Evolution has some splaining to do Lucy....

[DOTR]

Chris Matthews “Do you want to see Bernie (((Sanders))) speak at the Democrat National Convention? Do you want to have him up there as a socialist representing the Democratic Party?”

Debbie Blabbermouth (((Shultz) “Bernie Sanders has been a good Democrat. He caucuses with the Democrats. Of course he should speak"

Chris Matthews: “What is the difference between a Democrat and a socialist? I used to think there was a big difference. What do you think it is?”

Wasserman Schultz “uhm.”

“The difference between … the real question is what’s the difference between being a Democrat and being a Republican,”

Chris Matthews: You’re the chairman of the Democratic Party. Tell me the difference between you and a socialist.”

Blabbermouth Shultz “The relevant debate that we’ll be having over the course of this campaign is the difference between a Democrat and a Republican


HAHA..nobody but us non-socialists here.

 

[2aguy]

Chris Matthews “Do you want to see Bernie (((Sanders))) speak at the Democrat National Convention? Do you want to have him up there as a socialist representing the Democratic Party?”

Debbie Blabbermouth (((Shultz) “Bernie Sanders has been a good Democrat. He caucuses with the Democrats. Of course he should speak"

Chris Matthews: “What is the difference between a Democrat and a socialist? I used to think there was a big difference. What do you think it is?”

Wasserman Schultz “uhm.”

“The difference between … the real question is what’s the difference between being a Democrat and being a Republican,”

Chris Matthews: You’re the chairman of the Democratic Party. Tell me the difference between you and a socialist.”

Blabbermouth Shultz “The relevant debate that we’ll be having over the course of this campaign is the difference between a Democrat and a Republican


HAHA..nobody but us non-socialists here.

Yes..... millionaire socialist Bernie Sanders.... I love rich socialists bitching about people who have money...

 

[DOTR]

So typically conservative.

You don't care about the accuracy of the science- only that you can blame 'leftists' on changing inaccurate and unproven scientific dogma.

You must be really upset that those 'leftists' stopped using bleeding as a standard treatment for female hysteria.

Did homosexuals take over the mics at medical conventions? Or picket doctors houses? Or did researchers find a better way than bleeding people? See real science works with no Marxists around..

Like I said

You don't care about the accuracy of the science- only that you can blame 'leftists' on changing inaccurate and unproven scientific dogma.

You have carefully avoided the facts- in favor of your hysteria.

The facts were:
a) There was no science to support labeling homosexuals as mentally ill.
b) There was science to support homosexuals being as mentally healthy as anyone else.
c) Homosexuals objected to being labeled something that the science didn't support.
d) The medical community- starting with the APA- changed the DSM to reflect the science- not Conservative prejudices.
e) Conservatives have complained about it for the last 40 years.....

You left out the one fact that started this..the one you keep deflecting. Leftists violently attacked and intimidated the APA into changing a scientific consensus...without any scientific evidence to the contrary.
No creationists ever shut down a school to block science. Ask EO Wilson who are only people who have ever tried to block his science and blockade his class. Even Margaret Mead from the podium of the America Anthropology Association called out left-wing "book burning". Margaret Mead!

But its those mean old creationists. Can you give an example of creationists violently attacking a scientific organization and intimidating it into changing its opinion?

Here's the recent story of a professor beaten by leftists for discussing Charles Murray. Ever see a mob of creationists attack a college professor and beat him?

Opinion | Understanding the Angry Mob at Middlebury That Gave Me a Concussion

Heather Mac Donald, with degrees from Cambridge, Yale and Stanford and a fellow at the Manhatten Institute was accosted by a mob of leftists when she tried to give a speech on the data regarding race and arrests.
"Keck Science professor Anthony Fucaloro pushed against and grappled with the crowd of protesters in an unsuccessful attempt to reach the door."
The leftists stopped every member of the science faculty from entering..stopped it with violence. You can watch the professors being assaulted here...Students Blockade Athenaeum to Protest Conservative Speaker

Now start your whataboutism...and tell us about the creationist boogymen threatening science.

 

[rightwinger]

What was that about fish learning to walk?

Evolutionists: 'Oops! We May Have Been Wrong All Along'

Thanks to a new study, evolutionists and their disciples are having to reexamine some of their most revered dogma. Particularly, evolutionists are now having to make sense of conclusions stating that almost all animal species, as well as humans, showed up on the stage of human history at the same time.
------

A study published in the journal Human Evolution is causing quite the stir. In the words of Phys.org, "The study's most startling result, perhaps, is that nine out of 10 species on Earth today, including humans, came into being 100,000 to 200,000 years ago."

So startling, in fact, that according to David Thaler, one of the lead authors of the study, "This conclusion is very surprising, and I fought against it as hard as I could.

Tell us more about Jesus and the Dinosaurs

 

[2aguy]

What was that about fish learning to walk?

Evolutionists: 'Oops! We May Have Been Wrong All Along'

Thanks to a new study, evolutionists and their disciples are having to reexamine some of their most revered dogma. Particularly, evolutionists are now having to make sense of conclusions stating that almost all animal species, as well as humans, showed up on the stage of human history at the same time.
------

A study published in the journal Human Evolution is causing quite the stir. In the words of Phys.org, "The study's most startling result, perhaps, is that nine out of 10 species on Earth today, including humans, came into being 100,000 to 200,000 years ago."

So startling, in fact, that according to David Thaler, one of the lead authors of the study, "This conclusion is very surprising, and I fought against it as hard as I could.

Tell us more about Jesus and the Dinosaurs

Again....how about you ask God, he can give you the complete story.....and how it all works out.

 

[DOTR]

So why haven't creatures "evolved" on Europa and Enceladus to walk upright and set up telescopes on their moons surface?

a) Why do you believe there is life on Europe and Enceladus?
b) And if there was life there- why would you expect that life to have telescopes?

There's absolutely 100% life on those 2 moons: octopus, coral and jellyfish, just like here.

Why haven't they "evolved" to mine and make cities and industries and walk on the surface?

Are you being serious?

If evolution works as supposed, then yes, complex intelligent life should be flourishing in our solar system.

Obviously modern evolutionary theory doesnt work as supposed?

 

[Skylar]

We know so little about the world around us and yet the left thinks they know everything.....and will fill mass graves to prove it...

Wait, what? How did you go from evolution to 'filling mass graves'?

 

[Skylar]

What was that about fish learning to walk?

Evolutionists: 'Oops! We May Have Been Wrong All Along'

Thanks to a new study, evolutionists and their disciples are having to reexamine some of their most revered dogma. Particularly, evolutionists are now having to make sense of conclusions stating that almost all animal species, as well as humans, showed up on the stage of human history at the same time.
------

A study published in the journal Human Evolution is causing quite the stir. In the words of Phys.org, "The study's most startling result, perhaps, is that nine out of 10 species on Earth today, including humans, came into being 100,000 to 200,000 years ago."

So startling, in fact, that according to David Thaler, one of the lead authors of the study, "This conclusion is very surprising, and I fought against it as hard as I could.

Tell us more about Jesus and the Dinosaurs

Again....how about you ask God, he can give you the complete story.....and how it all works out.

Which 'god'? Jesus? Amaterasu? Shiva? Zeus? Apollo? Tanuki? Odin? Krishna? Durga? Coatlicue?

None of them have much to say about mitochondrial DNA.

 

[Aba Incieni]

They're finding living DNA and pliable skin in dinosaur bones. Hard to be living after having died off billions of years ago.

 

[Skylar]

They're finding living DNA and pliable skin in dinosaur bones. Hard to be living after having died off billions of years ago.

No, they aren't finding 'living DNA' in dinosaur bones.

And Dinosaurs didn't die of 'billions of years ago'. But tens of millions.

 

[Weatherman2020]

What was that about fish learning to walk?

Evolutionists: 'Oops! We May Have Been Wrong All Along'

Thanks to a new study, evolutionists and their disciples are having to reexamine some of their most revered dogma. Particularly, evolutionists are now having to make sense of conclusions stating that almost all animal species, as well as humans, showed up on the stage of human history at the same time.
------

A study published in the journal Human Evolution is causing quite the stir. In the words of Phys.org, "The study's most startling result, perhaps, is that nine out of 10 species on Earth today, including humans, came into being 100,000 to 200,000 years ago."

So startling, in fact, that according to David Thaler, one of the lead authors of the study, "This conclusion is very surprising, and I fought against it as hard as I could.

All DNA evidence shows no evidence of evolution. In fact, it shows distinct segregation of species. Evolution has no scientific evidence to support it.

 

[Skylar]

What was that about fish learning to walk?

Evolutionists: 'Oops! We May Have Been Wrong All Along'

Thanks to a new study, evolutionists and their disciples are having to reexamine some of their most revered dogma. Particularly, evolutionists are now having to make sense of conclusions stating that almost all animal species, as well as humans, showed up on the stage of human history at the same time.
------

A study published in the journal Human Evolution is causing quite the stir. In the words of Phys.org, "The study's most startling result, perhaps, is that nine out of 10 species on Earth today, including humans, came into being 100,000 to 200,000 years ago."

So startling, in fact, that according to David Thaler, one of the lead authors of the study, "This conclusion is very surprising, and I fought against it as hard as I could.

All DNA evidence shows no evidence of evolution. In fact, it shows distinct segregation of species. Evolution has no scientific evidence to support it.

In comparison to what? The 'Jesus did it!' theory?

 

[Weatherman2020]

They're finding living DNA and pliable skin in dinosaur bones. Hard to be living after having died off billions of years ago.

No, they aren't finding 'living DNA' in dinosaur bones.

And Dinosaurs didn't die of 'billions of years ago'. But tens of millions.

Soft tissue of Dino’s have been found.

 

[Aba Incieni]

They're finding living DNA and pliable skin in dinosaur bones. Hard to be living after having died off billions of years ago.

No, they aren't finding 'living DNA' in dinosaur bones.

And Dinosaurs didn't die of 'billions of years ago'. But tens of millions.

Check yoself.

 

[Weatherman2020]

What was that about fish learning to walk?

Evolutionists: 'Oops! We May Have Been Wrong All Along'

Thanks to a new study, evolutionists and their disciples are having to reexamine some of their most revered dogma. Particularly, evolutionists are now having to make sense of conclusions stating that almost all animal species, as well as humans, showed up on the stage of human history at the same time.
------

A study published in the journal Human Evolution is causing quite the stir. In the words of Phys.org, "The study's most startling result, perhaps, is that nine out of 10 species on Earth today, including humans, came into being 100,000 to 200,000 years ago."

So startling, in fact, that according to David Thaler, one of the lead authors of the study, "This conclusion is very surprising, and I fought against it as hard as I could.

All DNA evidence shows no evidence of evolution. In fact, it shows distinct segregation of species. Evolution has no scientific evidence to support it.

In comparison to what? The 'Jesus did it!' theory?

I figured that would be your level of rebuttal.

 

[Skylar]

They're finding living DNA and pliable skin in dinosaur bones. Hard to be living after having died off billions of years ago.

No, they aren't finding 'living DNA' in dinosaur bones.

And Dinosaurs didn't die of 'billions of years ago'. But tens of millions.

Soft tissue of Dino’s have been found.

Soft tissue and 'living DNA' aren't the same thing. They're not even close to the same thing.

 

[Skylar]

What was that about fish learning to walk?

Evolutionists: 'Oops! We May Have Been Wrong All Along'

Thanks to a new study, evolutionists and their disciples are having to reexamine some of their most revered dogma. Particularly, evolutionists are now having to make sense of conclusions stating that almost all animal species, as well as humans, showed up on the stage of human history at the same time.
------

A study published in the journal Human Evolution is causing quite the stir. In the words of Phys.org, "The study's most startling result, perhaps, is that nine out of 10 species on Earth today, including humans, came into being 100,000 to 200,000 years ago."

So startling, in fact, that according to David Thaler, one of the lead authors of the study, "This conclusion is very surprising, and I fought against it as hard as I could.

All DNA evidence shows no evidence of evolution. In fact, it shows distinct segregation of species. Evolution has no scientific evidence to support it.

In comparison to what? The 'Jesus did it!' theory?

I figured that would be your level of rebuttal.

Given that 'God did it' has already been forwarded in the thread, its on the table.

And you won't touch it with a 10 foot pole. Deny god twice more and we can have a bible story reenactment!

 

[Weatherman2020]

They're finding living DNA and pliable skin in dinosaur bones. Hard to be living after having died off billions of years ago.

No, they aren't finding 'living DNA' in dinosaur bones.

And Dinosaurs didn't die of 'billions of years ago'. But tens of millions.

Soft tissue of Dino’s have been found.

Soft tissue and 'living DNA' aren't the same thing. They're not even close to the same thing.

Soft tissue supposedly being ‘75 million years old’ is.

 

[Weatherman2020]

What was that about fish learning to walk?

Evolutionists: 'Oops! We May Have Been Wrong All Along'

Thanks to a new study, evolutionists and their disciples are having to reexamine some of their most revered dogma. Particularly, evolutionists are now having to make sense of conclusions stating that almost all animal species, as well as humans, showed up on the stage of human history at the same time.
------

A study published in the journal Human Evolution is causing quite the stir. In the words of Phys.org, "The study's most startling result, perhaps, is that nine out of 10 species on Earth today, including humans, came into being 100,000 to 200,000 years ago."

So startling, in fact, that according to David Thaler, one of the lead authors of the study, "This conclusion is very surprising, and I fought against it as hard as I could.

All DNA evidence shows no evidence of evolution. In fact, it shows distinct segregation of species. Evolution has no scientific evidence to support it.

In comparison to what? The 'Jesus did it!' theory?

I figured that would be your level of rebuttal.

Given that 'God did it' has already been forwarded in the thread, its on the table.

And you won't touch it with a 10 foot pole. Deny god twice more and we can have a bible story reenactment!

Very unscientific if you to try to validate a theory by attacking another competing theory.

Stop attacking science and instead embrace it.

 

[Skylar]

They're finding living DNA and pliable skin in dinosaur bones. Hard to be living after having died off billions of years ago.

No, they aren't finding 'living DNA' in dinosaur bones.

And Dinosaurs didn't die of 'billions of years ago'. But tens of millions.

Soft tissue of Dino’s have been found.

Soft tissue and 'living DNA' aren't the same thing. They're not even close to the same thing.

Soft tissue supposedly being ‘75 million years old’ is.

Show me the evidence that the soft tissue contains 'living DNA'.

You'll find when you move from the realm of imagination to the real world, your claims don't work.