Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Liar, it is not functioning exactly how it was specified in the law. The law included an individual mandate. Trump is ignoring that and is not enforcing it. What a pity you foaming at the mouth righties struggle do to post without lying.ObamaCare.Which other laws?Trump has already decided not to enforce other laws he wants changed. Don’t pretend like this is something he hasn’t done, can’t do, or won’t do.What they're angling for is for Trump to use the same Unconstitutional power Obama did, simply decide not to enforce the law, and turn all the illegal immigrants loose to wander away and disappear. And THEN - bonus! - they get the masses of illegals they want AND they get to attack Trump for not solving illegal immigration.
Sorry, but the Trump administration has continued to abide by the law in regards to Obamacare. It continues to function exactly as specified by the laws currently in effect. Trying to compare Trump's completely legal and Constitutional pushing for Congressional legislation CHANGING Obamacare to Obama simply saying, "I don't like this law, so fuck it, I'm not going to enforce it" is just another sign that we should ignore everything you say.
Obama was not even remotely tough on illegals, and when his administration was forced to deal with them instead of just turning them loose, they bungled it mightily.
That clear things up for you, Sparkles?
So you admit at least that when Obama came up with the plan of separating children from their mothers -- that was an awesome kick ass idea, right?
I mean, that took some serious balls to just stick it to those illegals like that, show those fucking animals where they belong, and Obama did that -- fuck yea!
Why don't you just give the man credit for doing a great thing?
If Trump ignored the law I still don't think the regressive libs would "fawn" all over him like they do Bath house.Liar, it is not functioning exactly how it was specified in the law. The law included an individual mandate. Trump is ignoring that and is not enforcing it. What a pity you foaming at the mouth righties struggle do to post without lying.ObamaCare.Which other laws?Trump has already decided not to enforce other laws he wants changed. Don’t pretend like this is something he hasn’t done, can’t do, or won’t do.
Sorry, but the Trump administration has continued to abide by the law in regards to Obamacare. It continues to function exactly as specified by the laws currently in effect. Trying to compare Trump's completely legal and Constitutional pushing for Congressional legislation CHANGING Obamacare to Obama simply saying, "I don't like this law, so fuck it, I'm not going to enforce it" is just another sign that we should ignore everything you say.
Ah, yes. "Trump is ignoring the law, by changing it."
I actually did a very thorough answer of your utter bullshit, and the computer lost it when I hit "Post". So I'm going to have to recompile it when I have some more time.
Nah, we’ve been down that road before.cross that bridge when we get to it.And when they continue to get in in spite of the wall, then what? Build a third one even higher?Easier to build one single buildable wall then to police hundreds, perhaps thousands of businesses who want cheap labor.there are already walls and fences along much of the border and building newer and bigger ones are still not going to keep illegals out. If you want to stop illegal immigration, make it harder for them to find work here.Possible solutions;The policy of locking up every single illegal alien charged with a misdemeanor is resulting in breaking up families. No other president before Trump ever did that. There’s reason Trump can’t simply process these people and ship the whole family back whole, rather than incarcerating the parents and shipping their kids off to various locations around the country.
Seal the border so they can't get here in the first place. Best one.
Immediately deport all of them without trial.
Imprison the kids with the Parents until trial and deportation. Liberals didn't like that one.
Yeah? Then..gosh..what is this?Obama didn't separate children and parents.Gee. Obama could have done the same thing.
Don't see any of you complaining about Barry and those separated children.
Hypocrisy much???
If Trump ignored the law I still don't think the regressive libs would "fawn" all over him like they do Bath house.Liar, it is not functioning exactly how it was specified in the law. The law included an individual mandate. Trump is ignoring that and is not enforcing it. What a pity you foaming at the mouth righties struggle do to post without lying.ObamaCare.Which other laws?
Sorry, but the Trump administration has continued to abide by the law in regards to Obamacare. It continues to function exactly as specified by the laws currently in effect. Trying to compare Trump's completely legal and Constitutional pushing for Congressional legislation CHANGING Obamacare to Obama simply saying, "I don't like this law, so fuck it, I'm not going to enforce it" is just another sign that we should ignore everything you say.
Ah, yes. "Trump is ignoring the law, by changing it."
I actually did a very thorough answer of your utter bullshit, and the computer lost it when I hit "Post". So I'm going to have to recompile it when I have some more time.
Because nobody is saying that’s what’s happening except for the partisan that are trying to make excuses. Most elected officials including Trump is advocating a change to the law to keep families togetherHow can everyone know that's not what's happening when 99 percent of us are not down there at the border? lolOf course not, safety first. But don’t conflate the situation everybody knows that’s not what’s happening which is why you hear both Trump and republicans calling for a change in the law to keep families together. It’s a bit hypocritical for Trump to be doing so as he is the one using this as leverage to get his wallWhy not? Because they are not serious offenses. Do you think we should throw jaywalkers in jail as well? How about people who run stop signs or speed? Kind of a silly question don’t you think?Is that so ? Why not ?No I don’t think people need to go to jail for misdemeanor offenses
Do you think a single child should be allowed into this country when we cannot verify that the adult they are with are not child sex traffickers?
Again, what does that have to do with anything? When you ditch the topic to try and point out the hypocrisy of your opponents then you have lost the argument. I don’t give a shit about the wingnut hypocrites in either side. Pointing to that doesn’t make your point any stronger, it only makes you sound weakOf course not, safety first. But don’t conflate the situation everybody knows that’s not what’s happening which is why you hear both Trump and republicans calling for a change in the law to keep families together. It’s a bit hypocritical for Trump to be doing so as he is the one using this as leverage to get his wallWhy not? Because they are not serious offenses. Do you think we should throw jaywalkers in jail as well? How about people who run stop signs or speed? Kind of a silly question don’t you think?Is that so ? Why not ?No I don’t think people need to go to jail for misdemeanor offenses
Do you think a single child should be allowed into this country when we cannot verify that the adult they are with are not child sex traffickers?
Is that why the Libs and the Liberal Media, knowing the prevalence of Child Sex Trafficking on our souther border pushed so hard for the change?
Yea, right?
Gee. Obama could have done the same thing.
Don't see any of you complaining about Barry and those separated children.
Hypocrisy much???
"Barry"? Nicely played, the base of bigots probably adores you.
But, I digress. President Obama is not President of the United States at the moment, and if every living FLOTUS had told him his policy was cruel and immoral I suspect President Obama would have considered their counsel and issue and EO to reunite the children with their parent(s).
Of course the current Commander-in-Chief's (donnie) moral turpitude will mean he will continue to blame Obama and the Democrats as will the Trumpanzees, and never take any responsibility for things which go awry.
Keep them together in Mexico.Because nobody is saying that’s what’s happening except for the partisan that are trying to make excuses. Most elected officials including Trump is advocating a change to the law to keep families togetherHow can everyone know that's not what's happening when 99 percent of us are not down there at the border? lolOf course not, safety first. But don’t conflate the situation everybody knows that’s not what’s happening which is why you hear both Trump and republicans calling for a change in the law to keep families together. It’s a bit hypocritical for Trump to be doing so as he is the one using this as leverage to get his wallWhy not? Because they are not serious offenses. Do you think we should throw jaywalkers in jail as well? How about people who run stop signs or speed? Kind of a silly question don’t you think?Is that so ? Why not ?
Do you think a single child should be allowed into this country when we cannot verify that the adult they are with are not child sex traffickers?
Why not? Because they are not serious offenses. Do you think we should throw jaywalkers in jail as well? How about people who run stop signs or speed? Kind of a silly question don’t you think?Is that so ? Why not ?No I don’t think people need to go to jail for misdemeanor offenses
Actually there was a law suite that created the law that requires children to not be housed with adults while their asylum claim is being processed.Political scientist Larry Sabato notes:
Larry Sabato on Twitter"Good for you, Melania. Now ask your husband to issue an executive order to stop this cruel policy. POTUS can end it TODAY. No need for Congress to act."
No I don’t think people need to go to jail for misdemeanor offensesSo what? What does that have to do with anything that’s going on now? Do you really think that distracting from the situation by trying to point out political hypocrisy is of any help?Just to inject a little context and perspective here: You realize that separating illegal families began under . . . Obama, right? Right? You know that, right?
Are you trying to make a point that since Dems didn’t complain about it under Obama then they have no right to complain about what’s happening now? Fine, fair point so all the partisan hacks can beat it... so now that it is us moderates and independents left, what do you think about the issue at hand?
So, what is YOUR idea for a solution? Do you want the children to go to jail with their parents?
Yes, it’s also an option to put jaywalkers in jail but we aren’t questioning the legality, it’s a question about the right way to enforce.Why not? Because they are not serious offenses. Do you think we should throw jaywalkers in jail as well? How about people who run stop signs or speed? Kind of a silly question don’t you think?Is that so ? Why not ?No I don’t think people need to go to jail for misdemeanor offenses
It is an option to put an offender in jail on a misdemeanor...especially if the offender doesn't have a fixed address.
Again, not questioning the legality. Questioning the way the laws are being enforced. Trump made a zero tolerance policy and ramped up the severity that they enforce these laws. That’s his right, but as we can see it is causing a lot of controversyNo I don’t think people need to go to jail for misdemeanor offensesSo what? What does that have to do with anything that’s going on now? Do you really think that distracting from the situation by trying to point out political hypocrisy is of any help?Just to inject a little context and perspective here: You realize that separating illegal families began under . . . Obama, right? Right? You know that, right?
Are you trying to make a point that since Dems didn’t complain about it under Obama then they have no right to complain about what’s happening now? Fine, fair point so all the partisan hacks can beat it... so now that it is us moderates and independents left, what do you think about the issue at hand?
So, what is YOUR idea for a solution? Do you want the children to go to jail with their parents?
But, it's not illegal or even unusual to go to jail for a misdemeanor. It is unusual to go to prison for committing a misdemeanor and in most states (I'm not sure about all 50), it will not happen.
Yeah right. Prove that statement. You win the idiot award for the dayIt's sad that the Democrats are sick with hate that they want kids to be housed with adult Human Traffickers, rapist and murderers
Yes, it’s also an option to put jaywalkers in jail but we aren’t questioning the legality, it’s a question about the right way to enforce.Why not? Because they are not serious offenses. Do you think we should throw jaywalkers in jail as well? How about people who run stop signs or speed? Kind of a silly question don’t you think?Is that so ? Why not ?No I don’t think people need to go to jail for misdemeanor offenses
It is an option to put an offender in jail on a misdemeanor...especially if the offender doesn't have a fixed address.
That’s fine if you feel that way. Sounding like the majority of people disagree with you. Including Trump and Ted CruzYes, it’s also an option to put jaywalkers in jail but we aren’t questioning the legality, it’s a question about the right way to enforce.Why not? Because they are not serious offenses. Do you think we should throw jaywalkers in jail as well? How about people who run stop signs or speed? Kind of a silly question don’t you think?Is that so ? Why not ?No I don’t think people need to go to jail for misdemeanor offenses
It is an option to put an offender in jail on a misdemeanor...especially if the offender doesn't have a fixed address.
The offender has no fixed address. His/her appearance in court cannot be guaranteed and if he/she is released, it is likely they will not be found and arrested for not appearing because they will not be found. It is the right way to enforce in such a circumstance.
