🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Evolution has some splaining to do Lucy....

Was the science in DSM 1 sound? Or should it have been fixed in DSM 2?

Is a little boy who thinks he is a girl healthy or sick?

Was the science in DSM 1 sound? Or should it have been fixed in DSM 2?

Listen. I can only say this the same way. I dont know. I assume so. If it should have been fixed it would have been. Science by thuggery is something I'll leave to stalinists.

And it was fixed- because there was no science involved originally.

Believing in something that science says isn't true- I will leave that up to the Marxists and Creationists.

It wasnt "fixed". A scientific manual was revised in the typical leftist fashion...abuse, shouts, takeovers, disruptions.

And you see creationists under your bed?
 
What was that about fish learning to walk?

Evolutionists: 'Oops! We May Have Been Wrong All Along'

Thanks to a new study, evolutionists and their disciples are having to reexamine some of their most revered dogma. Particularly, evolutionists are now having to make sense of conclusions stating that almost all animal species, as well as humans, showed up on the stage of human history at the same time.
------

A study published in the journal Human Evolution is causing quite the stir. In the words of Phys.org, "The study's most startling result, perhaps, is that nine out of 10 species on Earth today, including humans, came into being 100,000 to 200,000 years ago."

So startling, in fact, that according to David Thaler, one of the lead authors of the study, "This conclusion is very surprising, and I fought against it as hard as I could.

It's very simple. If the theory of evolution was true, the earth would be 100 feet deep in bones.


The End.

LOL.

ken-ham-dinosaur-book-garden-eden.jpg
Ever wonder where all those different beings came from?
 
Was the science in DSM 1 sound? Or should it have been fixed in DSM 2?

Is a little boy who thinks he is a girl healthy or sick?
How can you tell if he is sick just because he believes he is a girl?
By definition delusions are sickness. It is delusional for a boy to think he is a girl and for a girl to think she is a boy.
Who said it was a delusion? You cant see the hormones and chemicals amounts in his brain.

It is called "phenotype". try "The Extended Phenotype" by Dawkins.
 
I am not seeing marxists controlling much of anything today. The Soviets were not really marxists but absolutely agree that they abused science for their political ends. Who is left today? Cuba? Venezuela? Vietnam?

The DNC?
 
A catholic monk discovered particulate inheritance.
Another Catholic cleric originated the Big Bang model.
The American milieu is unique in that, as I have said, even the atheists thump the Bible for their points.
 
I am not seeing marxists controlling much of anything today. The Soviets were not really marxists but absolutely agree that they abused science for their political ends. Who is left today? Cuba? Venezuela? Vietnam?

The DNC?

If you really believe that the DNC is 'marxist' then I just didn't realize how ignorant you are.
 
Was the science in DSM 1 sound? Or should it have been fixed in DSM 2?

Is a little boy who thinks he is a girl healthy or sick?

Was the science in DSM 1 sound? Or should it have been fixed in DSM 2?

Listen. I can only say this the same way. I dont know. I assume so. If it should have been fixed it would have been. Science by thuggery is something I'll leave to stalinists.

And it was fixed- because there was no science involved originally.

Believing in something that science says isn't true- I will leave that up to the Marxists and Creationists.

It wasnt "fixed". A scientific manual was revised in the typical leftist fashion...abuse, shouts, takeovers, disruptions.

And you see creationists under your bed?

So typically conservative.

You don't care about the accuracy of the science- only that you can blame 'leftists' on changing inaccurate and unproven scientific dogma.

You must be really upset that those 'leftists' stopped using bleeding as a standard treatment for female hysteria.
 
What was that about fish learning to walk?

Evolutionists: 'Oops! We May Have Been Wrong All Along'

Thanks to a new study, evolutionists and their disciples are having to reexamine some of their most revered dogma. Particularly, evolutionists are now having to make sense of conclusions stating that almost all animal species, as well as humans, showed up on the stage of human history at the same time.
------

A study published in the journal Human Evolution is causing quite the stir. In the words of Phys.org, "The study's most startling result, perhaps, is that nine out of 10 species on Earth today, including humans, came into being 100,000 to 200,000 years ago."

So startling, in fact, that according to David Thaler, one of the lead authors of the study, "This conclusion is very surprising, and I fought against it as hard as I could.

It's very simple. If the theory of evolution was true, the earth would be 100 feet deep in bones.


The End.

LOL.

ken-ham-dinosaur-book-garden-eden.jpg
Ever wonder where all those different beings came from?

They all came from Earth.
 
Is a little boy who thinks he is a girl healthy or sick?

Was the science in DSM 1 sound? Or should it have been fixed in DSM 2?

Listen. I can only say this the same way. I dont know. I assume so. If it should have been fixed it would have been. Science by thuggery is something I'll leave to stalinists.

And it was fixed- because there was no science involved originally.

Believing in something that science says isn't true- I will leave that up to the Marxists and Creationists.

It wasnt "fixed". A scientific manual was revised in the typical leftist fashion...abuse, shouts, takeovers, disruptions.

And you see creationists under your bed?

So typically conservative.

You don't care about the accuracy of the science- only that you can blame 'leftists' on changing inaccurate and unproven scientific dogma.

You must be really upset that those 'leftists' stopped using bleeding as a standard treatment for female hysteria.


It is abnormal to want to have sex with your own sex. Thus a sickness.
 
Was the science in DSM 1 sound? Or should it have been fixed in DSM 2?

Listen. I can only say this the same way. I dont know. I assume so. If it should have been fixed it would have been. Science by thuggery is something I'll leave to stalinists.

And it was fixed- because there was no science involved originally.

Believing in something that science says isn't true- I will leave that up to the Marxists and Creationists.

It wasnt "fixed". A scientific manual was revised in the typical leftist fashion...abuse, shouts, takeovers, disruptions.

And you see creationists under your bed?

So typically conservative.

You don't care about the accuracy of the science- only that you can blame 'leftists' on changing inaccurate and unproven scientific dogma.

You must be really upset that those 'leftists' stopped using bleeding as a standard treatment for female hysteria.


It is abnormal to want to have sex with your own sex. Thus a sickness.

it is abnormal to use your left hand to eat with. Thus a sickness.
 
If you really believe that the DNC is 'marxist' then I just didn't realize how ignorant you are.

Sure..the avowed Marxists running for their party dont really fit in. The DNC hates them right?


marxist10.jpg


Obama's Houston HQ 2008.
 
So typically conservative.

You don't care about the accuracy of the science- only that you can blame 'leftists' on changing inaccurate and unproven scientific dogma.

You must be really upset that those 'leftists' stopped using bleeding as a standard treatment for female hysteria.

Did homosexuals take over the mics at medical conventions? Or picket doctors houses? Or did researchers find a better way than bleeding people? See real science works with no Marxists around.
And it was William Harvey who prominently fought the fallacy of bloodletting. The same who said "“We acknowledge God, the supreme and omnipotent creator, to be present in the production of all animals, and to point, as it were, with a finger to his existence in his works”
Now run off and root out those insidious creationists causing so much trouble.
 
So typically conservative.

You don't care about the accuracy of the science- only that you can blame 'leftists' on changing inaccurate and unproven scientific dogma.

You must be really upset that those 'leftists' stopped using bleeding as a standard treatment for female hysteria.

Did homosexuals take over the mics at medical conventions? Or picket doctors houses? Or did researchers find a better way than bleeding people? See real science works with no Marxists around..

Like I said

You don't care about the accuracy of the science- only that you can blame 'leftists' on changing inaccurate and unproven scientific dogma.

You have carefully avoided the facts- in favor of your hysteria.

The facts were:
a) There was no science to support labeling homosexuals as mentally ill.
b) There was science to support homosexuals being as mentally healthy as anyone else.
c) Homosexuals objected to being labeled something that the science didn't support.
d) The medical community- starting with the APA- changed the DSM to reflect the science- not Conservative prejudices.
e) Conservatives have complained about it for the last 40 years.....
 
If you really believe that the DNC is 'marxist' then I just didn't realize how ignorant you are.

Sure..the avowed Marxists running for their party dont really fit in. The DNC hates them right?
.

Just like the Republican party
If you really believe that the DNC is 'marxist' then I just didn't realize how ignorant you are.

Sure..the avowed Marxists running for their party dont really fit in. The DNC hates them right?


View attachment 203102

Obama's Houston HQ 2008.
Statement from Obama's campaign:

This is a volunteer office that is not in any way controlled by the Obama campaign. We were disappointed to see this picture because it is both offensive to many Cuban-Americans — and Americans of all backgrounds — and because it does not reflect Senator Obama’s views. Barack Obama has been very clear in putting forward a Cuba policy that is based on one principle: freedom for the Cuban people.

Parties can't always control who claims to be part of the party....
2018-02-08_08-31-54a-800x430.jpg


I guess by your standards this means that the GOP is the party of the Nazi's.....

Here is Art Jones speaking on behalf of Donald Trump

180205-art-jones-illinois-congress-njs-954a_48ddae52ca1108be172221cf521dae5e.fit-760w.jpg
 
If you really believe that the DNC is 'marxist' then I just didn't realize how ignorant you are.

Sure..the avowed Marxists running for their party dont really fit in. The DNC hates them right?
.

Just like the Republican party
If you really believe that the DNC is 'marxist' then I just didn't realize how ignorant you are.

Sure..the avowed Marxists running for their party dont really fit in. The DNC hates them right?


View attachment 203102

Obama's Houston HQ 2008.
Statement from Obama's campaign:

This is a volunteer office that is not in any way controlled by the Obama campaign. We were disappointed to see this picture because it is both offensive to many Cuban-Americans — and Americans of all backgrounds — and because it does not reflect Senator Obama’s views. Barack Obama has been very clear in putting forward a Cuba policy that is based on one principle: freedom for the Cuban people.

Parties can't always control who claims to be part of the party....
2018-02-08_08-31-54a-800x430.jpg


I guess by your standards this means that the GOP is the party of the Nazi's.....

Here is Art Jones speaking on behalf of Donald Trump

180205-art-jones-illinois-congress-njs-954a_48ddae52ca1108be172221cf521dae5e.fit-760w.jpg
Well except Obama then normalized relations with communist Cuba even meeting Castro as I recall.
 
What was that about fish learning to walk?

Evolutionists: 'Oops! We May Have Been Wrong All Along'

Thanks to a new study, evolutionists and their disciples are having to reexamine some of their most revered dogma. Particularly, evolutionists are now having to make sense of conclusions stating that almost all animal species, as well as humans, showed up on the stage of human history at the same time.
------

A study published in the journal Human Evolution is causing quite the stir. In the words of Phys.org, "The study's most startling result, perhaps, is that nine out of 10 species on Earth today, including humans, came into being 100,000 to 200,000 years ago."

So startling, in fact, that according to David Thaler, one of the lead authors of the study, "This conclusion is very surprising, and I fought against it as hard as I could.

Why are you asking Lucy Hamilton to explain Evolution?

Are Australians particularly adept at science?
 
If you really believe that the DNC is 'marxist' then I just didn't realize how ignorant you are.

Sure..the avowed Marxists running for their party dont really fit in. The DNC hates them right?
.

Just like the Republican party
If you really believe that the DNC is 'marxist' then I just didn't realize how ignorant you are.

Sure..the avowed Marxists running for their party dont really fit in. The DNC hates them right?


View attachment 203102

Obama's Houston HQ 2008.
Statement from Obama's campaign:

This is a volunteer office that is not in any way controlled by the Obama campaign. We were disappointed to see this picture because it is both offensive to many Cuban-Americans — and Americans of all backgrounds — and because it does not reflect Senator Obama’s views. Barack Obama has been very clear in putting forward a Cuba policy that is based on one principle: freedom for the Cuban people.

Parties can't always control who claims to be part of the party....
2018-02-08_08-31-54a-800x430.jpg


I guess by your standards this means that the GOP is the party of the Nazi's.....

Here is Art Jones speaking on behalf of Donald Trump

180205-art-jones-illinois-congress-njs-954a_48ddae52ca1108be172221cf521dae5e.fit-760w.jpg


What a coward you are.

Chairman of the DNC on the new socialist in Brooklyn.

"TOM PEREZ: Well, she’s—she has no opponent. I mean, we’re obviously supporting her. And that’s a safe Democratic seat. And I’m excited" LINK

."...because she really, she represents the future of our party.” LINK

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez says she learned her socialism from Ted Kennedy.

Bernie Sanders the socialist who caucuses as a Democrat.

Four socialist-backed candidates win Pennsylvania legislative primaries

There are 69 Democrats in the House of Representatives who are also members of the Democrat Socialists of America.
Birds of a feather....
Now you will tell me Socialists arent actually Marxist I suppose?
You should grasp that constantly denying what you are is a dead giveaway that you are on the wrong side.
 
Last edited:
If you really believe that the DNC is 'marxist' then I just didn't realize how ignorant you are.

Sure..the avowed Marxists running for their party dont really fit in. The DNC hates them right?
.

Just like the Republican party
If you really believe that the DNC is 'marxist' then I just didn't realize how ignorant you are.

Sure..the avowed Marxists running for their party dont really fit in. The DNC hates them right?


View attachment 203102

Obama's Houston HQ 2008.
Statement from Obama's campaign:

This is a volunteer office that is not in any way controlled by the Obama campaign. We were disappointed to see this picture because it is both offensive to many Cuban-Americans — and Americans of all backgrounds — and because it does not reflect Senator Obama’s views. Barack Obama has been very clear in putting forward a Cuba policy that is based on one principle: freedom for the Cuban people.

Parties can't always control who claims to be part of the party....



"I'm not a communist...just my offices are". :)
 

Forum List

Back
Top