Ethics Lawyers File Lawsuit Re: Some Of Trump's Unconstitutional Acts

[ThoughtCrimes]

I've written about Trumps potential to violate Article 1, § 9, Cls 8 before his elevation to the presidency. I wrote that he appeared to be in violation of the emoluments' clause, and today, a group of ethics lawyers files suit against the shiny new POTUS for that very reason.

The claim asserts, "These violations of the Foreign Emoluments Clause pose a grave threat to the United States and its citizens. As the Framers were aware, private financial interests can subtly sway even the most virtuous leaders, and entanglements between American officials and foreign powers could pose a creeping, insidious threat to the Republic."

Read it here;
Ethics Experts File Lawsuit Saying Trump's Overseas Interests Violate Constitution

 

[TNHarley]

Fucking hacks

 

[toomuchtime_]

I've written about Trumps potential to violate Article 1, § 9, Cls 8 before his elevation to the presidency. I wrote that he appeared to be in violation of the emoluments' clause, and today, a group of ethics lawyers files suit against the shiny new POTUS for that very reason.

The claim asserts, "These violations of the Foreign Emoluments Clause pose a grave threat to the United States and its citizens. As the Framers were aware, private financial interests can subtly sway even the most virtuous leaders, and entanglements between American officials and foreign powers could pose a creeping, insidious threat to the Republic."

Read it here;
Ethics Experts File Lawsuit Saying Trump's Overseas Interests Violate Constitution

Give it up, no one is taking this nonsense seriously. Everyone who voted for Trump understood he had wide ranging investments and they decided he was so rich he couldn't be bought. It's sad that the same people who had no problem with Clinton selling influence at the State Department are now pretending to be worried about Trump's hotel.

 

[TNHarley]

the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, which is owned by the Chinese government, is a tenant at Trump Tower in New York, and its lease is due to expire during Trump's term, the suit says. This could mean that the Chinese government will be in negotiations with the Trump Organization to renew the lease

Sorry I couldn't help myself... Why would you even post this malarkey?

 

[irosie91]

reminds me of the-----BIRTHER libel. Some shit never gets flushed

 

[The Irish Ram]

I find "ethics lawyers" an oxymoron.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Don't care. Neither did America

 

[ThoughtCrimes]

I've written about Trumps potential to violate Article 1, § 9, Cls 8 before his elevation to the presidency. I wrote that he appeared to be in violation of the emoluments' clause, and today, a group of ethics lawyers files suit against the shiny new POTUS for that very reason.

The claim asserts, "These violations of the Foreign Emoluments Clause pose a grave threat to the United States and its citizens. As the Framers were aware, private financial interests can subtly sway even the most virtuous leaders, and entanglements between American officials and foreign powers could pose a creeping, insidious threat to the Republic."

Read it here;
Ethics Experts File Lawsuit Saying Trump's Overseas Interests Violate Constitution

Give it up, no one is taking this nonsense seriously. Everyone who voted for Trump understood he had wide ranging investments and they decided he was so rich he couldn't be bought. It's sad that the same people who had no problem with Clinton selling influence at the State Department are now pretending to be worried about Trump's hotel.

Figuratively closing your eyes, sticking your fingers in your ears and chanting your favorite nursery school mantra over and over to block out uncomfortable sensory inputs is not uncommon in adults refusing to face reality! And how the fuck do you know he's so fucking wealthy? Have you seen his tax returns or are you foolish enough to take Trump's word that he's as rich as he says?

Hey, shit for brains, its not about Clinton's, or Obama's, or any other swinging Richard's conduct, but rather about the new POTUS, Trump! Is it hard to stay on point when it's on the top of your head?

 

[owebo]

I've written about Trumps potential to violate Article 1, § 9, Cls 8 before his elevation to the presidency. I wrote that he appeared to be in violation of the emoluments' clause, and today, a group of ethics lawyers files suit against the shiny new POTUS for that very reason.

The claim asserts, "These violations of the Foreign Emoluments Clause pose a grave threat to the United States and its citizens. As the Framers were aware, private financial interests can subtly sway even the most virtuous leaders, and entanglements between American officials and foreign powers could pose a creeping, insidious threat to the Republic."

Read it here;
Ethics Experts File Lawsuit Saying Trump's Overseas Interests Violate Constitution

Have they gotten through all 44's yet?

 

[toomuchtime_]

I've written about Trumps potential to violate Article 1, § 9, Cls 8 before his elevation to the presidency. I wrote that he appeared to be in violation of the emoluments' clause, and today, a group of ethics lawyers files suit against the shiny new POTUS for that very reason.

The claim asserts, "These violations of the Foreign Emoluments Clause pose a grave threat to the United States and its citizens. As the Framers were aware, private financial interests can subtly sway even the most virtuous leaders, and entanglements between American officials and foreign powers could pose a creeping, insidious threat to the Republic."

Read it here;
Ethics Experts File Lawsuit Saying Trump's Overseas Interests Violate Constitution

Give it up, no one is taking this nonsense seriously. Everyone who voted for Trump understood he had wide ranging investments and they decided he was so rich he couldn't be bought. It's sad that the same people who had no problem with Clinton selling influence at the State Department are now pretending to be worried about Trump's hotel.

Figuratively closing your eyes, sticking your fingers in your ears and chanting your favorite nursery school mantra over and over to block out uncomfortable sensory inputs is not uncommon in adults refusing to face reality! And how the fuck do you know he's so fucking wealthy? Have you seen his tax returns or are you foolish enough to take Trump's word that he's as rich as he says?

Hey, shit for brains, its not about Clinton's, or Obama's, or any other swinging Richard's conduct, but rather about the new POTUS, Trump! Is it hard to stay on point when it's on the top of your head?

lol There is no issue with President Trump's hotel. You are just looking for a justification for your hostility toward him and in the process you are making all of his critics look stupid and dishonest by posting this nonsense.

 

[ThoughtCrimes]

I've written about Trumps potential to violate Article 1, § 9, Cls 8 before his elevation to the presidency. I wrote that he appeared to be in violation of the emoluments' clause, and today, a group of ethics lawyers files suit against the shiny new POTUS for that very reason.

The claim asserts, "These violations of the Foreign Emoluments Clause pose a grave threat to the United States and its citizens. As the Framers were aware, private financial interests can subtly sway even the most virtuous leaders, and entanglements between American officials and foreign powers could pose a creeping, insidious threat to the Republic."

Read it here;
Ethics Experts File Lawsuit Saying Trump's Overseas Interests Violate Constitution

Give it up, no one is taking this nonsense seriously. Everyone who voted for Trump understood he had wide ranging investments and they decided he was so rich he couldn't be bought. It's sad that the same people who had no problem with Clinton selling influence at the State Department are now pretending to be worried about Trump's hotel.

Figuratively closing your eyes, sticking your fingers in your ears and chanting your favorite nursery school mantra over and over to block out uncomfortable sensory inputs is not uncommon in adults refusing to face reality! And how the fuck do you know he's so fucking wealthy? Have you seen his tax returns or are you foolish enough to take Trump's word that he's as rich as he says?

Hey, shit for brains, its not about Clinton's, or Obama's, or any other swinging Richard's conduct, but rather about the new POTUS, Trump! Is it hard to stay on point when it's on the top of your head?

lol There is no issue with President Trump's hotel. You are just looking for a justification for your hostility toward him and in the process you are making all of his critics look stupid and dishonest by posting this nonsense.

Because you are ignorant of the Constitution does not validate your assertion to the contrary or Trump's apparent flaunting of the law as embodied in that founding document! Get the fuck over yourself!

 

[toomuchtime_]

I've written about Trumps potential to violate Article 1, § 9, Cls 8 before his elevation to the presidency. I wrote that he appeared to be in violation of the emoluments' clause, and today, a group of ethics lawyers files suit against the shiny new POTUS for that very reason.

The claim asserts, "These violations of the Foreign Emoluments Clause pose a grave threat to the United States and its citizens. As the Framers were aware, private financial interests can subtly sway even the most virtuous leaders, and entanglements between American officials and foreign powers could pose a creeping, insidious threat to the Republic."

Read it here;
Ethics Experts File Lawsuit Saying Trump's Overseas Interests Violate Constitution

Give it up, no one is taking this nonsense seriously. Everyone who voted for Trump understood he had wide ranging investments and they decided he was so rich he couldn't be bought. It's sad that the same people who had no problem with Clinton selling influence at the State Department are now pretending to be worried about Trump's hotel.

Figuratively closing your eyes, sticking your fingers in your ears and chanting your favorite nursery school mantra over and over to block out uncomfortable sensory inputs is not uncommon in adults refusing to face reality! And how the fuck do you know he's so fucking wealthy? Have you seen his tax returns or are you foolish enough to take Trump's word that he's as rich as he says?

Hey, shit for brains, its not about Clinton's, or Obama's, or any other swinging Richard's conduct, but rather about the new POTUS, Trump! Is it hard to stay on point when it's on the top of your head?

lol There is no issue with President Trump's hotel. You are just looking for a justification for your hostility toward him and in the process you are making all of his critics look stupid and dishonest by posting this nonsense.

Because you are ignorant of the Constitution does not validate your assertion to the contrary or Trump's apparent flaunting of the law as embodied in that founding document! Get the fuck over yourself!

Bullshit. No one is taking you seriously.

 

[Mad Scientist]

OP must have missed that part where The President signed over control of his businesses to his sons.

Donald Trump to turn over business empire to his children

NPR? Isn't the President looking to cut their funding?

 

[ThoughtCrimes]

I've written about Trumps potential to violate Article 1, § 9, Cls 8 before his elevation to the presidency. I wrote that he appeared to be in violation of the emoluments' clause, and today, a group of ethics lawyers files suit against the shiny new POTUS for that very reason.

The claim asserts, "These violations of the Foreign Emoluments Clause pose a grave threat to the United States and its citizens. As the Framers were aware, private financial interests can subtly sway even the most virtuous leaders, and entanglements between American officials and foreign powers could pose a creeping, insidious threat to the Republic."

Read it here;
Ethics Experts File Lawsuit Saying Trump's Overseas Interests Violate Constitution

Give it up, no one is taking this nonsense seriously. Everyone who voted for Trump understood he had wide ranging investments and they decided he was so rich he couldn't be bought. It's sad that the same people who had no problem with Clinton selling influence at the State Department are now pretending to be worried about Trump's hotel.

Figuratively closing your eyes, sticking your fingers in your ears and chanting your favorite nursery school mantra over and over to block out uncomfortable sensory inputs is not uncommon in adults refusing to face reality! And how the fuck do you know he's so fucking wealthy? Have you seen his tax returns or are you foolish enough to take Trump's word that he's as rich as he says?

Hey, shit for brains, its not about Clinton's, or Obama's, or any other swinging Richard's conduct, but rather about the new POTUS, Trump! Is it hard to stay on point when it's on the top of your head?

lol There is no issue with President Trump's hotel. You are just looking for a justification for your hostility toward him and in the process you are making all of his critics look stupid and dishonest by posting this nonsense.

Because you are ignorant of the Constitution does not validate your assertion to the contrary or Trump's apparent flaunting of the law as embodied in that founding document! Get the fuck over yourself!

Bullshit. No one is taking you seriously.

Bullshit. No one is taking you seriously.

And you speak for everyone? Your fucking ego is larger that Trump's, you asshole!

 

[toomuchtime_]

Give it up, no one is taking this nonsense seriously. Everyone who voted for Trump understood he had wide ranging investments and they decided he was so rich he couldn't be bought. It's sad that the same people who had no problem with Clinton selling influence at the State Department are now pretending to be worried about Trump's hotel.

Figuratively closing your eyes, sticking your fingers in your ears and chanting your favorite nursery school mantra over and over to block out uncomfortable sensory inputs is not uncommon in adults refusing to face reality! And how the fuck do you know he's so fucking wealthy? Have you seen his tax returns or are you foolish enough to take Trump's word that he's as rich as he says?

Hey, shit for brains, its not about Clinton's, or Obama's, or any other swinging Richard's conduct, but rather about the new POTUS, Trump! Is it hard to stay on point when it's on the top of your head?

lol There is no issue with President Trump's hotel. You are just looking for a justification for your hostility toward him and in the process you are making all of his critics look stupid and dishonest by posting this nonsense.

Because you are ignorant of the Constitution does not validate your assertion to the contrary or Trump's apparent flaunting of the law as embodied in that founding document! Get the fuck over yourself!

Bullshit. No one is taking you seriously.

Bullshit. No one is taking you seriously.

And you speak for everyone? Your fucking ego is larger that Trump's, you asshole!

lol You're just making a fool of yourself.

 

[ThoughtCrimes]

OP must have missed that part where The President signed over control of his businesses to his sons.

Donald Trump to turn over business empire to his children

NPR? Isn't the President looking to cut their funding?

And you must have missed the part that Trump Sr. will STILL retain ownership of illiquid assets such as his resorts and hotels! Can we say emoluments clause? Turning over management responsibilities to family members or even non-family members is not is not total divestment of interests, fool! You'd lose at any shell game, ya rube!

 

[ThoughtCrimes]

Figuratively closing your eyes, sticking your fingers in your ears and chanting your favorite nursery school mantra over and over to block out uncomfortable sensory inputs is not uncommon in adults refusing to face reality! And how the fuck do you know he's so fucking wealthy? Have you seen his tax returns or are you foolish enough to take Trump's word that he's as rich as he says?

Hey, shit for brains, its not about Clinton's, or Obama's, or any other swinging Richard's conduct, but rather about the new POTUS, Trump! Is it hard to stay on point when it's on the top of your head?

lol There is no issue with President Trump's hotel. You are just looking for a justification for your hostility toward him and in the process you are making all of his critics look stupid and dishonest by posting this nonsense.

Because you are ignorant of the Constitution does not validate your assertion to the contrary or Trump's apparent flaunting of the law as embodied in that founding document! Get the fuck over yourself!

Bullshit. No one is taking you seriously.

Bullshit. No one is taking you seriously.

And you speak for everyone? Your fucking ego is larger that Trump's, you asshole!

lol You're just making a fool of yourself.

Well you just run with that meme then, dimwit!

 

[CrusaderFrank]

I've written about Trumps potential to violate Article 1, § 9, Cls 8 before his elevation to the presidency. I wrote that he appeared to be in violation of the emoluments' clause, and today, a group of ethics lawyers files suit against the shiny new POTUS for that very reason.

The claim asserts, "These violations of the Foreign Emoluments Clause pose a grave threat to the United States and its citizens. As the Framers were aware, private financial interests can subtly sway even the most virtuous leaders, and entanglements between American officials and foreign powers could pose a creeping, insidious threat to the Republic."

Read it here;
Ethics Experts File Lawsuit Saying Trump's Overseas Interests Violate Constitution

Obama sold his autobiography overseas. I wonder how many Jihadists have autographed copies?

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Emoluments mean gifts. Paying the rent is not a gift.

 

[toomuchtime_]

OP must have missed that part where The President signed over control of his businesses to his sons.

Donald Trump to turn over business empire to his children

NPR? Isn't the President looking to cut their funding?

And you must have missed the part that Trump Sr. will STILL retain ownership of illiquid assets such as his resorts and hotels! Can we say emoluments clause? Turning over management responsibilities to family members or even non-family members is not is not total divestment of interests, fool! You'd lose at any shell game, ya rube!

Why would you make a fool of yourself arguing this when you know it's not going to go anywhere?