harmonica
Diamond Member
- Sep 1, 2017
- 43,841
- 20,017
- 2,300
?? what did you just say??How is saying that a black child born in America, in 1600, was innately equal to a white child and did not genetically inherit any knowledge or culture through there DNA......saying that blacks are perfect angels and whites are evil?the whites of 1600 were much more advanced than the Africans of 1600Just like I thought. More obfuscation. When child is born in America, they have no culture, no language....just instincts. Hence, I am saying that if the white people born in America, since 1600, experienced in degree and kind what black children born into this land experienced, would whites be any better, worse or the same as blacks are today socioeconomically?....depends on their cultural history......are they living in grass huts/no alphabet/no technology/etc??
yes--they would be better
.....
A white newborn in 1600 was more advanced than a black newborn in 1600? How? What did nature provide the white newborn that it did not equip the black newborn with, in regards to its ability to learn and prosper?
Birth is a RESTART. You are not born with knowledge or culture....you pick it up from your environment. Blacks and whites born in America in 1600 should have had access to the same culture, learning, etc, needed to prosper. Its irrelevant what was going on in Africa once a child is born in America.....America is where the child will learn. European society being more advanced than African society is not transferred. Whatever your society has learned and created, a child is not born with it, but has to LEARN it. Hence, white and black children born in America should theoretically have had access to what America had to offer in terms of knowledge and culture.sure --the whites are evil/racists--blacks perfect angels..that's your main point every time.....that's the MSM....that's what the NFL players want you to believe....and Obama/etcthe whites of 1600 were much more advanced than the Africans of 1600Just like I thought. More obfuscation. When child is born in America, they have no culture, no language....just instincts. Hence, I am saying that if the white people born in America, since 1600, experienced in degree and kind what black children born into this land experienced, would whites be any better, worse or the same as blacks are today socioeconomically?....depends on their cultural history......are they living in grass huts/no alphabet/no technology/etc??
yes--they would be better
.....
A white newborn in 1600 was more advanced than a black newborn in 1600? How? What did nature provide the white newborn that it did not equip the black newborn with, in regards to its ability to learn and prosper?
Birth is a RESTART. You are not born with knowledge or culture....you pick it up from your environment. Blacks and whites born in America in 1600 should have had access to the same culture, learning, etc, needed to prosper. Its irrelevant what was going on in Africa once a child is born in America.....America is where the child will learn. European society being more advanced than African society is not transferred. Whatever your society has learned and created, a child is not born with it, but has to LEARN it. Hence, white and black children born in America should theoretically have had access to what America had to offer in terms of knowledge and culture.
hahahhaha
ok--you won't admit blacks are racist--will you? it's all about the EVIL whites--isn't it?