainly don't deny that environment including malnutrition impacts IQ.
There's no reason to believe Communist countries with higher levels of malnutrition would have scored higher IQ's than African Americans.
Furthermore according to this study Malnourished Koreans scored a 102 IQ, while well nourished Koreans scored a 112 IQ.
(Sure that's a sizable 10 point IQ gap, but it still beats the IQ of much of the Western Whites ironically)
The Handbook of International Adoption Medicine
They started from a higher point than the Africans did, and then drove their collective IQ's down, that's what happens under socialism, and now, the IQ levels are coming back up. It takes time for nourishment to work its magic.
Never said they conquered it. I said they harvested it for its raw materials and enslaved the people. MOST of mankind lives within a few miles of the oceans of the world. It is only with the recent inventions of trains and cars etc. that mankind has moved into the interior of the various continents of the world.
Much of the slavery came from Africans trading their slaves to Arabs, or Europeans.
As for resources I'd like to see a source for widespread non-Sub-Saharan influences before the Scramble for Africa?
Which merely reinforces my point. Thank you. The only reason why white Europeans have higher IQs now is because they have benefited from over a century of good nutrition. That's it. White people are not inherently smarter. They are just fed better.
While I certainly don't deny that environment including malnutrition impacts IQ.
There's no reason to believe Communist countries with higher levels of malnutrition would have scored higher IQ's than African Americans.
Furthermore according to this study Malnourished Koreans scored a 102 IQ, while well nourished Koreans scored a 112 IQ.
(Sure that's a sizable 10 point IQ gap, but it still beats the IQ of much of the Western Whites ironically)
The Handbook of International Adoption Medicine
They started from a higher point than the Africans did, and then drove their collective IQ's down, that's what happens under socialism, and now, the IQ levels are coming back up. It takes time for nourishment to work its magic.
China was poorer than Africa as a collective in Per Capita Income GDP in 1973.
So, how do you figure they started at a higher point?
Especially in comparison to African Americans who had benefits of living in the U.S.A?
Much of the slavery came from Africans trading their slaves to Arabs, or Europeans.
As for resources I'd like to see a source for widespread non-Sub-Saharan influences before the Scramble for Africa?
Which merely reinforces my point. Thank you. The only reason why white Europeans have higher IQs now is because they have benefited from over a century of good nutrition. That's it. White people are not inherently smarter. They are just fed better.
While I certainly don't deny that environment including malnutrition impacts IQ.
There's no reason to believe Communist countries with higher levels of malnutrition would have scored higher IQ's than African Americans.
Furthermore according to this study Malnourished Koreans scored a 102 IQ, while well nourished Koreans scored a 112 IQ.
(Sure that's a sizable 10 point IQ gap, but it still beats the IQ of much of the Western Whites ironically)
The Handbook of International Adoption Medicine
They started from a higher point than the Africans did, and then drove their collective IQ's down, that's what happens under socialism, and now, the IQ levels are coming back up. It takes time for nourishment to work its magic.
China was poorer than Africa as a collective in Per Capita Income GDP in 1973.
So, how do you figure they started at a higher point?
Especially in comparison to African Americans who had benefits of living in the U.S.A?
And it had a BILLION people to draw from for the testing. Critical thinking is clearly not taught where you live!
Estonia was colonized longer, and later than Africa, Estonia was also Socialist to a higher degree than Africa.
So, why is Estonia doing better than almost all of Africa economically, and better than all of Africa intellectually?
Estonia was colonized longer, and later than Africa, Estonia was also Socialist to a higher degree than Africa.
So, why is Estonia doing better than almost all of Africa economically, and better than all of Africa intellectually?
Because they aren't being exploited by an elite group who keep them dumb to keep them mollified. Pretty much all of Africa is one corrupt nation after another. The leadership wants its people to be dumb because dumb people are easier to control. We've been over this. It ain't the genes. It's how well they are fed in addition to the genes. You ignore that nutrition part because it interferes with your preconceived notion of white superiority.
If what you claim is true then no black can ever be a great scientist and there are too many great black scientists throughout history for that assertion to be factual.
Estonia was colonized longer, and later than Africa, Estonia was also Socialist to a higher degree than Africa.
So, why is Estonia doing better than almost all of Africa economically, and better than all of Africa intellectually?
Because they aren't being exploited by an elite group who keep them dumb to keep them mollified. Pretty much all of Africa is one corrupt nation after another. The leadership wants its people to be dumb because dumb people are easier to control. We've been over this. It ain't the genes. It's how well they are fed in addition to the genes. You ignore that nutrition part because it interferes with your preconceived notion of white superiority.
If what you claim is true then no black can ever be a great scientist and there are too many great black scientists throughout history for that assertion to be factual.
Why is Africa more corrupt than Eastern Europe?
Shouldn't have the Soviet fiasco helped tyrants more so in their corruption?
There were probably some great Homo Erectus achievements too, but I wouldn't say they were equal as a collective, now would you?
Indeed the Homo Erectus which first controlled fire was probably a genius too.
But, all groups have an intelligence curve within the same group, but that doesn't make them equal.
Estonia was colonized longer, and later than Africa, Estonia was also Socialist to a higher degree than Africa.
So, why is Estonia doing better than almost all of Africa economically, and better than all of Africa intellectually?
Because they aren't being exploited by an elite group who keep them dumb to keep them mollified. Pretty much all of Africa is one corrupt nation after another. The leadership wants its people to be dumb because dumb people are easier to control. We've been over this. It ain't the genes. It's how well they are fed in addition to the genes. You ignore that nutrition part because it interferes with your preconceived notion of white superiority.
If what you claim is true then no black can ever be a great scientist and there are too many great black scientists throughout history for that assertion to be factual.
Why is Africa more corrupt than Eastern Europe?
Shouldn't have the Soviet fiasco helped tyrants more so in their corruption?
There were probably some great Homo Erectus achievements too, but I wouldn't say they were equal as a collective, now would you?
Indeed the Homo Erectus which first controlled fire was probably a genius too.
But, all groups have an intelligence curve within the same group, but that doesn't make them equal.
Ummm. Because people are scum, and it takes a long time for revolutions to occur when the people are oppressed. How many millions did Stalin murder in his purges? Why do people do bad things to people? It's called human behavior. At times it is inexplicable what man does to man.
Most Russians in the Soviet era were not murderers, nor were Germans in the Nazi era, or Brits in Raj India, nor were Hutu, and Tutsi in Rwanda, nor are most Arab Sunnis murderers because of ISIS.
The fact is the apathy, and tolerance of the masses, enabled such genocides.
Estonia was colonized longer, and later than Africa, Estonia was also Socialist to a higher degree than Africa.
So, why is Estonia doing better than almost all of Africa economically, and better than all of Africa intellectually?
Because they aren't being exploited by an elite group who keep them dumb to keep them mollified. Pretty much all of Africa is one corrupt nation after another. The leadership wants its people to be dumb because dumb people are easier to control. We've been over this. It ain't the genes. It's how well they are fed in addition to the genes. You ignore that nutrition part because it interferes with your preconceived notion of white superiority.
If what you claim is true then no black can ever be a great scientist and there are too many great black scientists throughout history for that assertion to be factual.
Why is Africa more corrupt than Eastern Europe?
Shouldn't have the Soviet fiasco helped tyrants more so in their corruption?
There were probably some great Homo Erectus achievements too, but I wouldn't say they were equal as a collective, now would you?
Indeed the Homo Erectus which first controlled fire was probably a genius too.
But, all groups have an intelligence curve within the same group, but that doesn't make them equal.
... Why do people do bad things to people? ....
Most Russians in the Soviet era were not murderers, nor were Germans in the Nazi era, or Brits in Raj India, nor were Hutu, and Tutsi in Rwanda, nor are most Arab Sunnis murderers because of ISIS.
The fact is the apathy, and tolerance of the masses, enabled such genocides.
Agreed. And yet the few that were were able to murder tens of millions of people. Funny how that works, eh?
Most Russians in the Soviet era were not murderers, nor were Germans in the Nazi era, or Brits in Raj India, nor were Hutu, and Tutsi in Rwanda, nor are most Arab Sunnis murderers because of ISIS.
The fact is the apathy, and tolerance of the masses, enabled such genocides.
Agreed. And yet the few that were were able to murder tens of millions of people. Funny how that works, eh?
The NKVD, and SS butcherers were only a small segment of their societies.
