Evidence that global warming IS happening

[Abraham3]

Faggots? Why don't you call back when you get out of elementary school.

 

[Meister]

Have you ever attempted to provide evidence to your claims? Without it, all you have are unsubstantiated assertions. Like "I had lunch with a unicorn today" and "Carmen Electra is waiting in my bed this instant" and "Bill Gates just gave me a billion in cash for being so cool".

Get the idea?

Your cult haven't supplied any evidence of AGW. And you want the AGW deniers to prove that AGW is false? Really?

 

[driveby]

Faggots? Why don't you call back when you get out of elementary school.

Your claim that Anchorage is experiencing a 70 year high makes you a lying faggot, pull up your poopy drawers and deal with it......

 

[Abraham3]

Here's your evidence Whizzo IPCC - Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

 

[Abraham3]

Faggots? Why don't you call back when you get out of elementary school.

Your claim that Anchorage is experiencing a 70 year high makes you a lying faggot, pull up your poopy drawers and deal with it......

Sorry... kindergarten.

 

[Meister]

70 year record high in Anchorage

70 years? The Earth is around 5,000, 000, 000 years old and you talking about the last 70, huh?

 

[driveby]

Here's your evidence Whizzo IPCC - Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

Evidence of what numbnuts?

 

[Meister]

Here's your evidence Whizzo IPCC - Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

IPCC?

They cherry picked the papers, son.

 

[Abraham3]

How stupid ARE you people?

That child posted that tomorrow would be a 70 year low in Pittsburgh or whatever fucking place he hangs his diaper. If you look at a diagram of the circumpolar jet stream and what it's doing now that the warming of the Arctic has led to the creation of deep Rossby waves, you will see that the cold in the American northeast is off set by warmth in the American northwest. Work your way around the globe and you'll find unseasonably cold followed by unseasonably warm followed by cold followed by warm.

The US northeast is not the whole planet.

You idiots.

 

[Abraham3]

Here's your evidence Whizzo IPCC - Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

IPCC?

They cherry picked the papers, son.

I realize you're entirely too stupid to understand prose that technical. Find someone with a high school education to read it to you and explain the big words.

 

[driveby]

How stupid ARE you people?

That child posted that tomorrow would be a 70 year low in Pittsburgh or whatever fucking place he hangs his diaper. If you look at a diagram of the circumpolar jet stream and what it's doing now that the warming of the Arctic has led to the creation of deep Rossby waves, you will see that the cold in the American northeast is off set by warmth in the American northwest. Work your way around the globe and you'll find unseasonably cold followed by unseasonably warm followed by cold followed by warm.

The US northeast is not the whole planet.

You idiots.

I told the truth, you lied about Anchorage. I understand though, your whole religion is based on lies.....

 

[Meister]

Here's your evidence Whizzo IPCC - Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

IPCC?

They cherry picked the papers, son.

I realize you're entirely too stupid to understand prose that technical. Find someone with a high school education to read it to you and explain the big words.

IPCC with the manipulated data and the emails trying to cover their ass? That IPCC? Drink some more kool ade.

 

[driveby]

Here's your evidence Whizzo IPCC - Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

IPCC?

They cherry picked the papers, son.

I realize you're entirely too stupid to understand prose that technical. Find someone with a high school education to read it to you and explain the big words.

You can link a propaganda site, impressive.....

 

[whitehall]

I don't usually quote "Greenpeace" but the founder said it so eloquently. "The enemy of life is frost and freezing temperatures". A recent survey found that more than half of the registered democrats surveyed are not aware of the most basic part of the understanding of global physics, that the earth revolves around the sun. It's likely that this is the core of the political global warming support. The sun is not a static energy source. Stuff happens to the sun that scientists are not able to comprehend and geological evidence points to a likelyhood of less energy from the sun from time to time which translates to ice age or mini-ice age and we have no defense for it.

 

[mamooth]

You don't see the rational people here raving about their imaginary political enemies. As Whitehall demonstrates, denialism is a hallmark of an extremist fringe cult. Denialistm itself isn't the cult; it's a required belief of a weird political cult. And as driveby and meister show, all they have left now is deranged conspiracy theories about the great global socialist plot. Since all the data contradicts them, their only choice is to declare all the data is faked. Standard cult behavior.

In direct opposition, global warming science is embraced by all political types all around the world. That would be because it's actual science.

 

[Abraham3]

I don't usually quote "Greenpeace" but the founder said it so eloquently. "The enemy of life is frost and freezing temperatures".

If you were under the impression that the world's climate scientists are suggesting we're all going to burn to death from a 2C temperature rise, you need to go back and review the basics. Global warming is going to cause changes to sea level, precipitation and weather, water supplies, crop cycle timing, predator-prey relationships and a host of other issues. It is not going to burn us up.

A recent survey found that more than half of the registered democrats surveyed are not aware of the most basic part of the understanding of global physics, that the earth revolves around the sun.

I'm going to have to throw the bullshit flag on that one. I'm also going to point out that the validity of AGW is established and quantified by the level of acceptance among the world's experts, not the lay public and not the fictional characters in your fictional survey.

It's likely that this is the core of the political global warming support.

It's quite certain that it is not.

The sun is not a static energy source.

No it's not. Here's what it does.

Stuff happens to the sun that scientists are not able to comprehend

So, you've decided that all the evidence supporting AGW is somehow refuted by something we "are not able to comprehend". Like magic?

and geological evidence points to a likelyhood of less energy from the sun from time to time which translates to ice age or mini-ice age and we have no defense for it.

Changes in received solar radiation, primarily from long term orbital mechanics (Milankovitch cycles) do cause climatic changes on the Earth and are likely the primary cause of our ice ages. But that geological evidence - one of many products from the very same scientists you've just characterized as incompetent - also indicates that on every occasion that the Earth has warmed, CO2 held in sequestration has been released and, at least during the last 22,000 years, Greenhouse warming from the CO2 eventually overtook whatever factors had originated the warming. CO2 is both the result of warming and causes warming. In our case, we skipped the typical first step and have put significant amounts of CO2 directly into the atmosphere ourselves. We DO have a defense for that: get as close as we can to a full stop on emitting GHGs.

BTW, rejecting what we know out of fear of what we don't is not a successful strategy in any endeavour. Neither is lying about the characteristics of your opponents. You should read your Sun Tzu.

 

[Meister]

You don't see the rational people here raving about their imaginary political enemies. As Whitehall demonstrates, denialism is a hallmark of an extremist fringe cult. Denialistm itself isn't the cult; it's a required belief of a weird political cult. And as driveby and meister show, all they have left now is deranged conspiracy theories about the great global socialist plot. Since all the data contradicts them, their only choice is to declare all the data is faked. Standard cult behavior.

In direct opposition, global warming science is embraced by all political types all around the world. That would be because it's actual science.

You also don't see the rational people agreeing with AGW.
Nobody is denying the existence regarding climate change, it's the AGW that the cultists are clinging to. Even though their science hasn't proven the existence of it.
Thirty one thousand scientists in the USA would disagree with you and Abe on this matter. Why? Because your religion hasn't been able to prove their premise. They've manipulated data, they've had emails between one another that suggest that they don't have it. We didn't declare their data faked.....they did it themselves.
You can't deny the truth, kitten....no matter how you try and smear the deniers.

If you want to see who is part of the extremist fringe cult, just look in the mirror. So run along to your kitty box.

 

[Meister]

I don't usually quote "Greenpeace" but the founder said it so eloquently. "The enemy of life is frost and freezing temperatures".

If you were under the impression that the world's climate scientists are suggesting we're all going to burn to death from a 2C temperature rise, you need to go back and review the basics. Global warming is going to cause changes to sea level, precipitation and weather, water supplies, crop cycle timing, predator-prey relationships and a host of other issues. It is not going to burn us up.

A recent survey found that more than half of the registered democrats surveyed are not aware of the most basic part of the understanding of global physics, that the earth revolves around the sun.

I'm going to have to throw the bullshit flag on that one. I'm also going to point out that the validity of AGW is established and quantified by the level of acceptance among the world's experts, not the lay public and not the fictional characters in your fictional survey.



It's quite certain that it is not.



No it's not. Here's what it does.

Stuff happens to the sun that scientists are not able to comprehend

So, you've decided that all the evidence supporting AGW is somehow refuted by something we "are not able to comprehend". Like magic?

and geological evidence points to a likelyhood of less energy from the sun from time to time which translates to ice age or mini-ice age and we have no defense for it.

Changes in received solar radiation, primarily from long term orbital mechanics (Milankovitch cycles) do cause climatic changes on the Earth and are likely the primary cause of our ice ages. But that geological evidence - one of many products from the very same scientists you've just characterized as incompetent - also indicates that on every occasion that the Earth has warmed, CO2 held in sequestration has been released and, at least during the last 22,000 years, Greenhouse warming from the CO2 eventually overtook whatever factors had originated the warming. CO2 is both the result of warming and causes warming. In our case, we skipped the typical first step and have put significant amounts of CO2 directly into the atmosphere ourselves. We DO have a defense for that: get as close as we can to a full stop on emitting GHGs.

BTW, rejecting what we know out of fear of what we don't is not a successful strategy in any endeavour. Neither is lying about the characteristics of your opponents. You should read your Sun Tzu.

Yet, all your scientists can do is put garbage data in and create a model. If it was so cut and dry with the science, there wouldn't have been a need to manipulate the data nor trying to cover their asses via emails. Everything would have been crystal clear....but it's not. Stupid fools will always be stupid fools, Abe.....and you wear like a badge.

 

[SSDD]

Here's your evidence Whizzo IPCC - Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

Only an idiot would believe anything at all that the IPCC has to say about the climate. You believe them?

 

[SSDD]

How stupid ARE you people?

Not as stupid as those poor deluded koolaid junkies who believe the IPCC.

T