C_Clayton_Jones
Diamond Member
‘The States argue that the Executive Order violates the
Establishment and Equal Protection Clauses because it was
intended to disfavor Muslims. In support of this argument,
the States have offered evidence of numerous statements by
the President about his intent to implement a “Muslim ban”
as well as evidence they claim suggests that the Executive
Order was intended to be that ban, including sections 5(b)
and 5(e) of the Order. It is well established that evidence of
purpose beyond the face of the challenged law may be
considered in evaluating Establishment and Equal Protection
Clause claims.’
http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2017/02/09/17-35105.pdf
The court also acknowledges the fact that the EO does not afford those adversely effected the right to due process of the law, in violation of the Fifth Amendment; refugees and asylees were given neither notice nor an opportunity to respond.
Trump’s un-Constitutional EO is the epitome of rightwing bigotry, stupidity, and hate.
Establishment and Equal Protection Clauses because it was
intended to disfavor Muslims. In support of this argument,
the States have offered evidence of numerous statements by
the President about his intent to implement a “Muslim ban”
as well as evidence they claim suggests that the Executive
Order was intended to be that ban, including sections 5(b)
and 5(e) of the Order. It is well established that evidence of
purpose beyond the face of the challenged law may be
considered in evaluating Establishment and Equal Protection
Clause claims.’
http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2017/02/09/17-35105.pdf
The court also acknowledges the fact that the EO does not afford those adversely effected the right to due process of the law, in violation of the Fifth Amendment; refugees and asylees were given neither notice nor an opportunity to respond.
Trump’s un-Constitutional EO is the epitome of rightwing bigotry, stupidity, and hate.