JakeStarkey
Diamond Member
- Aug 10, 2009
- 168,037
- 16,520
It did in Vietnam finally when poppa and momma realized that the draft for which it was constructed was being misued.The population of America was much greater, the wars were overseas, and the technology much more powerful.Mischaracterization, Correll. You make a premise then a conclusion but fail to link them together with logic and analysis, two tools the which you flatly don't comprehend. Make the connection.
Disir, the LTC is talking about our volunteer army that gives a president the opportunity to act like a Casear and dispatch troops just as Bush did.
95% of all Americans killed during a wars, died when there was a draft. A Draft does not make the United States less likely to engage in war. If it were true, there is no way that the United States would have entered the Korean and Vietnam wars.
None of that has anything to do with a draft.
We are very fortunate the Iraqis did not have the capacity or ability or professionalism of the Nazis or the Japanese.
None of that addresses his point that having "skin in the game" did not lead to anti-war policies.
One, you want an imperial presidency with a volunteer army because you are a neo-con.
Two, a draft would end that nonsense as long as the electorate stays aware.