Every Argument made for Gay Marriage applies to Mother's Marrying Daughters who...

[mal]

...care for a Child together.

If Marriage is a Right between (2) Adults then it has to be Expanded Equally in Law to all variations of Consenting Aged Adults.

It is Unconstitutional to Deny people Rights without Due Process.

Explain to me how Two Lesbians and a Mother and Daughter or Two Sisters of Consenting Age are different when it comes to Deserving Marriage Rights.



peace...

 

[kaz]

...care for a Child together.

If Marriage is a Right between (2) Adults then it has to be Expanded Equally in Law to all variations of Consenting Aged Adults.

It is Unconstitutional to Deny people Rights without Due Process.

Explain to me how Two Lesbians and a Mother and Daughter or Two Sisters of Consenting Age are different when it comes to Deserving Marriage Rights.



peace...

I agree. My aunt has been caring for years for her long time female friend and former roommate who is dying. Why should they not have the benefits of marriage?

 

[mal]

...care for a Child together.

If Marriage is a Right between (2) Adults then it has to be Expanded Equally in Law to all variations of Consenting Aged Adults.

It is Unconstitutional to Deny people Rights without Due Process.

Explain to me how Two Lesbians and a Mother and Daughter or Two Sisters of Consenting Age are different when it comes to Deserving Marriage Rights.



peace...

I agree. My aunt has been caring for years for her long time female friend and former roommate who is dying. Why should they not have the benefits of marriage?

Because it will chip away at the Validation that Homosexuals are seeking in getting Special Marriage "Rights" for only them.

That's what this has ALWAYS been about.



peace...

 

[PaintMyHouse]

...care for a Child together.

If Marriage is a Right between (2) Adults then it has to be Expanded Equally in Law to all variations of Consenting Aged Adults.

It is Unconstitutional to Deny people Rights without Due Process.

Explain to me how Two Lesbians and a Mother and Daughter or Two Sisters of Consenting Age are different when it comes to Deserving Marriage Rights.



peace...

They aren't...

 

[mal]

Yep... the Silence is Deafening.



peace...

 

[rightwinger]

Actually, it doesnt

 

[Plasmaball]

Oh looks like someone wanted attention so they made the same thread over again.

 

[LoneLaugher]

I often stay silent when I happen upon something so damned stupid.

 

[Howey]

...care for a Child together.

If Marriage is a Right between (2) Adults then it has to be Expanded Equally in Law to all variations of Consenting Aged Adults.

It is Unconstitutional to Deny people Rights without Due Process.

Explain to me how Two Lesbians and a Mother and Daughter or Two Sisters of Consenting Age are different when it comes to Deserving Marriage Rights.



peace...

Since you obviously have no idea what marriage or parenthood is about, why should anyone bother with your stupidity?

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Every Argument made for Gay Marriage applies to Mother's Marrying Daughters who care for a Child together.

It must be time for you to exhibit your ignorance of the law again, as well as your general stupidity.

There is no such thing as ‘gay marriage,’ there is only marriage (contract) law, written by the states and administered by state courts, where either same- or opposite-sex couples are eligible to enter into the marriage contract.

No other type of relationship is eligible to enter into the marriage contract, because the law isn’t written to accommodate any other type of relationship, including mothers and daughters ‘marrying.’

Because same-sex couples are eligible to enter into marriage contracts, when states seek to deny gay Americans their right to marry, those states are in violation of the 14th Amendment’s Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses.

And your thread premise fails accordingly, a consequence of your ignorance and unwarranted hatred of gay Americans.

 

[mal]

Every Argument made for Gay Marriage applies to Mother's Marrying Daughters who care for a Child together.

It must be time for you to exhibit your ignorance of the law again, as well as your general stupidity.

There is no such thing as ‘gay marriage,’ there is only marriage (contract) law, written by the states and administered by state courts, where either same- or opposite-sex couples are eligible to enter into the marriage contract.

No other type of relationship is eligible to enter into the marriage contract, because the law isn’t written to accommodate any other type of relationship, including mothers and daughters ‘marrying.’

Because same-sex couples are eligible to enter into marriage contracts, when states seek to deny gay Americans their right to marry, those states are in violation of the 14th Amendment’s Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses.

And your thread premise fails accordingly, a consequence of your ignorance and unwarranted hatred of gay Americans.

Marriage has never been between same Sex in the United States as matter of Constitional Law on National level... Not one single fucking day has it been.

You might FEEL that it is, but you can't limit who the 2 consenting Adults are to fit your Personal Agenda.

It's either ALL Consenting Adults, or Man and Woman.

You Ignorant Fuck.



peace...

 

[mal]

...care for a Child together.

If Marriage is a Right between (2) Adults then it has to be Expanded Equally in Law to all variations of Consenting Aged Adults.

It is Unconstitutional to Deny people Rights without Due Process.

Explain to me how Two Lesbians and a Mother and Daughter or Two Sisters of Consenting Age are different when it comes to Deserving Marriage Rights.



peace...

Since you obviously have no idea what marriage or parenthood is about, why should anyone bother with your stupidity?

Since you can't Deal with Reality you Troll and Dismiss...I am not Surprised in the least.



peace...

 

[mal]

Oh looks like someone wanted attention so they made the same thread over again.

Looks like G.T. doesn't have Lady Balls to come into this Thread with his Primary Account...



peace...

 

[Howey]

...care for a Child together.

If Marriage is a Right between (2) Adults then it has to be Expanded Equally in Law to all variations of Consenting Aged Adults.

It is Unconstitutional to Deny people Rights without Due Process.

Explain to me how Two Lesbians and a Mother and Daughter or Two Sisters of Consenting Age are different when it comes to Deserving Marriage Rights.



peace...

Since you obviously have no idea what marriage or parenthood is about, why should anyone bother with your stupidity?

Since you can't Deal with Reality you Troll and Dismiss...I am not Surprised in the least.



peace...

OK.

So tell us, Malformed....

What exactly does marriage have to do with raising a child?

 

[mal]

Actually, it doesnt

Actually, it does...

Here's the List...

Do a Mother and Daughter Love each other?... Yep.

Are they Caring for a Child together?... Yep.

Do they Share Responsibilities regarding things like the Hopsital and School functions?... Yep.

If they Live together and share Expenses or one Works and the other Cares for the Child at Home, are they EXACTLY like many Gay Adoptive Couples?... Yep.

Do they need Insurance?... Yep.

What are some of the other Arguments FOR Gay Marriage?...

Please share them and we'll see if they apply to Siblings.

And no Sex is not part of this because as we've been told, Gay Marriage isn't about Sex.



peace...

 

[Plasmaball]

Dude youve been bitched slapped on three different forums on this subject. The gay rights movement has taken less punishment than you on this subject. You talk in circles and your arguments are weak.

 

[mal]

But even it was... What does it matter to the State if two Sisters are having Kilted Karpet Sex?...



peace...

 

[mal]

Dude youve been bitched slapped on three different forums on this subject. The gay rights movement has taken less punishment than you on this subject. You talk in circles and your arguments are weak.

Are you "s0nin'" me there Shorty?...

Let me know when you can counter the points I've made... Otherwise go crawl back up your Master's ass you Fisted Fuck.



peace...

 

[mal]

OK.

So tell us, Malformed....

What exactly does marriage have to do with raising a child?

Already did...

Actually, it doesnt

Actually, it does...

Here's the List...

Do a Mother and Daughter Love each other?... Yep.

Are they Caring for a Child together?... Yep.

Do they Share Responsibilities regarding things like the Hopsital and School functions?... Yep.

If they Live together and share Expenses or one Works and the other Cares for the Child at Home, are they EXACTLY like many Gay Adoptive Couples?... Yep.

Do they need Insurance?... Yep.

What are some of the other Arguments FOR Gay Marriage?...

Please share them and we'll see if they apply to Siblings.

And no Sex is not part of this because as we've been told, Gay Marriage isn't about Sex.



peace...

Now what are the Reasons Gays need Marriage that is Equal to Man and Woman?...



peace...

 

[emilynghiem]

...care for a Child together.

If Marriage is a Right between (2) Adults then it has to be Expanded Equally in Law to all variations of Consenting Aged Adults.

It is Unconstitutional to Deny people Rights without Due Process.

Explain to me how Two Lesbians and a Mother and Daughter or Two Sisters of Consenting Age are different when it comes to Deserving Marriage Rights.



peace...

Yes, ideally and to be fully constitutional where no one can argue there is religious bias,
the state should only oversee CIVIL CONTRACTS that could be for ANY legally responsible consenting adults.

Anything to do with marriage is technically personal private religious or spiritual
and should not be in govt hands; the exception being if all people in a state AGREE to a policy, that is not imposing a religious bias if everyone is equally represented and consents.

But this is purely theoretical/technical only.

In political reality, people can't focus on "rights for ALL PEOPLE/Groups in general"
but go for political expedience and convenience "one target issue at a time" to mobilize through public media.

If you look at Equal Voting rights, when campaigns pushed for the rights of Blacks and of Women combined together as Human Rights,
this was too much for people to respond to and follow. Advocates divided the suffrage issues into two separate battles in order to win either one.

Blacks won the right (15th Amendment in 1870) to vote before Women did (19th Amendment in 1920).

What we SHOULD do is use the Gay Rights agenda, and 'right to health' propoganda
to argue for Equal Political Freedom for all views: right to life, right to secede, right to free market health care
as political beliefs protected under the First and Fourteenth from discrimination by creed, same as gays and singlepayer advocates who believe in their agenda.
And hold PARTIES responsible for funding managing and representing their own political agenda, similar to religious beliefs that don't belong in govt unless all people consent to be under such policies.